Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • MARK DOES IT AGAIN!!!!! WHOOO HOOO!!!!! #post

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=47ZmIppQSZQJOHN MARK DOES IT AGAIN!!!!! WHOOO HOOO!!!!!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=47ZmIppQSZQ

    #post

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-03 14:28:00 UTC

  • “( starvation is the best disinfectant )”—Bill Joslin Ouch. Damn

    —“( starvation is the best disinfectant )”—Bill Joslin

    Ouch. Damn.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-03 14:26:00 UTC

  • “The closer one gets to the top of one of these hierarchies the more one realize

    —“The closer one gets to the top of one of these hierarchies the more one realizes how absolutely dependent one is on those below. Finance is nothing without the entrepreneur. Generals are nothing without warriors.”—Michael Churchill

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-03 14:23:00 UTC

  • DON”T DEMONSTRATE YOUR INCOMPETENCE BY PUNCHING RIGHT. You’re punching against w

    DON”T DEMONSTRATE YOUR INCOMPETENCE BY PUNCHING RIGHT.

    You’re punching against what you understand as trivial violations in loyalty or solidarity, because it’s all you have the intellectual capacity of doing. And because it’s the only thing others with the same limited intellectual capacity will respond to. What you aren’t doing is punching against the enemy and then defending yourself – because you lack the intellectual capacity and knowledge to defend yourself.

    When you punch at Cantwell you’re jerking off. You would fold under pressure from the system. Everyone does. You would out people on your side who had undermined you. Everyone does. If you don’t t hink so you’re too inexperienced in the real world of real consequences to have an opinion.

    You can punch at and Peterson (soyboys) for counter signaling ethnocentrism – despite the science says it’s the optimum. You can punch Molyneux (potential men) if he overstaps into denial. But punching Others for not taking the next step is just stupid. They are just a sales funnel for slowly dragging people into the fold.

    I punch against ideas. I punch at specific libertarians and christians in general terms because they are allies of our ((())) ancient enemy. I try to avoid the punching right as much as possible unless someone punches me first.

    Be smart. Be strong. Be an army.

    Punch Left. Guilt Center. Don’t punch right.

    #post

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-03 13:41:00 UTC

  • Britain’s cline is northwest to southeast from celtic to scandinavian to german,

    Britain’s cline is northwest to southeast from celtic to scandinavian to german, very much like india’s cline from northwest to southeast is caucasian to dravidian.

    This is somewhat difficult to state with clarity in my opinion because the migratory peoples were largely germanic(R1a/b) with a mixture of Nordics I1 (northern proto europeans).

    However, culturally, germanic (land) and scandinavian(sea) differences evolved due to adaptation to territory.

    So in this sense west scandinavians are and were a german nordic mixture, east scandinavians (nordics), while continentals german, and east continentals slavic, with continuous grading between them. Britain certainly appears west eurasian (culturally celt), scandinavian (germanic continental and nordic mixture), and germanic continental.

    However IMO the empire divorced the british from germanic culture, whether german or french, and created something quite new. This culture failed at home in the UK after the collapse, and the country is struggling to choose between empire, german, and scandinavian group strategies.

    Meanwhile scandinavians are committing suicide faster than the rest of us combined.

    (Please correct me if I err)

    #post

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-03 13:27:00 UTC

  • STOICISM, PROPERTARIANISM, ECONOMICS, HISTORY ARE THE BEST WE CAN DO. There will

    STOICISM, PROPERTARIANISM, ECONOMICS, HISTORY ARE THE BEST WE CAN DO.

    There will always be hyper conservatives, sophists, pseudoscientists, supernaturalists on the right.

    There will always be hedonists (hyper consumption), sophists, pseudoscientist and occultists on the left.

    The best we can do is provide education in mindfulness, propertarianism, history to reduce their numbers

    Stoicism => Self

    Propertarianism => Others

    Economics => Polities

    History => Mankind.

    #post

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-03 12:26:00 UTC

  • “I think as ideas increase in complexity to the level of P we broadly get 3 cate

    —“I think as ideas increase in complexity to the level of P we broadly get 3 categories.

    1) People who get it and can expand and expound upon it.

    2) people who get it and can spread and promote it.

    3) People who can intuit that it is right and truthful and take orders.

    4) People that follow their friends or leaders in 3.

    Do you bear this in mind at different stages of your marketing so to speak as P grows and adjust language and talking points accordingly?”. — Gunther T.

    Exactly.

    My job is 1 (130+),

    John’s job is 2(115+), and;

    Our audience is 3(100+), and;

    The rest 4 follow 3 (100-)

    #post

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-03 12:09:00 UTC

  • “The spirit approaches the church, hypocrisy fills it.”—Francesco Principi

    —“The spirit approaches the church, hypocrisy fills it.”—Francesco Principi

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-03 10:37:00 UTC

  • NO MORE LIES —“@Curt Doolittle If I have an idea, a theory, yet don’t have the

    NO MORE LIES

    —“@Curt Doolittle If I have an idea, a theory, yet don’t have the evidence yet–it still might be true. The Higgs Boson comes to mind. It was an idea, a theory, there were no facts yet to prove it, it fit in with the standard model, itself a theory, and solved some problems in quantum mechanics, but it wasn’t until the particle was actually discovered by the LHC that we could call it true. So was it a lie before then? You can’t always exactly know what’s true. Some questions are unsettled. So we make assumptions to try things out. It’s not exactly faith but it’s like it. It requires that we temporarily believe in it to test it, to question it, to try and figure it out. All part of reasoning. Maybe you didn’t mean what you said to this depth, what you wrote seems to make perfect sense on the surface, but through a little questioning, seeking to drill down, to get to the essence and the fundamentals of things, it seemed to me to be a little imprecise. This is not to simply be disputatious, to be contrary, not to be mean or anything, your statement was a fine, stimulating, sentiment, but to honestly question.​”— Mark Wright

    We do not have faith or temporarily believe in anything. We seek only to discover by testing that which is testable. And we limit ourselves to that limit.

    1) such things are testable and falsifiable.

    2) such things preserve the parsimony of naturalism,

    3) such things are not counter to all of historical evidence, nor commensurate with the long history of ignorance error, fraud, and deceit

    4) such things serve as no premise for consequent inference likewise for fraud and deceit,

    5) such things are not dependent on verbal pretense or sophism,

    6) such things are not claimed true only speculative,

    7) such things have no malincentive to lie, or preserve a lie.

    8) Conversely what i argued against was the opposite of all those tests.

    It is not arrogance but intolerance for the continued use of lies against my people by those in conscious or unconscious league with the ancient enemy of not only my people but all of mankind.

    No more lies.

    #post

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-02 19:21:00 UTC

  • “AUTISTOCRACY” —“I’m perfectly comfortable with aristocracy being formed by au

    “AUTISTOCRACY”

    —“I’m perfectly comfortable with aristocracy being formed by autists. Autistocracy.”— Martin Štěpán

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-02 18:08:00 UTC