IT ALL BEGINS WITH THE MILITIA: THE DISTRIBUTED DICTATORSHIP OF SOVEREIGN MEN
It all begins with the militia. We restore the militia, we have western civilization. We end the militia we end western civilization. The militia constitutes the shareholders (owners) of the territory, capital, and institutions. Every man a sovereign, soldier, sheriff, juror and judge.
|ARISTOCRACY| Sovereignty > Reciprocity > Truth > Duty > Rule of Law > Markets In Everything: Association, Cooperation, Reproduction, Production, Commons, Polity, and War.
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/44737078_10156728338182264_4914342588430942208_n_10156728338177264.jpg THE HISTORY OF EXTRAJUDICIAL PUNISHMENT
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lynching#History
The French Revolution Popularized The Practice (Really)
—“Every society has had forms of extrajudicial punishments, including murder. The legal and cultural antecedents of American lynching were carried across the Atlantic by migrants from the British Isles to colonial North America. Collective violence was a familiar aspect of the early modern Anglo-American legal landscape. Group violence in the British Atlantic was usually nonlethal in intention and result. In the seventeenth century, in the context of political turmoil in England and unsettled social and political conditions in the American colonies, there arose rebellions and riots that took multiple lives.”—
In Anglo Saxon Culture, The MILITIA solved problems of enemies of the people. Judicial Resolution of disputes was meant to resolve conflicts between members of the polity in order to prevent retaliation cycles (feuds).
The “Politicization” of extra-judicial punishment was a product of the French Revolution and then spread to the Antebellum era in the states.James SantagataStar Chamber.Oct 23, 2018, 2:58 PMJoffre CrossThat does look to be a rather exceptional branch for the purpose at handOct 23, 2018, 3:02 PMCorbus AureliusLiterally lesson learned.Oct 23, 2018, 3:08 PMCurt Doolittle( That’s the best response to any post. thanks. Some people ‘get’ the idea I’m putting across, and some don’t. Happiest when you (they) do. ) -hugsOct 23, 2018, 3:11 PMCorbus AureliusCurt Doolittle And thank you for all your effort and creativity. I become a bit more nuanced in my ability to explain positions I think are valuable every post you make.Oct 23, 2018, 3:31 PMMicah PezdirtzMight be worth discussing the extrajudicial function of the MSM in prosecuting noncompliance with the given narrative through shame, obstinance, violence, vandalism, etcOct 23, 2018, 3:56 PMCurt Doolittleok. now THAT is smart. You wanna take a cut at it? no?Oct 23, 2018, 3:56 PMMicah PezdirtzI might enjoy stumbling through itOct 23, 2018, 3:57 PMMicah PezdirtzJournalists (and so called comedians, actors, celebrities) utilize praise and blame to implant positive and negative sentiments in those who lack agency and cannot determine the validity of the claims. E.g. “Orange man bad” or “let the refugees in”.
Their audience then either pushes directly for formal legal action, or indirectly for acceptance of new (typically inverted) social norms.
(Sorry I don’t have the time to elaborate more, my attention is limited at work)Oct 23, 2018, 4:11 PMMicah PezdirtzThe point being non legal entities decide (judge) what behavior to accept or reject(verdict), and how to respond (sentence) without reference to legal process or precident. Their oligarchical process aims for the most totalitarian, profitable outcome as possible and it does so at direct cost to our commonsOct 23, 2018, 4:21 PMSkogi Brevikgood afternoon, daily reminder that the available data on lynchings indicate that the current justice system “targets” blacks more than “racist” former slave owning southerners did per capita and that, if this is oppression, freed slaves being lynched were less oppressed than blacks are now.Oct 23, 2018, 5:03 PMSolomon VolodymyrIf you want to see the definition of failure to prevent feuds, check out Albania…Oct 23, 2018, 6:04 PMBrett StevensEverything from the French Revolution is toxic.Oct 24, 2018, 10:17 AMTHE HISTORY OF EXTRAJUDICIAL PUNISHMENT
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lynching#History
The French Revolution Popularized The Practice (Really)
—“Every society has had forms of extrajudicial punishments, including murder. The legal and cultural antecedents of American lynching were carried across the Atlantic by migrants from the British Isles to colonial North America. Collective violence was a familiar aspect of the early modern Anglo-American legal landscape. Group violence in the British Atlantic was usually nonlethal in intention and result. In the seventeenth century, in the context of political turmoil in England and unsettled social and political conditions in the American colonies, there arose rebellions and riots that took multiple lives.”—
In Anglo Saxon Culture, The MILITIA solved problems of enemies of the people. Judicial Resolution of disputes was meant to resolve conflicts between members of the polity in order to prevent retaliation cycles (feuds).
