Source: Facebook

  • by Bjarg Jonsson Each academic discipline has it’s own language and terminology.

    by Bjarg Jonsson

    Each academic discipline has it’s own language and terminology. Part of becoming a professional in a discipline requires a basic mastery of the language used in describing the principles of operation.

    I have no academic background in law. However, with a Black’s Law Dictionary one can research what particular words mean in the practice of law. Reasonable suspicion, probable cause, jury nullification, etc can be understood by layman; otherwise a policeman could not arrest someone for a crime and write the changing documents with the elements to reach probable cause for indictment.

    I was taught in grad school, the difference between average people and bright people was not whether average people could learn something. But bright people just learn faster, which would be an advantage in multi discipline learning.

    John Mark is very important because he is explaining the concepts of propertarianism in the language of the everyday person and they get it. When we want to impress each other with how smart we are we use words (big) which are not normally in the other guy’s lexicon. Want reach the masses, you have use words out of their dictionary. They will get it, tit for tat.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-13 20:30:00 UTC

  • (Windstorm. Lots of power outages. Go out to drug store. I notice a tree fell. T

    (Windstorm. Lots of power outages. Go out to drug store. I notice a tree fell. The cars are three feet apart. Fell right between them. Hardly as scratch on them. lol god is not angry with me today. 😉 )


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-13 19:31:00 UTC

  • (Humor) (little old lady trying to get attention. giving me smack by mumbling ri

    (Humor)

    (little old lady trying to get attention. giving me smack by mumbling ridicule under her breath.)

    Me: “Don’t start anything I have to finish. It always ends in tears.” (One of her favorite phrases during our childhood. It exasperates her when we quote from her parental phrase book on her.)

    Her: “You and what army?”

    Me: “Just me. An army of one. My name is legion and I’m many.”

    Her: “Your name is wus. You’ve got nothing.”

    Me: (laughing)

    It’s ten minutes later and she’s still saying “wussy, wussy, woos” and “Don’t know what we’re gonna do with him, he’s a wussy, wussy wus”. “Too bad there’s no return policy.” Every now and then to distract me from working. lol Now it’s something about scotch tape, followed by giggles.

    Favorite trick. Let her ask me to do something inane like put a big pot away, and move it to odd places in the house over the next 48 hours until she’s exasperated. 😉

    You can outstubborn a cat if you have patience. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-13 19:30:00 UTC

  • Updated Apr 13, 2020, 11:57 AM

    Updated Apr 13, 2020, 11:57 AM


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-13 11:57:00 UTC

  • FETCHING THE KINDLING by Andrew Gilmour —“Although, I would go along with Jung

    FETCHING THE KINDLING

    by Andrew Gilmour

    —“Although, I would go along with Jung and Piaget as long as we burn Freud at the stake for his crimes against humanity.” — Curt Doolittle.

    I’ll get the Kindling. XD


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-13 11:12:00 UTC

  • NEW CONSTITUTION ON DEFENSE. In this constitution, all rights and obligations un

    https://propertarianism.com/revolution/constitution/rights-obligations/OUR NEW CONSTITUTION ON DEFENSE.

    In this constitution, all rights and obligations under all conditions are enumerated in “Article III – Rights and Obligations” – and it is this article and it’s structure that improves upon the bill of rights by organizing and consolidating rights so that they are all but impossible to violate. The failure to enumerate rights using this formal structure is why they were so easy to circumvent.

    The right and obligation for defense is under “Section IV – Reciprocity in Defense”.

    The primary work effort missing from this Article is the changes in rights and obligations under war or windfall. This will be an innovation in articulating the law where it hasn’t been articulated before. But that shouldn’t interfere with your discussion.

    https://propertarianism.com/revolution/constitution/rights-obligations/Updated Apr 13, 2020, 11:03 AM


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-13 11:03:00 UTC

  • Choice – Episode 4 – The Dog, the Cake, and You in Three Lessons – A Parable. 😉

    https://propertarianism.com/2020/04/13/the-choice-episode-4-the-dog-the-cake-and-you-in-three-lessons/The Choice – Episode 4 – The Dog, the Cake, and You in Three Lessons – A Parable. 😉

    (conspiracy, meaning, responsibility, the law)

