Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • WHY INTELLECTUALS DEBATE IN TEXT NOT SPEECH —“Let’s schedule a video call, and

    WHY INTELLECTUALS DEBATE IN TEXT NOT SPEECH

    —“Let’s schedule a video call, and we can exhaust this without the unnecessary social incentives until I find out where I’m wrong, and I’ll leave you guys be in Aryan Propertyland.”—

    The Value of Text

    1) leaves a record of the evolution of the argument, and the tactics used in pursuing it.

    2) Sophisms, Signaling, and Frauds are much harder to get away with in text.

    3) The chain of reasoning one can produce in text is more suitable to proof by falsification, whereas verbal reparté is more suitable to analogy and justification (fraud).

    4) I do not care whether you continue to argue or depart, because articulate debate only serves to educate the followers – there is no chance that you can win such an argument – you just don’t know that yet. I do. You can only say “Lying is a strategic advantage if you can get enough people to do it without getting them killed in the process.”

    5) I am now aware of you, just as you are aware of me. And I don’t practice philosophy but law. And prosecution of those who perpetuate harm against the commons is not only my job, my art but my moral duty.

    6) You can use the pejorative ‘aryan’ as if aryan (law) vs semitic (religion) is some sort of dispute over taste rather than a dispute over truth and transcendence, vs lies and dysgenic regression.

    You’re reasonably talented but it’s too clear that you are used to confusing the tactic of winning by sophism against the common folk, and not experienced at such debate with professionals with the hard science of it all.

    Trying to repeat the past is simply an admissino of the failure to solve the problems of the present. The problem of the present is the same as it has always been: the conflict between the agrarian-metalworkers using law and markets (Male reproductive strategy), and the pastoralists using cults, and separatism (the female reproductive strategy)

    Horse+bronze+wheel+sky-worshipping+Militaristic+expansionist vs earth worshipping, pacifist, separatists.

    The eternal war between Cain and Able: The Masculine vs the Feminine.

    This is the fourth cycle of that war of civilizations.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-16 13:36:00 UTC

  • THE PROBLEM OF POLITICAL STABILITY by Michael Churchill The left cannot function

    THE PROBLEM OF POLITICAL STABILITY

    by Michael Churchill

    The left cannot function once its means are revealed. Its leaders understand that, hence the cultivation of Antifa as shock troops.

    Democracy may be in the process of phasing out as an optimal political solution, because it creates a monopoly, and one side cannot accept the other side’s victory if it’s a given that it is not one country but two enemy camps.

    Even Bolsonaro is a manifestation of that.

    So the interesting question is what will the political map look like in 20 years around the globe. A mix of right and left wing dictatorships?

    The problem with dictatorship is that it is not really stable if it’s imposed on half the population against their will. Thus it would seem to me something else would be more likely to come about.

    ( CD: Ergo, Nationalism(Fascism) by Political Order. )

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-16 12:33:00 UTC

  • “I’m still recovering from havin’ my own little corner of the universe shattered

    —“I’m still recovering from havin’ my own little corner of the universe shattered.”— Nick Heywood

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-16 11:31:00 UTC

  • “That The optimum government is flexible (Roman) with Authoritarianism for War,

    —“That The optimum government is flexible (Roman) with Authoritarianism for War, Markets for growth, and Redistribution for Windfalls. Can’t be said enough.”— William L. Benge

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-16 11:30:00 UTC

  • (was afk for a bit there sorry)

    (was afk for a bit there sorry)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-16 10:53:00 UTC

  • THE HERD, (NPCs) RESIST ALL MEASUREMENTS (COMMENSURABILITIES) Resistance to pers

    THE HERD, (NPCs) RESIST ALL MEASUREMENTS (COMMENSURABILITIES)

    Resistance to personality, iq, class, race, and gender differences, is an NPC behavior (herd behavior) for obvious reasons- the pack requires a hierarchy to organize for the purpose of eugenic evolution (competition), but the herd rebels against it for the purpose of dysgenic (equalitarian) persistence.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-16 10:52:00 UTC

