Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • A WOMAN’S OBSERVATION OF PROPERTARIANISM —“Well, as a woman that’s been observ

    A WOMAN’S OBSERVATION OF PROPERTARIANISM

    —“Well, as a woman that’s been observing Propertarianism over the last few years I can say that holding my interest was never really the issue. For me it was a question of being too drawn in, to the point of distrusting my own judgement, leading to withdrawal. I mostly just found it all too overwhelming…like being caught in an intellectual flash-flood that was hell bent on carving out a new course for humanity. My presence felt inappropriate somehow.

    There is a degree of masculinity within the group that’s certainly suffocating – you’re clearly aware of this and acknowledge that it is a necessary part of building up the organisation, however.

    I don’t think Propertarianism really needs a female presence and any attempts and making it more accommodating will likely weaken the organisation’s capacity to attract young, enterprising males.”— Lisa Outhwaite

    Smart woman. A rare intellectually honest one.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-25 19:45:00 UTC

  • “Curt. Prepare a Network of people of smart people (in the know) found in the va

    —“Curt. Prepare a Network of people of smart people (in the know) found in the various states of America.”— A Friend

    Control is unnecessary. Information, Opportunity, Incentives , and Enforcement via prosecution will do the rest.

    Markets in everything.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-25 19:28:00 UTC

  • (Very proud of y’alll. Very proud of all of us. Let’s hope we scale faster enoug

    (Very proud of y’alll. Very proud of all of us. Let’s hope we scale faster enough from here that we are ready for the events that will happen even if we aren’t.)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-25 17:41:00 UTC

  • “The crazy notion that overlapping distributions can still have divergent centra

    —“The crazy notion that overlapping distributions can still have divergent central tendencies and dispersion. It’s almost as if statistical reasoning doesn’t stop at the door just because we want it to.”—Duke Newcomb

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-25 17:32:00 UTC

  • THE POLICE ARE DEPENDENT ON GASOLINE TOO In Houston I have gone 5 days without e

    THE POLICE ARE DEPENDENT ON GASOLINE TOO

    In Houston I have gone 5 days without electricity or EMS/Police service due to hurricanes.

    The first thing to go is gasoline. It was creepy to listen on my police scanner as they refused 911 calls because they didn’t have enough fuel to drive to the location.

    Now I fill several 5-gallon fuel cans when a hurricane approaches. Get a few of these and put them in your attic. Fill them when danger approaches…

    —Bill Shevick Jager

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-25 17:31:00 UTC

  • IF YOU WANT TO LEARN P Propertarianism is like aristotelianism – it is a huge pr

    IF YOU WANT TO LEARN P

    Propertarianism is like aristotelianism – it is a huge project that reforms much human thought especially logic, language, epistemology (knowledge), psychology, sociology, ethics, law, and politics.

    1. You can learn about our proposed constitution and it’s policies (it’s a lot, and you might have to learn a bit bout economics and the justice system but you can do it.)

    2. You can learn the Big History of the competition between civilizations and in particular between european and semitic.(easy)

    3. You can learn why europeans evolved faster than the rest, and developed the only truth telling, high trust, wealthy, advanced, technological, civilization in so short a span in the bronze, ancient, and modern worlds – except for our period of failure during the abrahamic dark age. (relatively easy)

    4. You can learn a whole suite of the propertarian arguments (Takes some work)

    5. You can learn how to conduct propertarian arguments

    You can learn how to use the p-methodology (Not easy)

    6. And you can if you want to get into the foundations of the P-methodology, the completed scientific method, and logic and epistemology. (Hard)

    SO IF YOU WANT TO LEARN ANY OF THAT

    1) you can use the site and read it.

    2) you can follow along.

    3) you can use my friends list to contact and catch the attention of a mentor by asking for help:

    alain, stepan, bill, luke, brandon, erik, steve, eli, …(thera are a lot more)

    4) you can take our course (if you are patient enough for me to slowly release content – and I mean slowly).

    The other folks are better teachers than I am. Really. By far.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-25 17:27:00 UTC

  • P-DECIDABILTY IS A DANGEROUS IDEA! by Duke Newcomb This decidability is a danger

    P-DECIDABILTY IS A DANGEROUS IDEA!

    by Duke Newcomb

    This decidability is a dangerous idea.

    If the you-know-whos were to figure out the stuff we talk about and what we really mean, they’d SHUT IT DOWN!

    Decidability may be more of an antipode to parasitism than reciprocity. A decidable institution could hit such an escape velocity that it would shake off or burn off parasites along the way. It could not just counter the small hats’ group strategy as enforced reciprocity does, it could foreclose on its use.

    Perhaps that’s wishful thinking on my part, but mein Gott, this idea seems highly radioactive and long half-lived

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-25 16:44:00 UTC

  • The economics of consumption has replaced morality in politics, but it is possib

    The economics of consumption has replaced morality in politics, but it is possible to restore consumption-with-tests-of-changes-in-the-state-of-capital possible under commodity money, localized capital, regional markets, and social homogeneity and abandon simple volume of consumption under conditions of paper money, social heterogeneity, world capital, and worldwide markets, thereby ending hyperconsumption, including of genetic, social, institutional, cultural and civilizational capital.

