Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • RECIPROCITY ENTERING THE MAINSTREAM —“There’s that word reciprocity again… W

    RECIPROCITY ENTERING THE MAINSTREAM

    —“There’s that word reciprocity again… Where have I heard that before?!?”— JWarren Warren

    We will get there. We will standardize that term as the central object of conflict, thereby replacing equality. We probably wont get credit for it. But we will get there. Everyone will use the term. It is the foundation of western civilization. It’s the reason for our success. Its true and it’s moral. But the harder problem in the future will be preventing the use of abrahamic deceit to undermine that term. And every time they try we will have an opportunity to train the world about abrahamic deceit ,and its cause of past present conflcit dark age, and destruction.

    THE BIG HISTORY IN P

    This is the ‘big history’ (as someone said yesterday) provided by my research into Propertarianism. It’s that the war between the masculine eugenic indo-europea, the feminine dysgenic semitic, the masculine eugenic east asian, remains with India providing the most interesting compromise position at the expense of continuous failure to evolve.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 12:18:00 UTC

  • WE HAVE NO CHOICE. EQUALITY IN RECIPROCITY OR IN POVERTY Our only possibilities

    WE HAVE NO CHOICE. EQUALITY IN RECIPROCITY OR IN POVERTY

    Our only possibilities are equality in reciprocity or equality in ignorance, superstition, and absolute poverty. There is no choice. It’s just physics. Humans have memories, predictions from memories, and ability to choose to act on those predictions, so that we can outwit time in ways physical processes lacking memory, prediction, choice, and action cannot. However that only allows us to benefit from physical processes not deny or circumvent them. We are as physically constrained as is the rest of the universe. And our only substantial advantage is that the ability to imitate, empathize, sympathize, predict futures from them, and choose to cooperate on those possible futures, is so much more efficient and provides so many greater returns, that we can do a bit better than the rest of life forms – at least with our limits – to convert more calories, and continuously increase our consumption through continuous expansion of cooperation. But in doing so we form Pareto distributions of influence, in order to obtain Nash equilibriums of rewards. And that is a physical necessity of physical reality. We don’t have any choice. We are not wealthier than cave men, our only asset is time. Through cooperation we have made the purchasing power of time increase over and over again throughout history, although disproportionately so with the invention of aristotielainsim, and even more so with the mastery of heat, steam, electricity, chemistry, and now information.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 12:18:00 UTC

  • THE PAST CHALLENGE OF BRINGING WOMEN INTO, AND KEEPING THEM IN, PROPERTARIANISM

    THE PAST CHALLENGE OF BRINGING WOMEN INTO, AND KEEPING THEM IN, PROPERTARIANISM

    —“Enjoying your posts”— A very kind woman 😉

    Awesome.

    It’s very hard for us to keep women interested, so that makes me (and the leadership) very happy.

    Three reasons it’s challenging: (I need a reason to post this so I’ll seize the opportunity you’ve created. 　 )

    The general strategy of restoring the compromise between the genders that makes raising children, family, civil society, harmonious society, possible tends to attract men falsifying the excesses of marxism, feminism, postmodernism, and denialism (political correctness) when masculine men always and everywhere think in systems and politics, and women in empathy and relationships means that if we don’t find women who’ve had strong fathers and brothers, that they too often cannot translate male systematizing and political speech(aggregates), and interpret it as personal speech, or and interpersonal speech and find this offensive.

    Worse, we can attract men with bad experiences making it worse. SO this is why I spend time writing about male and female relationships in economic terms so that we can return to a compromise between the genders rather than a see-saw of conflcit between extremes.

    Worse, I teach in the masculine method of competition using king of the hill games, taking positions i agree with, disagree with, or can go other way with, or which can be interpreted by me advocating both ways. This generates lots of masculine huffing and chuffing and flexing and dominance, which is how men love to learn and will value what they learn. And very few women like to play the king of the hill game. Most women tend to referee the men instead. And that’s probably our natural dispositions.,

    So a woman has to be able to say ‘thats just silly man talk’ the same way men say ‘thats just silly women talk’ because we’re both expressing our genetic impulses instead of working on compromise through trades. The difference is that is almost universal for masculine men to say ‘men and women engage in silly man talk, and silly women talk and that’s ok’. And for evolutionary reasons – men fear only of force not words, and women primarily concerned with words, both for their own protection from other women, and for protection of their children on many levels – including preventing them from ‘learning what they can’t yet make use of’.

