photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46348337_10156782411017264_31513059814014976_o_10156782411012264.jpg EXAMPLE OF TWITTER CRITICISMJC Trott“IM GOING TO TYPE IN ALL CAPS TO SHOW YOU HOW RIGHT I AM!!!”Nov 16, 2018, 1:06 PMDmitry NikolovLove your savage responseNov 16, 2018, 1:16 PMJonathan WilburReport himNov 16, 2018, 1:39 PMJonathan WilburThat’s rapeNov 16, 2018, 1:39 PMDan Warrenmmmmm windows….tasty.Nov 16, 2018, 1:42 PMOkon Miracle PatrickYou’re actually on the right path man.Nov 16, 2018, 2:04 PMMatthew PenningtonSo that’s why they always say louder for the people in the back🤔Nov 16, 2018, 2:51 PMSean RingAnother gender studies major with $250,000 in student debt and zero income, surely. Totally off Twitter now. Or at least until they rename it “Twatter.”Nov 16, 2018, 10:35 PMBlake Peter DowsonAdding window licker to my lexiconNov 17, 2018, 2:33 AMMicah PezdirtzAdd it to your playlist- Aphex TwinNov 17, 2018, 6:09 AMEXAMPLE OF TWITTER CRITICISM
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46383054_10156782266992264_6999890342711394304_o_10156782266987264.jpg FOR NEWBS: UNDERSTANDING PROPERTARIANISM AS THE EXTENSION OF THE SCIENCES
Propertarianism Consists of The Formal Logic of Natural Law: Psychology, Sociology, Politics, Group Evolutionary Strategy, as An Completion of The Laws of Nature.
Originally I called it “capitalismv3” until I realized how erroneous that title was: I was doing the law, and economics only a part of it. Then I moved to calling it propertarianism. Then, once I understood what I was doing, I correctly labeled it Natural Law. The problem is that “Natural Law” has a long history of appropriation like “liberalism” and false criticism like “national socialism”. And is framed as a philosophical justification(excuse) rather than a scientific decidability (truth). And we had already built a brand around Propertarianism.
So, we keep the ‘Brand’ Propertarianism for the simple reason that it was the ‘propertarians’ that I evolved the work out of, and the brand awareness is such that it’s hard to change at this point – and while it is only partially descriptive (referring to the unit of measure in psychology, sociology, ethics, politics and group strategy) , and could equally be called Testimonialism (truthful speech), or Vitruvianism or operationalism (universal system of measurement system by demonstrable human actions), or The Law of Conscious Beings (Any coopertting being must work by this set of decisions to survive), we retain Propertarianism and Natural Law out of situational convenience. ,
However, as this image illustrates, we have just COMPLETED the SCIENCES by expanding the scientific method into the social and psychological sciences.
PROPERTARIANISM = THE NATURAL LAW.
You should understand this then as the Application of the scientific method to the social sciences. and as such that we are learning a SCIENCE that will take you YEARS TO MASTER not a philosophy that you can read a book and add to your catalog of frames.
PHYSICAL LAW OF TRANSFORMATION (INVOLUNTARY) EVOLVES INTO THE NATURAL LAW OF COOPERATION (VOLUNTARY) AS AN EXTENSION OF THOSE SAME LAWS.
We can state these fundamental laws, Logically, Empirically, or operationally. Unfortunately, in the twentieth century, due to the ‘mathification’ of physics, and the ‘idealism’ of mathematics, due to the lack of a ‘model’, information has been LOST, that on the re-operationalizatoin of physics (undiscovered fundamental-wave, subatomic-particle, atomic, chemical, biological, sentient-cognizant, rational-calculable-computable), Psychology (Acquisitionism), Sociology (cooperation), law (decidability, organization), accounting-finance-economics (information, units of measure, measurements), is necessary to obtain the same benefits between sentient (feeling, evaluating, responding), aware (remembering, comparing), conscious (choosing), calculating (reasoning, calculating, computing) objects, as those objects that cannot detect and respond to changes in state.
