Source: Facebook

  • THE EUGENICS AND DYSGENICS OF OUR RULING CLASS “The church conducted this progra

    THE EUGENICS AND DYSGENICS OF OUR RULING CLASS

    “The church conducted this program of outbreeding in order to capture more inheritance revenue for itself. It was not a socially beneficent policy. It was entirely self serving. And I wold argue that the state is conducting a program of integration and multiculturalism in order to do the same: create power and wealth for members of the state, at the expense of the non-state, coming english people.”

    From: http://www.capitalismv3.com/2012/04/07/defending-john-derbyshire-dear-brits-get-ready-to-eat-crow-on-race/


    Source date (UTC): 2012-04-10 16:42:00 UTC

  • YOU READ ONE ARTICLE THIS WEEK – THIS IS THE ONE TO READ: STRATFOR ON IRAN’S STR

    http://www.stratfor.com/weekly/irans-strategyIF YOU READ ONE ARTICLE THIS WEEK – THIS IS THE ONE TO READ:

    STRATFOR ON IRAN’S STRATEGY

    Depending upon your concept of the world: universalist democratic socialist, or hierarchical tribalist, or utilitarian economist, you might see US policy toward Iran in a different light.

    One thing is for sure: we are accomplishing for militant islam, on behalf of Iran, precisely what the Persians and the radicals have always desired — a restoration of the empire from the mediterranean to the Sino-Hindu border, and a vehicle for concentrating wealth via oil revenues that will surpass both the classical era’s means of concentrating wealth via agriculture, the renaissance era’s means of concentrating wealth through shipping, or the industrial era’s means of concentrating wealth through institutional capitalism and industrial production.

    We will have an expansionist, anti-rational, totalitarian civilization, operating on non-market principles, with which much of the developed world cannot compete.

    We will lose the dollar as a reserve currency, and as a Petro-currency, and finish the cycle of credit expansion, finish the Keyenesian economic era, and eradicate the ability of the west to pursue debt-dependent social programs. We will see europe need to remilitarize just when it cannot afford to. We will see the USA split between a hostile and patient china and a hostile and impatient islam, just when the USA is itself split by political, regional and racial discord.

    You cannot ‘spread democracy’. You can only spread capitalism and consumerism. Democracy is a unique property of the west, because the west is the only civilization to have broken familial and tribal bonds — having forbidden intermarriage for centuries. Democracy will never succeed except among families, tribes, villages and small cities. It is antithetical to human nature. Even capitalism is ‘democratic’. Nations adopt democratic republicanism when the middle class requires access to politics, and when the antiquarian political systems can no longer accomodate the increased number of people with economic interests. Republican democracy is not ideological, it is simply a necessity born of increases in the numbers of economic interests.

    For these reasons I did, and do, favor war in the middle east on an entirely humanistic, as well as economic, as well as cultural basis: We have spent five hundred years raising humanity out of agrarian ignorance and poverty, through the spread of rationalism, science, technology and the capitalist institutions that make industrial production possible. We must treat Islam as we did the Soviets and the Chinese communists: a militaristic, expansionist form of anti-market regressiveism. A threat to our existing way of life, by a mystical, tribal and familial empire, its culture and religion.

    Until the last, most primitive civilization has joined the movement, they are a regressive threat to all of humanity. They are the latest luddite movement — yet another variation on Marxism, and nothing more. An attempt by existing power structures, and existing cultural investments, to hold onto antiquity despite the obvious failure of their culture in the contrast to others.

    And while my libertarian friends do not like battle drums, they too often ignore the fact, that one must defend one’s market from non-market forces. Markets of the peculiar composition in the west, were made by man, by intent, not by accident.

    The institution of property itself requires defense of not only the property itself, but the institutions of property, and the market itself. Our libertarianism evolved within that set of institutions. And within that set of Institutions it is viable. That does not mean the same principles apply without. Those broader threats pose to high a risk.

    Ideology is for children living under the convenience of those institutions.

    Although I would argue that the attempt to contain Germany actually caused the suicide of the west, our attempts to contain the Russians, Chinese and now islam has not been so.


    Source date (UTC): 2012-04-10 16:11:00 UTC

  • CNN IS ANTI-CHRISTIAN ON EASTER. HOW NICE. NOW, LETS TRY SOMETHING MORE POSITIVE

    CNN IS ANTI-CHRISTIAN ON EASTER. HOW NICE.

