Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • Truth is the most intolerant religion. This is the oath of that religion: A HEAT

    Truth is the most intolerant religion.

    This is the oath of that religion:

    A HEATHEN, A CHRISTIAN, AN ARYAN, A WARRIOR, A MAN TRANSCENDENT

    I am a Heathen if 1) I accept the laws of nature as binding on all of existence; and 2) if I treat nature as sacred and to be contemplated, protected and improved; and 3) I treat the world as something to transform closer to a Garden in whatever ways I can before I die; and 4) if I deny the existence of supreme beings with dominion over the physical laws; and I treat all gods, demigods, heroes, saints, figures of history, and ancestors as characters with whom I may speak to in private contemplation in the hope of gaining wisdom and synchronicity from having done so. And 5) if I participate with others of my society in repetition of oaths, repetition of myths, repetition of festivals, repetition of holidays, and the perpetuation of all of the above to my offspring. And 6) if I leave open that synchronicity appears to exist now and then, and that it may be possible that there is a scientific explanation for it, other than just humans subject to similar stimuli producing similar intuitions and therefore similar ends.

    As far as I know this is all that is required of me to be a Heathen: the Worship(Appreciation) of Kin, Hearth and Home.

    I am a christian if I have adopted the teaching of christianity: 1) the eradication of hatred from the human heart. 2) the extension of kinship love to non-kin. 3) the demand for personal acts of charity, 4) the extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war.

    As far as I know, this is all that is required of me to be a Christian.

    I am an Aryan if 1) I proudly display my excellences so that others seek to achieve or exceed them; 2) I seek competition to constantly test and improve myself so I do not weaken; 3) I swear to speak no insult and demand it; 4) I speak the truth and demand it; 5) I take nothing not paid for and demand it; 6) I grant sovereignty to my kin and demand it; 7) I insure my people regardless of condition, and demand it; and in doing so leave nothing but voluntary markets of cooperation between sovereign men; and to discipline, enserf, enslave, ostracize or kill those who do otherwise; 8) to not show fear or cowardice, abandon my brothers, or retreat, and 9) to die a good death in the service of my kin, my clan, my tribe and my people.

    As far as I know, this is all that is required of me to be an Aryan.

    I am a warrior in that 1) we will prepare for war so perfectly that none dare enter it against us. 2) Once we go to war, we do so with *joy*, with eagerness, and with passion, and without mercy, without constraint, and without remorse; And 3) before ending war, we shall defeat an enemy completely such that no other dares a condition of our enemy, and the memory of the slaughter lives a hundred generations.

    As far as I know, this is all that is required of me to be a Warrior.

    As far as I know, if I succeed as a Heathen, as a Christian, as an Aryan, as a Warrior, then I have transcended the animal man, and earned my place among the saints, heroes, demigods, gods, in the memories, histories, and legends of man.

    And that is the objective of heroes. We leave the rest for ordinary men who are still animals, and not man transcendent.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-28 10:45:00 UTC

  • HOW OUR RELIGION WAS ABRAHAMISED: by Yiannis Kontinopoulos Poet Homer -> Saul of

    HOW OUR RELIGION WAS ABRAHAMISED:

    by Yiannis Kontinopoulos

    Poet

    Homer -> Saul of Tarsus

    Prophet

    Aristotle -> Abraham

    Hero

    Achilles -> Muhammad

    Superhero

    Mithras -> Moses

    Deity

    Sol Invictus -> Jesus

    God

    Dyeus Pater -> Yahweh/Allah

    Mindfulness

    Stoicism -> Faith

    Ritual/Feast

    Mithraic Mysteries -> Mass

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-28 10:19:00 UTC

  • DIVERGENCE OF ADVANCED NATIONS (TODD: –“I am a demographer”–, Which I hope ill

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4yz4zUGlhK8THE DIVERGENCE OF ADVANCED NATIONS

    (TODD: –“I am a demographer”–, Which I hope illustrates my constant point that ‘demographics is everything’. )

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4yz4zUGlhK8

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-28 10:10:00 UTC

  • YOU DON”T THINK OF IT BUT… Delayed marriage and reproduction not only decrease

    YOU DON”T THINK OF IT BUT…

    Delayed marriage and reproduction not only decrease infant mortality, increase investment in children, but they force CLASS SORTITION by demonstrated evidence of success.

    This is the ‘big sort’ that is going on. Except we are not compensating by reducing the reproduction of the underclasses and upwardly redistributing reproduction to their betters.

    THIS STUFF MATTERS.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-28 09:58:00 UTC

  • DOOLITTLE VS HUNTINGTON – MINOR DIFFERENCE WITH MAJOR CONSEQUENCES —“The under

    DOOLITTLE VS HUNTINGTON – MINOR DIFFERENCE WITH MAJOR CONSEQUENCES

    —“The underlying problem for the West is not Islamic

    Fundamentalism. It is Islam, a different civilisation whose

    people are convinced of the superiority of their culture and

    are obsessed with the inferiority ol°their power. The problem

    for Islam is not CIA orthc US. Department of defense. It is

    the West, a different civilisation whose people are convinced

    of the universality of their culture and believe that their

    superior, if declining, power imposes on them the obligation to impose that culture throughout the world. These are the

    basic ingredients that fuel conflict between Islam and the

    West.”— Huntington.

