Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-18 13:17:00 UTC

  • “The left tests the limits capital accumulation. The right tests the limits of c

    —“The left tests the limits capital accumulation. The right tests the limits of capital outlay (consumption).”— Skye Stewart

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-18 12:29:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    https://propertarianism.com/2018/03/24/the-history-of-the-world-wars-against-white-peole/https://propertarianism.com/2018/03/24/the-history-of-the-world-wars-against-white-peole/

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-18 12:28:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46479393_10156787026407264_874469571

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46479393_10156787026407264_8744695719807418368_o_10156787026397264.jpg CHRIS WALLACE PANDERING TO MORONS

    You can calculate probabilities of closed systems but only price risk in open systems.Eric DykstraI find it hard to decipher when someone is pandering to morons versus when they just are a moron.Nov 18, 2018, 12:08 PMSteve PenderI’ve hated him for a long time. Classic case of media nepotism through his dad Mike.Nov 18, 2018, 12:23 PMJennifer DeanSameNov 18, 2018, 12:38 PMCurt DoolittleMike Wallace (Wallik)

    —“Wallace, whose family’s surname was originally Wallik,[2] was born on May 9, 1918, in Brookline, Massachusetts,[2] to Russian Jewish immigrant parents,[2][3] He identified as a Jew throughout his life”—Nov 18, 2018, 1:14 PMCurt DoolittleChris Wallace

    —“Wallace was born in Chicago, Illinois,[2] the son of longtime CBS 60 Minutes reporter Mike Wallace and Norma Kaphan.[4] Wallace is Jewish[5] and both his parents were Jewish.[6][7] His parents divorced when he was one year old. He grew up in a home with his mother and his stepfather, former CBS News President Bill Leonard.[8] He did not develop a relationship with his biological father until the age of 14.[9] Leonard gave him early exposure to political journalism, hiring him as an assistant to Walter Cronkite at the 1964 Republican National Convention.”—Nov 18, 2018, 1:15 PMAndrea RoyallImagine being so pathetically “jewish” that you have to steal a Scottish surname to hide your “Jewishness”.Nov 18, 2018, 1:17 PMAndrew ClaytonAndrea Royall “I didn’t steal it, goy. My Name was always Wallace.

    Help! Police! This Wallik guy is trying to steal my name!”

    *rubs hands*Nov 18, 2018, 2:26 PMAndrea Royallyou forgot the shekels 😉Nov 18, 2018, 2:27 PMAlex Macleodhttps://youtu.be/eB8K1jPBnwc?t=11Nov 18, 2018, 5:58 PMKarl KühlschrankName was changed from Myron Wallik to Mike Wallace.Nov 18, 2018, 8:11 PMJim LeisAnd is it just me, or has he grown sillier as he gets older? Or maybe it’s just a journalistic sign of the times.Nov 18, 2018, 10:34 PMRichard HallCould I get an example of a probability in a closed system and a priced risk in an open system?

    I don’t understand why they aren’t interchangeable.Nov 19, 2018, 3:30 PMCurt Doolittledice, roulette wheel, cards, vs stock market vs an economy.Nov 19, 2018, 4:23 PMCurt Doolittlesee ludic fallacy by talebNov 19, 2018, 4:24 PMMichael AndradeWe’re reaching levels of of course that shouldn’t be possible.Nov 19, 2018, 11:14 PMRichard HallAh I see now. Thank you.Nov 20, 2018, 3:15 PMCHRIS WALLACE PANDERING TO MORONS

    You can calculate probabilities of closed systems but only price risk in open systems.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-18 12:03:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46493645_10156787024747264_511817229

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46493645_10156787024747264_5118172295960985600_o_10156787024737264.jpg USING SERIES TO TEST A LINE OF CONSTANT RELATIONS ACROSS SCALES

    —“Always love this structure of Aphorism”— A Twitter Friend danqueseq

    (referring to use of series to illustrate a concept)

    One point – an ideal, or ideal type – tells you nothing. Three points to test a line. More points falsify the line such that it is increasingly free of ignorance, error, bias and deceit.

    Hence, demand for definitions in series as a defense against conflation, inflation, and fictionalism.

    -hugs brother.Skye StewartThe left tests the limits capital accumulation

    The right tests the limits of capital outlayNov 18, 2018, 12:09 PMCurt Doolittleooh… quotable… well done.Nov 18, 2018, 12:29 PMBryan Nova BreySkye Stewart What does the Federal Reserve test?Nov 18, 2018, 12:48 PMMichael D. AbbottYes. id = infantile. ego = maternal. super egp = paternal. I know you don’t subscribe to these terms–but it’s a similar idea.Nov 18, 2018, 12:55 PMSkye StewartBryan Nova Brey patience?Nov 18, 2018, 1:05 PMKari Anne DorstadI don’t see myself as a women that tests the limit of Men ! It’s not my nature to do that !Nov 18, 2018, 2:26 PMMichael D. AbbottGood women encourage men to test each other, while remaining encouraging.Nov 18, 2018, 2:31 PMMichael D. AbbottBut the female shadow tests men to the core.Nov 18, 2018, 2:31 PMCurt Doolittle^really? Or are you imagining that? What do women really do? they continuously sh-t test, in every culture. Women undermine men constantly through nagging and endless seeking of acquisitions….