    In other words we lost the ability to test the changes in civilizational capital, by failing to measure them as trade moved from regional to national to civilizational to world scope – and in doing so our failure to include measurements of, and tools for measuring, human, cultural, institutional, genetic, etc capital was exposed and exploited, just as was our local tolerance for information stated with european law norm, christian values, and aristotelian reason.

    I keep saying this but the problem of the 20th was a failure of our institutions to produce systems of measurement and incentives to defend capital in parallel with the commercial and monetary expansion.

    The beauty of the western common law under which the first court finding that resolves a dispute over an innovation in means of irreciprocity, is that it responds the fastest to inventions of irreciprocity forcing us to continually innovate in means of competition under reciprocity.

    The problem is that our law failed to modernize particularly in two areas (1) measurement of the very capital that provides our civilizational means of competition (human , informal institutional and formal institutional capital), and (2) expanding our law to cover innovations in deception for the purpose of irreciprocity and obscuring that very capital consumption, made possible by the industrialization of false speech, and the reformation of abrahamic supernaturalism, sophism and denial, into abrahamic pseudoscience sophism and denial: marxism, boazianism, freudianism, feminism, postmodernism, and political correctness: denialism.

    We aren’t unique. It destroyed every empire i know of. Because what is accumulated rent seeking other than a failure to measure all capital transformation, and to create new incentives under the law to suppress newly available forms of parasitism that consume rather than produce human capital.

    All civilizations collapse because they have exhausted the capital available to use in the reorganization of a pareto distribution of influences, and a nash equilibrium of rewards for preserving that new system of organization, in response to scarcities, shocks, changes in trade routes, conflcit, war (Physical, Ideological, religious, economic), and variations in the environment (drought, climate, water and river changes, continuous quakes, world volcanic activity – which aside from very large asteroids is the most dangerous of all.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-25 16:29:00 UTC

  • THE PAST CHALLENGE OF BRINGING WOMEN INTO, AND KEEPING THEM IN, PROPERTARIANISM

    THE PAST CHALLENGE OF BRINGING WOMEN INTO, AND KEEPING THEM IN, PROPERTARIANISM

    —“Enjoying your posts”— A very kind woman 😉

    Awesome.

    It’s very hard for us to keep women interested, so that makes me (and the leadership) very happy.

    Three reasons it’s challenging: (I need a reason to post this so I’ll seize the opportunity you’ve created. 　 )

    The general strategy of restoring the compromise between the genders that makes raising children, family, civil society, harmonious society, possible tends to attract men falsifying the excesses of marxism, feminism, postmodernism, and denialism (political correctness) when masculine men always and everywhere think in systems and politics, and women in empathy and relationships means that if we don’t find women who’ve had strong fathers and brothers, that they too often cannot translate male systematizing and political speech(aggregates), and interpret it as personal speech, or and interpersonal speech and find this offensive.

    Worse, we can attract men with bad experiences making it worse. SO this is why I spend time writing about male and female relationships in economic terms so that we can return to a compromise between the genders rather than a see-saw of conflcit between extremes.

    Worse, I teach in the masculine method of competition using king of the hill games, taking positions i agree with, disagree with, or can go other way with, or which can be interpreted by me advocating both ways. This generates lots of masculine huffing and chuffing and flexing and dominance, which is how men love to learn and will value what they learn. And very few women like to play the king of the hill game. Most women tend to referee the men instead. And that’s probably our natural dispositions.,

    So a woman has to be able to say ‘thats just silly man talk’ the same way men say ‘thats just silly women talk’ because we’re both expressing our genetic impulses instead of working on compromise through trades. The difference is that is almost universal for masculine men to say ‘men and women engage in silly man talk, and silly women talk and that’s ok’. And for evolutionary reasons – men fear only of force not words, and women primarily concerned with words, both for their own protection from other women, and for protection of their children on many levels – including preventing them from ‘learning what they can’t yet make use of’.

    I think part of our transition out of the more analytic content and more into the religious, social, and political application of p-law is helping our expansion. Very few people want to understand testimonial truth – and I’m not sure how many can. lol )

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-25 16:01:00 UTC

  • ALL P’S: PLEASE FOLLOW THE CULTURAL ONCOLOGIST! (He’s Following the John Mark St

    ALL P’S: PLEASE FOLLOW THE CULTURAL ONCOLOGIST!

    (He’s Following the John Mark Strategy)

    Dear Propertarians;

    Here is my contact information. Thank you again Curt, keep doing the Lord’s work.

    BitChute @ https://www.bitchute.com/channel/wAEx58aksBtN/

    Minds: @Theculturaloncologist

    Twitter: @CancerKulture

    Backup Twitter @Hunderkoch

    Gab @TheculturalOncologist

    UnsilencedVoice.com http://UnsilencedVoice.com TheCulturalOncologist

    Reddit u/CulturalOncologist

    Email: Theculturaloncologist@protonmail.com

    SubscribeStar @ https://www.subscribestar.com/cultural-oncologist

    Patreon @ https://www.patreon.com/Theculturaloncologist

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-25 15:21:00 UTC