Source: Facebook

–ADAM VOIGHT: “TOLKIEN WAS SHOWING US THE MIDDLE WAY”–

—“Sauron is the sort of thing both Christians and Aryans can agree on and the Lord of the Rings is meant to show that. This is also the theme of CS Lewis’ “Abolition of Man”, where he speaks of the Tao instead of God. It is meant to be a Law of nature.”— Adam Voight

Our ancestral method is not us good vs them evil, but us ORDER and the universe CHAOS and unpredictable.

This is the correct understanding of our relationship to our gods. They were undependable. Fickle.

Hence we were SUPERIOR GODS ASCENDANT.

When we mastered fire it put us equal to the gods.

When we mastered metal it put us superior to the gods.

That one lesson is THE lesson.

—

So I think that Tolkiens narrative, and Adam’s argument is best understood as the problem of a homogenous people against nature (our western way) and heterogeneous peoples against each other (the zoroastrian middle-eastern way).

I mean we have evidence in our mythology of the pre-metal europeans and their religion, then the metal europeans and their religion, and that is the origin of the Vanir-Aesir divide.

We have the western ascendance of the prophet figure of odin over the indo european ancestral gods, to create what we think of as nordic-germanic- pagan religion.

And then we have the nordic-germanic-pagan of the Etru being overtaken by the Itals.

And we have the southern adoption of the greek pantheon into the etru-italic thereby obscuring the ancient religion except for it’s ‘naturalism’ which the romans persisted.

Then we had the imposition (by force) of a semitic<zoroastrian religion into europe, and it’s expansion under the ‘bribery’ of literacy and political power.

And we have been trying desperately to restore our Natural Religion, and almost did so prior to the world wars.

But after the world wars the Semites (marxism-feminism) and their co-conspirators the Parisians (postmodernism-feminism) and the Anglo Puritans (social democracy-feminism) worked desperately to destroy that restoration of our Natural Religion.

All religion is political in nature, we just have so many layers of allegory and fraud and deception that it’s extremely difficult to untangle.

REligion produces a group competitive strategy so that our many micro-decisions support that strategy, at very near zero cost, because many, many of our decisions are otherwise undecidable. As such religion teaches us that whenever possible, given any set of choices, among those that are in your self interest, then chose the decision that is ALSO in the common interest.

This is the means by which the ‘decision economy of religion’ functions to advance – many times per day per person – the group: many micro payments into the commons.

We can be an homogenous people against the vicissitudes of nature and transcend man into the stars and eternity or fall again victim to the heterogeneous people against the attempt at transformation, and the sedation of the many into a long sleep and hyper consumption decline by continuous regression of man into the abrahamic stupor of dysgenia, superstition, and ignorance.

Ancestor Worship is an enrichment.

Hinduism a subsistence.

Buddhism is an illness.

Abrahamism is a cancer.

It is not that complicated.

You just have to understand if you’re an addict.

Some of us are not addicts.

But those who are addicts are just as lost as those on opiates.

Cheers