Source: Facebook

  • WAS THAT A SMALL EARTHQUAKE? Greater Seattle Area?

    WAS THAT A SMALL EARTHQUAKE?

    Greater Seattle Area?


    Source date (UTC): 2012-05-20 23:20:00 UTC

  • THE TOP THEORETICAL TAX RATE REALY 70% OR IS IT REALLY 50%? This article discuss

    http://www.nationalreview.com/agenda/300373/guest-post-arpit-gupta-saez-and-diamond-taxes-arpit-guptaIS THE TOP THEORETICAL TAX RATE REALY 70% OR IS IT REALLY 50%?

    This article discusses top tax rates in tolerably accessible terms.

    I’ll buy that it’s 48%, depending upon where it’s graduated. But as I’ve stated repeatedly, it has to be constructed on a rolling average of income, not that of a single year, which penalizes the middle class for rare events that pay for their retirements. Otherwise there is no 1% (or the more accurate .017%) because something close to 30% of people end up in that high tax bracket at some time in their lives, and that’s too big a block to alienate through aggressive taxation that threatens their retirement savings that come from almost entirely from rare events.


    Source date (UTC): 2012-05-19 17:47:00 UTC

  • would like to see a similar chart containing the social class of the protagonist

    http://io9.com/5911520/a-chart-that-reveals-how-science-fiction-futures-changed-over-timeI would like to see a similar chart containing the social class of the protagonists (Futurama:lower, Gibson: lower middle, Star Trek: Middle, Asimov: upper middle, Herbert’s Dune: Upper.) Because I think that would tell us just as much about class changes as it does about the presence of technological change.


    Source date (UTC): 2012-05-19 16:59:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    http://www.capitalismv3.com/2012/05/08/what-is-the-motivation-of-conservatives-libertarians-and-liberals/


    Source date (UTC): 2012-05-18 12:48:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    http://www.capitalismv3.com/2012/05/18/the-left-right-divide-is-meaningful-because-our-institutions-reinforce-it/


    Source date (UTC): 2012-05-18 12:46:00 UTC

  • QUESTION Is there knowledge or wisdom we would prefer not to have even if it is

    QUESTION

    Is there knowledge or wisdom we would prefer not to have even if it is inescapably true?


    Source date (UTC): 2012-05-17 21:40:00 UTC

  • LAWSUITS AS ENTERTAINMENT I’m writing a pleading. I actually like writing them.

    LAWSUITS AS ENTERTAINMENT

    I’m writing a pleading. I actually like writing them. It’s like philosophy except that the law is even more criminal in itself than the things we adjudicate with it.

    What is so painfully obvious to the libertarian, is the need to compensate for the pervasive ignorance of the state, its total abandonment of property rights, and the emphasis on protecting the presumption of competence of the court rather than the property rights of the individuals at hand.

    Compared to philosophy it’s like slumming for beers in the cheap bars in college.


    Source date (UTC): 2012-05-17 18:22:00 UTC

  • Libertarianism and Marxism They are both philosophically rigorous. libertarianis

    Libertarianism and Marxism

    They are both philosophically rigorous.

    libertarianism wins on everything except the satisfaction of our psyches.

    Liberalism and conservatism have no such rigor. Conservatism is historical. Liberalism is emotional. Rawls creates a system of justice that assumes away scarcity. Hayek places limits that progressives cannot bear to face.

    But its exasperating that we are able to argue rationally with Marxists despite the gravity of their failure. But cannot convert conservatives. And cannot even have rational conversations of any sort with liberals.

    The only way to solve this problem is empirically and we cannot do that with the data we have today. The best we can do is prove the other side is even more ignorant than we are. And is therefore exposing us to risk by preventing us from reducing our risk, while greatly expanding it.


    Source date (UTC): 2012-05-17 17:32:00 UTC

  • BULL MARKET OVER? “You can blame Europe…you can blame the Fed…or you can blame h

    BULL MARKET OVER?

    “You can blame Europe…you can blame the Fed…or you can blame high energy prices. But no matter where you put the blame – it appears that our brief, nine-week bull market is over.” – William James, Eastman


    Source date (UTC): 2012-05-17 14:33:00 UTC

  • SMART PEOPLE TALK TO THEMSELVES BUT POLITICS IS THE ART OF THE MUNDANE Talking h

    SMART PEOPLE TALK TO THEMSELVES BUT POLITICS IS THE ART OF THE MUNDANE

    Talking heads and bloggers abound. But we talk mostly to ourselves in order to construct arguments that can be successfully employed by our faction leaders, which can then be articulated by our faction members, in oder to maintain their conviction in support of onslaughts from our competing factions.

    Our political preferences are inherited, and we largely seek to confirm them. And it’s important because only the undecideds determine elections, and we must keep our factions motivated in order to give the undecideds the confidence to vote for our side versus the other.

    But if you attend state and local level political gatherings. And listen to average party discourse, there are one or two important initiatives, but most of the members argue along ideological lines using the tired mantras that we silly scribblers have produced over the past election cycle, if not the past generation, precisely for their use. Human beings can rarely articulate their own feelings and ideas. We give them the tools to do so. And it’s either gratifying or horrifying how procedural the process is, from ideological manufacture of memes, to the tactical employment of them in daily life.

    Average voters are something else altogether different from faction members. They vote ideologically or pragmatically. But they still get their information from near neighbors who have collected and sorted through these memes. And in the end, they seem to vote almost exclusively for who they think will win, or their subjective evaluation of the current state of affairs, versus who’s policy that they agree with.

    And those that we cannot convince with arguments we convince by saturation bombing with advertising in the vague hope to tilt the 15% of people who are not entirely committed to one side or the other. People need a means of choosing from the impossible and incomprehensible and we try to give them one.

    I would much prefer economic democracy, where we used the web to allocate our tax dollars to what we prefer, rather than relied upon politicians and bureaucrats, elected according to ideology, using memes that we produced for the purpose of swaying the 15% of people who simply don’t care one way or another.


    Source date (UTC): 2012-05-16 16:06:00 UTC