photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53343638_10157038577322264_1482964147594330112_o_10157038577277264.jpg Altaic languages
Altaic is a hypothetical language family of central Eurasia and Siberia first proposed in the 18th century, but whose existence is widely discredited among comparative linguists. The Turkic, Mongolic and Tungusic groups are invariably included in the family; some authors added Koreanic and the Japonic languages. The latter expanded grouping came to be known as “Macro-Altaic”, leading to the designation of the smaller former grouping as “Micro-Altaic” by retronymy. Most proponents of Altaic continue to support the inclusion of Korean. These languages are spoken in a wide arc stretching from Eastern Europe through Anatolia and eastern Caucasus through North Asia and Central Asia to the Korean Peninsula and Japanese archipelago in East Asia. The group is named after the Altai mountain range in the center of Asia.Altaic languages
Altaic is a hypothetical language family of central Eurasia and Siberia first proposed in the 18th century, but whose existence is widely discredited among comparative linguists. The Turkic, Mongolic and Tungusic groups are invariably included in the family; some authors added Koreanic and the Japonic languages. The latter expanded grouping came to be known as “Macro-Altaic”, leading to the designation of the smaller former grouping as “Micro-Altaic” by retronymy. Most proponents of Altaic continue to support the inclusion of Korean. These languages are spoken in a wide arc stretching from Eastern Europe through Anatolia and eastern Caucasus through North Asia and Central Asia to the Korean Peninsula and Japanese archipelago in East Asia. The group is named after the Altai mountain range in the center of Asia.
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53727159_10157038540127264_7221819738211483648_n_10157038540117264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53354627_10157038540322264_6270393355826364416_n_10157038540317264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53315474_10157038540452264_3086211229430054912_n_10157038540437264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53668415_10157038540522264_2092567831081123840_n_10157038540517264.jpg ANOTHER TAKE ON THE IE EXPANSION
Stage 1: “ORIGINATION”
Some pre-IE languages are also indicated:
– Vasconic is tentatively associated here with Neolithic languages of Thessalian origin (my main working hypothesis). It would at the time be the largest European language family therefore.
– Uralic should be right north of the early Indoeuropeans, what explains their ancestral Sprachbund.
– Pelasgian indicates the language of Vinca-Dimini (Grey Ware), which was a limited intrusion c. 5000 BCE with origins related to Tell Halaf most likely.
Stage 2: “EXPANSION”
The main outline of the Indo-european expansion. Some other cultures and languages are indicated in gray colors for context. At this point we should have the seeds of:
– Anatolian (Maykop)
– Tocharian (Afanasevo, in Altai)
– Indo-Iranian (Yamna)
– Western Indo-european (Baalberge): a large subfamily that would give birth to Balto-Slavic, Germanic, Celtic and Italic.
– Possible seeds of Tracian, Greek, etc. in the Balcanic Kurgans, an ill-defined group that would nevertheless plunder and radically alter the ethnic geography of the Eastern Balcans (see next map).
Stage 3: “CONSOLIDATION”
Some notes:
– The Anatolian branch goes into Asia with the Kura-Araxes culture.
– The Eastern Balcans are divided between two cultures:
– – – Cotofeni, more purely Kurgan and a candidate for Greek origins
– – – Ezero, rather Dniepr-Don (→ Sredny-Stog II) cultural inheritance. Surely proto-Thracians and hence a candidate for the origin of Armenian (via Phrygians).
– Expansion of Yamna (proto-Indo-Iranians) and therefore liquidation of Dniepr-Don Neolithic
– Consolidation and first expansion of the Western IE branch (Globular Amphorae). It may be important to note that in the Baalberge→→→Globular Amphorae period, this Kurgan culture experimented various influences that may be considered Vasconic: the Danubian substrate, the powerful southern Danubian culture of Baden and the Northernly Funnelbeaker influence, associated to Atlantic Megalithism.
Stage 4: “COMPLETION”
Setting the proto-historical scenario with some further expansions.
Most notably:
– Corded Ware: a major expansion of the Western IE group to the West, East and North.
– Vucedol: probably associated with the previous, eradicates the Danubian culture in their homeland (only Foltesti in Moldavia would survive for some more time within this important Neolithic macro-culture). Vucedol would be another candidate for Greek origins for their use of the architectural concept of megaron.
– Catacombs culture’s origins are debated but it’s clearly Kurgan in any case.
– Poltavka represents continuity with the seed of the Kurgan/Indoeuropean phenomenon and its later evolution leads directly to Indo-Iranians.
It should be noted that, synchronously with the Corded Ware expansion, the Megalithic bowmen of Artenac culture expanded from Dordogne, subsuming the last Western Danubian groups all the way to Belgium. This culture was probably proto-Aquitanian.
