Source: Facebook

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/94459593_268438137887680_24168874172

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/94459593_268438137887680_2416887417261785088_o_268438131221014.jpg GRID EXPLAINING COMMONS-ISM

    GRID:

    ……………………CHILD……………………….

    ANARCHIST …….VS ….COMMUNIST

    (heterogeneous, no commons, just consumption)

    (diasporic, tribal, imperial subjects, “the men will do it”)

    no capitalization ………no capitalization

    individual…………………collective

    inequality…………………equality

    .

    MALE………………VS…………………….FEMALE

    .

    inequality…………………equality

    familial…………………….collective familial

    max capitalization ……max consumption

    (landed, national, self rule, “we’re the men who do it”)

    (homogenous, commons, over consumption )

    COMMONSIST …VS …SOCIALIST

    ……………………PARENT……………………….

    Humans have very comprehensible differences in instincts, and evolved to express those very comprehensible instincts, and then to make up stories justifying them.GRID EXPLAINING COMMONS-ISM

    GRID:

    ……………………CHILD……………………….

    ANARCHIST …….VS ….COMMUNIST

    (heterogeneous, no commons, just consumption)

    (diasporic, tribal, imperial subjects, “the men will do it”)

    no capitalization ………no capitalization

    individual…………………collective

    inequality…………………equality

    .

    MALE………………VS…………………….FEMALE

    .

    inequality…………………equality

    familial…………………….collective familial

    max capitalization ……max consumption

    (landed, national, self rule, “we’re the men who do it”)

    (homogenous, commons, over consumption )

    COMMONSIST …VS …SOCIALIST

    ……………………PARENT……………………….

    Humans have very comprehensible differences in instincts, and evolved to express those very comprehensible instincts, and then to make up stories justifying them.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-28 08:15:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/94819585_268162841248543_20482286803

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/94819585_268162841248543_2048228680366292992_n_268162837915210.jpg ETYMOLOGY: “SHUTTER DOG”

    In engineering, a dog is a tool or part of a tool that prevents movement or imparts movement by offering physical obstruction or engagement of some kind.

    It may hold another object in place by blocking it, clamping it, or otherwise obstructing its movement. Or it may couple various parts together so that they move in unison – the primary example of this being a flexible drive to mate two shafts in order to transmit torque.

    This word usage is a metaphor derived from the idea of a dog (animal) biting and holding on, the “dog” name derived from the basic idea of how a dog jaw locks on, by the movement of the jaw, or by the presence of many teeth.

    The first shutter dog named the “rat tail shutter dog” was hand forged in Colonial Williamsburg. Made with a hammer and anvil, steel was formed into an elongated hook that spiraled at the bottom. The earliest method of mounting the rat tail shutter dog involved a wrought nail hammered in to a wooden structure. The wrought nail later evolved in to a threaded bolt.ETYMOLOGY: “SHUTTER DOG”

    In engineering, a dog is a tool or part of a tool that prevents movement or imparts movement by offering physical obstruction or engagement of some kind.

    It may hold another object in place by blocking it, clamping it, or otherwise obstructing its movement. Or it may couple various parts together so that they move in unison – the primary example of this being a flexible drive to mate two shafts in order to transmit torque.

    This word usage is a metaphor derived from the idea of a dog (animal) biting and holding on, the “dog” name derived from the basic idea of how a dog jaw locks on, by the movement of the jaw, or by the presence of many teeth.

    The first shutter dog named the “rat tail shutter dog” was hand forged in Colonial Williamsburg. Made with a hammer and anvil, steel was formed into an elongated hook that spiraled at the bottom. The earliest method of mounting the rat tail shutter dog involved a wrought nail hammered in to a wooden structure. The wrought nail later evolved in to a threaded bolt.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-27 22:51:00 UTC

  • “Christianity is the religion of empires dragged out of the eastern gutter by Eu

    —“Christianity is the religion of empires dragged out of the eastern gutter by Europe.”— James Louis LaSalle

    interesting.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-27 22:18:00 UTC

  • (Y’all gotta thank Luke Weinhagen for that framing. Been fussing with it myself

    (Y’all gotta thank Luke Weinhagen for that framing. Been fussing with it myself and wasn’t until he put the frame around it that I could write the economics of it. But this concept has legs.)