    DOOLITTLE’S EXPANSION OF HUNTINGTON:

    My position is that it is not just the west against islam (since islam is the only civilization hostile to modernity remaining), but that it is Western Aryanism: Truth, Sovereignty, Agency, and Eugenics and the Male Pack Strategy of Nation States, against Semitic Abrahamism: Deceit, Submission, and Dysgenics, and the female herd strategy of empires of ignorance.

    In other words, it is against the Abrahamic Method, and it’s instantiations in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, and Marxism (jewish), postmodernism (christian), Feminism (secular), and Islamism (islamic), forms

    The evidence is what it is. Nothing can change it.

    HUNTINGTON VS DOOLITTLE

    It’s not just culture and belief, but the survival and transcendence of mankind rather than it’s continuous devolution and destruction that occurs wherever islam, judaism spread.

    Huntington was arguing in the cold war model of political and military strategy.

    I’m arguing against extinction of mankind, by the extinction of truth, reason, science, and sovereignty.

    Judaism, Christianity, and Islam are technologies not of rebellion but of undermining, conquest, consumption, and destruction through devolution and consumption.

    Islame consumed each civilization. It is cancer.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-28 09:55:00 UTC

  • THE COLD WAR AND POST-COLD WAR ERAS IN TWO ARTICLES – LITTLE IDEAS HAVE VAST CON

    THE COLD WAR AND POST-COLD WAR ERAS IN TWO ARTICLES – LITTLE IDEAS HAVE VAST CONSEQUENCES

    —“The Cold War was bookended by two articles: “The Sources of Soviet Conduct” (based on the “Long Telegram” ) in 1947 and the “Clash of Civilisations” in 1993. Both articles were published in the journal Foreign Affairs.”—

    THE SOURCES OF SOVIET CONDUCT

    http://www.historyguide.org/Europe/Kennan.html

    THE CLASH OF CIVILIZATIONS

    1) Summary

    https://www.beyondintractability.org/bksum/huntington-clash

    2) Original Article (~28pp)

    The only copy of the original Foreign Affairs article that I can find is on Scribd, so publisher must be working hard to keep it off the internet. I’ll update this with

    3) Book

    In our library.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-28 09:46:00 UTC

  • TODD IN DEPTH: MARRIAGE DIFFERENCES MATTER – PERHAPS MOST OF ALL

    https://www.samizdata.net/2013/11/first-thoughts-on-america-3-0-the-emmanuel-todd-connection/EMMANUEL TODD IN DEPTH: MARRIAGE DIFFERENCES MATTER – PERHAPS MOST OF ALL.

    https://www.samizdata.net/2013/11/first-thoughts-on-america-3-0-the-emmanuel-todd-connection/

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-28 09:24:00 UTC

  • TODD AND FAMILY STRUCTURES

    https://morganwlfc.wordpress.com/2014/03/18/an-introduction-to-emmanuel-todd-in-english-part-one/EMMANUEL TODD AND FAMILY STRUCTURES

    https://morganwlfc.wordpress.com/2014/03/18/an-introduction-to-emmanuel-todd-in-english-part-one/

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-28 09:22:00 UTC

  • HAJNAL LINE —“What is it called? Hansa line? Hanja line? I can’t find anything

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hajnal_lineTHE HAJNAL LINE

    —“What is it called? Hansa line? Hanja line? I can’t find anything when searching for it”—

    Hajnal Line: Line where bipartite manorialism spread in northern europe, producing delayed marriage and higher investment parenting, and seems to have been the cause of low clannishness, the work ethic, and high trust.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hajnal_line

    Just as Kevin Macdonald worked on the Jewish Question, Jayman/Steve Hsu and others on the genetic question, to a large degree HBD_Chick (who stays anonymous just as did Jayman) works on clannishness and she popularized (among the HBD movement) the work of both Emmanuel Todd (French historian), and John Hajnal (Hungarian-British Mathematician) in their work on the differences between populations in europe – particularly given their family structures.

    This work dovetails with Hannan’s “Albion’s Seed” argument about the retention of local british culture as waves of british immigrants spread across the states.

    -Curt Doolittle

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-28 09:18:00 UTC

  • FOR NEWBIES: WORK METHODOLOGY (worth repeating) The way I work is by relating id

    FOR NEWBIES: WORK METHODOLOGY

    (worth repeating)

    The way I work is by relating ideas across the spectrum in a series of shorter arguments – because I ‘whittle away’ at the stone so to speak, turning it to view it from different angles, working to gradually expose the figure (truth) below.

    I try to produce operational definitions in series, and to describe behavior as supply and demand using those series of definitions.

    Then I attempt to turn the fundamental insight into one or more aphorisms (summaries).

    Then to create a narrative that explains the topic and its applications.

    Then to weave these narratives together using the same constant language – this editing is what exhausts me and is why it takes me so long to produce a work.

    WORKFLOW

    I work from an outline of the complete scope of human thought.

    I work through the outline from metaphysics to group competitive strategy.

    Then I work with (many) sketches on FB. I move most of them to the web site.

    Then I collect the best of them into what I call ‘short courses’ or collections of posts.

    Then I take those ‘short courses’ and put them into the book.

    Then edit it all into an explanation.

    That’s my workflow.

    It’s actually painfully methodical. It just doesn’t look like it to the casual observer, because most people are desirous of rushing to judgment whereas i tend to exhaust a topic completely (very) before adding it to the canon. Then refine the network of concepts added to the canon once there.

    cheers.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-28 08:51:00 UTC