A whole millennium of stability followed at the new Rhine border, crossed only by the likely traders of the Bell Beaker phenomenon.
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53431890_10157038500272264_5232992478478467072_n_10157038500267264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53386719_10157038501692264_7866898597432786944_o_10157038501687264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53739890_10157038500647264_5409198227670958080_o_10157038500642264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/54215005_10157038504657264_7175755651321167872_n_10157038504652264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53742515_10157038505502264_199387495870234624_n_10157038505482264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53739998_10157038513402264_4772302616883363840_o_10157038513392264.jpg Food and Govt before trade, vs trade and govt before food.
4. …. …. …. Scientific PeriodJack SanduskyKurt, do you consider Zoroastrianism to be the root of Christianity?Mar 9, 2019, 1:17 PMCurt Doolittleof courseMar 9, 2019, 1:20 PMJack SanduskyCurt Doolittle root of all, got it.Mar 9, 2019, 1:21 PMCurt DoolittleSCIENCEMar 9, 2019, 1:27 PMCurt DoolittleCHRISTIAN – POLITICS
I am a Christian if I have adopted the teaching of christianity: 1) the eradication of hatred from the human heart. 2) the extension of kinship love to non-kin. 3) the demand for personal acts of charity and personal cost, 4) the extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war.
As far as I know, this is all that is required of me to be a Christian.Mar 9, 2019, 1:27 PMCurt DoolittleARYAN (PAGAN) – PEOPLE
I am an Aryan if 1) I proudly display my excellences so that others seek to achieve or exceed them; 2) I seek competition to constantly test and improve myself so I do not weaken; 3) I swear to speak no insult and demand it; 4) I speak the truth and demand it; 5) I take nothing not paid for and demand it; 6) I grant sovereignty to my kin and demand it; 7) I insure my people regardless of condition, and demand it; and in doing so leave nothing but voluntary markets of cooperation between sovereign men; and to discipline, enserf, enslave, ostracize or kill those who do otherwise; 8) to not show fear or cowardice, abandon my brothers, or retreat, and 9) to die a good death in the service of my kin, my clan, my tribe and my people.
As far as I know, this is all that is required of me to be an Aryan.Mar 9, 2019, 1:27 PMCurt DoolittleHEATHEN: NATURE
I am a Heathen if 1) I accept the laws of nature as binding on all of existence; and 2) if I treat nature as sacred and to be contemplated, protected and improved; and 3) I treat the world as something to transform closer to an Eden in whatever ways I can before I die; and 4) if I deny the existence of a supreme being with dominion over the physical laws, and treat all gods, demigods, heroes, saints, figures of history, and ancestors as characters with whom I may speak to in private contemplation in the hope of gaining wisdom and synchronicity from having done so. And 5) if I participate with others of my society in repetition of oaths, repetition of myths, repetition of festivals, repetition of holidays, and the perpetuation of all of the above to my offspring. And 6) if I leave open that synchronicity appears to exist now and then, and that it may be possible that there is a scientific explanation for it, other than just humans subject to similar stimuli producing similar intuitions and therefore similar ends.
As far as I know this is all that is required of me to be a Heathen.Mar 9, 2019, 1:27 PMAurick FaustAKA shitMar 9, 2019, 1:39 PMBill Joslin1 and 4 are the same (only at different scales 😉 )Mar 9, 2019, 4:11 PMSeth Barcello5 The belief that Jesus is the son of godMar 9, 2019, 4:50 PMCurt DoolittleThere is no god. There can be no son of god. All we can say is that the end result of germanicizing christianity is the principles I’ve mentioned.Mar 9, 2019, 4:52 PMBill Joslin(four courses – for accolades? Right to wear the patch after learning to argue for it?)Mar 9, 2019, 6:14 PMKeslan TroyPlot twist on your deathbed, pompous boomerMar 10, 2019, 6:30 AMThomas NorgateBlack sun is amazingMar 11, 2019, 10:20 AMJames StillwellCurt Doolittle Certainly no biblical Christian would accept your definition of what a Christian is. It seems quite shallow. To be a Christian according to the New Testament is to be granted saving faith, to feel the weight of your “sin”, to repent and believe the gospel. To be regenerated by the Holy Spirit, to be one of Gawds “electos”, to go therefore and make disciples of all men. To die daily and take up one’s electric chair. To suffer from bad conscience. And actually the Bible doesn’t teach to eradicate hate. It says that “god hates the wicked everyday” and “Jacob I loved, Esau I hated”.
At any rate, if you don’t hate, you cannot love.
