Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • ” NAP rings true for them because they ALREADY accept the preconditions that the

    —” NAP rings true for them because they ALREADY accept the preconditions that the NAP assumes – it’s a self-fulfilling prophecy.”—JWarren Prescott

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-14 18:08:00 UTC

  • “Might makes rule”– James Fox Higgins (via Micah Pezdirtz)

    —“Might makes rule”– James Fox Higgins

    (via Micah Pezdirtz)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-14 18:05:00 UTC

  • James Fox Higgins understands like few others the difference between discussing

    James Fox Higgins understands like few others the difference between discussing what is and what we can, desire to, and should be.

    Everyone else wants me to produce a via positiva ideology philosophy or religion. When all I am doing is producing the law that prevents reconquest of our people if we impose it.

    And I have not had this experience with any other christian thought leader. When we are talk I am free to say “I can only say that this is what is – that this is law. I do not say what should or must outside of that law.” This is my version of humility. I leave the good and preferable, the inspirational and the spiritual to those for whom those things are important.

    For me, I see heathenism (the dead and nature), paganism (social archetypes), christianity ( political ideals), Militia and Martial Participation as (spiritual), and stoic training in mindfulness as components of my religious portfolio. But I am ABLE to do so. Not all of us are able without training. Some are not able to do more than one. it is too much for them.

    My view of our future is of a god (universe) of many faces (archetypes), many levels (scales), and each of us practices a group of rites (debt payments to) the faces of that god we best depend (are indebted to).

    Natural law and jesus’ five rules are identical.

    The ten commandments are simply statements of property.

    —“You cannot derive an “ought” from an “is”… without an “if”.”— James Fox Higgins

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-14 17:43:00 UTC

  • (must read) by James Fox Higgins I’m seeing a number of people who are strugglin

    (must read)

    by James Fox Higgins

    I’m seeing a number of people who are struggling with some of the core ideas of Curt Doolittle’s Propertarianism like property-in-toto which observes that one man’s ideal of the concept “property” may differ from another’s, just as in some cultures women are considered a man’s property which we in the Christian west find abhorrent. But the reality remains: in the Islamic state, women ARE the property of their men. It doesn’t make it morally right. It’s just an empirical fact.

    I thought Curt was Satan incarnate until it clicked for me that he is not in the business of moralisms like just about every other philosopher is. He’s not dealing with Platonic ideals. He’s dealing with Aristotelean empiricism. Not what ought to be (which is culturally relative), but what is (which is empirical).

    Words like “legitimate property” are ideals, but fail to argue against what really occurs: people defend with force that which they consider to be theirs. Those with the greater will to power, control such moral definitions. You really think the men of radical Islam will care about our Christian moralisms if they gain control of our lands? Might doesn’t make make right, might makes rule.

    You can talk about property moralistically if you like, but it has no bearing on the empirical reality. Wishful thinking seldom changes the reality of those who don’t accept your definitions but do have a greater will to power.

    This is what propertarianism is about: using language to describe what actually is, not what ought to be. Your ideals-based definitions of property are fine if you preface them with “I prefer” or “I wish” or “what would be ideal to me is” or “what is most in line with Christian ethics is”… But when it comes down to it… Bane OWNED Gotham city, until Batman took it back. Morality is only as good (in practise) as those with the will to protect it.

    Morality is God-given, but it is protected by the will and flesh of men. If you won’t fight for what is yours and what you believe in your heart to be right, you’re just relying on others to do it for you so you can quibble over the language of “legitimate property”. When the barbarians take your lands, livestock, and women, it is (empirically) theirs. Same applies to anything you value. Own it and defend it, or accept that others will.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-14 17:24:00 UTC

  • EITHER YOU ACT LIKE JESUS OR YOU DON’T. I separate the catholic church as a poli

    EITHER YOU ACT LIKE JESUS OR YOU DON’T.

    I separate the catholic church as a political organization, from belief in the supernatural and occult, from christianity as a system of alien myths and dogmas, from imitating person jesus regardless of the primitivism of words attributed to him, from the general need for simple people to escape the continuous judgement of self and others in a world where doing so by some standard other than selfishness is non rational.

    What we call ‘christian’ is a semitic political religious dogma taught by a greek bureaucracy over an aryan social religious relationship between peoples and the world.

    One is a member of the christian system of behaviors because he behaves more like other christians than he does members of every other rious order – not because what he thinks or believes. Otherwise all of christianity is false.

