Source: Facebook

  • COMBATTING THE PARASITE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX. by Luke Weinhagen The Parasite Indus

    COMBATTING THE PARASITE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX.

    by Luke Weinhagen

    The Parasite Industrial Complex branches:

    – Military Industrial Complex (masculine parasitism, right establishment politics)

    – Narrative Industrial Complex (feminine parasitism, left establishment politics)

    Many models of thought and politic have been proposed to combat either the Military Industrial Complex or the Narrative Industrial Complex.

    Propertarianism recognizes and combats the Parasite Industrial Complex.

    (excellent)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-30 15:14:00 UTC

  • “Should the aristocracy that governs us be ultimately meritocratic or reproduce

    —“Should the aristocracy that governs us be ultimately meritocratic or reproduce through birth.”—

    Not necessarily an either-or proposition. Given: Monarchy, Aristocracy (military /territory), Nobility (church /governance /ability); the reason for inheritance of the MONARCHY evolved to be inheritable as (a) demand for singular rule decreased as participation by the aristocracy (territory) and nobility (ability) in rule increased, (b) demand for limiting competition over secession between the aristocracy and nobility increased.

    So via positiva meritocracy and via negativa aristocracy just rotate at different rates, and the monarchy slowest of all (if at all).

    In this context the elite intellectual families are doing a pretty good job of self perpetuation and maybe we should subsidize them a bit more.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-30 15:12:00 UTC

  • ALL YOU REALLY NEED TO KNOW ABOUT PROPERTARIANISM Reductive version: “all you ne

    ALL YOU REALLY NEED TO KNOW ABOUT PROPERTARIANISM

    Reductive version: “all you need to really understand about propertarianism is that it makes it possible to write law so these f—kers in the financial media academy state complex can’t keep stealing from you without repercussion, and because of that we can de-financialize, de-propagandize, de-politicize our country and live happily as one income families again.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-30 15:01:00 UTC

  • THIS IS ALL NORMIES NEED TO UNDERSTAND: PROPERTARIANISM WILL MAKE THEIR LIVES BE

    THIS IS ALL NORMIES NEED TO UNDERSTAND: PROPERTARIANISM WILL MAKE THEIR LIVES BETTER AND FAST – NOT BECAUSE THEY UNDERSTAND IT. BUT BECAUSE OF THE LAW IT MAKES POSSIBLE.

    Normal people are not students of, or interested in, nor necessarily capable of conceiving the world via the tools of calculus, economics, programming, law, or formal logic. They are merely the BENEFICIARIES of it when used by those of us who can.

    If you merely explain that it is possible to use the law to prohibit the financial sector, the media, politicians and the academy from taking advantage of them by lying to them, and that Propertarianism provides a method of writing the law in order to make that possible, they will understand.

    Because the work consists largely of:

    (a) a single value-independent language of logic, science, ethics, politics, economics, and law.

    (b) a set of criteria for testing whether or not statements made in that language (which is very close to law already) is false (such that it may still be true but it is not false or dependent upon pretense of knowledge).

    (c) that we can add this to the constitution and the courts fairly easily. And in doing so allow us to continue market support of what we favor, and court suppression of falsehoods that we don’t.

    (d) and if we do this most of the ‘redistributive demands’ can be made possible by disempowering of the financial, academy, media, and state sector, so that those proceeds can instead by consumed by the people (citizens),

    (e) so that once again it is possible to bear and rase a family on one income, pay for one’s house, and then save for retirement for the vast majority of the laboring, working, middle, and upper middle classes.

    That’s it.

    That’s what they have to understand.

    The rest of it is just the technical means of constructing, debating, writing, administering, and judging the law such that all of that is possible.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-30 14:52:00 UTC

  • “WE MUST RESTORE LIMITS TO THE TAKER” by Luke Weinhagen In taking ruthlessness (

    “WE MUST RESTORE LIMITS TO THE TAKER”

    by Luke Weinhagen

    In taking ruthlessness (competition unhindered by forbearance) off the table we have allowed “I kill you and take your stuff” to be replaced with “I outvote you and take your stuff”.

    It is the same threat of violence underpinning both iterations, but the latter removes the limit of direct risk to the taker.

    We need to be ruthless enough to restore limits to the taker, no matter how the taker fills in the blank within the statement “I ________ you and take you stuff”.

    What the parasite fills the blank with (guilt, shame, lies, demographics, etc…), ruthlessness must match.

