Source: Facebook

  • by Gary Knight Thinking on JBP and sovereign individualism. It’s interesting tha

    by Gary Knight

    Thinking on JBP and sovereign individualism.

    It’s interesting that he often cites ancient genetic causes for hierarchy as a defence against SJW complaints regarding patriarchy and capitalism.

    He correctly identifies the depth of hierarchy and inequality in ancient biological programming that goes right back to our most remote ancestors.

    E.g. Dominance hierarchies in lobsters.

    What’s frustrating is he doesn’t apply the same analogy to Western Dominance.

    He attributes the Christian ethic as the source of the classical liberal / enlightenment values that birthed individualism as the source of Western Success (although he doesn’t say ‘Western success’ explicitly.

    It seems apparent in my readings about indo-Europeans that the West developed sovereignty mostly as a bi-product of distributive power which was an accident of geography – sufficient rivers, fertile land, hills, crags and natural barriers to break up the European landscape into defensible City states which led cultural development away from centralised monopoly governments that formed in the Middle East, Egypt etc.

    I think Peterson flaw is he gives to much credit to Christianity in his arguments for promoting the sovereign individual and fails to see the ancient source code for this cultural feature.

    In a sense he feels the words of Abrahamism gifted us new programming for regarding the individual as sacred when it seems we had in us from our martial ethic and domestication allowed the extension of sovereignty down the classes as we had more people capable of the agency to hold the idea.

    Which is why Christian Africa doesn’t have individualism and market success – software can’t take root in hardware that can’t process it.

    ——-

    If I was to use a loose metaphor I feel like Western Sovereignty is like a European plant species that was kept tame my the conditions in which it rooted.

    But once conditions changed and it had its shot it just spread across the earth and dominated – but first it had to be hardened by time and circumstance.

    Eg The plant species Lantana species is a potted flower in the UK.

    Once it was exported to Australia it thrived in the sunlight and grew rampant, choking out competitors.

    I see Western Sovereignty the same.

    Shaped my marital conflict over distributive geography and then once the conditions changes it became hyper-fertile and encompassed the world.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-30 08:54:00 UTC

  • MOST FAILURES OBVIOUS? The study of failures is more valuable than the study of

    https://www.cbinsights.com/research/corporate-innovation-product-fails/AREN’T MOST FAILURES OBVIOUS?

    The study of failures is more valuable than the study of successes. (note that for some reason Google+ made this list twice. lol )

    https://www.cbinsights.com/research/corporate-innovation-product-fails/


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-30 08:34:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6537891/French-police-fire-tear-gas-yellow-vest-demonstrators-Paris-demonstrations-continue.html

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-30 03:07:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    https://www.vox.com/the-goods/2018/12/27/18156431/recession-fashion-design-minimalismhttps://www.vox.com/the-goods/2018/12/27/18156431/recession-fashion-design-minimalism


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-30 02:27:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    https://www.apnews.com/c852e9751cd744b7a27fa9333c14d1a0https://www.apnews.com/c852e9751cd744b7a27fa9333c14d1a0


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-30 01:55:00 UTC

  • “Just saw you table of grammars, there is enough material for ten years of study

    —“Just saw you table of grammars, there is enough material for ten years of study just there.”— Singular Speech

    Yep. Grammars, Dimensional Warranties of Due Diligence, operational language, acquisitions, propertarianism. Those sets of concepts produce a formal logic of social science, expressible not with set language, but with operational language.

    Like I said. There is a wonderful parsimonious elegance underneath it all. It’s beautiful.

    Truth is enough – and it is now possible.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-29 20:48:00 UTC

  • I want to toss out that we are not only seeing stoicism, not only seeing the exp

    I want to toss out that we are not only seeing stoicism, not only seeing the expansion of plot arcs, but also seeing the conversion of characters from pure archetypes to sets of archetype properties – in which I see the resurrection of our ancient gods – leaving the degeneracy of ideals behind us.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-29 20:45:00 UTC

  • If you haven’t done the Netflix > Black Mirror > Bandersnatch thing yet you real

    If you haven’t done the Netflix > Black Mirror > Bandersnatch thing yet you really should. Great use of the tech. Creates interesting expansion on the high-plot-density with many-character-arcs trend we’ve seen over the past decade.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-29 20:43:00 UTC

  • You will be struck by our New Constitution in that it includes what others do no

    You will be struck by our New Constitution in that it includes what others do not: Definitions as constants, variables, and types, and that there is far more definition, constant, variable and type, than their is prescription. This constitution states what is and what must be. What one then does with that constitution in terms of institution and procedure is then quite short – and relatively unassailable.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-29 18:37:00 UTC

  • The structure of aphorism, and the use of aphorism, is a signal in and of itself

    The structure of aphorism, and the use of aphorism, is a signal in and of itself.

    Western Aphorism, Chinese Koan, Scriptural Quote.

    Science, Reason, and Deceit.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-29 18:30:00 UTC