Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • WHY AND HOW PILPUL FUNCTIONS AS A MEANS OF DECEPTION. —“(((They))) win by crea

    WHY AND HOW PILPUL FUNCTIONS AS A MEANS OF DECEPTION.

    —“(((They))) win by creating false dichotomies; the use of language is very important.”—Mirjana Bilić

    Their technique of Pilpul: They use an element of truth to create a false dichotomy and therefore frame the question by suggestion, and obscure the solution due to anchoring.

    We are always vulnerable to anchoring.

    Because we are vulnerable to anchoring we are vulnerable to framing.

    Because we are vulnerable to framing we are vulnerable to suggestion and obscurantism.

    Because we are vulnerable to suggestion and obscurantism we are vulnerable to influence.

    If we are provided for incentive to justify that influence we can be controlled – by BLOCKING our OPPORTUNITY and MOTIVATION for seeking truth.

    The three abrahamic religions (Judaism, Christianity, and Islam) all produce recursive ignorance cue to BLOCKING our search for truth.

    This is how PILPUL is used to deceive, and why math, logic, science, economics, law and testimonial truth are such an important defense.

    A lie (incentive), a half truth, a False dichotomy (choice).

    Low trust people simply dont’ go beyond the tangible. High trust people do. Our asset of high trust in constructing the commons which produce such outsized returns compared to other peoples. But our trust( suspension of disbelief), and vulnerability to anchoring, suggestion, and obscurantism make our ordinary folk easily deceived, manipulated, controlled, and preyed upon.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-28 14:27:00 UTC

  • More From My Portfolio of CEO Responses 1) “You’re right. We should do that. Are

    More From My Portfolio of CEO Responses

    1) “You’re right. We should do that. Are you volunteering to get it done?”

    2) “Really? I have simple means of testing demonstrated preference: He who does, chooses. He who doesn’t, doesn’t.”

    3) “Really, now you don’t understand why I did that? Why do you think I would do that” (Silly reason follows.) “Actually, here is why I did it ….” (Stunned) (Teaching Moment Succeeded).

    4) “Great idea. Given that we must, and do, at all times make use of all available capital, What should we not do in order to pay for doing that?”

    Teaching People to fish never ends. Why? They actually want someone to catch the fish for them.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-28 14:20:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/44932872_10156739127297264_184488312

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/44932872_10156739127297264_184488312

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/44932872_10156739127297264_1844883123024691200_o_10156739127287264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/44964296_10156739127012264_1577737157940871168_o_10156739127007264.jpg Mexico and South American Demographics

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-28 13:59:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/44932872_10156739127297264_18448831

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/44932872_10156739127297264_18448831

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/44932872_10156739127297264_1844883123024691200_o_10156739127287264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/44964296_10156739127012264_1577737157940871168_o_10156739127007264.jpg Mexico and South American Demographics

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-28 13:59:00 UTC

  • TOLD YA. RIGHT ON TIME

    TOLD YA. RIGHT ON TIME.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-28 13:36:00 UTC

  • NO. HERE IS THE FUTURE OF BTC (No more lies, means no more btc lies too) This is

    NO. HERE IS THE FUTURE OF BTC

    (No more lies, means no more btc lies too)

    This is of course an interesting thought experiment, but of course the difference is that such a metal does not exist, the precious metals are in demand for un-replicable reasons, and they are insufficient in volume, so their function of a monetary substitute (holding place of value) is actually oil.

    Fiat money consists of shares in the state, and is in demand because the state demands it for taxes, and demands it’s monopoly. Bitcoin consists of shares in the bitcoin network. There is trivial difference between electronic distribution of any existing currency, and the distribution of bitcoin OTHER than the FEES that can be extracted for use of those other currencies, in exchange for state insurance of those transactions, and that the INDIVIDUAL COIN HOLDER provides the function of clearances between different currencies (locales), at lower FEES (transaction costs) at slower rates (transaction rates), in the absence of insurance by the currency issuer (the state or the btc network). There is no known method of insuring the BTC network and it remains slow expensive and fragile.

