Updated Oct 4, 2019, 6:03 PM
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-04 18:03:00 UTC
Updated Oct 4, 2019, 6:03 PM
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-04 18:03:00 UTC
Click for video: photos_and_videos/videos/10000000_319674349198065_7144005878576225769_n_128826298515532.mp4 SHORT AMA – IN THEATRE
(low light) (Testing connection)SHORT AMA – IN THEATRE
(low light) (Testing connection)

Source date (UTC): 2019-10-04 13:26:00 UTC
Click for video: photos_and_videos/videos/10000000_164774001417906_570362092411588422_n_128826298515532.mp4 SHORT AMA – IN THEATRE
(low light) (Testing connection)Ahmed RedaHey!Oct 4, 2019, 1:27 PMCurt DoolittleHello allOct 4, 2019, 1:27 PMMicah PezdirtzJoker?Oct 4, 2019, 1:27 PMShamus Oliver SmithAt the desk in SeattleOct 4, 2019, 1:27 PMMicah PezdirtzIT’S HAPPENINGOct 4, 2019, 1:27 PMCurt DoolittleI might go see joker tonight. If I can find anyone else in driving distance that has a white collar… lolOct 4, 2019, 1:28 PMShamus Oliver SmithTop o’ the morning, sir!Oct 4, 2019, 1:28 PMAlexio MaciasWatch out for incel shootersOct 4, 2019, 1:29 PMJoseph PilroseVox Day over hereOct 4, 2019, 1:29 PMMike EmmonsHowdy CurtOct 4, 2019, 1:29 PMWilliam BlackCan I get a shout out for Difficulty II?Oct 4, 2019, 1:31 PMMichael HayesSound is goodOct 4, 2019, 1:31 PMMicah PezdirtzAudio goodOct 4, 2019, 1:31 PMMike EmmonsLoud and clearOct 4, 2019, 1:31 PMNoah J RevoyLoud and clear. Audio is good.Oct 4, 2019, 1:31 PMCurt DoolittleCan you hear me?Oct 4, 2019, 1:31 PMAlexio MaciasSounds goodOct 4, 2019, 1:31 PMAhmed Reda(Y)Oct 4, 2019, 1:31 PMCurt DoolittleOK. Good thanks.Oct 4, 2019, 1:31 PMMicah PezdirtzAny word if Moly will talk with Curt, Noah, Bill, etc?Oct 4, 2019, 1:32 PMWilliam BlackBig shout out for Difficulty my guyOct 4, 2019, 1:32 PMNoah J RevoyVery good brother. Got a few minutes between clients.Oct 4, 2019, 1:32 PMNoah J RevoySM demand collapsing = market opening.
The window is shifting.
But stay positive (only P has constructive ideas)Oct 4, 2019, 1:33 PMMike EmmonsMolyneux seems to be studiously avoiding speaking with youOct 4, 2019, 1:34 PMAlexio MaciasWho would you like to debate if you could choose anyone?Oct 4, 2019, 1:35 PMMicah PezdirtzEven moly likes to sugar coat things in his bittersweet way but like curt said he won’t even go where the discussion needs toOct 4, 2019, 1:35 PMNoah J RevoyMen (and some mothers) are starting to fear for their children.
Position P as the solution to protect their children from predators.
