Curt Doolittle shared a memory.
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-19 18:12:00 UTC
Curt Doolittle shared a memory.
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-19 18:12:00 UTC
“One Law. Zero Tolerance.”
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-19 17:24:00 UTC
THANKS TO THE LONG TIME FOLLOWERS: WE’RE COMPLETE.
Thank all of you who over the past years have stuck with me while I try to develop the skill to communicate these ideas. You were a huge part of the process. And I couldn’t really have done it without your help. Every question, every criticism, every bit of advice, every contribution to the thought mattered.
It is so much easier to explain everything now. And we’re all getting better every day that passes.
Change the world by removing the veil of deceit – one person at a time, one day at a time.
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-19 11:26:00 UTC
A LAW DEGREE MIGHT HINDER YOUR UNDERSTANDING OF PROPERTARIANISM
by Daniel Roland Anderson (law)
Depending on one’s academic and personal background, a law degree does significantly more harm than good when it comes to understanding Curt’s work. (Math, Engineering, and Philosophy majors can help. English Lit, Sociology, and Political Science will hinder.)
Mostly, a law degree hurts, because one learns to conflate legislation and regulation with actual law—which you won’t learn in law school at all.
And the version of Common Law schools teach (pilpul) will definitely do more harm than good because reciprocity has no role in the process, unless learning how to circumvent, distort, denigrate, and subvert reciprocity counts as a “role.”
Law schools excel at this.
Also, Dunning-Kruger will be an issue for most law school grads.
The situation is actually worse than I’m making out, but I’m spending some time with a friend who grew up working in the fields with me, so I’m in a good mood.
This kid just turned 32 and intuitively grasps the basics of Curt’s work very, very quickly.
He graduated high school with a 1.7 GPA, played a little college football and then never held an 8-5 job—opting instead for work where results determined income 100%. He’s trained people and started businesses and is raising a family.
He has a real law degree. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-19 11:22:00 UTC
Curt Doolittle shared a video.
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-19 10:19:00 UTC
REITERATING MY POINT: IT”S CLASS
(Sensitive topic warning. For Friends Only.)
We “white folks” have our own derogatory class names for each other – and lots of them. The “forbidden word” for our ex-slave community members is the equivalent of what we white folks call our fellow ‘trailer-tr-sh’.
Similarly, if you look up all the pejorative names for different racial groups, you can divide them into classes (I would do it here but it would be banned.)
The point being, that our complaints are mostly that of class and difference in group behavior at the lower end, and the similarity of class behavior at the upper end.
I mean, at island 120 you start getting close, and by 140, as long as you’re an aristotelian not a theist, people around the world are pretty much the same, because they are far less dependent on imitation and consensus and far more so on falsification, knowledge, and reason.
Now, they still tend to follow their own signals, so what is good and traditional to a group remains the same. But it is possible to cooperate fairly easily at the top – which is where the cooperation occurs: on behalf of the people who are not at the top.
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-19 09:40:00 UTC
—“I have a law degree and i still don’t understand.”–Shane Mark
If it wasn’t excruciatingly difficult, someone would have done it before me. Instead, a host of intellectuals during the late 19th through mid 20th tried and failed. But since that time we’ve had computer science (existential) instead of mathematics (ideal), and cognitive science (existential) instead of psychology (pseudoscience), and economics (real) instead of sociology (pseudoscience). There are lots of shoulders of giants to stand upon in the late 20th and early 21st when I’m working.
It’s possible to create strictly constructed law on one hand that is testable by computer software, and a chain of dependency that is testable by computer, and to provide the law, prosecutors, lawyers, judges, and the jury with a set of tests for truthful speech – which cannot be performed by computer.
Law of tort is quite good really. Legislation and regulation are reasonably good in the anglo (common law) tradition. We just need these tools, universal standing in matters of the commons, thereby ending disintermediation by the state, and providing a via negativa means of competition (court) in addition to the via-positiva means of competition (markets).
Now, increase the definition and scope of property (see property-in-toto) to the full suite of things that people act to invest in producing whether by expenditure of forgone opportunity, or expenditure of time, effort, or resources, (including manners, ethics, morals, norms, commons, capital et all) and it is very hard for special interests (and usurpers) to survive. And even more so, nearly impossible to seek rents (more on that another time.)
– Eradicate false and ir-reciprocal commercial, financial, economic, political, and informational speech in the commons.
– Restore libel and slander.
– Prohibit baiting into moral hazard in the law.
– Replace copyright with creative commons.
– Eliminate consumer interest (yes, really, and it’s not hard).
– Privatize (contract out) all bureaucratic functions.
– Replace private pensions with public (they aren’t possible anyway in current and future economies)…. meaning adopt the singapore model of ‘involuntarily buying insurance to protect your peers from your late age poverty’.
Much, more detail, but all of it is rather ordinary.
I can’t write twenty pages here but just take it for granted that I’ve worked through these ideas in painful detail.
We can depoliticize, de-propagandize, eliminate fraud and deceit in every aspect of public life, restore the civic society, halve the time people must work to pay off homes, drastically reduce the cost of education, and dozens of other great improvements and all it will do is end parasitism by the political, bureaucratic, and financial classes.
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-19 09:04:00 UTC
UPDATE: I have 660 open friend requests, and about 60 slots open on this account. This pass I’m taking everyone with military experience, people with lots of shared connections, and ‘promoters’ when I run across them.
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-18 21:47:00 UTC
Curt Doolittle shared a post.
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-18 21:22:00 UTC
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-18 21:21:00 UTC