    NOW, LETS TRY SOMETHING MORE POSITIVE

    I really don’t care about the content of religious mythology. I don’t think it matters. It might be better for preachers to read from the Iliad and the Odyssey, The Carolingian Epic, La Morte De Arthur, and the Nibelungen than it is to read from the Bible. It might be better to read selections from history and then speak about current events and how they relate. But the idea of a ceremonial leader and a teacher: someone very well educated that the community hires and pays for, and who speaks to the community every week, so that we actually have some sense of membership in something — even if it’s only for festivals and celebrations, births, marriages, foundings, launchings, consolation and deaths, and so we have an excuse to be civil egalitarians in practice by having an occasional meal together and afterward to work on charity together — well, that all seems like a good thing.

    I love the Monarchy, History, Mythology and Mankind. Nothing more miraculous than that seems necessary. I love the Pope too, just like I love the Monarchy. The only protection from the mob is having someone out there whose entire purpose is the perpetuation of our extended family, and who can, with caution say, ‘I do not know what is good, but I know what is bad, and this is bad, and this other thing might be better’. Moral leadership when it is powerless except for the use of passionate persuasion is a defense against tyranny of the mob, ideologies, groups or individuals. Monarchy, even only as a vehicle for veto or ascent, is good for the same reason – especially if the nations are small. Monarchy is in history, the most common, best understood, and therefore the natural order of man for this reason. Our parliaments are merely a means of getting more work done – not better work done.

    Religion need not be supernatural for it to have mystery and profundity in the beauty of its complexity. As humans we are capable of all that and more on our own. Gods should be a role model. A model we can aspire to, and perhaps one day achieve. I might prefer Arthur or Alexander. But if you have to pick a particular Nazarene instead, I’m all for it. He was a good man to use as a role model. And the consequences of using him for that purpose are nothing if not magical. 🙂


    Source date (UTC): 2012-04-08 13:08:00 UTC

  • (Ulcers are really painful. Disablingly so. Making Easter impossibly tedious. Go

    (Ulcers are really painful. Disablingly so. Making Easter impossibly tedious. Going to eat Paleo from now on. Sigh.)


    Source date (UTC): 2012-04-08 12:20:00 UTC

  • DIFFERENCES ARE A MASS PHENOMENON “‘We do not see our differences during casual

    DIFFERENCES ARE A MASS PHENOMENON

    “‘We do not see our differences during casual conversations between individuals. It is when we form mobs, polities, armies, and economies, and compete as groups; when we unite under the banner of our myths, when we express our metaphysics, our first-beliefs in man, that those subtle tendencies, en masse find free expression, without the courtesy of daily connivance between isolated individuals. It is then, in that state, our sentiments fully exposed, we can compare the differences in our cultures, our nations and our values.”


    Source date (UTC): 2012-04-08 11:56:00 UTC

  • CONTROVERSIAL POST ON RACE, POLITICS, NORMS, AND MULTICULTURALISM (A reply to th

    http://www.capitalismv3.com/2012/04/07/defending-john-derbyshire-dear-brits-get-ready-to-eat-crow-on-race/A CONTROVERSIAL POST ON RACE, POLITICS, NORMS, AND MULTICULTURALISM

    (A reply to the Guardian)


    Source date (UTC): 2012-04-08 11:43:00 UTC

  • CAN WE HAVE THE QUEEN PLEASE? Seems awfully selfish of the Brits not to share

    CAN WE HAVE THE QUEEN PLEASE?

    Seems awfully selfish of the Brits not to share.


    Source date (UTC): 2012-04-06 18:02:00 UTC

  • HUMAN ACTION AS A SOLUTION TO PHILOSOPHICAL PROBLEMS OF CAUSATION (Had To Captur

    HUMAN ACTION AS A SOLUTION TO PHILOSOPHICAL PROBLEMS OF CAUSATION

    (Had To Capture This one – although I belabored the middle part a bit)

    RE: “Like “Existence”, “Causation” is, as Gian-Carlo Rota might have said, a folie. There is only direction of entropy as measured by gradients of correlation. It is one of those dirty secrets of philosophy of science.” – A Critic