    In short – We need to say ‘No” and ruthlessly mean it.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-30 14:13:00 UTC

  • GETTING THESE IDEAS INTO A FORMAT FOR NORMIES —“I’m just trying to get your id

    GETTING THESE IDEAS INTO A FORMAT FOR NORMIES

    —“I’m just trying to get your ideas into a format that registers on a level with normal people aside from some superficial respect for scientific sounding words and phrases but instead upon a deeper spiritual and emotional level.”—- Christian Kalafut

    I understand.

    I cannot reduce logic of this depth to comforting analogy when it it precisely the use of comforting analogy for the purpose of deception that I have constructed it for.

    Normal people are not capable of calculus, economics, programming, law, or formal logic. They are merely the BENEFICIARIES of it when used by those of us who can.

    If you merely explain that it is possible to use the law to prohibit the financial sector, the media, politicians and the academy from taking advantage of them by lying to them, and that Propertarianism provides a method of writing the law in order to make that possible, they will understand.

    Because the work consists largely of:

    (a) a single value-independent language of logic, science, ethics, politics, economics, and law.

    (b) a set of criteria for testing whether or not statements made in that language (which is very close to law already) is false (such that it may still be true but it is not false or dependent upon pretense of knowledge).

    (c) that we can add this to the constitution and the courts fairly easily. And in doing so allow us to continue market support of what we favor, and court suppression of falsehoods that we don’t.

    (d) and if we do this most of the ‘redistributive demands’ can be made possible by disempowering of the financial, academy, media, and state sector, so that those proceeds can instead by consumed by the people (citizens),

    (e) so that once again it is possible to bear and rase a family on one income, pay for one’s house, and then save for retirement for the vast majority of the laboring, working, middle, and upper middle classes.

    That’s it.

    That’s what they have to understand.

    The rest of it is just the technical means of constructing, debating, writing, administering, and judging the law such that all of that is possible.

    It would be as great a return as the scientific revolution. Because the vast majority of the problem ordinary people face today is that the systems by which they are defrauded are so complicated that it takes people like you can I to explain it to them – and why they suffer from it.

    This is very profound program. It is larger than marxism, and completes the scientific revolution by producing a logic and science of the social sciences, an an institutional means of suppressing the conquest of our civilization by deception, using marxism, postmodernism, feminism and the organized institution of deception by the state, academy, media, financial sector.

    That’s alll people need to know. They do not need to know calculus, only have a vague understanding of how statistics can be used.

    They do not need to undrestand propertarianism (whether you call it natural law, or the law of information).

    They just need to understand that these tools help us restore our civilization to civility.

    So, as a reminder:

    Again, there exists both EDUCATION (meaning via positiva) and DECIDABILITY(Science via negativa) I do the latter so that others may better teach the former.

    I don’t do RELIGION (Demand for Supernatural Authoritarian Conformity) or PHILOSOPHY (Persuasive Moral Sophistry).

    I do Law, Science, and Logic. (Decidability).

    And one day I hope either I or others will do EDUCATION.

    ps: ( My preference all along, and our strategy all along, has been that I do the theory others do the education, becuase frankly the difference between me and my frame of understanding and that of normies is that of a difference in species. I can’t empathize or sympathize well enough to do their storytelling.)

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev Ukraine.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-30 13:51:00 UTC

  • WORM TURNS: THE OVERTON WINDOW MOVES CLOSER EVERY SINGLE DAY

    https://www.wnd.com/2018/10/is-this-worse-than-1968/THE WORM TURNS: THE OVERTON WINDOW MOVES CLOSER EVERY SINGLE DAY

    https://www.wnd.com/2018/10/is-this-worse-than-1968/


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-30 13:26:00 UTC

  • “There’s no way to be ruthless enough to defend the gains of hundreds of thousan

    —“There’s no way to be ruthless enough to defend the gains of hundreds of thousands of years of evolution, representing thousands of lifetimes spent braving the ice, war, and plagues, to produce a healthier, smarter genome.”—@[11804727:2048:Steve Pender]


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-30 13:19:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45005918_10156743578027264_208601502

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45005918_10156743578027264_208601502

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45005918_10156743578027264_2086015025247420416_n_10156743578017264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45163633_10156743578472264_6815858136608407552_o_10156743578462264.jpg WHY CAN’T WE HAVE THESE IN THE STATES?

    at <10k for the top model it would crush the jeep market.

    I want one. I love them. I don’t care. lol


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-30 13:15:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/45005918_10156743578027264_20860150

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/45005918_10156743578027264_20860150

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/45005918_10156743578027264_2086015025247420416_n_10156743578017264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/45163633_10156743578472264_6815858136608407552_o_10156743578462264.jpg WHY CAN’T WE HAVE THESE IN THE STATES?

    at <10k for the top model it would crush the jeep market.

    I want one. I love them. I don’t care. lol


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-30 13:15:00 UTC