The “Politicization” of extra-judicial punishment was a product of the French Revolution and then spread to the Antebellum era in the states.
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/44737078_10156728338182264_4914342588430942208_n_10156728338177264.jpg THE HISTORY OF EXTRAJUDICIAL PUNISHMENT
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lynching#History
The French Revolution Popularized The Practice (Really)
—“Every society has had forms of extrajudicial punishments, including murder. The legal and cultural antecedents of American lynching were carried across the Atlantic by migrants from the British Isles to colonial North America. Collective violence was a familiar aspect of the early modern Anglo-American legal landscape. Group violence in the British Atlantic was usually nonlethal in intention and result. In the seventeenth century, in the context of political turmoil in England and unsettled social and political conditions in the American colonies, there arose rebellions and riots that took multiple lives.”—
In Anglo Saxon Culture, The MILITIA solved problems of enemies of the people. Judicial Resolution of disputes was meant to resolve conflicts between members of the polity in order to prevent retaliation cycles (feuds).
The “Politicization” of extra-judicial punishment was a product of the French Revolution and then spread to the Antebellum era in the states.James SantagataStar Chamber.Oct 23, 2018 2:58pmJoffre CrossThat does look to be a rather exceptional branch for the purpose at handOct 23, 2018 3:02pmCorbus AureliusLiterally lesson learned.Oct 23, 2018 3:08pmCurt Doolittle( That’s the best response to any post. thanks. Some people ‘get’ the idea I’m putting across, and some don’t. Happiest when you (they) do. ) -hugsOct 23, 2018 3:11pmCorbus Aurelius@[741197263:2048:Curt Doolittle] And thank you for all your effort and creativity. I become a bit more nuanced in my ability to explain positions I think are valuable every post you make.Oct 23, 2018 3:31pmMicah PezdirtzMight be worth discussing the extrajudicial function of the MSM in prosecuting noncompliance with the given narrative through shame, obstinance, violence, vandalism, etcOct 23, 2018 3:56pmCurt Doolittleok. now THAT is smart. You wanna take a cut at it? no?Oct 23, 2018 3:56pmMicah PezdirtzI might enjoy stumbling through itOct 23, 2018 3:57pmMicah PezdirtzJournalists (and so called comedians, actors, celebrities) utilize praise and blame to implant positive and negative sentiments in those who lack agency and cannot determine the validity of the claims. E.g. “Orange man bad” or “let the refugees in”.
Their audience then either pushes directly for formal legal action, or indirectly for acceptance of new (typically inverted) social norms.
(Sorry I don’t have the time to elaborate more, my attention is limited at work)Oct 23, 2018 4:11pmMicah PezdirtzThe point being non legal entities decide (judge) what behavior to accept or reject(verdict), and how to respond (sentence) without reference to legal process or precident. Their oligarchical process aims for the most totalitarian, profitable outcome as possible and it does so at direct cost to our commonsOct 23, 2018 4:21pmSkogi Brevikgood afternoon, daily reminder that the available data on lynchings indicate that the current justice system “targets” blacks more than “racist” former slave owning southerners did per capita and that, if this is oppression, freed slaves being lynched were less oppressed than blacks are now.Oct 23, 2018 5:03pmSolomon VolodymyrIf you want to see the definition of failure to prevent feuds, check out Albania…Oct 23, 2018 6:04pmBrett StevensEverything from the French Revolution is toxic.Oct 24, 2018 10:17amTHE HISTORY OF EXTRAJUDICIAL PUNISHMENT
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lynching#History
The French Revolution Popularized The Practice (Really)
—“Every society has had forms of extrajudicial punishments, including murder. The legal and cultural antecedents of American lynching were carried across the Atlantic by migrants from the British Isles to colonial North America. Collective violence was a familiar aspect of the early modern Anglo-American legal landscape. Group violence in the British Atlantic was usually nonlethal in intention and result. In the seventeenth century, in the context of political turmoil in England and unsettled social and political conditions in the American colonies, there arose rebellions and riots that took multiple lives.”—
In Anglo Saxon Culture, The MILITIA solved problems of enemies of the people. Judicial Resolution of disputes was meant to resolve conflicts between members of the polity in order to prevent retaliation cycles (feuds).