    I found myself laughing a bit while working on it so hopefully it’s not only informative but amusing.Updated Apr 13, 2020, 10:49 AM


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-13 10:49:00 UTC

  • THE UNDERMINING OF THE MASCULINE BY MAGICAL THINKING (important summary) The mil

    THE UNDERMINING OF THE MASCULINE BY MAGICAL THINKING

    (important summary)

    The military was shut out of politics. Then men’s organizations shut off and out of civil society. Then the family undermined to shut men out of the family. Then manliness shut out of education. Then men and manliness shut out of discourse. And only once that was accomplished could the enemy fully remove european sense making: realism, naturalism, operationalism and our heroism and duty, Excellence and Beauty, Truth and reciprocity, Law and Jury, and markets and eugenics – How, persistent, relentless undermining – the warfare strategy of the human female. It was all by design. The design to restore the pre-civilizational strategy of the female and the herd. A design driven by instinct not rason. However, there are no female civilizations for reason – they cannot survive. Yet they try over and over again to fail. Why? “Predisposition to magical thinking.” The predisposition to magical thinking is as relentless as the predisposition to undermine. Neither Eve nor Pandora received the punishment they deserved. … Until now.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-13 09:11:00 UTC

  • “Globalism is the disease. The virus is a symptom.”—Herbert Hackett

    —“Globalism is the disease. The virus is a symptom.”—Herbert Hackett


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-13 02:07:00 UTC

  • CHINA’S VISION FOR A NEW WORLD ORDER – THE NATIONAL BUREAU OF ASIAN RESEARCH (NB

    CHINA’S VISION FOR A NEW WORLD ORDER – THE NATIONAL BUREAU OF ASIAN RESEARCH (NBR)

    by Nadège Rolland

    In my latest report, I dissect the strands of thought underpinning China’s vision for a new world order and study its emerging features

    China’s leadership is determined to alter the norms that underpin existing institutions and put in place the building blocks of a new international system.

    A “vision” is by definition abstract, not fully formed and subject to change. In China’s case, this vision is also buried under layers of propaganda. But if we pay close attention, some key elements are discernible.

    1/ The Chinese leadership believes that the existing order is “unfair” (it should allow China to have a greater role, commensurate with its growing power) and is incapable of offering “reasonable” solutions to the global needs.

    2/ Instead of considering liberal democratic values as essential conditions for achieving global peace and prosperity, the CCP sees the global promotion of “so-called universal values” as the main cause for conflict and chaos – an obvious reflection of its own survival anxieties.

    3/The CCP does not have any appealing substitutes to the existing set of international norms. Even at home, it is trying to bolster its legitimacy with artifices rather than a positive, clearly defined set of beliefs for the country’s overall direction.

    4/The Chinese leadership’s vision for what the world should look like is based in the first instance on a negative agenda – the refutation of liberal democracy as the path to peace and prosperity – rather than a positive view of a desired future.

    5/China does not need to prove that its own system can be applied universally. Demonstrating that no system is truly universal fundamentally undermines the existing international order’s core principles and undercuts any system based on universal values.

    6/Once China has eroded a truly international order, it can hope to carve out a sphere of influence including large portions of the non-Western and mostly non-democratic world where its preferred worldview, rules and norms will be endorsed, followed and respected.

    7/China wants to dominate this parallel system. But the 21st Century Chinese version of hegemony does not seek to replicate the old “Rule Britannia” or “Pax Americana” precedents. Chinese elites reject any form of Western influence, even when they think about models of empire.

    8/Chinese elites are trying to develop modern, softened versions of the traditional sinocentric order, usually by insisting on its benevolent nature (“humane authority,” “great harmony”…). But imperialistic undertones and intimations of domination are not easy to work around.

    9/The various components of Xi’s diplomacy (community of shared future, Belt and Road, global network of partnerships) point to a vision in which China’s leadership is exercised over substantial portions of the emerging and developing world,…

    10/…a space free from Western influence and largely purged of the core liberal democratic beliefs supported by the West.

    11/In this hierarchical system, China would be akin to a massive, dazzling star pulling smaller planets into its orbit without necessarily exerting direct control over them.

    12/Its contours would not be defined along precise geographic or ideological lines, but rather by the degree of deference and respect that those within China’s sphere are willing to offer Beijing.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-12 19:17:00 UTC