LIBERTARIANISM AS MISNOMER
by Alain Dwight
A lot of libertarianism is a misnomer.. no rule of law, no stable production of liberty. The problem is focusing on the outcome and not the requirements is a convenient means of deception.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-28 09:50:00 UTC
YOU’RE ONLY A FOLLOWER UNTIL YOU’RE A LEADER
We Make Leaders.
Told you we would. 😉
See?
One brick at a time.
Slowly. Consistently.
(It’s Bill Joslin’s teaching, my research and development, and John’s Propaganda, and the thousands that help us. We’re the founders.)
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-28 09:43:00 UTC
ORRGSM IS A RESOURCE, JUST LIKE VIOLENCE
GSRRM like Violence for which it is a substitute, is simply a resource. The question is what you are using the resource for … punishing the dissemination of undesirable truth and demand for reciprocity, or punishing the dissemination of falsehood and ir-reciprocity.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-28 09:33:00 UTC
A QUESTION ABOUT THE CORTEX
—“Does the commensurability of the edge of the cerebral cortex require fractal geometry, like a coastline? Does it have self similarity?”—The Nationalist @Nationalist7346
No.
1. the outer layer of the cortex is just a couple of mm thick; consists two functions (what,where), using six layers; divided into columns and modules (groups of columns); homogenous in structure but differing in neural density by physical origin of nerves that enter them.
2. So no it’s not fractal: the average size of a human cortex, if laid out flat would be approximately the size of a dinner napkin, and just as thick. The rest of the neocortex consists entirely of white matter (nerve fibers: axons) which connect everything to everything.
3. With the hippocampus consolidating and organizing information, and then using rehearsal (replay) to encode episodes of memory, and thalamus controlling attention (what gets thru to the neocortex for computation, and basal ganglia that surrounds both releasing physical actions.
4. Most of the advanced functions of the brain consist of these three ‘levers’ and the natural increase in reflection created by increasing brain size, from back (senses) to front (permuting, planning, manipulating). So the brain functions as a series of loops (operating system)
5. That recursively process a moment of information and merge it with the next moment of information in a continuous stream which we can ‘buffer’ with a half life of just a few seconds, and no more than twenty or so. By Comparison of these moments we discern change in state.
6. When people say the brain isn’t a computer they’re only a tiny bit right. It does operate in binary (on off) and frequency (hertz), and by competition for attention but with unimaginable numbers of connections in unimaginable parallel, in a continuous loop (OS).
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-28 09:18:00 UTC
P: WE OPERATIONALIZE THE SERIES (Statement) NOT THE ELEMENTS (Evidence)
—-“Your proclamation as being scientific is also interesting considering the most interesting of your formulations are extrapolations (grammar “word->word”, non-operational, but well condensed.”— Twitter
(That’s a great question. Very few people have the insight to ask it.)
The Methodology:
Disambiguation by Enumeration, Serialization and Operationalization.
Serialization provides empirical evidence of the spectrum in a given language, even if some terms must be disambiguated. We operationalize the constant relations expressed in the SERIES, not the elements.
So if I list the truth spectrum, identify its constant relations, and state them operationally, I have completed the method. (It’s just like geometry, three points make a line, lines are unambiguous).
Which is why you see me using geometry in everything. It’s a higher (less ambiguous) standard of measurement. Or said differently, geometry constitutes the most complete grammar we have, and sets are a means of producing ideals and sophism. Or better: all language is measurement.
The question is only the precision of the measures.
P is the most precise n-dimensional language we have.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-28 08:31:00 UTC
P: WE OPERATIONALIZE THE SERIES (Statement) NOT THE ELEMENTS (Evidence)
—-“Your proclamation as being scientific is also interesting considering the most interesting of your formulations are extrapolations (grammar “word->word”, non-operational, but well condensed.”— Twitter
(That’s a great question. Very few people have the insight to ask it.)
The Methodology:
Disambiguation by Enumeration, Serialization and Operationalization.
Serialization provides empirical evidence of the spectrum in a given language, even if some terms must be disambiguated. We operationalize the constant relations expressed in the SERIES, not the elements.
So if I list the truth spectrum, identify its constant relations, and state them operationally, I have completed the method. (It’s just like geometry, three points make a line, lines are unambiguous).
Which is why you see me using geometry in everything. It’s a higher (less ambiguous) standard of measurement. Or said differently, geometry constitutes the most complete grammar we have, and sets are a means of producing ideals and sophism. Or better: all language is measurement.
The question is only the precision of the measures.
P is the most precise n-dimensional language we have.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-28 08:30:00 UTC
Updated Sep 28, 2019, 7:32 AM
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-28 07:32:00 UTC
LIBERTARIANISM WORKS FOR MEN WHO OWN BUSINESSES, WEAPONS AND FAMILIES.
by Con Eli Khan
European libertarianism is just the political philosophy of armed men with property. If I am a baron or knight with my own land(economic sovereignty) family( reproductive sovereignty) arms and armor (Physical sovereignty). Interference in another sovereign’s affairs for transient reasons is risky, expensive and pointless. The problem with Mises is that he sought to extend the benefits of sovereignty to those unqualified for it. The TLDR is that libertarianism works for white men who own businesses, have weapons and their own families. Nobody else.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-28 07:26:00 UTC
Updated Sep 28, 2019, 6:42 AM
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-28 06:42:00 UTC
(movie review, unimportant)
I’m from the Ebert school of movie reviews: a movie must only deliver on its promise given its budget. And there is a place for saturday afternoon sci fi just like saturday evening horror. And Doom Annihilation delivers exactly what was promised: true to the lore, true to the visuals, with decent sets, budget props and actors. Personally I enjoyed it and I wish there were more ‘honest’ productions like this: Low budget but good light, sufficient staging, sufficient props, sufficient acting, a decent story compatible with the lore, decent camera work, better than decent editing, not overly dramatic, or trying to sell chick power. I mean, I wish they’d crank one out a year using the same general theme and approach. They ruined the Alien franchise searching for high concept, but the doom franchise like the alien franchise is better suited to this form than high concept, just as the original star trek was better suited to cheap delivery of high concept. We aren’t going to get people in theatres any longer except for spectacles, so we need to re-learn how to produce movies we’re interested in more on the design and production of plays. I had fun with it. And I appreciate the work that went into it. -Cheers
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-27 23:01:00 UTC