  • ( A good barber. A hot shave with a blade. Wax for ears, nose, and brows. Powder

    ( A good barber. A hot shave with a blade. Wax for ears, nose, and brows. Powder instead of alcohol. A fresh shirt. A tailored jacket. No socks. Canvas shoes. Crisp fall air. … Joy. Simple joys. )

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-16 10:47:00 UTC

  • AGAIN: MBTI vs BIG5/6 vs MORAL FOUNDATIONS vs GENDER (from elsewhere) In other w

    AGAIN: MBTI vs BIG5/6 vs MORAL FOUNDATIONS vs GENDER

    (from elsewhere)

    In other words, the principle difference between MBTI and Big 5 are (a) the weight it gives to trait expression, and (b) the principle difference in value is that with 100 Questions we can test your IQ within a half a standard deviation, because all components scale evenly, but we cannot test the rest of your personality traits with so few questions because they do NOT scale evenly.

    Moreover, MBTI is a WORKPLACE and social weighting of traits, while BIG5 is a THERAPEUTIC weighting of traits. These are differences in value rather than differences in measurement.

    I was not the first person to make this distinction, but I have written extensively on the fact that while MBTI is imprecise, it is the maximum complexity of a model that individuals can work with in the workplace.

    We can measure all sorts of trait expression, and even the big 5 FACTORS must be broken down into TRAITS in order to accommodate the difference in factor expression between the GENDERS.

    STATISTICAL DIFFERENCES: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10156661592707264&set=a.10156479504747264&type=3&size=850%2C370

    In this sense MBTI is a better judge of the GENDER biases inherent in cognitive and emotional biases because its fairly obvious that the gender distributions are inverted.

    Whereas this transparency was only visible in BIG5 *after* division from Factors into Trait Expressions – and that occurred fairly recently (post 2000), as psychology attempted to reform from a pseudoscience to a science when confronted with imaging, genetic, and pharmaceutical science.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-16 10:43:00 UTC

  • Honor and Decency are antithetical to the left. They mean ‘don’t steal’. The lef

    Honor and Decency are antithetical to the left. They mean ‘don’t steal’. The left HAS to be kleptocratic. They’re dysgenic.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-16 07:58:00 UTC

  • ABSOLUTISM IS NONSENSE. ZERO TOLERANCE IS NOT. 1) We pursue what we can both und

    ABSOLUTISM IS NONSENSE. ZERO TOLERANCE IS NOT.

    1) We pursue what we can both undrestand and suits our interests.

    2) Absolutism is easy to understand. It’s the children’s-blocks version of political problem solving.

    3) Absolutism is easy to use when ‘backward’ or ‘at war’, but extremely error prone at competition and production. It is an extremely weak form of organization compared to markets. It depends on retaining the attention of the populace through constant manipulation. It is expensive. Hence absolute military, absolute law, market economy, limited charity is the optimum order. (India vs China. China has better demographics, is ethnically homogenous, and has the red army. India has none of the above.)

    4) one can organize the vast network of productions in an polity by authority (fear), compensation (reward), or deceit (fear or promise). But we are no longer in a position where the information system can be monopolized and the population is ignorant.

    5) The purpose of advancing markets (liberalism et all) is to provide those in power with the means of holding and expanding power cheaply and easily. In other words, one is naive to think he can capture attention and power without material incentives, and we are all victims of overestimating our deviation from the norm.

    6) The optimum government is flexible (Roman) with Authoritarianism for War, Markets for growth, and Redistribution for Windfalls.

    7) In other words: Money Scales Power. And the vast majority are always and everywhere motivated by (a) access to mates, (b) food and food prices (now energy as well), (c) change in economic condition (d) release from perceived oppression (taxation, competition, conquest).

    POWER REQUIRES WEALTH REQUIRES MARKET ORDER REQUIRES RULE OF LAW – which is what Putin has had to learn.

    OUR RULE OF LAW IS SIMPLY TOO TOLERANT.

    (Ergo – stop stroking your dicks, and masturbating to manga-fantasies of absolutism.)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-15 19:44:00 UTC