In other words, due to a lack of a model, the model-less-ness of mathematical idealism has worked through logic, and physics, and now into philosophy, ethics, and politics. just as theology did in the ancient world – producing similar ignorances.
The Operational Movement (restoration of the model ) failed in the early part of the 20th century, and the postwar reaction against darwin (which is the model like it or not) and turing (which is the model, like it or not) because of eugenics (which is the optimum method of progression of human existence like it or not – just as was physics in the 17th-20th centuries, like it or not).FOR NEWBS: UNDERSTANDING PROPERTARIANISM AS THE EXTENSION OF THE SCIENCES
Propertarianism Consists of The Formal Logic of Natural Law: Psychology, Sociology, Politics, Group Evolutionary Strategy, as An Completion of The Laws of Nature.
Originally I called it “capitalismv3” until I realized how erroneous that title was: I was doing the law, and economics only a part of it. Then I moved to calling it propertarianism. Then, once I understood what I was doing, I correctly labeled it Natural Law. The problem is that “Natural Law” has a long history of appropriation like “liberalism” and false criticism like “national socialism”. And is framed as a philosophical justification(excuse) rather than a scientific decidability (truth). And we had already built a brand around Propertarianism.
So, we keep the ‘Brand’ Propertarianism for the simple reason that it was the ‘propertarians’ that I evolved the work out of, and the brand awareness is such that it’s hard to change at this point – and while it is only partially descriptive (referring to the unit of measure in psychology, sociology, ethics, politics and group strategy) , and could equally be called Testimonialism (truthful speech), or Vitruvianism or operationalism (universal system of measurement system by demonstrable human actions), or The Law of Conscious Beings (Any coopertting being must work by this set of decisions to survive), we retain Propertarianism and Natural Law out of situational convenience. ,
However, as this image illustrates, we have just COMPLETED the SCIENCES by expanding the scientific method into the social and psychological sciences.
PROPERTARIANISM = THE NATURAL LAW.
You should understand this then as the Application of the scientific method to the social sciences. and as such that we are learning a SCIENCE that will take you YEARS TO MASTER not a philosophy that you can read a book and add to your catalog of frames.
PHYSICAL LAW OF TRANSFORMATION (INVOLUNTARY) EVOLVES INTO THE NATURAL LAW OF COOPERATION (VOLUNTARY) AS AN EXTENSION OF THOSE SAME LAWS.
We can state these fundamental laws, Logically, Empirically, or operationally. Unfortunately, in the twentieth century, due to the ‘mathification’ of physics, and the ‘idealism’ of mathematics, due to the lack of a ‘model’, information has been LOST, that on the re-operationalizatoin of physics (undiscovered fundamental-wave, subatomic-particle, atomic, chemical, biological, sentient-cognizant, rational-calculable-computable), Psychology (Acquisitionism), Sociology (cooperation), law (decidability, organization), accounting-finance-economics (information, units of measure, measurements), is necessary to obtain the same benefits between sentient (feeling, evaluating, responding), aware (remembering, comparing), conscious (choosing), calculating (reasoning, calculating, computing) objects, as those objects that cannot detect and respond to changes in state.
In other words, due to a lack of a model, the model-less-ness of mathematical idealism has worked through logic, and physics, and now into philosophy, ethics, and politics. just as theology did in the ancient world – producing similar ignorances.
The Operational Movement (restoration of the model ) failed in the early part of the 20th century, and the postwar reaction against darwin (which is the model like it or not) and turing (which is the model, like it or not) because of eugenics (which is the optimum method of progression of human existence like it or not – just as was physics in the 17th-20th centuries, like it or not).
—“Basically in layman’s terms: There are infinite frames of references (paradigms). We can choose an arbitrary frame of reference within some set of paradigms, or we can use the OPERATIONAL frame of reference consisting of fully commensurable terms, or the mathematical frame of that same reference, that allows us to speak in a standardized format, such that we can discuss across domains and disciplines”—Yiannis Kontinopoulos
My little-old-lady mother: “You’re in your fifties and you act like you’re twenty-two. Are you ever going to grow up?”
Me? “Not if I’m both lucky and able.”