(((Christianity))) is pure toxic waste! I know, I used to be an evangelist and theologian, and apologist.
1John 5:1, John 6:44, 65. John ch 3. Rom ch 9. Ephesians 2:8 Acts 13:48 etc.Mar 11, 2019, 2:43 PMCurt DoolittleOne does not ask a lunatic for reason, nor weight his claims as reason.Mar 11, 2019, 3:28 PMJames StillwellCurt Doolittle who are you calling a lunatic?Mar 11, 2019, 3:32 PMCurt DoolittleOne does not ask the faithful for reason, nor weight his claims as reason.Mar 11, 2019, 3:34 PMJames StillwellCurt Doolittle then why in a million yrs would you don the label of a faithful (Christian)? Personally, I distance myself from such non sense as far as possible.Mar 11, 2019, 3:36 PMCurt Doolittlea thing is determined by what it is not. not what it is claimed to be.Mar 11, 2019, 3:42 PMJames StillwellCurt Doolittle Doolittle I see so many people on the right who pander to Christers. Like Richard Spencer who calls himself a “culture Christian” or so many in the alt right who call themselves Christians, who claim that Christianity is “the glue of western civilization” and yet whose Christianity is merely a shallow facade. Basically, they are secretly tragic atheists who larp as cHristians, not realizing how toxic their slave religion, their slave morality is, and how it created the mess we now inhabit.Mar 11, 2019, 3:57 PMAaron LongCurt Doolittle your quite wrong on this one.Mar 11, 2019, 6:58 PMSascha Alexander GünterThis aint a christian symbol tho.Mar 14, 2019, 4:55 PMCurt DoolittleI separate the catholic church as a political organization, from belief in the supernatural and occult, from christianity as a system of alien myths and dogmas, from imitating person jesus regardless of the primitivism of words attributed to him, from the general need for simple people to escape the continuous judgement of self and others in a world where doing so by some standard other than selfishness is non rational.
What we call ‘christian’ is a semitic political religious dogma taught by a greek bureaucracy over an aryan social religious relationship between peoples and the world.
One is a member of the christian system of behaviors because he behaves more like other christians than he does members of every other rious order – not because what he thinks or believes. Otherwise all of christianity is false.
These are empirical statements – not justificationary statements.
Either you act in practice under the accumulated behaviors of our aryan, roman, greek, and semitic systems of thought, or you don’t. The degree with which you fantasize about it is merely a statement of your demand to insulate yourself from counter signaling by others.
Which is the reason for religion: counter-signaling our alienation with some form of mindfulness as our relative value to the polity decreases with political scale.Mar 14, 2019, 5:16 PMJames StillwellCurt Doolittle I don’t think the character of Jesus as articulated in the NT is something that should be imitated by us white folk. Again Jesus was a toxic slave moralist. As to the Catholic Church as an organization, it props up parasites that nature would weed out. It is dysgenic. It spreads bad conscience and universalist thinking. The Christ pox must be eliminated.
“O, Christ! O, Christ! Thou artful fiend! Thou Great Subverter! – What an amazing Eblis glamour thou has cast over the world? Thou mean, insignificant-minded Jew!
Why is it that our modern philosophers are so mortally afraid to boldly challenge the ‘inspired’ utopianism of this poor, self-deluded, Gallilean mountaineer – this preacher of all eunuch-virtues – of self-abasement, of passive suffering?
The sickly humanitarian ethics, so eloquently rayed forth by Jesus Christ and his superstitious successors in ancient Judea and throughout the moribund Roman empire, are generally accepted in Anglo-Saxondom as the very elixir of immortal wisdom, the purest, wisest, grandest, most incontrovertible of all ‘divine revelations’, or occult thaumauturgies. And yet when closely examined, they are found to be neither divine, occult, reasonable, nor even honest; but composed, almost exclusively of the stuff that nightmares are made of, together with a strong dash of oriental legerdemain.
Through a thousand different channels current politico-economic belief is dominated by the base communistic caballa of the ‘man of many sorrows’; yet as a practical theorem, it is hardly ever critically examined. Why is it that the suggested social solutions promulgated by Jesus, Peter, Paul, James and other Asiatic “cataleptics are accepted so meekly by us, upon trust? If these men were anything, they were crude socialist reformers with mis-shapen souls, preachers of ‘a new heaven and a new earth’, that is to say, demagogues – politician-of-the-slums; and out of the slums, nothing that is noble can ever be born.”