The “Politicization” of extra-judicial punishment was a product of the French Revolution and then spread to the Antebellum era in the states.
NO, WE’RE FRUSTRATED THAT WE CAN’T SOLVE THE PROBLEM WITH A ONE-TIME COST
—“You’re mad because you have to take basic security measures for your family and property?”— Joseph Michael (Proletarian)
Actually, we’re frustrated why we can’t just eliminate the reasons for having to take basic security measures – and remain distinct from second and third world countries. We never had to do that before. Most of us never had to lock our homes or cars, or worry if we dropped our wallets they’d be ‘found and taken’. Why should we pay those costs of self defense constantly, instead of paying the cost of deportation? Security is an ongoing cost, and deportation (or capital punishment for that matter) is a one-time-cost, and those one-time costs were extremely beneficial for our ancestors. I mean, there no reason not to return to taking advantage of the local oak tree.
I am unconvinced either way on China. It is very hard to analyze because the data are so murky. From a Mosca-ian perspective, the issue is whether the decision-making process in a uni-party state gets enough new ideas, fresh blood and diverse opinions to keep itself tethered to reality. So far that’s been sort of true of China. But it’s also the case they have maxed out the credit cards of the SOEs — exactly what happened to Japan before its 25-year dormancy period.
Curt Doolittle:
Just to amplify your statement a little bit: authoritarianism is exceptional at “catching up from behind”; and state-capitalism is exceptional at (if not necessary for) startup-funding of capital-demanding industries (which is why americans have high risk light capital industries and more statist countries have low risk heavy capital industries). But states are notoriously horrible at returns on capital (operating, profiting, innovating) for the same reasons they are good at heavy capital organizing (military, industry, bureaucracy state finance). So the question about china is whether she can defeat the red queen of middle class development before her authoritarian credit card runs out, and whether that middle class can convert to operating profits independent of state credit cards (directly and indirectly). It’s one thing to BUY your way into a middle class, and another for that middle class to grab the baton and run the race with it. Seems like they are doing a pretty good job so far. much better than I thought. And of course, we have (sh-t) data from over there so its like reading tea leaves. What I didn’t estimate whatsoever was the quality and size of the labor pool that can be educated to perform chemical, industrial, engineering, and construction work. There is much less ‘drag’ from the lower classes over there. We’ve imported ‘drag’ we can’t compensate for.
Science and Law are via-negativa disciplines. We know truth by eliminating what is false. We know legal, ethical, moral, and good, by eliminating what is irreciprocal, unethical, immoral, criminal, and bad. Science is the means by which we perform due diligence against ignorance, error, bias, suggestion, fictionalism, and deceit – leaving only truth candidates remaining.
So, when we say someone is LYING it does not require that they via-positiva relied upon intent. Instead, we require via-negativa, that we take involuntary responsibility for performing due diligence against spreading a falsehood suggestion or deceit. So via-negativa, someone is lying if they distribute a falsehood suggestion or deceit, regardless of whether they intend to.
This is a higher standard of suppression of falsehood – one that is necessary to prevent the spread of falsehoods. Because we have been defeated once by the falsehood of monotheism, and the same people are trying to defeat us with mono-classism, and monopoly. We are the only people to create a market between classes and ideas, and everyone else produced a monopoly equalitarianism, or a monopoly hierarchy, rather than the markets that have made our successes possible.
