Source: Facebook

  • IF WE MUST HAVE GOVERNMENT LETS HAVE RATIONAL GOVERNMENT “We know personal accou

    IF WE MUST HAVE GOVERNMENT LETS HAVE RATIONAL GOVERNMENT

    “We know personal accounts work because we’ve seen them work successfully in Chile and Galveston, Texas.

    In 1981, Chileans were given the option of a personal Social Security account. Within a year and a half, a whopping 93% of workers transitioned from the government-run system to personal accounts. In 30 years, because of the power of compound interest, Chileans who opted for personal accounts have retired with two to three times more money than what they would have received from traditional Social Security. Chile also guaranteed that if an individual’s personal account dropped below the minimum amount the government would make up the difference. In 30 years, they have never had to write a single check.

    The experience in Galveston, Texas mirrors that of Chile: A system that transfers control of retirement decisions from bureaucrats to workers ultimately yields much higher returns than traditional Social Security could ever provide.” – Gingrich.


    Source date (UTC): 2012-03-29 17:38:00 UTC

  • WHY DON”T YOU WRITE MORE SIMPLY? Simplicity comes from the statement of first pr

    http://www.capitalismv3.com/2012/03/29/on-the-complexity-of-philosophical-arguments-and-the-problem-of-conservative-and-progressive-discourse/CURT, WHY DON”T YOU WRITE MORE SIMPLY?

    Simplicity comes from the statement of first principles. Philosophizing itself is a messy, tedious and abstract process which is an effort to deduce those first principles. And, while most philosophy concerns itself with the infinite regress analysis of social norms — which are things we can perceive with our senses — when we consider the subjects of politics and political economy, which consist entirely of things we cannot perceive with our senses, the complexity of philosophical inquiry into economics and politics becomes nearly as difficult as the process of inquiry into metaphysics. I’m sorry. it’s just a complicated problem by its nature.


    Source date (UTC): 2012-03-29 09:18:00 UTC

  • Escher Triangle: impossible objects

    Escher Triangle: impossible objects.


    Source date (UTC): 2012-03-28 23:08:00 UTC

  • CONSERVATIVE STRATEGY: Starve the beast. It isn’t about rational language. It’s

    http://www.capitalismv3.com/2012/03/08/the-conservative-strategy/THE CONSERVATIVE STRATEGY: Starve the beast. It isn’t about rational language. It’s about rational outcomes.


    Source date (UTC): 2012-03-27 09:58:00 UTC

  • problem with our eristic political debate: Conservatism is articulated irrationa

    http://www.capitalismv3.com/2012/03/27/on-the-irrationality-of-liberal-rationalism/The problem with our eristic political debate: Conservatism is articulated irrationally but its premises are true. Progressivism is articulated rationally but its premises are false.


    Source date (UTC): 2012-03-27 09:58:00 UTC

  • economics, what does STRUCTURAL mean? I’ll provide the Austrian answer. It makes

    http://www.capitalismv3.com/2012/03/26/the-definition-of-structural-unemployment/In economics, what does STRUCTURAL mean? I’ll provide the Austrian answer. It makes sense. Will someone else try to provide one that makes sense for keynesianism?


    Source date (UTC): 2012-03-27 09:56:00 UTC

  • is a racist, dishonest, political hack

    http://www.capitalismv3.com/2012/03/26/krugman-is-a-racist-dishonest-hack/Krugman is a racist, dishonest, political hack.


    Source date (UTC): 2012-03-27 09:51:00 UTC

  • REJECT A SUPERIOR MILITARY TECHNOLOGY The right has learned from the left. The l

    http://lewrockwell.com/north/north1108.htmlNEVER REJECT A SUPERIOR MILITARY TECHNOLOGY

    The right has learned from the left. The left hates it. The problem is, that the right views these tactics as dishonorable. THey intuitively reject the ethics of the bazaar, in favor of the ethics of chivalry.

    And that is the right’s vulnerability.

    Never reject a superior technology.


    Source date (UTC): 2012-03-25 20:05:00 UTC

  • EARTH IS FULL Silly Progressive dependency upon Ponzi growth. Silly Progressive

    http://www.ted.com/talks/paul_gilding_the_earth_is_full.htmlTHE EARTH IS FULL

    Silly Progressive dependency upon Ponzi growth. Silly Progressive assumption about ‘creativity’. Our prosperity today is dependent almost entirely upon two technologies: fossile fuels and antibiotics.

    The problem is not growth, it’s productivity. And that’s why the conservative social and economic structures are superior.


    Source date (UTC): 2012-03-25 19:42:00 UTC

  • BUILDING IT OLD FASHIONED WAY A must-see on the next trip to Germany

    http://www.spiegel.de/international/zeitgeist/0,1518,822375,00.htmlTHE BUILDING IT OLD FASHIONED WAY

    A must-see on the next trip to Germany.


    Source date (UTC): 2012-03-25 18:49:00 UTC