Source: Facebook

  • BETWEEN US AND NEANDERTHALS: 96 Genes. Immunity and Brain (ie: more suggestion o

    http://www.ancient-origins.net/news-evolution-human-origins/entire-neanderthal-genome-finally-mapped-amazing-results-001138DIFFERENCES BETWEEN US AND NEANDERTHALS:

    96 Genes. Immunity and Brain (ie: more suggestion of the Dopaninergenic theory has some legs)

    “Only 96 genes responsible for making proteins in cells are different between modern humans and Neanderthals. Intriguingly, some of the gene differences involve ones involved in both immune responses and the development of brain cells in people. Somewhere within these 96 genes may lay the answer to why Neanderthals and Denisovans became extinct.”

    I ALREADY KNOW WHY THEY WENT EXTINCT: WE ATE THEM.


    Source date (UTC): 2013-12-23 15:32:00 UTC

  • BERMUDA Ostensibly Zero Taxes. Common Law Courts. Great infrastructure. Nice wea

    BERMUDA

    Ostensibly Zero Taxes. Common Law Courts. Great infrastructure. Nice weather. Most of the Fortune 100 are there.


    Source date (UTC): 2013-12-23 08:45:00 UTC

  • ADVOCACY IS INCOMPATIBLE WITH SCIENCE Sorry. The state has created the problem o

    ADVOCACY IS INCOMPATIBLE WITH SCIENCE

    Sorry. The state has created the problem of bad science like it has created almost all other ‘bads’ in our society.

    Advocacy is the job of public intellectuals.

    Facts are the job of scientists.

    Skepticism is the job of citizens.

    Judith Curry’s blog is fascinating to read – the moral hazard of scientific advocacy is inescapable, but there are a thousand regulatory prognostications a day, none of which will make any difference. People follow incentives. And advocacy makes for bad science. Books are the only advocacy that science appears to make possible. Papers are merely property claims on intellectual products. The are IP rights for ideas among scholars, scientists, and academics.

    Advocacy is advertising for grant money.


    Source date (UTC): 2013-12-23 08:43:00 UTC

  • Lester came very close to identifying descriptive ethics of the high trust socie

    http://www.amazon.com/Escape-Leviathan-Liberty-Welfare-Reconciled/dp/0312234163Jan Lester came very close to identifying descriptive ethics of the high trust society we call northwestern european aristocratic egalitarian – the North Sea Peoples.

    He came very close. Closer than anyone else.

    And, regardless of criticisms we can lay against his work, we must acknowledge that he came very close to the correct answer: a universally descriptive system of ethics.

    Now, it has become clear, that liberty is in fact incompatible with sociobiological diversity. And I am fairly sure that it’s impossible to refute that criticism. As such, while liberty is not incompatible within a tribe of closely related people, it is entirely incompatible within diverse polity, that has access to political power, whether by bureaucratic or propertarian means.

    That said, Lester’s arguments are informative, as are Hoppe’s, for those homogenous societies with indifferent sociobiological capabilities, reproductive structures, and structures of production.

    Even if they do not help us with societies in conflict on their borders with competing social orders, or within their borders with competing moral and sociobiological orders.

    The fact that lester’s ‘externalization of costs’ is half-right, is still better than everyone else’s arguments, prior to Propertarianism’s universally descriptive ethics.


    Source date (UTC): 2013-12-23 08:34:00 UTC

  • THANKS Just rec’d another note of appreciation from someone who understands what

    THANKS

    Just rec’d another note of appreciation from someone who understands what I’m up to in reforming libertarianism.

    Encouragement matters to me. I can’t thank friends and supporters enough. And for those people who grasp the meaning of my work, you make the world a better, less frustrating place for me to live in.

    Thank you again. All of you.

    Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!


    Source date (UTC): 2013-12-23 07:14:00 UTC

  • My experience over the past month has convinced me even more, that the state is

    My experience over the past month has convinced me even more, that the state is an out-of-control predator. And that one’s only defense is portable property – a mixture of cash and gold. And that any real property one possesses, is just on lease from the state until they can find someone who will pay more for it than you do.

    We have been fattened and herded for ready slaughter.

    The road to hell is paved with cheap, unearned, status signals.


    Source date (UTC): 2013-12-23 07:08:00 UTC

  • MASHUP (joy)(bubbling over) Oversing = Facebook + LinkedIn + Email + Microsoft C

    MASHUP

    (joy)(bubbling over)

    Oversing = Facebook + LinkedIn + Email + Microsoft CRM + Jira + Greenhopper + Microsoft Project + Halogen Recruiting Software + Scrivener + Confluence + Microsoft Dynamics PSA. Plus plenty of things none of those products do.

    And in one very clean interface.

    All we need are spreadsheets. But that’s off in the future.

    Like anything else, it’ll take three versions. But I’m pretty sure it’s gonna be the standard app for managing white collar work, even if I designed it for Advertising, Marketing, Internet and Technology firms.

    I know how to fix ‘the spreadsheet problem’ that plagues the world. And so maybe that’s the last killer feature to add…

    Getting ahead of myself. But we did it. We created a killer app. ๐Ÿ™‚

    Gotta hire one of the best UI artists in the East to tune it up a bit. But it’s just what we wanted, and just what the market needs.


    Source date (UTC): 2013-12-23 06:04:00 UTC

  • HIGH TRUST PRIVATE PROPERTY AS THE SUPPRESSION OF DISCOUNTS Forcing **ALL** comp

    HIGH TRUST PRIVATE PROPERTY AS THE SUPPRESSION OF DISCOUNTS

    Forcing **ALL** competition into the market for goods and services.

    We do not need the monopoly state to suppress discounts.

    Government can consist of simple rules – a contract. A constitution.

    We can use insurance companies as our insurer of last resort, and the ‘government’ for the purpose of constructing commons.

    What discounts do you prohibit as violation of rights?

    I. SIMPLE THEFT

    1. Violence (asymmetry of force)

    2. Theft (asymmetry of control)

    II. COMPLEX THEFT

    3. Fraud (false information)

    4. Omission (Omitting information)

    5. Obstruction (Inhibiting someone elseโ€™s transaction)

    6. Externalization (externalizing costs of any transaction)

    7. Free Riding (using externalities for self benefit)

    8. Socializing Losses (externalization to commons)

    9. Privatizing Gains (appropriation of commons)

    III. ORGANIZED THEFT

    10. Rent Seeking (organizational free riding)

    11. Corruption ( organized rent seeking)

    12. Conspiracy (organized indirect theft)

    13. Extortion (Organized direct theft)

    14. War (organized violence)


    Source date (UTC): 2013-12-23 03:40:00 UTC

  • Why do I work on this problem again? Oh. So that I can understand. That’s right.

    Why do I work on this problem again? Oh. So that I can understand. That’s right.

    I forgot for a minute there.

    sigh


    Source date (UTC): 2013-12-23 03:09:00 UTC

  • THE USA IS AGAINST SECESSION : TOO BAD FOR UKRAINE

    THE USA IS AGAINST SECESSION : TOO BAD FOR UKRAINE


    Source date (UTC): 2013-12-23 03:06:00 UTC