People always resist paying the costs of incremental increases in suppression of opportunity for free riding, conspiracy, deception, fraud, theft and violence, just as they resist paying all costs of creating and maintaining the commons: physical, normative, and informational.
That does not mean that we are always and everywhere paying those costs in exchange for the most valuable commons we can produce: good information, truthful speech, the trust, economic velocity, and innovation that results from it.
Because the only way a small, high-individual-investment, superior population can compete is by producing the economy necessary to pay for the superior technological means ( and arms) by which to compensate for their numbers.
MY VERY SIMPLE SCIENTIFIC TECHNIQUE AND WHAT I HAVE LEARNED FROM RELIGION
Religion is, surprisingly, the ‘hard problem’ of social science. Every other problem I have set out to solve (understand) has been trivial by comparison. Truth took me a year. The grammars took me less than six months. And those are very hard problems. Religion was much harder.
I use a very simple (scientific) technique, that long-term followers know well, which is to attack a problem, causing other people to defend it, until I understand their incentives. This is a better method of research than reading what other authors opine (make excuses for or against.)
I am trying to understand (better than I do now) why the the demand for the God (bad) and Jesus (good) mythos’ (they are different) persists among some people and groups and not others. I have begun to understand it better than I did. I understand (easily) why certain classes demand it. I have begun to understand the different weights different cultures attach to it.
And I am ‘testing’ whether (I think correctly) it is simply a failure to provide mindfulness by non-nonsense means (and why governments would resist teaching a non-nonsense method of mindfulness).
Mostly what I have come to understand, is that people are ignorant of the available options and their intuitions have been so successfully trained by the one they already hold, that they cannot imagine training their intuitions by any other means.
So (a) man needs mindfulness, and (b) and man needs mindfulness to different degrees, and (c) the mindfulness is dependent a bit on genetics of mindfulness (males less than females in general, and females more in general), (d) personality needs, (e) class circumstances, (f) cultural-political circumstances – all of which generate (or do not generate) demand for mindfulness.
Now, that mindfulness can be provided by the Hindu Means (literary immersion), the three abrahamic monotheistic means (organized indoctrination) of low(islam), working(christian), and middle (jewish) religion; the buddhist means (training); the rather ‘new age/european’ (philosophy-as-religion-substitute) means; the shinto and ritual means (ritual); or by cognitive-behavioral education that we call ‘Stoicism’ for context.
And there is a great deal to lean just from the ORDER of those methods of training: how much infrastructure is needed to preserve the ‘illusion’ of the mythos vs argument vs ritual vs education. And how much ‘ability’ given the means of training (immersion in hinduism through individual education in stoicism). But this is just a matter of WEALTH sufficient to pay for the means of TRAINING vs a given period of time: ie: producing the mass illusions of the ancient religions required an informational vulnerability (absence of knowledge and alternatives) that existed only in the past – and no longer does.
So if one wants to produce a religion that is not made of lies, it is entirely possible to do so – with a total absence of religious parables. And instead, a reliance on parables of history, and training in the virtues.
Christianity has a very simple set of underlying principles that are constituted in only four statements. Islam and judaism can also be, but to do so is horrifying. Christianity’s four statements are quite simple and will in general produce consequent goods.
There is just no need to lie to people and train them to be vulnerable to lies, and train priests to lie, and politicians to lie by the same means in order to teach those four rules.
No more lies by judaism, devolves into christianity, devolves into islam, evolves into marxism, postmodernism, feminism.
No more lies. People need “imaginary friends, parents, leaders” for very well underst reasons: they have been failed by those around them, to provide positive socialization and training by existential means.
We are able to teach truthful speech (science) and there is no reason we cannot provide positive socialization and training (mindfulness) by equally truthful means.
Convergence on the Truth: continuous correspondence between reality perception cognition recollection description negotiation, and advocacy.
—“Rootless, lifeless, metropolitan drones who have a permanent thousand-yard stare due to an existence void of any meaning other than waiting for the next iPhone.”–
