Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • Untitled

    China, Russia Building Super-EMP Bombs for ‘Blackout Warfare’

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-24 18:08:00 UTC

  • Eric Orwoll says followers of propertarianism are “losers”

    Eric Orwoll says followers of propertarianism are “losers”.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-24 15:19:00 UTC

  • Look nitwits. You can try hard to criticize propertarianism. And you’re going to

    Look nitwits. You can try hard to criticize propertarianism. And you’re going to fail. I promise. It’s not gonna happen. That you don’t know this yet is just a matter of time. It is what it is.

    What you can criticize is:

    1) the PRACTICAL possibility of sufficient power to produce a constitutional order making use of it in law.

    2) the POLICIES I’ve recommended for the restoration of the middle class at the expense of the financial, political, academic, and media classes.

    3) the PREFERENCE of some alternative order that is NOT dependent upon natural law, but some other set of rules.

    To engage in any of those criticisms you must produce one of the following:

    a) some sort of argument that a few hundred thousand men can’t disrupt cooperative velocity in all its forms sufficiently to bring the government to the negotiating table.

    b) some set of arguments that these are not already the general beliefs and wants of the populace (other than voluntary disassociation).

    c) that you can produce a recipe for the construction of an alternative order by equally operational means.

    You can criticize it.

    So do it.

    Or realize you can’t and do us a favor of not wasting our time.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-24 15:18:00 UTC

  • “IF YOU WON’T FIGHT YOU DON’T MATTER” (orwoll’s latest shot) OK. This is rather

    “IF YOU WON’T FIGHT YOU DON’T MATTER”

    (orwoll’s latest shot)

    OK. This is rather silly. Here is your entire argument:

    “I don’t think it’s gonna work.

    The government is scary.

    I don’t wanna take the risk.

    I don’t want you guys to take the risk.

    There won’t be enough of you to take the risk.

    I don’t care about my people or the future just the present.

    I’m gonna pretend that christ will save me.

    I don’t understand your stuff but I’m gonna call you a cult (religious) leader – even if I would’t call marxists, postmodernists, feminists, cults but philosophical movements.

    I don’t understand the policy demands, or the changes to the constitution and the laws and the practical results that they would produce.

    I wanna do nothing – just like we’ve been doing.”

    You don’t offer anything to counter the epistemology, formal law, the constitution changes, or the set of policies.

    you only say “I dunno but I am ignorant and scared and I don’t want anything to do with it.”

    Which I agree with. Because you don’t matter.

    You can thank us if we are successful.

    And virtue signal yourself if we are not.

    And unless you are going to offer something substantive this is not worth my time. So let’s run a test: Let’s see how everything plays out. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-24 15:08:00 UTC

  • “The solution is for us to stop being reasonable. Stop compromising and start be

    —“The solution is for us to stop being reasonable. Stop compromising and start being intolerant and objective. The most intolerant win, and that needs to be us. Propertarianism gives us the tools to be totally intolerant and objective in our demands. This is the reason we are the Winning Right.”–Noah J Revoy

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-24 14:21:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-24 14:20:00 UTC

  • TERMINOLOGICAL SUBTLETY I use the spectra: Display (visible signals) … Word (s

    TERMINOLOGICAL SUBTLETY

    I use the spectra:

    Display (visible signals)

    … Word (sound/speech)

    … … Deed (action)

    Sense (stimuli)

    … Perception (stimuli with memory)

    … … Prediction (imagine)

    … … … Experience

    … … … … Memory (result)

    … … … … … Recursion

    … … … … … … Intuition

    … … … … … … … Free Association

    … … … … … … … … Thinking

    … … … … … … … … … Reasoning

    … … … … … … … … … … Calculating

    … … … … … … … … … … … Computing

    Imitation (physical) >

    … Empathy (emotional) >

    … … Sympathy (thought) >

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-24 12:08:00 UTC

  • PROPERTARIAN PARSIMONY GIVEN THE FOLLOWING Whereas life defends investment of 1.

