Source: Facebook

  • Regarding The Wars Of Religion: The wars of religion were the result of economic

    Regarding The Wars Of Religion: The wars of religion were the result of economic power transferred from the Mediterranean to the atlantic, and the rise in germanic people’s populations which in turn resulted in their ‘revolution’ and separation from the south. Protestantism was a reaction to the political corruption of the church and the export of capital from the north to the south as taxes. The germanic monarchies wanted to keep the money in-country rather than export it to the south, and so they supported Luther. The people were simple pawns in this process, just as they were during the American civil war. The American civil war was fought between a merchant manufacturing north and an agrarian export south, over the markets created by the westward expansion made possible by the Louisiana purchase and the fact that the south could block northern legislation leading to political stalemate, and the south, as an export economy, paid for all the government’s costs, so there was a tension between the two economic and political bases. Europe’s first civil war was not over religion, it was over economics. America’s first civil war was not over slavery, it was over economics. All wars are over economics. It’s not complicated. What we are seeing today in the muslim world is similar. A combination of rapid increase in population accompanied by rapid increase in food prices, when food prices consume 70% or more of the income of these peoples. They are not ideological revolutions. They are about food. The fact that we talk about these historical events in moral and emotive populist terms is why we fail to learn from them and hence repeat them. THe USA is now going through a demographic shift, and trifurcation if not a four way split of the economy, and a political stalemate between regional cultural differences. This will eventually result in some sort of revolution or change int he political system. THere are any number of theories when this will occur. But the economic and cultural interests are sufficiently divergent that it is unlikely that the domestic empire can persist indefinitely. There are no wars of religion. There are wars of economic interest. FOLLOW THE MONEY.


    Source date (UTC): 2011-05-18 06:16:00 UTC

  • “Customary Law”: See this paper, and this section “Customary Law for the Commerc

    “Customary Law”: See this paper, and this section “Customary Law for the Commercial Revolution”

    See Hayek’s Law Legislation and Liberty if you want to understand the history and importance of common law.

    You can skip the libertarian content if you want, and just read about the history of legal development.


    Source date (UTC): 2011-05-17 00:12:00 UTC

  • Monarchy = Nationalism

    Monarchy = Nationalism.


    Source date (UTC): 2011-05-16 17:20:00 UTC

  • Develop a cohesive, written ideology and the economic justification of the ideol

    Develop a cohesive, written ideology and the economic justification of the ideology. Privatize the school system. Create a network of school. Teach the great tradition of western history for two generations. This line of reasoning is the best method of producing great minds – even in average people. These students will be sought by business and industry, and their social status will be something that people will seek to imitate. Create two new branches of military service: homeland maintenance (emergency preparedness), and foreign service (policing and administering), and leave the existing institutions for the sole purpose of violence. Withdraw our troops from europe and asia. Require military service of all citizens in order to vote. And in two generations you will make it possible to have a Constitutional monarchy. Monarchy is a government for nationalism – an extended family. Families have common values. Education an service make people invested. Our current form of democracy in the USA is more concerned with protecting our trade routes, disempowering white males, promoting ideological class warfare, and obtaining political power than it is in the long term health of the nation.


    Source date (UTC): 2011-05-16 17:19:00 UTC

  • An Ideology: Any reasonably coherent set of social, cultural, moral and politica

    An Ideology: Any reasonably coherent set of social, cultural, moral and political ideas that can be used to obtain and hold political power on the behalf of a part of a population that perceives it has similar interests. Monarchy needs a sufficient ideological base. The people have abandoned the church. The church has abandoned christendom. Economics has replaced cultural nationalism, and empirical tools have replaced the moral sentiments. For monarchy to prevail in the post-mystical age, we must remake it’s foundations so that they rely upon economic and cultural superiorities, not desire to return to the past.

    Monarchs are superior to elected ministers because they have a longer time preference, and with a longer time preference they can more wisely veto those changes which will, in the long term, harm the society – because they are not subject to the fashions of the people.