My little-old-lady mother: “You were a perfect boy, and I sent you to college and it was all downhill from there”.
(Translated: I raised a proper catholic schoolboy and sent him out in the world for slaughter, and he survived but that catholic schoolboy didn’t. – lolz Women always want to preserve infantilism because it is the only time in their lives that a woman is in control. )
IT DOESN’T TAKE 30 YEARS TO SPEAK IN THE NATURAL LAW. IT TAKES AS LONG AS A DEGREE IN THE LAW
—“In 30 years maybe I’ll have Curt’s ability to summarise this well.”—
Regarding: ( “….No Marxist, postmodern, feminist revolution is possible because the competence structure necessary for the preservation of human standards of living cannot tolerate any other distribution than the Pareto…..”)
Just to comfort you … it takes four years on average if you try to construct and repeat the arguments. There are people who are faster and take a year or so, but only four so far.
We have pre-complied many of the arguments. We are in the process of refining them today into Definitions, Series (this>that>that-other), Aphorisms, and Maxisms, (like the quote above) that can be memorized rather than reinvented each time you want to use them.
So it depends on age (younger is easier), personality (observers, lower agreeableness), and whether you have experience in philosophy of science, programming, economics, and history, so that you either have an existing framework, or so that you are not so ‘addicted’ to analogies and literature that (really) induce a form of ignorance through imprecision.
Evidence is that if you are drawn to philosophy and theology it might be an impediment – although not always. Philosophy and theology as practiced are a significant part of the problem: fantasy literature.
FOR NEWBS: ON MY AGGRESSIVE POSTURE AT THE INTERNET PODIUM
—“And no need to be so passive aggressive. I was just trying to have a discussion, clearly you’re more keen on “wrecking” people who engage than talking to them.”—
No, i just cant tell whether someone is an addict and a waste of time or a candidate for discourse until i push back on them and discover whether they have any agency and therefore intellectual honesty, or not. Congratulations for passing the test. I am very good at what i do and teaching class in the locker room that is the internet among idiots and hostiles requires abandonment of conservative tolerance and restoration of victorian discipline.
So ask dont tell. You told presuming you knew better, you didnt ask presuming i did. I responded.
If we expect the initial hostilities to fall along political ideology, left vs right (parasite vs producer), then we can see by the ideology maps that the leftists primarily occupy major cities.
Dense, urban settings. The thing is, even in today’s “functioning” leftist cities, crime is rampant as is refuse and human waste. Some cities like San Diego has recurring hepatitis outbreaks now….
San Fran is swimming in human feces.
Now imagine when the power goes down, the lights go dark, the water stops flowing, the water becomes non-potable, the store shelves run bare and resupplies are sporadic if at all.
That will happen with a week of a shut down.
Power substations hit, key power transmission lines taken out, roadways barricaded or railways lines sabotaged.
It really doesn’t take much for the whole system to screech to a halt.
—“Hey Curt, so I’ve been watching some Eric Weinstein, and I had some thoughts, let me know what you think of if I’m getting this right:
So Weinstein suggested that gauge theory is a sort of universal framework that allows for the interoperability between sciences, namely as an example the key to unifying standard deterministic electrodynamics with darwinian selection.
What I see your work in operationalism as, is a manifestation of this attempt in the realm of logics-linguistics, instead of mathematics-hard sciences
Whereas he is trying to suggest a framework where the hard sciences and the biological sciences can talk, you are offering a framework where the hard sciences, the logics/mathematics and the social sciences can talk.”— Yiannis Kontinopoulos
—“Did you ever read Aeschylus’ “Agamemnon”? Some things can only be learned by suffering–enduring the consequences of your agency.”—Chip Sills
This kind of conflation of heroic effort with suffering is a christian mental disease. if it is some kind of suffering for you then you are mentally, physically, emotionally unfit or inferior…
its just work.
cancer, serious illness, pain, divorce, loss, this is not suffering but endurance.
suffering is loss regardless of action. all else is work.
If you make the choice it may be Work to achieve or Tragedy to fail to achieve, but Suffering is due to that which is beyond your actions.
