Source: Facebook

  • IT!!!! by Pat Buchanan, today. In the long run, history will validate Donald Tru

    https://www.wnd.com/2019/01/memo-to-trump-declare-an-emergency/#0x9xMvKsy7YcjCRg.99DO IT!!!!

    by Pat Buchanan, today.

    In the long run, history will validate Donald Trump’s stand on a border wall to defend the sovereignty and security of the United States.

    Why? Because mass migration from the global South, not climate change, is the real existential crisis of the West.

    The American people know this, and even the elites sense it.

    Think not? Well, check out the leading liberal newspapers Thursday.

    The Washington Post and the New York Times each had two front-page stories about the president’s battle with Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer on funding the border wall.

    Inside the first section, the Post had more stories, including one describing walls in history from China’s Great Wall to the Berlin Wall to the Israeli West Bank wall to the wall separating Hungary from Serbia.

    Inside the Times was a story on a new anti-immigration party, Vox, surging in Andalusia in Spain, and a story about African migrants being welcomed in Malta after being denied entry into Europe.

    Another Times story related how the new president of Brazil, Jair Bolsonaro, has pulled out of a U.N. pact on migration, declaring, “Brazil has a sovereign right to decide whether or not it accepts immigrants.”

    Half the columns on the op-ed pages of the papers dealt with Trump, immigration and the wall. And there was nothing significant in either on the Democrats’ hot new issue, a Green New Deal.

    Consider. In 1992, this writer’s presidential campaign had to fight to have inserted in the GOP platform a call for “structures” on the border.

    Now, the whole Western world is worried about its borders as issues of immigration and identity convulse almost every country.

    Looking ahead, does anyone think Americans in 2030 are going to be more concerned about the border between North Korea and South Korea, or Turkey and Syria, or Kuwait and Iraq, or Russia and Ukraine, than about the 2,000-mile border between the U.S. and Mexico?

    Does anyone think Pelosi’s position that a wall is immoral will not be regarded as absurd?

    America’s southern border is eventually going to be militarized and defended, or the United States, as we have known it, is going to cease to exist. And Americans will not go gentle into that good night.

    Whatever one may think of the face-off Tuesday with “Chuck and Nancy,” Trump’s portrait of an unsustainable border crisis is dead on: “In the last two years, ICE officers made 266,000 arrests of aliens with criminal records, including those charged or convicted of 100,000 assaults, 30,000 sex crimes and 4,000 violent killings.”

    The Democrats routine retort, that native-born Americans have a higher crime rate, will not suffice as new atrocities, like those Trump related, are reported and repeated before November 2020.

    What should Trump do now? Act. He cannot lose this battle with Pelosi without demoralizing his people and imperiling his presidency.

    Since FDR, we have had presidential government. And when U.S. presidents have been decisive activists, history has rewarded their actions.

    Lincoln suspended habeas corpus. On taking office, FDR declared a bank holiday. When Britain was barely hanging on in World War II, he swapped 50 destroyers for British bases. He ordered U.S. ships to chase down German submarines and lied about it. Truman fired Gen. MacArthur.

    Reagan fired the striking air controllers and ordered the military to occupy Grenada to stop Marxist thugs who had taken over in a coup from taking 500 U.S. medical students hostage.

    Critics raged: Reagan had no right to invade. But the American people rewarded Reagan with a 49-state landslide.

    Trump should declare a national emergency, shift funds out of the Pentagon, build his wall, open the government and charge Democrats with finding excuses not to secure our border because they have a demographic and ideological interest in changing the face of the nation.

    For the larger the share of the U.S. population that requires welfare, the greater the need for more social workers, and the more voters there will be to vote to further grow the liberal welfare state.

    The more multiracial, multiethnic, multicultural, multilingual America becomes – the less it looks like Ronald Reagan’s America – the more dependably Democratic it will become.

    The Democratic Party is hostile to white men, because the smaller the share of the U.S. population that white men become, the sooner that Democrats inherit the national estate.

    The only way to greater “diversity,” the golden calf of the Democratic Party, is to increase the number of women, African-Americans, Asians and Hispanics, and thereby reduce the number of white men.

    The decisive issues on which Trump was elected were not the old Republican litany of tax cuts, conservative judges and increased defense spending.

    They were securing the borders, extricating America from foolish wars, eliminating trade deficits with NAFTA nations, the EU and China, making allies pay their fair share of the common defense, resurrecting our manufacturing base and getting along with Russia.

    “America First!” is still a winning hand.

    Read more at https://www.wnd.com/2019/01/memo-to-trump-declare-an-emergency/#0x9xMvKsy7YcjCRg.99


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-11 17:47:00 UTC

  • There is no wisdom literature that is not false, that cannot be broken in to ope

    There is no wisdom literature that is not false, that cannot be broken in to operational, fully accounted language.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-11 17:43:00 UTC

  • SO WHAT DOES GA BRING TO DERRIDA’S TABLE? All I see is a series of publications

    SO WHAT DOES GA BRING TO DERRIDA’S TABLE?

    All I see is a series of publications using hand waving as an attempt to provide a pseudoscientific defense of Derrida, in that ‘well’ everything evolved from language therefore we can evolve anything with language. In other words, postmodernism.

    GA tells us nothing that we don’t already know. So, what is it that GA brings to the table? What can we deduce from it? What application can we put it to? What purpose does this theory solve?

    I understand language as consisting of continuous recursive production of transactional measurements and linguistic competition for demonstrated results as improving measurements (truth) and biasing measurements (frauds and deceits). Whether a cliff or a climb is irrelevant.

    The central problem is one of computational costs in that production versus time and energy costs of that production. In other words, language tends to be pragmatically adjusted for precision over time, given the context.