    As I’ve written consistently since I think 2012, all we are doing with these currencies is performing research and development for the state, which will NOT use a distributed but CENTRALIZED transaction processor, on top of existing financial networks, using the encryption technology, and the state will destroy private networks because the state can INSURE those transactions as well as police the input and output of money into and out of such networks.

    There is absolutely zero chance of any other outcome. As far as I know the legacy of BTC and similar products will be as registries of title, thereby eliminating title companies. Registries of stocks and interests. And if someone is smart enough, to eliminate the check-cashing businesses which will then be able to provide cash distribution services in lieu of risk, for flat fees rather than interest.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-28 13:31:00 UTC

  • EXPLAINING CONSCIOUSNESS INDIRECTLY —“Where does “the present” (initial, whole

    EXPLAINING CONSCIOUSNESS INDIRECTLY

    —“Where does “the present” (initial, whole experience) as opposed to memory and the rest (post hoc, partial translations) fit into your model?”— Ben Quimby

    We create the latter in order to increase our chose and volume and intensity of consumption of the former.

    —“But it *is* something that stands alone outside of all these categories, yes? Part of each moment, necessarily, does not carry over into any translation, making said parts, by definition, “ineffable”, correct?”— Ben Quimby

    Well, you know, if you ask it that way I have to defend against misinterpretation. “experience” is our ultra-short-term memory continuously learning and forgetting the cacophony of stimuli from our nervous system, and the ‘echoes’ that they produce in from our memories, and the consequent chemical responses (feelings) that those echoes produce

    Memories require we merely ‘choke’ our senses and focus on (not sure how we do that, but I assume it’s the hippocampus) the echoes rather than the perceptions (senses). I know it’s related to how we focus our vision, and I know it’s an evolution of the prey drive, but that’s all I know.

    So there is no difference except focus. All experience is RECONSTRUCTED from the combination of sensation and memory. We just bias our focus on present(sense) vs past(memory) within that stream of stimulation.

    So there are not two separate things, but simply the resources devoted to senses vs recalls so that we experience greater now than the past.

    GIven that our brains allow us to do both of these at the same time only enhances the illusion.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-28 13:03:00 UTC

  • FIXING LIBERTARIANISM’S FRAUD BY CONFLATIONARY SOPHISM (PILPUL) Investment(Actio

    FIXING LIBERTARIANISM’S FRAUD BY CONFLATIONARY SOPHISM (PILPUL)

    Investment(Action) > Possession (Possession) > Ownership (Property). Don’t confuse the Imaginary(self), with the Moral (goal) with the Real (truth).

    —“You can’t own an idea once it has been communicated.”–Wyatt Storch

    You can however prohibit commercial benefit from that – we do it all the time. The question only whether an idea or anything else non physical can be used non-commercially

    —“Yes you can threaten people and hurt them and take their stuff. But you can’t assign ownership status to that which cannot be owned without faking reality.”—Wyatt Storch

    Well, no, that’s a conflation of terms. You are using ‘owned’ which means ‘insured by third party’, versus ‘possessed’ (fact), versus ‘demonstrated Investment,’ or ‘demonstrated property’ (moral, under natural law).

    You can possess and use information, without consuming it unless you are the exclusive possessor.

    You only possess ownership of property rather possession of asset if it is insured by a third party.

    Everything else is simply deception by conflation.

    So one can possess information, and one can exchange it, but whether one can sell that information in the market, where the market is ensured by the third party, is up to the third party not you.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-28 12:52:00 UTC

  • Violence vs Pacifism like Socialism vs Captialism is (((another))) fraud by prop

    Violence vs Pacifism like Socialism vs Captialism is (((another))) fraud by propaganda. The question is only between what end violence is put to, and what end markets are put to. One can use violence to create rule of law, markets and property, or use it to create rule by man, involuntary organization of production distribution and trade, by eliminating property.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-28 11:55:00 UTC

  • “When we took violence off the table we invited lies in its place”—Greg Hamilt

    —“When we took violence off the table we invited lies in its place”—Greg Hamilton

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-28 10:23:00 UTC