https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lkkw3-JsYEgTHE SPENGLER CHRONICLES:
“INVICTUS, HEATHEN, DOOLITTLE”
(Great Conversation.)
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-14 12:12:00 UTC
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lkkw3-JsYEgTHE SPENGLER CHRONICLES:
“INVICTUS, HEATHEN, DOOLITTLE”
(Great Conversation.)
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-14 12:12:00 UTC

photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/49948394_10156916627572264_5888674864629284864_n_10156916627567264.jpg Steve PenderAppeal to truth seekers to empower priests who pose as intermediates for the source of truth.Jan 14, 2019, 12:07 PMCurt DoolittleTruth or utility?Jan 14, 2019, 12:13 PMSteven JacksonReligion offers truth in the same way snake oil salesmen offers a cure.
The customer is still looking for a cure but the snake oil salesman doesn’t deliver the cure but a hope of one.
I stand by thisJan 14, 2019, 12:47 PMCurt DoolittletrueJan 14, 2019, 12:47 PMCurt Doolittleheroin dealer offers heroin.Jan 14, 2019, 12:47 PMLisa OuthwaiteSome pretty broad strokes being applied here. I’m assuming you don’t mean that there are no universal truths embedded within religion?Jan 14, 2019, 1:15 PMLisa OuthwaiteWho doesn’t love a double negative? 🤪Jan 14, 2019, 1:16 PMSteven JacksonCurt Doolittle rat experiments show that drug addiction correlates with social ostracism.
The hormones stimulated by social acceptance can also be stimulated through the use of narcotics.
Marx was literally correct when he described religion as being the opiate of the masses.
The difference between the drug peddler and the priest is that the unifying narrative of religion can be put to use to build trust and social cohesion. The priest builds social capital by writing a common hymn book so everyone sings the same song.
The drug dealer creates a demand for drugs and nothing else. He preys on low trust societies with low social cohesion and makes it worse, he is a parasite because he drains the society of social capital.
Religion falls apart when it’s lies are exposed, but many are willing to overlook the lies because of the benefit provided by living among those singing off the same sheet.Jan 14, 2019, 1:17 PMNick HeywoodNo! It ain’t!
Religion is observed, but un-scientifically explained, framework of behavioral decidability.
And usually reduces to group evolutionary reciprocity strategy.
“If you want to be a member of this group”?… “you’ll behave thus” “and decide crap according to these rules”!
“We know these principles, that govern limits, of behaviour and decisions work”! “We’ve seen ‘them’ work” “and our ancestors were successful because they adhered to them”.
Another question becomes… “what’s the goal, aim, proposed outcome”? That’s a different question, though. 🙂
Nothing at all wrong with religion. It’s natural!
As long as ya don’t wanna colonise the universe or f around with capital development, resource distribution, engineering, biology, chemistry, maths, physics’n’quantum shit etc.😁
Once you’ve developed that capability?
Religion’s no good to ya! You’ll just hurt ya’self and melt shit. 🙂Jan 14, 2019, 1:44 PMNick HeywoodUtility for the hierarchy! 🙂😉😎Jan 14, 2019, 2:00 PMSteven JacksonNick Heywood religion has always been a factor in every advanced society. The industrial revolution occurred under puritanical Protestantism and Presbyterianism. The medieval Christian monks preserved literature and science (albeit after destroying it in the early years of Christianity.) The Greek philosophers flourished under their pagan ancestor worship etc etc.
When we have dispensed with religion (a unifying narrative) we have ended up with relativism and pseudoscience. The USSR is a prime example of this, the communist narrative was destructive and couldn’t capture a second generation. The initial cohesion, gained through genocide, produced the space race and Kalashnikov. A generation later it produced only civil war, Mafia and rusting public utilities.
Similar forces destroyed the narrative in the west and we have trannys and feminism.
Religion as a means of social cohesion seems to be necessary, as knowledge has progressed, religion has evolved. We just need to evolve it to agree with what we now understand to be true. The modernists threw the baby out with the bath water when they misunderstood “God is dead”Jan 14, 2019, 2:27 PMSteven J. WoronLike the new profile pic btw…Jan 14, 2019, 3:02 PMNick HeywoodThe unifying narrative became a tyranny in and of itself. Which really f’d things up.Jan 14, 2019, 6:10 PMDylan KnowlesModern religion is not worshipping a faith, it is the worship of mammon. Reject the modern world, reject degeneracy.Jan 14, 2019, 9:27 PM