    PROPERTARIAN PARSIMONY

    GIVEN THE FOLLOWING

    Whereas life defends investment of

    1. Time,

    2. Effort,

    3. Resources,

    4. Forgone opportunity

    Where defended investments consist of:

    1. Self-Property – Body, Time, Actions, Memory, Concepts, Status, etc.

    2. Personal Property – Houses, Cars, “Things”, etc.

    3. Kinship Property – Mates, Children, Family, Friends, etc.

    4. Cooperative Property – Organizational and Knowledge ties.

    5. Shareholder Property – Recorded and Quantified shares. Citizenship.

    6. Common Property – Territorial and capital interests, Artificial Property.

    7. Informal Institutional Property – Manners, Ethics, Morals, Myths, Rituals.

    8. Formal Institutional Property – Religion, Government, Laws.

    Where reciprocity consists of:

    1. Productive

    2. Fully informed

    3. Warrantied

    4. Voluntary transfer

    5. Free negative externality.

    Where ir-reciprocity in action consists of:

    Action:

    1. Murder

    2. Harm

    3. Theft

    —

    4. Fraud (in all forms)

    5. Free Riding (in all forms: Socialization of losses, Privatization of commons)

    7. Blackmail

    8. Rent Seeking.

    9. Conspiracy

    —

    10. Propagandizing (Poisoning the well)

    11. Conversion (Poisoning the well)

    —

    12. Immigration,

    13. Conquest

    14. Genocide

    And where ir-reciprocity in speech consists in:

    Speech

    1. Intent to lie.

    2. Intent to deceive.

    3. Failure of due diligence against lying

    4. Carrier of lies.

    5. Carrier of tradition and culture of lies.

    6. A genetic predisposition to lie.

    And Where truthful speech consists of:

    1. categorically consistent (identity)

    2. internally consistent (logic)

    3. externally correspondent (empirical)

    4. operationally consistent (existentially possible)

    5. rationally consistent (rational choice)

    6. reciprocally consistent (reciprocal rational choice)

    7. consistent within scope, limits, and fully accounting (complete)

    8. consistent across all those seven dimensions (coherent)

    And where:

    And where both Actions and Speech are limited by:

    9. limited to actions for which restitution(restoration) is possible.

    10. warrantied by sufficient resources to perform restitution.

    And Where the function of the state is:

    1. The function of the state is largely to serve as insurer of last resort against actions for which restitution is impossible, improbable, or beyond the means of the community to organize.

    And Where the function of the law is:

    1. The function of common natural law is to resolve differences.

    2. The function of legislation is to provide contracts for production of commons.

    3. The function of regulation is to administer operationalization of legislation, and the common law.

    And Where the difficulty in the present:

    1. No means of testing the legislation prior to its enactment.

    2. No means of returning legislation to the legislature.

    3. No means of approving regulation as expansion of legislation.

    4. No means of structurally limiting law, legislation, and regulation, to strict construction from reciprocity and therefore tests of computability (operational possibility).

    In other words, there are limits to what private insurers can do, and the case study is germany, which makes most use of insurance of any people.

    Cheers.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-24 10:09:00 UTC

  • ( Apologies if I’ve been grouchy in answering today. Legal issue, sleep issue, l

    ( Apologies if I’ve been grouchy in answering today. Legal issue, sleep issue, leading to headache issue. I’ll try to get back on my game in a day or two. -hugs )

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-24 01:03:00 UTC

  • FOR LURKERS…. by Dominic DeLuca For the lurkers who might feel intellectually

    FOR LURKERS….

    by Dominic DeLuca

    For the lurkers who might feel intellectually intimidated by Curt’s writing style or content, just ask for clarification if there’s something you don’t understand. It’s something that you should use to your advantage, considering that most people who produce content like this are nowhere near as accessible as he is.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-24 01:01:00 UTC