– Might is Right – Ragnar RedbeardMar 14, 2019, 5:29 PMAaron BradleyI’m stealing this 🤓😄Mar 14, 2019, 5:33 PMJosé Francisco MayoraCurt Doolittle Then is Leonardo one of the prophets… Maybe the first of the New Testament (Reinassance)Mar 15, 2019, 5:51 AMOUR ANCESTRAL RELIGIONS
I provide light tech support for neighborhood people – mostly old folks out here in the sticks – and I charge “coffee, cookies, and a hug.” Few days ago a printer. Day before yesterday it was an iPhone. Yesterday it was our Theater (the building has a full on private movie theatre, and a full on bar/lounge with pool table). Every time I see someone carrying something I offer to help. Helping usually takes me 15 minutes. Makes the people absurdly happy (which makes me happy). Builds my local ‘rep’ as a good guy (if they only knew!) and banks some Karma (which I feel I need.) This afternoon I have a handful of home made fig filled bar cookies to snack on. 😉 Doing shit for people does make you happy. I know why. I know it’s purely programming, but it does work. 😉
a) I am pretty sure once just LAW103 Foundations is done, and LAW203/6 and we have worked through the method, the definitions, and then the long list of applications of that law, we have a purely descriptive science of the psychological and social sciences. I am on the third revision of LAW103 – Foundations, and it is … well it’s where you can understand it pretty easily as a single thing in a hierarchy of applications. And that the number of component parts is just a handful that I could roll off right now with east. I will be done with 103 fairly shortly, and doing so has helped me shorten the book down to something very simple. Between the constitution (which is a chinese menu) , the Course LAW103/LAW203/6, and a book containing both, the work will be rock solid. And it is achievable. And while y’all complain about me taking so long (and I complain too) the time I take matters because it allows me to turn all of this prose into something parsimonious, clear, and accessible to most people by one means or another.
b) The Institute owns everything I do other than my software biz which is owned by me and my investors. If anything happens to me all IP goes either to the institute, or to my investors, with a portion of any software profits for my family.
c) In the case where something happens to me, the institute, a few people whose names I won’t mention, and the donors will have license to do what they will with the work after I’m gone.
d) There are people here today capable of continuing the work. The problem is that I am able for various economic reasons to devote full time to the effort, and they are not. The best people have limited time to devote. My hope would be that the institute will evolve successfully into an online university for teaching this material, and a network of schools and teachers will evolve and will provide income to those people willing and able to continue the work whether contributing or simply persisting it.
e) I need to be clear though that my age and health are not in my favor. Even this winter I’ve been questionably effective since maybe mid december because of health issues. But, if I can finish the courses, constitution, and book, and then spend the rest of my time using the same method to produce courses and books I will be productive as long as I am able, and reconstruct the western canon – a full academic program that is defended against the left forever. I have to get into a living condition where i can walk and lift every day but sleep enough every night so that I stay healthy enough to do it. And I’m not keen on abandoning care of my elders to do that.
LAW103 – Foundations – The Method (“The Core”)
LAW106 Foundations: Man, Law, and Argument
LAW206 Application and Reformation
It is possible that if I continue making similar progress that law 106 will be just another 3 credits. I can’t easily estimate the work load without completing the course. People might be able to do the work faster than I assume.
Law 206 (application to the scope of knowledge) should be a 300 level course i think, and Law 306 a 400 level course, since it involves writing constitutions for different groups of people.
After that we then go to comparative legal systems and tear apart constitutions and legal systems on a country by country basis. Once that is donet here will be no legal scholars in the world that can compete with Propertarian Jurists with any excuse other than ‘it’s tradition’.
Now that I feel REALLY secure about the Foundations, I feel like the workload for students will drop, because once you get the hang of it I think a lot of this will come more naturally than I expected. I would love to get this into a two year program, and then spend more time on economics, history and war to fill out a degree.
But again.
I have this work and my software work to do and I’m not 30 years old any longer.
TRAINING in operational prose, logic, and grammar would help all people communicate just like the same operational prose, logic, and grammar help the scientific community communicate – although P-law, in addition covers not just the physical sciences but the human (psychology, sociology, ethics, law, politics, group strategy, and literature)
But just as one cannot hope to communicate in mathematics or physics or chemistry or law without training in those disciplines, one cannot hope to communicate in the Human Sciences, and in particular ‘morality’ without training in the language and method of doing so.
Ergo, One can train people in the logic of cooperation but one cannot discourse with people unless they are so trained. the reason being that one can never divorce himself from cognitive bias, and accumulated disinformation without that training any more than one can grasp physics without training – Sciences exist because such things are beyond the limits of our personal comprehension without systems of measurement to eliminate our biases and disinformation.
So, yes, if you learn the propertarian method you can speak in measurements. Those measurements are not all that complicated really. But it appears to take about six months to two years to learn them today. And, I assume we can cut that to less time with the courses.