    Good women are in place because bad women are prevented, but that doesn’t mean women are naturally good, any more than men are naturally good. Men and women are naturally pragmatic, and we use violence and threats to force them gradually out of bad and into surviving by the good. which is quite expensive and difficult.Nov 18, 2018, 3:26 PMUSING SERIES TO TEST A LINE OF CONSTANT RELATIONS ACROSS SCALES

    —“Always love this structure of Aphorism”— A Twitter Friend danqueseq

    (referring to use of series to illustrate a concept)

    One point – an ideal, or ideal type – tells you nothing. Three points to test a line. More points falsify the line such that it is increasingly free of ignorance, error, bias and deceit.

    Hence, demand for definitions in series as a defense against conflation, inflation, and fictionalism.

    -hugs brother.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-18 12:02:00 UTC

  • THE HIERARCHY OF LIMIT TESTS (SH-T TESTS) 1) children test the limits of mothers

    THE HIERARCHY OF LIMIT TESTS (SH-T TESTS)

    1) children test the limits of mothers

    2) women test the limits of men

    3) men test the limits of other men

    4) mankind tests the limits of nature.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-18 11:37:00 UTC

  • IDEALS VS LIMITS by Bill Joslin The notion of “ideal and unlimited” pertains to

    IDEALS VS LIMITS

    by Bill Joslin

    The notion of “ideal and unlimited” pertains to moral foundations asserted as universal and well… An ideal…. Opposed to the notion that all concepts exist with in limits (boundaries and context). By doing so, following a moral foundation which doesn’t acknowledge proper conditions which allows that action to exist has said action producing different and often opposite effects (ideal morals often result in immoral outcomes )

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-18 11:20:00 UTC

  • GOVERNING IS SIMPLE IF TRUTHFUL AND DIFFICULT IF DECEITFUL AND CORRUPT by JG Gar

    GOVERNING IS SIMPLE IF TRUTHFUL AND DIFFICULT IF DECEITFUL AND CORRUPT

    by JG Garner

    Agreed. Black and white. Dark or light. North or south. East or west.

    I read a book a few years back. A book well known to many. I will paraphrase the general idea.

    The author wrote governing is not hard. It is easy. The corrupt make it complicated. The compromised make the waters murky.

    It’s simple. Is it good for the nation? Is it good for the economy? Does it weaken us? Do we want those convicted of the most heinous crimes to still breath. As long as they live, they could be amongst us “free men” again.

    I’ve provided a small paragraph on an entire chapter. But you get my point. Things should be pretty cut and dry.

    In the criminal justice system we now look at the accused in a sympathetic view. Was his life hard? Did his parents beat him? Ect. The only thing we need to unwind is was a crime committed? Did the accused commit said crime? Is the victim dead or injured.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-18 11:15:00 UTC

  • THE NATURAL ORDER by Bill Joslin Patriarchy is older than humans. Patriarchy evo

    THE NATURAL ORDER

    by Bill Joslin

    Patriarchy is older than humans. Patriarchy evolves naturally because nature rewards ability and action (and nothing else).

    Patriarchy is driven by female sexual selection in all animals (including humans until the counter culture). Females with offspring produce demands (food, protection, shelter etc). Males provide supply (build shelters, provide protection, find food etc) and limits to consumption.

    Men are better equipped to secure communities (and nations) than women. Further to that men are expendable (do not produce children, can mate in seconds then die etc – where as women need gestation time and to raise children i.e. expensive) thus men are a better choice for dangerous work (protections, hunting, high-risk occupations). Women who chose men who are better able to provide and this increase their likelihood to survive. Those who choose differently will not thrive. Those men better disposed to these task will rise above others. This results in patriarchy.

    Patriarchy will always rise, if not explicitly it will be implicit (even the modern feminist manifestation only exists because of the support by a stack of powerful men )

    When our laws take in consideration natural phenomena and also what undergirds these phenomena (survival strategies) then a proper patriarchy will be restored. A proper aristocracy will be restored.

    Islam won’t do this. Why? It’s a River Delta survival strategy adapted to a desert people (raider’s strategy). It scales up well, but crumbles under its own weight and tends to destroy human flourishing.

    Anglos got it right – velocity via natural law (judge discovered law), empiricism and shallow -via negativa- moral foundations (which results in velocity). This produces the best survival strategy

    Where this has failed has been universalism and idealistic moral foundations both of which are a result of Abrahamic rhetoric – the first middle eastern invasion of Europe .

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-18 11:12:00 UTC

  • The only measure is zero tolerance

    The only measure is zero tolerance.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-18 10:55:00 UTC