    There are three basic western philosophical traditions: 1) Aristocratic and Conservative with the longest time preference. 2) Middle Class and Classical Liberal with medium time preference 3) Proletarian and socialist with short time preference. These three philosophies loosely correspond to social class sentiments and perceptions of social order. THey also loosely correspond to the Monarchy, the Senate, and House of Commons. The insight of the british model was to give each social class it’s house, and to force the houses to collaborate in order to enact laws.

    This model was sufficient until the american and french revolutions attempted to break the class model and transfer full power to either the middle or lower classes. And was further exacerbated by the Russian and chinese revolutions which (regrettably) succeeded in transferring political power to the proletariat. After the world wars, Europe was broken and rejected the aristocratic model entirely. (Wrongly. Germany was right. German social order is the most economically productive yet discovered because it mobilizes the working class to produce quality exports.) Instead, governments sought solace in socialist doctrine and universal enfranchisement, while authoritarian and military control was absorbed by the Americans along with the British navy and port system. Americans used this period of economic prosperity to assert their inherited global military power to undermine communism – successfully, but is not largely bankrupt and unable to fund it’s existing military structure as well as it’s redistributionist benefit system. Instead, Americans export debt instead of taxing other countries, and they use that debt to finance the cost of running the world trade system. Unfortunately, in the process of running the empire, Americans have now become a fractured society, with race, culture and class divisions, as well as somewhere between four and ten different ‘nations’ within the USA, operating under the administration of an international imperial government. The US economy is now so dependent upon the value of the dollar, and the use of military force to determine the means by which trade is administered, that the citizenry will suffer if these obligations are reduced.

    This series of events shows the danger of empire building, whether it is done on purpose as in the case of Britain defending herself from spain and france, or by accident, in the case of the USA, trying to maintain stability during and after the war period.

    The optimum government must reflect the class structure of society in one way or another, so that the classes that do exist can use the government to cooperate rather than regress into class warfare.

    A constitution enumerating the specific powers of the government. A hereditary monarch with veto power. A senate of commerce and banking whose members must meet rigid criteria, and who are chosen by lottery. A house of redistribution that is democratically elected. An independent judiciary operating on the common law. And most importantly, 1) issuing loans not laws – loans are calculable and forecastable. 2) the senate borrowing money from the house and repaying interest for use in redistribution to the house, 3) the privatization of all offices of government, so that a bureaucracy cannot form and seize power. 4) electronic presentation of all house legislation, and direct democratic voting on individual bills. 5) Immigration requires cultural assimilation and language adoption, as well as purchased right of entry, and accountable sponsorship of the individual. 6) The return of the majority of political power to the states, and the limitation of the federal government to money, insurance, and defense. 7) the right of nullification and secession is inviolate.

    Money, Insurance, War are global but all trade and culture is local. — And that’s how people want it. Classes exist and in any society will either cooperate and prosper, or in conflict, they will undermine that society and it’s government.


    Source date (UTC): 2011-05-12 15:18:00 UTC

  • Happy Birthday! Can’t wait to see you. Have a great day

    Happy Birthday! Can’t wait to see you. Have a great day.


    Source date (UTC): 2011-05-10 11:16:00 UTC

  • is how to translate accusation of ‘market failure’ into rational language

    http://www.capitalismv3.com/?p=2616Here is how to translate accusation of ‘market failure’ into rational language.


    Source date (UTC): 2011-05-06 15:24:00 UTC

  • over the methodology is a straw man. We’re arguing over the uses of money

    http://www.capitalismv3.com/?p=2627Arguing over the methodology is a straw man. We’re arguing over the uses of money.


    Source date (UTC): 2011-05-06 15:23:00 UTC

  • George Soros is not a good man. Don’t fall for the ruse

    http://www.capitalismv3.com/?p=2633No. George Soros is not a good man. Don’t fall for the ruse.


    Source date (UTC): 2011-05-06 15:21:00 UTC

  • the currencies. Then the monarchies. …. I can have hope, can’t i?

    http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/0,1518,761201,00.htmlFirst the currencies. Then the monarchies. …. I can have hope, can’t i?


    Source date (UTC): 2011-05-06 12:58:00 UTC