Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • Updated Oct 19, 2019, 11:28 AM

    Updated Oct 19, 2019, 11:28 AM

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-19 11:28:00 UTC

  • Updated Oct 19, 2019, 11:27 AM

    Updated Oct 19, 2019, 11:27 AM

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-19 11:27:00 UTC

  • DON’T BE SURPRISED —“The government endlessly invests in grown adults who can’

    DON’T BE SURPRISED

    —“The government endlessly invests in grown adults who can’t dress themselves or bathe., and who destroy every apartment they’ve ever lived in. … As Marx says “from each according to his ability. To each accord to his need.” … Don’t be surprised when you have hoards of VERY needy people with that policy.”—Aaron Schwartz

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-19 10:56:00 UTC

  • STATE SPONSORED HYPERCONSUMPTION OF GOODS, SERVICES, INFO, AND VIRTUE SIGNALS —

    STATE SPONSORED HYPERCONSUMPTION OF GOODS, SERVICES, INFO, AND VIRTUE SIGNALS

    —“What we like or want may not be good for us.” –Curt Doolittle

    Context of the original quote was that we have used a variety of techniques to generate hyper-consumption and especially conspicuous hyper consumption, and even worse, conspicuous hyper consumption of virtue signals. In other words, we may like hyper consumption but that does not mean it is good for us, any more than hyperconsumption of the pleasure response by drugs is, or hyperconsumption of sedation by alcohol, or hyperconsumption of calming by nicotine, or anything else in any similar spectrum.

    So, yes, “all things in moderation” for the individual but this isn’t enforceable if the entirety of the political economy is generating hyperconsumption for hyper-taxation, and hyper-redistribution.

    The state should not engage in the provision of the incentive to hyperconsume. This only benefits the financial sector. Instead, just redistribute liquidity in response to shock and sags directly to the consumer and cause business to fight over it.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-19 10:55:00 UTC

  • Updated Oct 19, 2019, 10:52 AM

    Updated Oct 19, 2019, 10:52 AM

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-19 10:52:00 UTC

  • NO, IT’S NOT HUMILITY, ITS JUST R&D IS DONE —“Good, you’re learning humbleness

    NO, IT’S NOT HUMILITY, ITS JUST R&D IS DONE

    —“Good, you’re learning humbleness”—Giego Caleiro

    That’s unlikely. It’s that I’ve finished the research project, and have moved on to explanation and application. So I’m not attacking ideas to learn how to disambiguate them. I’m just working on explaining everything with spectra of market demands rather than monopoly ideals.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-19 10:51:00 UTC

  • As if obama had ANY influence on the business cycle that didn’t make it worse, a

    As if obama had ANY influence on the business cycle that didn’t make it worse, and as if Trump hasn’t systematically worked to repatriate business to the USA.

    —“Why does it bother you that a black President could succeed after being handed aftermath of 2 recessions + 2 wars. If you don’t know tRump by now your education has failed you. #TrumpRussia Mafia Giuliani Ukraine Visa Mob Ties Russia.” — Global News Thailand 🇹🇭 สาระความรู้

    Why would his being black have anything to do with anything? Why does it bother you that someone who specializes in disambiguating pseudoscience from pseudoscience states the rather obvious that obama furthered the global parasitism and Trump undermines global parasitism.

    The Clintons are the most corrupt people ever to hold office (they stole 2M from me personally). We don’t have evidence that Trump did anything except work in finance, construction, maintenance, and food service industries in a world where corruption is a cost of doing business.

    Obama didn’t do anything other than ride the normal business cycle. He certainly didn’t do what I (right), or Galbraith (Left) recommended. He didn’t end the wars like Trump. He didn’t repatriate business. He didn’t force europeans to pay for their defense, or stop chinese theft.

    And as far as we know Russian interference was to sew discord (undermine, in proper marxist, pomo, feminist tradition) in both parties – which is where Russian intelligence spends 70% of their resources – finding ‘useful idiots’ like you and feeding them ‘desirable’ propaganda.

    Russians learned from the Marxists, Bolsheviks, Feminists and Postmodernists, that it is cheaper to sew discord and undermine from within, than to fight economically (they can’t) or militarily (they can’t) or politically (they can’t).

    The female competitive strategy is to undermine by gossiping, rallying, shaming, ridiculing, moralizing, psychologizing, straw manning, disapproval, and denial (verbal) and the male strategy is economic political and military (material). Russians use the female strategy.

    And that is what you’re doing. Because undermining, disapproval, lying, and denial are necessary to obscure undesirable truth and falsehood.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-19 10:49:00 UTC

  • LIVE NOW!!!! CURT ON AKTOS INTERREGNUM Oct 19, 2019, 10:06 AM

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwA8CeHHYZE&feature=youtu.beWATCH LIVE NOW!!!! CURT ON AKTOS INTERREGNUM

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwA8CeHHYZE&feature=youtu.beUpdated Oct 19, 2019, 10:06 AM

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-19 10:06:00 UTC

  • “Siege: The Highbrow Edition, by Curt Doolittle”—E. Vee (humor, from elsewhere

    —“Siege: The Highbrow Edition, by Curt Doolittle”—E. Vee

    (humor, from elsewhere)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-19 10:05:00 UTC

  • NOW!!! CURT ON AKTOS INTERREGNUM Oct 19, 2019, 9:45 AM

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwA8CeHHYZE&feature=youtu.beLIVE NOW!!! CURT ON AKTOS INTERREGNUM

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwA8CeHHYZE&feature=youtu.beUpdated Oct 19, 2019, 9:45 AM

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-19 09:45:00 UTC