Source date (UTC): 2019-01-14 11:52:00 UTC
NORMIE VERSION OF “WHAT IS PROPERTARIANISM?”
(via Bill and Curt)
Propertarianism is a method – it’s the completion of the scientific method, and that scientific method applied to EVERYTHING – including language, psychology, social science, economics, politics and group competitive strategies.
So while propertarianism consists of the completion of the scientific method, what results from that scientific method, is scientific law, and scientific government, which makes it possible for us to cooperate in the post industrial era.
And the benefit of scientific law and scientific government is that it ends parasitism and deceit in politics economics and law, and provides scientific solutions to the conflicts of politics economics and law.
In the broader historical sense, propertarianism completes the greco-anglo empirical program to complete the sciences, and to eliminate bias, wishful thinking, deception, superstition, idealism, and pseudoscience from the the public discourse that we call ‘the informational commons”.
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-14 11:23:00 UTC

photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/49811690_10156916370977264_1498804850270404608_o_10156916370972264.jpg THE MOST USEFUL MAP OF THE WORLD.
(Add the rivers and you’re there.)Marcin MoczarnyShit in streets?Jan 14, 2019, 9:42 AMMurphy CellAka: Where the next big war should go down.Jan 14, 2019, 9:50 AMAlex MacleodHell is other people?Jan 14, 2019, 9:56 AMTomás Rodriguez VillegasWhat does it rank?Jan 14, 2019, 10:09 AMGordon E. ComstockAre you seriously asking that or you’re just fishing for witty replies?Jan 14, 2019, 10:16 AMSteve PenderpopulationJan 14, 2019, 10:20 AMNicola PaviaThe top 20 most populated citiesJan 14, 2019, 10:27 AMTomás Rodriguez VillegasThen it’s wrong, Buenos Aires is not even in the top 5.Jan 14, 2019, 10:32 AMTomás Rodriguez VillegasGordon E. Comstock I know about the different population sizes of many different cities around the world, that’s why I can tell this ranking is bullshit. But before calling it bullshit I ask what it ranks because I may be missing something. Apparently not, it’s just a BS ranking.Jan 14, 2019, 10:33 AMGordon E. ComstockIt’s population density, you unintuitive, low IQ dolts! Those cities aren’t supposed to be the top 20 most populous, they are marked as way of clarification (I’m not precisely sure what it’s supposed to be clarifying, but it’s obviously not a top 20 ffs)Jan 14, 2019, 10:36 AMTomás Rodriguez VillegasIt would STILL be wrong, and no, it’s not population density, unless you think numbers like 13 million for Buenos Aires is refering to DENSITY and not overall population.Jan 14, 2019, 10:37 AMGordon E. Comstockoh for f*ck’s sakes! Maybe those are some especially densely packed cities (that’s why there’s no Mexico city highlighted)? I dunno. Otherwise the map could be read as just showing urbanization which more or less equals pop density.
Please tell me, when you see a figure attached to Lichtenstein on a map of Europe, do you automatically jump to the conclusion that it somehow ranks Lichtenstein!?Jan 14, 2019, 10:45 AMTomás Rodriguez VillegasMexico City IS highlighted and is ranked number 5, did you even spent one fucking second paying attention to the map or what? stop wasting my time.Jan 14, 2019, 10:46 AMGordon E. ComstockYou asked the question, you effin moron. The scale is most likely pop densityJan 14, 2019, 10:51 AMVoodoo JonesyLagos on point with the round figureJan 14, 2019, 10:52 AMTomás Rodriguez VillegasRead again. I asked about the ranking, not the fucking scale. And being that I live in the city which is ranked number 2 I think I can tell if its bullshit or not. Fuck off.Jan 14, 2019, 10:59 AMMary RomanoEnergy consumption?Jan 14, 2019, 11:11 AMNicola PaviaTomás Rodriguez Villegas City population is actually quite hard to measure precisely because some people will just count the city proper, others include suburbs, and in some countries an entire region will count as a “city”. So take these numbers with a grain of salt. Maybe these researchers were way too generous with which parts of Argentina they counted as “Buenos Aires”Jan 14, 2019, 11:56 AMTomás Rodriguez VillegasNicola Pavia, the numbers for Buenos Aires are actually accurate but a little bit outdated. 13 million is pretty close but I think it might have hiked to 14-15 million lately. Anyways, let’s say the number is right, in the case of Buenos Aires they are counting suburbs/outskirts, because the city itself is only 3.5 million. In the case of NYC they are probably doing the opposite, not counting the five boroughs completely maybe? NY is way over 8 million people. Sao Paulo and Mexico City are both bigger than Buenos Aires, which comes third in Latin America. And it’s just impossible that Lima makes it to this ranking but LA or Chicago don’t. The most populous cities are by far in Asia, particularly in China, India, Bangladesh and Indonesia, and also Tokyo Japan of course.Jan 14, 2019, 12:01 PMOsman ErdoganA.k.a where the nukes need to be sent.Jan 14, 2019, 1:04 PMCurt Doolittle(a) the site that produced this map is closed. (b) the site that contains the world data does not show the detail this clearly. (c) I chose this map entirely because of the clarity of the population distribution. (d) I do not know the ranking but I”ll find out. I may be urban, metropolitan or regional population or pop density. It might be rate of change. Kinshasa is what’s throwing me. but in general it’s pretty close to largest cities depending on which of the four values above is being measured.Jan 14, 2019, 10:59 PMSamuel CharlickThe Tokyo metropolis, which has consumed many other large cities such as Yokohama and Kawasaki, is the most populous metropolitan area in the world and exceeds 38 million people, and also expands by a further 2.5 million in day times due to commuters.Jan 14, 2019, 11:37 PMTomás Rodriguez Villegas^trueJan 15, 2019, 5:59 AMTHE MOST USEFUL MAP OF THE WORLD.
(Add the rivers and you’re there.)

