Updated Oct 6, 2019, 9:56 AM
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-06 09:56:00 UTC
Updated Oct 6, 2019, 9:56 AM
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-06 09:56:00 UTC
DOMESTICATION OF WARFARE IS OVER. THE WAR OF ALL AGAINST ALL HAS RETURNED
When William Wallace defeated the english at Sterling Bridge, it was because the english assumed the Scotts would wait until they crossed and stood formation – as was custom – before the fight. Instead, Wallace waited until a defeatable number of the english crossed the bridge and then massacred them. They did not conform to the ritualization of warfare between aristocratic families and clans fighting over territories to tax at the minimum losses to the people and assets. Nor did they want to disincentive the common people from fighting.
Western peoples have practiced ritualized warfare in order to domesticate our wars, pretty much forever – with the Westphalian peace that limited war to actions between states our most dominant present influence, and the false heroism of our European Civil Wars, and our current heroism by economic warfare, only slightly influencing our tradition.
The supermajority of our people and our statesmen maintain a current obsession with the presumption of the continued domestication of warfare, both abroad and in the coming second American civil war. They presume we have not, by the restoration of Marxist Terrorism, and their imitators using Islamic Terrorism, observed that the Westphalian peace has ended; and our heroism in dragging mankind out of ignorance, poverty, hard labor, suffering, and disease is ignored because of slavery practiced by every civilization back into eternity, with the muslims the most avid practitioners.
This coming civil war will be more like Lebanon and Syria than the American civil war, and less disorganized than the second world war. It will be region by region, neighborhood by neighborhood, house to house, in spontaneously escalating, unorganized destruction of individual lives, leaving dense urban areas favelas, the near complete loss of industrial capacity, communications, and power. Russians can lose a third of their economy and resort to farming. If Americans lose a third of their economy we will lose a third of our people. And we will certainly lose more. If it lasts six months we will never recover.
I work tirelessly to provide a constitution that will resolve this civil war by peaceful means, and incrementally escalate only upon failure to resolve it by peaceful means. But one thing is certain – the left will not survive as a movement. Ever. And this country will return to rule of law, or it will be reduced to a wasteland if we fail.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-06 09:55:00 UTC
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evGCpSS7vC8WATCH IT NOW!!!!
ALL: I didn’t think anyone, even John Mark could do better than his Reciprocity video.
I was wrong. He did. Watch and Listen to John’s video on Trump using Reciprocity, and the state of the grassroots right.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evGCpSS7vC8Updated Oct 6, 2019, 8:55 AM
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-06 08:55:00 UTC
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evGCpSS7vC8&feature=shareUtterly Brilliant. Brillant. John is amazing. WATCH IT.Updated Oct 6, 2019, 8:51 AM
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-06 08:51:00 UTC
PLEASE STOP BEING A USEFUL IDIOT ON BEHALF OF THE LEFT: LIBERTARIAN MEANS ‘USEFUL IDIOT”
—“For me the last part best manifests itself within the ideas of libertarianism.”—psionin @psionin
Libertarianism is just common property marxism. So “For me” means you don’t understand that the only source of Sovereignty, Liberty, Freedom and Prosperity is rule of law, producing markets for everything, including *commons*, or what we call ‘government’.
Rothbardians turned ‘libertarianism’ from Classical Liberalism under Rule of Law to Ghetto Ethics of diasporic peoples having no, and taking no, responsibility for commons. It’s just common property parasitism rather than private property parasitism.
So Rothbardians destroyed the term liberty as the left destroyed the term liberal. Either we have a militia in which every man holding the franchise defends rule of law under sovereignty and reciprocity, and produces commons necessary for survival of the polity – or not.
If not, then the polity cannot survive competition in the market for territories, population and social, economic, and political order. Which is why there are no libertarian polities, and never will be.
Libertarianism is just demand for a commune of private rather than common property at best, or an excuse to fool high trust european peoples into hosting parasitic peoples who specialize in profit from baiting into moral hazard, under the pretense of doing no harm.
So please stop being a useful idiot. I use Sovereigntarian, or rule of law of reciprocity, or rule of law monarchy, or classical liberal. Libertarian in the hayekian sense means Classical Liberalism. Libertarianism in the Rothbardian sense just means “useful idiot”.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-06 08:07:00 UTC
ANTI-STATISM. IS THAT CORRECT? I DON”T THINK SO.
Hmmm … This is an angle I haven’t worked on enough, which is disambiguating the state (assets and bureaucracy), government (leadership), authority (rule of law and market polity vs authority and directed polity). Because it’s not whether we have a state or government or authority but whether we have rule of law or arbitrary rule (Rule by discretion). Plato’s vision and Sparta’s vision were different only in details. Fundamentally, in both, the majority ‘unwashed’ needed rule. The church the same. The feudal fiefs the same (true). In the monarchies the people only needed order because the middle class had begun to evolve and commerce creates order by incentives thereby eliminating the need for intervention by rulers. The enlightenment sought a majority middle class where all of us were governed by incentives in the market. The industrial revolution tried to reverse it, under Marx putting labor in position of authority rather than the market, and the vast increase in the underclasses continued that expansion.
So when we say we are anti-state, or anti-governmnet this isn’t really true. it’s that we need a state and need a government, sufficient to preserve the largest middle class (market participants) possible, with the optimum common possible.
And the only way to do that is rule of law and eugenics. And eugenics requires either embodiment in law, or the unfettered consequences of the market. So embodiment in the law is preferable solution because it is a moral solution that trades non-reproduction, for subsidy.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-06 07:23:00 UTC
As far as I know the argument over the militia was only whether we be trained or not, and the debate as one of cost not existence. The result of which was that being armed with practice one or twice a year was enough – if affordable. It was never a question of our bearing arms.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-05 19:23:00 UTC
A two bedroom cottage on one level, a four bedroom house with floors, a multi-generational courtyard, a six bedroom manse with wings. …
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-05 16:49:00 UTC
We have known, and have books that describe optimum rooms and layouts. But we ignore them. We have known that all houses are boxes except for the trim that differentiates them. But we ignore it. Design houses by room with standard rooms in courtyard, longhouse or boxhouse.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-05 16:39:00 UTC
We have known the optimum house designs for two thousand years. Courtyard(warm) with outdoor fire and gardens, and Long House (temperate) with indoor fire and outdoor gardens, and Box-House(very cold) with internal chimney, and outdoor fields.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-05 16:37:00 UTC