    “Commons-ism”


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-27 22:16:00 UTC

  • “Can you describe the difference between P and Bakunin anarchy. Just reading som

    —“Can you describe the difference between P and Bakunin anarchy. Just reading something and the description seemed very similar to P but seems to simply lack the formalism around reciprocity.—-

    P is a method.

    I use the P-method to explain all group strategies, religions, political systems, and moral intuitions.

    I use P to recommend the optimum political system that has ever been formed – rule of law by natural law.

    I dunno why you would pick Bakunin. This is Bakunin’s fantasy:

    –“The liberty of man consists solely in this, that he obeys the laws of nature because he has himself recognized them as such, and not because they have been imposed upon him externally by any foreign will whatsoever, human or divine, collective or individual.”–Bakunin

    What is true instead?

    Man desires consumption, consumption is increased by opportunity, and opportunity is increased by liberty, but so is irresponsibility. And so is free riding, parasitism, fraud, crime, immigration, conversion, conquest, and genocide.

    The state evolved to incrementally suppress local parasitism decreasing local transaction costs, in exchange for paying taxes to pay the cost of decreasing local transaction costs. This made markets possible where only primitive trade previously existed.

    Man is amoral by nature, and pragmatic. By the institution of parenting, acculturation, indoctrination, training, laws, restitution, punishment, and prevention we invest in his domestication.

    Man develops theology, philosophy, ideologies, rationalizations, myths, fantasies, and various other forms of frauds, to attempt to obscure and justify his free riding, parasitism, fraud, crime, and organized crime.

    In order to produce the suppression of free riding, parasitism, fraud, crime, and organized crime, requires a power law of institutions of prevention, investigation, dispute resolution, prosecution, restitution, punishment and prevention.

    In order to produce a market requires a pareto distribution of assets, so that the organization of networks in an market can produce a complex division of labor and its returns without which the terms freedom and liberty have no meaning.

    In order to produce a society that tolerates market competition and the suppression of free riding, parasitism, fraud, crime, and organized crime, requires the resulting distribution of rewards satisfy a marginal nash equilibrium.

    Given three possible means of coercion: force-defense (Military-police, government), trade-boycott(commerce-law), and advocacy+insurance-undermining+ostracization(social,education,religion), elites will combine to use and misuse these skills in a competition.

    Given that Man varies greatly from barely human to superhuman in physical, social, and intellectual ability, and sexual, social, economic, political, and military value, and given the power, pareto, and nash necessities of distributions, man will sort by value to others by his value in those markets – producing networks of competing and overlapping hierarchies that we call sexual, social, economic, and political class.

    As such, rule of law and the independent judiciary provide a market for the suppression of not only individuals and groups of individuals, but elites in all three dimensions of elites, such that sovereignty, liberty and freedom are maintained DESPITE the presence of necessary hierarchies.

    So I consider bakunin like all other idiots as immature, adolescent, vain and ignorant consequences of the industrial revolution and the disregard for the hierarchies in elites of all resulted, and the that these vain, ignorant, immature, adolescent minds gave fertile soil for the false promise of pseudosciences and sophisms of the anti european sense making, and anti-european marxism, neo-marxism, neo-conservatism, libertarianism, postmodernism, feminism, and hbd-denial of the foundations of western civlization: that we used markets in everything to defeat regression to the mean by suppressing the reproduction of those that lacked ability to compete in the markets in the service of others.

    In other words, I view these well meaning fools as useful idiots in the destruction of western civlization.

    Which is how I pretty much view everyone. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-27 22:07:00 UTC

  • “THE ECONOMICS OF NATIONAL COMMONS-ISM” attn: @[1013719133:2048:Luke Weinhagen]

    “THE ECONOMICS OF NATIONAL COMMONS-ISM”

    attn: @[1013719133:2048:Luke Weinhagen]

    1) Commons are a non consumable capitalization from which everyone benefits – a park where you can raise small children cuts the cost of yard ownership for example. Lacking a park where you can raise small children increases the cost of homes and yards, driving people out of high investment parenting.