Meme of 2019 Democratic voter related.Oct 4, 2019, 1:36 PMGeorgeHi curtOct 4, 2019, 1:40 PMGeorgeAny thoughts for a propertarian college one day? As in on land a solid locationOct 4, 2019, 1:41 PMNoah J RevoyI’m going to write him again tomorrow. I was on a list that Mike made for future guests, but he left a few weeks after I got on the list. I think the list disappeared.Oct 4, 2019, 1:42 PMMichael HayesRelease the videos you make and dislike to us. :)Oct 4, 2019, 1:44 PMMicah PezdirtzBtw enjoyed your talk with George Bruno. Really got me thinking about propagating a network of leadersOct 4, 2019, 1:44 PMAlexio MaciasAre you familiar with the anarcho-capitalist social experiment that seemingly spontaneously occurred in a town in Austria in the middle of the Great Depression. The town was able to achieve virtually 100% employment with printing their own currency that lost value if not spent which led to an insulated economy of virtually 100% employment. But the central govnt frowned upon them taking autonomy and put them back into poverty.Oct 4, 2019, 1:48 PMMichael HayesNovelty seeking is an issue in a world of consumption and cog-fem humans.Oct 4, 2019, 1:56 PMMicah PezdirtzHave you covered mechanistic competition between neural circuits as the basis for complex decision making?Oct 4, 2019, 1:56 PMMichael HayesThey’ve adapted mal-adaptability. Yes; LIMITS.Oct 4, 2019, 2:00 PMNoah J RevoyWriting is a special kind of thinking. Alternating writing with discussions is my favorite way to learn/discover.Oct 4, 2019, 2:00 PMMichael HayesHow to sell the limits as helpful (the container for emergence)Oct 4, 2019, 2:00 PMAlexio MaciasHow bad do you think the problem is of the capitalist system cannibalizing I.E. corporations destroying industry disrupting innovation technology in order to maintain their industry status quo/profits.Oct 4, 2019, 2:02 PMNoah J RevoyThis feels like sitting with Curt, around a campfire and discussing shit. All we need are some cigars and whisky.Oct 4, 2019, 2:03 PMMichael HayesChaos/Order all the way down.Oct 4, 2019, 2:09 PMAlexio MaciasDo you think the Supreme Court rulings should be considered law or an opiniom?Oct 4, 2019, 2:13 PMMichael HayesThat could be a worthwhile moveOct 4, 2019, 2:13 PMLuke WeinhagenWas listening to audio only today, but came through clearly. Thanks for taking some time.Oct 4, 2019, 2:14 PMNoel KellyClearOct 4, 2019, 4:57 PMJose MartinezAre there any Propertarianism meetup groups or events?Oct 4, 2019, 9:24 PMIan OliverLove it Curt DoolittleOct 7, 2019, 9:20 AMIan OliverYes can hearOct 7, 2019, 9:23 AMSHORT AMA – IN THEATRE
(low light) (Testing connection)

Source date (UTC): 2019-10-04 13:26:00 UTC
Click for video: photos_and_videos/videos/10000000_551027495519177_6474824081269998870_n_128826298515532.mp4 SHORT AMA – IN THEATRE
(low light) (Testing connection)SHORT AMA – IN THEATRE
(low light) (Testing connection)

Source date (UTC): 2019-10-04 13:26:00 UTC
MY CONTROVERSIAL PERSONALITY
Yes, of course I got some of my demeanor from imitating Hoppe’s antagonistic style – and conversely by observing Hayek’s gentility as a failure. That should be obvious. But as someone said yesterday, I’m an mostly an eccentric anglo (english) and right now Jacob Rees-Mogg is my hero, just as much as Aristotle and Genghis Khan are my spirit animals. I’m unabashedly elitist (and have been all my life) which really burns some people. Anyone sufficiently lacking in agreeableness will be so. But sorry, I’m working to restore Aryanism, or what we would call “Prussian” civilization, and one is not left untransformed by doing so. If you want a loving mommy in daddy dress or a christian get a priest I do testimony, law, politics, and war – not coddling. )
-hugs
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-04 13:18:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/72215863_478073399456222_1815949238316564480_n_478073396122889.jpg SURVEY (REALLY)
(a) Is Curt Doolittle Alt-Right?
(b) if so, why?
(c) if not, then … ?
(via David German Hoppe)SURVEY (REALLY)
(a) Is Curt Doolittle Alt-Right?
(b) if so, why?
(c) if not, then … ?
(via David German Hoppe)

Source date (UTC): 2019-10-04 13:09:00 UTC
PROPERTARIANISM IS A SYSTEM OF THOUGHT JUST LIKE ARISTOTELIANISM WHICH IT SEEKS TO COMPLETE
Let’s disambiguate Propertarianism a bit.
We use the term “Propertarianism” as a brand name.
But, Propertarianism as constructed is just a methodology: an Operational Logic of the human sciences.