    These are empirical statements – not justificationary statements.

    Either you act in practice under the accumulated behaviors of our aryan, roman, greek, and semitic systems of thought, or you don’t. The degree with which you fantasize about it is merely a statement of your demand to insulate yourself from counter signaling by others.

    Which is the reason for religion: counter-signaling our alienation with some form of mindfulness as our relative value to the polity decreases with political scale.

    This is merely true.

    God and the universe are one and the same. Jesus told us one set of rules that make us more compatible with the universe, and therefore god. These rules are the optimum ingroup social order. There is none other.

    1) the eradication of hatred from the human heart.

    2) the extension of kinship love to non-kin.

    3) the demand for personal acts of charity and personal cost,

    4) the extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war.

    If you practice these rules then you are acting in concert with the universe and god such that no other set of practices will produce a superior end for you or others.

    That’s just the science of it all.

    I don’t need woo woo. I am not afraid of my station in relation to others. I do not fear my betters – I welcome them.

    The laws of the universe are the origin of truth aboutt hat universe. The natural law of human cooperation consists of reciprocity and the teachings of jesus.

    Neither set of rules is complicated.

    They are just so simple that they leave us no means of deceit by which to lie to ourselves or others.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-14 17:17:00 UTC

  • GET OVER THE NAP. IT MEANS YOU’RE A USEFUL IDIOT No. NAP looks like another semi

    GET OVER THE NAP. IT MEANS YOU’RE A USEFUL IDIOT

    No. NAP looks like another semitic (abrahamic, marxist, libertarian, postmodern) pretense to reciprocity and rule of law, that (a) does not require reciprocity be earned, (b) retains the semitic means of deceit by fraud by omission enabling blackmail, enabling conspiracy, (c) (d) continuing the semitic method of baiting well meaning fools into hazard thru piplup and deceit.

    NAP is to Reciprocity as Labor Theory of Value is to Subjective Value, and as money proper is to money substitutes – it’s another fraud.

    Other things may look like reciprocity. But they are not. They are all substitutes for reciprocity because they are means of circumventing reciprocity. So since they are all worse than reciprocity, one must answer the question why one seeks something less than reciprocity, and as such why one seeks to preserve means of irreciprocity.

    I mean, we know why our ancient enemy wants to preserve irreciprocity – to preserve parasitism upon the productive people.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-14 16:44:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53870800_10157048179262264_602542890

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53870800_10157048179262264_602542890396155904_o_10157048179257264.jpg told ya so.Justus KilianJohn Nicholas

    Suven LaljeeMar 14, 2019, 2:35 PMtold ya so.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-14 13:38:00 UTC

  • One day at a time we defeat the postmodern as we did the marxist, as we did the

    One day at a time we defeat the postmodern as we did the marxist, as we did the jewish(christian).

    But what a horrid price we pay for defeating the great lies of mysticism, pseudoscience and sophism.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-14 13:32:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53745014_10157048163182264_512928840

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53745014_10157048163182264_512928840146747392_n_10157048163177264.jpg SEX DIFFERENCES ARE GREAT BECAUSE OF MALE VARIATION AND FEMALE SIMILARITY

    Males specialize to change the universe. females generalize to train children

    ‏

    via @DegenRolf

    Here are more details from John Archer’s great new review: Psychological sex differences in humans are real, they can be large and even very large, and, in all probability, they have evolutionary origins.

    https://t.co/CumWLtlaeYSEX DIFFERENCES ARE GREAT BECAUSE OF MALE VARIATION AND FEMALE SIMILARITY

    Males specialize to change the universe. females generalize to train children

    ‏

    via @DegenRolf

    Here are more details from John Archer’s great new review: Psychological sex differences in humans are real, they can be large and even very large, and, in all probability, they have evolutionary origins.

    https://t.co/CumWLtlaeY

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-14 13:30:00 UTC

  • i love russians. idiot playing music too loud in the apartment building. girl kn

    i love russians. idiot playing music too loud in the apartment building. girl knocks on door. asks politely. idiot talks smack. man comes from behind girl. beats idiot for ten minutes to within an inch of his life. All the while lecturing him on his behavior. stops. then hangs around until idiot recovers.

    this is paternalism.

    This is what we have lost.

    Paternalism.

    Responsibility.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-14 12:48:00 UTC