Source: Facebook

YES, ITS GENETIC TOO, BUT THAT DOESN’T HELP US WITH INSTITUTIONS – JUST THE DESIRABILITY OF INSTITUTIONAL MODELS FOR DIFFERENT GROUPS.

1)I don’t think that the genetic argument needs to be terribly complicated.

(a) impulsivity is not a complex trait (gives time to consider)

(b) activation is not a complex trait. (desire to obtain stimuli through action)

(c) familial empathy is not a complex trait.(consider others as well as self)

(d) intelligence IS a complex trait, but it can be more easily expressed with lower impulsivity and higher activation.

2) liberty is uncommon and largely undesirable.

The evidence is mounting that liberty is a north-sea-peoples trait. That in objective terms it is an aristocratic philosophy, intolerable to the masses.

3) institutions should be genetically tolerant.

The problem with democracy is that it is a MONOPOLY and as such it is a means of conquest of others by whatever majority exists. The virtue of the market is that it allows us all to get what we want one way or the other, and virtually assures it, as long as it is done in cooperation with others.

Monopoly is bad everywhere, But everywhere it is created by the state.

Federations that use the ‘government’ as a market for exchanges, and where the only monopoly that must exist, is private property rights, BETWEEN groups, is all that is necessary.