    2) Commons solve the problem of high investment parenting, without requiring high familial economic investment by every family. Families buy access to commons by high investment parenting, which creates incentive for the production of commons and their high returns.

    3) We use high investment parenting in the production of high investment commons. We use high investment commons to facilitate high investment parenting.

    4) This is what the middle working, and lower working classes sense is being stolen from them – the ability to use commons to produce high investment parenting. Best example is that they can’t afford to move away from malcontents by denying them access.

    5) Low investment parenting immigrants and classes, decrease the incentive to produce commons that are then consumed for purposes of other than raising families. Low investment parenting immigrants and classes increase consumption that is upwardly redistributable to the financial sector, and decrease production of commons as redistribution to

    6) Elites (advertising, media, financial, academic, political), will happily consume profits and income instead of investing in commons if lower working, working, and middle classes tolerate it.

    7) The laboring, lower working, working, middle, and increasingly upper middle class, will only tolerate it until the low hanging fruit of consumption has been exhausted, and the demand for commons is restored.

    8) Christianity is exceptional at producing respect for commons because behavior in the church environment (suppression of impulse) and the sacredness of the properties, extend to the commons.

    9) In the absence of universal christian indoctrination we must us the law to suppress consumption (destruction) of the incentive to produce high trust, ‘sacred’ commons, suitable for the raising of children. And exporting ‘exploratory’ (teen, young adult) behavior (pre-maturity) to labor (markets) sport(competition) and external (wild) commons.Updated Apr 27, 2020, 9:38 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-27 21:38:00 UTC

  • MUCH WORTH THE WATCH Apr 27, 2020, 5:20 PM

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XMYruhJb8e0VERY MUCH WORTH THE WATCH

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XMYruhJb8e0Updated Apr 27, 2020, 5:20 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-27 17:20:00 UTC

  • TEAM: —“Mr Curt. Do you have any simplified version of P for dummies.. I am ne

    TEAM:

    —“Mr Curt. Do you have any simplified version of P for dummies.. I am new ..Thank you”—


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-27 13:45:00 UTC

  • Artworks, whether craft, decoration, design, or art, need only fulfill their pro

    Artworks, whether craft, decoration, design, or art, need only fulfill their promise. This is why student and amature art fails. In order to fulfill the minimum promise the work must not make false promise. We can appreciate good craft, decoration, design, and art. We can appreciate all the arts by the same criteria: craft, decoration, design, and art.

    Japanese ritualistic behavior in food preparation, cooking carpentry, and the crafts is the best example of institutionalized excellence. Italian design has never been equalled. Gothic architecture never equalled. German music never equalled. Russian literature never equalled.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-27 13:07:00 UTC

  • “CURT: WHAT IS EXCELLENCE?” What is excellence? Excellence is Art. DISAMBIGUATIO

    “CURT: WHAT IS EXCELLENCE?”

    What is excellence? Excellence is Art.

    DISAMBIGUATION (Properties)

    1. craftsmanship (physical action)

    2. … … materials (physical materials)

    3. aesthetics (senses, design)

    4. … … form follows function (without excess)

    5. meaning (mind, content, associations)

    6. … … captures a period in time (index)

    7. uniqueness (novelty)

    8. … … fulfills its promise (is ‘honest’)

    9. competitiveness (by triangulation)

    Culminates in Excellence

    All human action can be tested by this method.

    All of it. Everything humans do.

    CAUSALITY

    “Fertility”

    “Beauty is the presence of resources”

    “Excellence is the presence of Human Investment”

    “Human investment is the evidence of time invested”

    “The evidence of human mind and hand”

    HIERARCHY

    Children > Amature > Student > Practitioner > Craftsman > Master Craftsman > Artist > Representative of Movement > Peak of Movement > Peak Across Movements


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-27 13:03:00 UTC