    So what? That means we can tell truth and lie. It means that competitive ability highly reflects linguistic precision. It means that competitive ability provides competitive advantage. Because otherwise physical marginal indifference provides too little competitive advantage.

    So what does postmodern literary drivel bring to an otherwise well understood table?

    What I hear is that ‘its a useful means of manipulating people by deceit.’

    People lacking knowledge, power, achievement, and capital like the priests of the middle east attempting to destroy the empire with christianity judaism and islam. Lies are a competitive strategy. The entire abrahamic artifice is based upon the competitive utility of lying.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-11 17:41:00 UTC

  • LIES OF RIGHT ABSOLUTISTS AND LEFT ABSOLUTISTS ARE STILL JUST LIES – AN ADMISSIO

    LIES OF RIGHT ABSOLUTISTS AND LEFT ABSOLUTISTS ARE STILL JUST LIES – AN ADMISSION OF FAILURE.

    The difference between this article and some bit of occult nonsense by Evola is simply the flavor of sophism. No one disputes that language makes possible a multitude of paradigmatic lies of coercion, but it makes only one most parsimonious paradigmatic truth of decidability.

    The Pretense of Wisdom in the Tempo of Syllables, and the power of suggestion by loading and framing inarticulate and untestable prose. “Woo Woo” for the post-theological era. Science requires knowledge. “Woo” takes advantage of ignorance. Leftist or right lies are indifferent.

    No one disputes the relationship between consciousness and language – only the degree. It still does not justify that the history of man is a long filter of anthropocentric perception and intuition as we gradually eliminate ignorance, error, bias and deceit – despite the priests.

    Termination of lies and liars regardless of herd or pack is in the interest of both herd and pack.

    https://thejournalofneoabsolutism.wordpress.com/2017/05/02/the-anthropoetics-of-power/


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-11 17:05:00 UTC

  • EVERYTHING ROTHBARD SAYS IS A LIE 1. Rothbard and Hoppe always start with some a

    EVERYTHING ROTHBARD SAYS IS A LIE

    1. Rothbard and Hoppe always start with some artificial moral license to property rather than that property produces a division of labor that is more rewarding than predation (for the able) and is the only reason for the able to cooperate, and the only means of cooperation at scale.

    2. In the Free Rider Problem, the answer is that if you are a free rider you are consuming opportunity and resources that could by replaced by those who DO contribute to the commons that they benefit from. This is in fact what people demonstrably do: outcast free riders.

    3. We inherit the investments of our ancestors we do not free ride upon them because they are ours by inheritance, in exchange for persisting the genes, civilization, culture and investments of those previous generations, just as we hope following generations will preserve ours.

    4. —“must therefore be supplied outside the free market, by the coercive force of the government”– No, it is because it is an unsubstitutable good. There is no restitution for lost life nor substitution for risk of life. NONE.

    … I can’t even continue refuting rothbard because it makes me so angry that we have lost two generations to (((more lies))).

    EVERYTHING ROTHBARD SAYS IS A (((LIE))) DEFENDED BY A HALF TRUTH, AND APPEAL TO REASONABLENESS.

    …. EVERYTHING. YES, ….. EVERYTHING.

    Rothbard is only useful in so far as we can study his excellence at Straw Manning, Undue Praise, Pilpul and Critique, and by that study, understand why we moral men are vulnerable to that category of (((lies))).

    It’s just lies.

    ROTHBARD IS JUST (((A LIAR))) THAT SUCKERS MIDDLE CLASS YOUNG MEN, LIKE MARXISM WORKING CLASS MEN, LIKE POSTMODERNISM WOMEN AND NON-MEN.

    Everything he says is false. Study rothbard to learn how to lie, so that we can end lying to our people.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-11 16:39:00 UTC

  • One can have an interests in the criminally obtained, or the reciprocaly obtaine

    One can have an interests in the criminally obtained, or the reciprocaly obtained, or obtained by homesteading (creating).

    Potential Property consists in those interests that have been obtained under the natural law of reciprocity.

    Property by norm consists of that which others agree not to impose costs upon.

    Property rights consist of that which is not only norm but insured by a third party to whom you may appeal for enforcement.

    It is not JUST that one demonstrates property by what he defends – he demonstrates INTEREST by what he defends, but he cannot defend an interest that which was produced by crime or deceit without violating the natural law of reciprocity.

    I think what seems circular to you is that you’re not starting with reciprocity first, then evolving property from it, and instead, trying to (impossibly) evolve reciprocity from interest.

    Reciprocity > demonstrated interest > agreement on scope (property) > insurance of scope (rights)


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-11 16:28:00 UTC

  • PROPERTARIANISM: The Power to Deny Power

    PROPERTARIANISM: The Power to Deny Power.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-11 16:24:00 UTC

  • I TOLD YOU SO… A Moral License A Set of Demands A Means of Transition A Method

    I TOLD YOU SO…

    A Moral License

    A Set of Demands

    A Means of Transition

    A Method of altering the status quo.

    Welcome to the revolution.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-11 16:23:00 UTC

  • John Mark Rocks. One thing: He is playing up the nationalism race issue for good

    John Mark Rocks.

    One thing: He is playing up the nationalism race issue for good reasons that appeal to the audience.

    Yes, propertarianism allows our people to solve this issue. However, while propertarianism advocates nationalism, it is a race-independent law.

    It will work for ALL people.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-11 15:10:00 UTC

  • LIVE STREAM ON PROPERTARIANISM Another long video chat with Brave New World Chan

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ge0k-tWQCrAGOOD LIVE STREAM ON PROPERTARIANISM

    Another long video chat with Brave New World Channel’ s

    Fred van’t Ent (I don’t know when it will be released)

    Very good. Recommend this one highly for skeptics.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ge0k-tWQCrA


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-11 15:08:00 UTC