Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • I keep telling people. I do law: Accusation, Prosecution, and Judgment. I don’t

    I keep telling people. I do law: Accusation, Prosecution, and Judgment.

    I don’t do philosophy. It’s for wimps. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-14 17:51:00 UTC

  • WITH WALTER BLOCK A 4PM EASTERN Jun 14, 2020, 3:39 PM

    https://youtu.be/BhBp_k3rXY4DEBATE WITH WALTER BLOCK A 4PM EASTERN

    https://youtu.be/BhBp_k3rXY4Updated Jun 14, 2020, 3:39 PM

    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-14 15:14:00 UTC

  • P-LAW IS WHAT YOU’LL FIND AT CHILDHOOD’S END. Just as we all grow more conservat

    P-LAW IS WHAT YOU’LL FIND AT CHILDHOOD’S END.

    Just as we all grow more conservative as we grow older, and forget the protected world of parents, and schooling, and learn more and more about the demonstrated behavior of humans in the real world, we find it is far easier to understand P if you have fewer falsehoods to and false promises to overcome from the intentional extension of childhood by the progressive movements. P is what you’ll find at Childhood’s End.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-14 09:58:00 UTC

  • Politics is the Entertainment business for ugly people, but both operate in the

    Politics is the Entertainment business for ugly people, but both operate in the intersets of the evil people.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-14 07:31:00 UTC

  • Feminism as indifferent mediocrities rather than as opposite and compatible exce

    Feminism as indifferent mediocrities rather than as opposite and compatible excellences was a disaster for the west.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-13 14:50:00 UTC

  • WOMEN NEED THE FOUR AGREEMENTS BEFORE P-LAW Agreement 1: Be Impeccable With Your

    WOMEN NEED THE FOUR AGREEMENTS BEFORE P-LAW

    Agreement 1: Be Impeccable With Your Word

    Agreement 2: Don’t Take Anything Personally

    Agreement 3: Don’t Make Assumptions

    Agreement 4: Always Do Your Best

    Women are biased to take things personally for good reasons.

    The intuition in favor of the NAXALT Fallacy is an example.

    Don’t take economics, law, and politics personally.

    P-law is by definition political.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-13 14:49:00 UTC

  • P EXPOSES MALE AND FEMALE DIFFERENCES The sample of men interested in P are at t

    P EXPOSES MALE AND FEMALE DIFFERENCES

    The sample of men interested in P are at the high end of the systematizing scale, and P is a rigorous universal logic of systematizing using a value neutral logic of decidability.

    But as value neutral it is also an EMPATHY FREE system of decidability, that limits our empathy to personal interaction and deprives us of misapplication to economics, law, and politics.

    P exposes the fact that men are always talking politics even if it’s in personal context. Women are always talking personal context, even if its about politics. And that’s the ‘difficult’ part of learning how to understand the opposite sex.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-13 14:19:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/102556935_305058464225647_1396172612

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/102556935_305058464225647_1396172612

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/102556935_305058464225647_1396172612500429712_o_305058460892314.jpg Worth RepeatingWorth Repeating

    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-13 13:56:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/83210266_305057504225743_49963803153

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/83210266_305057504225743_49963803153

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/83210266_305057504225743_4996380315308482480_o_305057500892410.jpg P isn’t a religion. It’s not a philosophy. It’s not an ideology. It’s just the formal science of jurisprudence, and in particular of testimonial truth. You don’t ‘join’ physics or ‘calculus’ or ‘cognitive science’. You either accept it or deny it.

    Acceptance of science is a test of fitness.

    But I won’t pander to anyone.

    I can’t.

    That’s the whole point.

    Truth before face regardless of cost.

    And you either advocate for the constitutional reforms that restore our civilization or you don’t.P isn’t a religion. It’s not a philosophy. It’s not an ideology. It’s just the formal science of jurisprudence, and in particular of testimonial truth. You don’t ‘join’ physics or ‘calculus’ or ‘cognitive science’. You either accept it or deny it.

    Acceptance of science is a test of fitness.

    But I won’t pander to anyone.

    I can’t.

    That’s the whole point.

    Truth before face regardless of cost.

    And you either advocate for the constitutional reforms that restore our civilization or you don’t.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-13 13:45:00 UTC

  • The only measure of a theology, philosophy, or ideology is the social, economic,

    The only measure of a theology, philosophy, or ideology is the social, economic, scientific, technological, intellectual and military standing of a its practitioners.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-13 10:08:00 UTC