    This is only true in the abstract, special case of relations in the physical universe which exist independently of human action. When instead, we consider that category of relations which are the result of human action, and where such action requires information necessary to plan, and where such information is of necessity a generalization of the complexity of the physical universe, and as such where a loss of information is necessitated by such acts of generalization, and where such a loss of information is necessary in order to compose an action which will alter the course of events through a process of heuristic calculation, and where actions are limited to the possible scope of human actions, then by necessity causation consists of a set of actions that are observable, and categorically definable both individually, and in the aggregate, by observation of those actions, which because of the information loss aforementioned, produce patterns of outcome which are distinguishable from the entropic limitations of the physical universe to which calculation and aggregation are impossible concepts. The universe cannot observe itself, predict it’s own movements, and construct a plan by which it may alter events. It consists of constant categories. The categories used by human beings are limited only by their desired actions, and their desired actions, in collective permutation, are less limited than those of the physical universe.

    This paragraph, should you care to wade through it, answers the question of causation, and most likely imposes sufficient constraints upon the metaphysical nature of existence, and limits the problem of determinism and free will enough to reduce all problems to solvable problems. Humans must act.

    Science is more simplistic than human cooperation. That is why we solved it first.

    🙂


    Source date (UTC): 2012-04-06 16:24:00 UTC

  • CONFUSION AS AN EXAMPLE OF WHERE WIKIPEDIA FAILS

    http://www.capitalismv3.com/2012/04/04/caplan-and-boettke-on-wikipedia-and-the-economic-calculation-debate/AUSTRIAN CONFUSION AS AN EXAMPLE OF WHERE WIKIPEDIA FAILS


    Source date (UTC): 2012-04-06 14:50:00 UTC

  • AN HOMAGE: THE END OF LOVE OF THE EXPERIENCING OF DRIVING? Most people buy exoti

    AN HOMAGE: THE END OF LOVE OF THE EXPERIENCING OF DRIVING?

    Most people buy exotics entirely for signaling purposes. They certainly do not buy them for utilitarian transportation. But for some minority of owners, the pleasure of driving something terribly powerful, elegant to look at, visceral to command, and mechanically uncompromising is a pleasure in itself.

    In an era of commuting, where we often seek to replicate our living rooms in order to reduce the tedium of repetitive driving, or where we augment that utilitarian purpose with consumer status signaling, the pure pleasure of the experience of driving the sports car or the experience of adventure from driving the grand touring car is often forgotten.

    We have few places where we can experiment with our sports cars without fear of prosecution, and the world has shrunk so much and become so densely populated, and our roadways so utilitarian, that the grand touring experience has become one of selecting from a set of fixe drives through aging natural amusement parks rather than a means of exploring the world around us, and loving the experience of it.

    For many, the signaling that comes from driving a Ferrari is a net benefit. THey attract attention. For some of us, they attract too much attention. It’s painful to come back to your car after ten minutes and find a dent in the hood and fresh droplets of pistachio ice cream on it, because someone who does not know better sat on the car as a photo opportunity.

    For that reason, the Porsche truly is the best brand with which to experience the world. They are uncompromising machines. They are durable machines. They’re beautiful machines. And they’re thrilling to drive. And you don’t have to leave them with a hotel valet. You can leave them in a parking lot without worrying that they’ll attract the attention of the impulsive if you want to have an espresso while sitting in the sunshine, people-watching at a cafe.

    Much of the world that was explorable with postwar British sports cars is gone. The developed world is too highly populated, and human culture no longer functions in open air of markets and city streets. That postwar exploratory experience today is better found with a Jeep or Land Rover in the developing world. Outside of Los Angeles, the postwar baby boom car culture – cruising – as a means of socializing, is not only impossible but open to prosecution, because it is indistinguishable from criminal surveillance by gangs, or inebriated risk taking by the young. To some degree urban foot traffic in europe is the only way to have that social experience. Online socialization hardly suffices. But the thrill of driving is reserved tot hose people who participate in celebratory rallies like the Gold Rush or Gumball rallies. Rare events that are expensive and orchestrated, not recreational exploratory opportunities to gain insights into and compassion for, your fellow man.

    Driving is an expresson of freedom. A gift of modernity: our ability to move outside of our twenty mile radius of possible life experience with ease. A way of touching more humanity that we could without it. It was a privilege. A reflection of a time of rapid change. And what little is left for us, is best experienced not with an exotic which is the focus of your attention, but by a little sports car, where humanity, despite it’s materialistic homogeneity. is the focus of your attention.


    Source date (UTC): 2012-04-06 13:07:00 UTC