Source date (UTC): 2019-01-14 09:40:00 UTC

photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/50448685_10156916363952264_2123754718193778688_o_10156916363947264.jpg https://brilliantmaps.com/religion-world-map/Kari Anne DorstadVery nice Map curt ! I like that color combo ! Very artistic map ! I Love Map Art ! I have an old Globe with the Former Soviet union on itJan 14, 2019, 11:29 AMMax AdnerFrom the link: “despite right-wing fear-mongering”. Ugh…Jan 14, 2019, 2:21 PMhttps://brilliantmaps.com/religion-world-map/

Source date (UTC): 2019-01-14 09:36:00 UTC

photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/50023961_10156916363327264_4678214104064720896_n_10156916363322264.jpg Greg HamiltonDiversity + proximityJan 14, 2019, 12:56 PMMike Williams= problemsJan 14, 2019, 9:23 PMKari Anne DorstadWow I like that color combo on your map sir !Jan 14, 2019, 9:47 PM

Source date (UTC): 2019-01-14 09:36:00 UTC
Curt Doolittle shared a post.
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-14 09:30:00 UTC
WORDS IN RUSSIAN BUT NOT IN ENGLISH TELL US A LOT ABOUT RUSSIAN EMOTIONAL NORMATIVITY
1. Poshlost
Russian-American writer Vladimir Nabokov, who lectured on Slavic Studies to students in America, admitted that he couldn’t translate this word, which every Russian easily understands.
What is poshlost (пошлость)? Nabokov gives the following example: “Open any magazine and you’ll certainly find something like this – a family just bought a radio (a car, a refrigerator, silverware, it doesn’t matter), and the mother is clapping her hands, mad with joy, the children gathered around her with their mouths agape; the baby and the dog are leaning towards the table on which the `idol’ has been hoisted… a bit to the side victoriously stands the father, the proud breadwinner. The intense “poshlosity” of such a scene comes not from the false exaggeration of the dignity of a particular useful object, but from the assumption that the greatest joy can be bought and that such a purchase ennobles the buyer.”
“This word includes triviality, vulgarity, sexual promiscuity and soullessness,” added the late Professor Svetlana Boym from Harvard University.
2. Nadryv
German Wikipedia has an entire article dedicated to the word nadryv (надрыв). This is a key concept in the writings of Russian writer Fyodor Dostoevsky. The word describes an uncontrollable emotional outburst, when a person releases intimate, deeply hidden feelings.
Moreover, Dostoevsky’s nadryv implies a situation in which the protagonist indulges in the thought that he can find in his soul something that may not even exist. That’s why the nadryv often expressed imaginary, excessively exaggerated and distorted feelings. One part of the novel, Brothers Karamazov, is called “Nadryvs.”
3. Khamstvo
Soviet émigré writer Sergei Dovlatov wrote about this phenomenon in the article “This Untranslatable Khamstvo,” commenting that “Khamstvo is nothing other than rudeness, arrogance and insolence multiplied by impunity.”
In Dovlatov’s view, it’s with impunity that khamstvo (хамство) outright kills us. It’s impossible to fight it; you can only resign yourself to it. “I’ve lived in this mad, wonderful, horrifying New York for ten years and am amazed by the absence of khamstvo. Anything can happen to you here, but there’s no khamstvo. You can be robbed but no one will shut the door in your face,” added the writer.