Technically speaking propertarianism refers to the unit of measurement for demonstrated interests (expenditures) in individual action and interpersonal and group cooperation.
This methodology makes use of not less than the following reformation of the aristotelian categories and their merger with the sciences:
(a) physics – (realism, naturalism, entropy, operationalism)
(b) vitruvianism (the grammars) – metaphysics,
(c) acquisitionism – psychology,
(d) compatibilism – sociology,
(e) propertarianism (reciprocity) – ethics
(f) testimonialism – epistemology (logic, emp, oprer.)
(g) Sovereigntarianism (rule of law) – politics
(h) Adaptive Velocity – group strategy
(i) Transcendence (eugenics, heroism, excellence, beauty) – Aesthetics
As far as I now there is no other system of thought anywhere ear complete, nor one that is value neutral, other than aristotle’s attempt.
SOVEREIGNTARIANISM
Sovereigntarianism is a political methodology, or what we used to call philosophy, that uses the aristotelian-propertarian paradigm and methodology.
PERFECT GOVERNMENT
Perfect Government is a recommended organization of governments that can – like the roman- react to stress and war, operating as a growing concern – and distributing windfalls. This government differs from the modern in that it is less optimistic of human character, and suppresses falsehood and rent seeking of all kinds, and definnacializes the polity, and depoliticizes the polity, so that people are limited to the market of voluntary cooperation to improve their lives.
This government is described using a set of levers so to speak (set of choices) that vary according to market demand for government, from the most authoritarian in war, to the most redistributive under windfalls, while at the same time eliminating the ability of individuals and groups to accumulate rents and corruption (calcification) that always and everywhere brings down a polities from the village to the empire.
1. Propertarianism > Methodology
2. Sovereigntarianism > Socio-legal methodology
3. Perfect Government > Economic-political-military methodology.
As far as I know there is no program as large, or as complete, or as scientific as Propertarianism in human history and the best we have so far is the set of empirical disciplines that have been as much a tragedy as a benefit to us. Because empiricism = correspondence it does not equal causality.
Operationalism equals causality.
Thanks. I hope this helps newbs.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-04 13:02:00 UTC
USEFUL IDIOTS FOR THE ENEMY: NAP-ADDICTS
The NAP?
Really?
1. Define aggression, and aggression against what? How do you know what aggression means, and how do you know what constitutes aggression against what?
a) define aggression?
b) against what?
c) who determines it’s aggression and how?
2. The litmus test is blackmail. Is blackmail aggression?
3. What is the minimum scope of property necessary for a polity to survive competition for territory and people? How do you know that?
4. What is the minimum scope of contributions to the production of commons (defense, common goods and services) sufficient for a polity to survive competition for territory, population, and political control? How do you know that?
5. Why can’t I proactively defend myself on my terms rather than wait until an opposition individual, group, organization, or state conducts violence, harm, theft, fraud, socialization of losses, free riding, rent seeking, corruption, immigration, conversion, undermining, warfare, conquest?
Once you realize you’re a useful idiot it will probably make you angry that you were a useful idiot and then you will go thru a period of hating the enemy for baiting you in to useful idiocy, but the fact remains – you are a useful idiot if you bought the NAP instead of rule of law by sovereignty and reciprocity where property consists of demonstrated interests.
You and your opinion don’t matter. The market determines all of these – not you.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-04 12:40:00 UTC
(Jeez guys, we certainly have critical mass of people creating propertarian quoteables and arguments. It’s awesome.)
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-04 12:13:00 UTC
BEING A FASCIST ABOUT RECIPROCITY MEANS YOU CAN BE ANARCHIST ABOUT EVERYTHING ELSE
By: Gearóid Walsh (via Michael Hayes)
Being an absolute fascist about the bare essentials of punishing ir-reciprocity means you can be anarchist about everything else.
The idealist anarchist alternative is “well I hope that they will respect the Non Aggression Principle”.
The real world just doesn’t work that way. Liberty is an emergent property of safe and high trust societies (contracts and boundaries are expected to be honoured as a social norm and criminality is against the social norm) much more than it can be defined in the utopian abstract, and in terms of absence of select factors.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-04 12:12:00 UTC