4. Stushevatsya
Some linguists believe stushevatsya (стушеваться) was introduced by Fyodor Dostoevsky, who used it for the first time in a figurative sense in his novella, The Double. This word means to be less noticeable, go to the background, lose an important role, noticeably leave the scene, become confused in an awkward or unexpected situation, become meek.
5. Toska
This Russian word can be translated as “emotional pain,” or “melancholy,” but this does not transmit all of its depth. Vladimir Nabokov wrote that, “Not one word in English can transmit all the nuances of toska (тоска). This is a feeling of spiritual suffering without any particular reason. On a less dolorous level, it’s the indistinct pain of the soul…vague anxiety, nostalgia, amorous longing.”
6. Bytie
This word comes from the Russian byt'(to exist). In Russian-English dictionaries this philosophical concept is translated as “being.” However, bytie (бытие) is not just life or existence, it’s the existence of an objective reality that is independent of human consciousness (cosmos, nature, matter).
7. Bespredel
Eliot Borenstein, professor of Slavic Studies at New York University, explains that bespredel (беспредел) literally means “without restrictions or limits.” Translators often use “lawlessness” (bezzakonie). In Russian, however, the meaning of bespredel is much broader, and refers to the behavior of a person who violates not only the law, but also moral and social norms.
8. Avos’
It’s rather difficult to explain to people of other nationalities what this means. Interestingly, many people believe that avos’ (авось) is the main Russian national trait. Hoping for the avos’ means doing something without planning, without putting in much effort, counting on success.
9. Yurodivy
Yurodivy: Russian ‘Umberto Eco’ demystifies the Holy Fool
Yurodivys (юродивые) in ancient Rus’ were people who voluntarily renounced earthly pleasures in the name of Christ. Such people looked like madmen, and led a wandering lifestyle with the aim of obtaining inner peace and defeating the root of all sin – pride. They were valued and were considered close to God. Their opinions and prophecies were taken into consideration and they were even feared.
10. Podvig
This word is often translated into English as “feat” or “achievement,” but it has other meanings. Podvig (подвиг) is not just a result, or the achievement of an objective; it’s a brave and heroic act, an action performed in difficult circumstances. Russian literature often mentions military, civilian podvigs and even scientific podvigs. Moreover, this word is a synonym for selfless acts, for example, a podvig in the name of love.
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-14 07:26:00 UTC
Thank you John Mark, for all you are doing for us.
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-14 07:20:00 UTC
RUSSIANS HAVE A WORD FOR REALITY
Bytie (бытие), Russian.
This word comes from the Russian byt'(to exist). In Russian-English dictionaries this philosophical concept is translated as “being.” However, bytie (бытие) is not just life or existence, it’s the existence of an objective reality that is independent of human consciousness (cosmos, nature, matter).
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-14 07:18:00 UTC