    I think part of our transition out of the more analytic content and more into the religious, social, and political application of p-law is helping our expansion. Very few people want to understand testimonial truth – and I’m not sure how many can. lol )

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 12:18:00 UTC

  • IF YOU WANT TO LEARN P Propertarianism is like Aristotelianism – it is a huge pr

    IF YOU WANT TO LEARN P

    Propertarianism is like Aristotelianism – it is a huge project that reforms much human thought especially logic, language, epistemology (knowledge), psychology, sociology, ethics, law, and politics.

    1. You can learn about our proposed constitution and it’s policies (it’s a lot, and you might have to learn a bit bout economics and the justice system but you can do it.)

    2. You can learn the Big History of the competition between civilizations and in particular between European and Semitic.(easy)

    3. You can learn why Europeans evolved faster than the rest, and developed the only truth telling, high trust, wealthy, advanced, technological, civilization in so short a span in the bronze, ancient, and modern worlds – except for our period of failure during the Abrahamic dark age. (relatively easy)

    4. You can learn a whole suite of the propertarian arguments (Takes some work)

    5. You can learn how to conduct propertarian arguments

    You can learn how to use the p-methodology (Not easy)

    6. And you can if you want to get into the foundations of the P-methodology, the completed scientific method, and logic and epistemology. (Hard)

    SO IF YOU WANT TO LEARN ANY OF THAT

    1) you can use the site and read it.

    2) you can follow along.

    3) you can use my (Curt) friends list to contact and catch the attention of a mentor by asking for help:

    Alain, Martin, Bill, Luke, Brandon, Erik, Steve, Eli, …(there are a lot more)

    4) you can take our course (if you are patient enough for me to slowly release content – and I mean slowly).

    The other folks are better teachers than I am. Really. By far.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 12:17:00 UTC

  • DISAMBIGUATION OF ‘RATIONAL’ Rational choice(as in reasonable) within the limits

    DISAMBIGUATION OF ‘RATIONAL’

    Rational choice(as in reasonable) within the limits of knowledge and ability, not rational(logical) as in logical when possessed of sufficient information (justification), or rationalism using logic and tests of non-contradiction (textual or linguistic argument).

    Free Association

    … Competing Hypotheses

    … … Rational Choice (reasonable)

    … … … Logical Conclusion

    … … … … Using philosophical Rationalism

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 12:17:00 UTC

  • THE POLICE ARE DEPENDENT ON GASOLINE TOO In Houston I have gone 5 days without e

    THE POLICE ARE DEPENDENT ON GASOLINE TOO

    In Houston I have gone 5 days without electricity or EMS/Police service due to hurricanes.

    The first thing to go is gasoline. It was creepy to listen on my police scanner as they refused 911 calls because they didn’t have enough fuel to drive to the location.

    Now I fill several 5-gallon fuel cans when a hurricane approaches. Get a few of these and put them in your attic. Fill them when danger approaches…

    —Bill Shevick Jager

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 12:17:00 UTC

  • “The crazy notion that overlapping distributions can still have divergent centra

    —“The crazy notion that overlapping distributions can still have divergent central tendencies and dispersion. It’s almost as if statistical reasoning doesn’t stop at the door just because we want it to.”—Duke Newcomb

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 12:17:00 UTC

  • BELOW THE QUANTUM (worth repeating) … At present we deduce that a difference i

    BELOW THE QUANTUM

    (worth repeating)

    … At present we deduce that a difference in fundamental charges is producing a subsequent difference in fundamental charge distributions that we call quantum fields, and a distribution of temporary density of that quantum field we call a particle.

    And by repeating this process of a difference in the pattern of charges, particles form combinations we call atoms or elements, elements form chemicals ,chemicals form molecules, molecules that include carbon produce biochemical molecules, biochemical molecules form proteins, proteins produce molecules necessary for cells, cells produce other cells, cells produce organs, organs produce organisms, organisms produce nervous systems, nervous systems produce memories, memories produce predictions, predictions product choices, and there we go.

    The entirety of the ‘grammar’ of the universe is – similar to binary or ternary logic – a difference in charges, whose change we call entropy: the tendency of all charges to equilibrate from order caused by differences in charges, to the disorder – the minimum difference in charges possible. …

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 12:16:00 UTC

  • YES, ANN COULTER SOUNDS LIKE JOHN MARK —“Sir: I watched an interview with Ann

    YES, ANN COULTER SOUNDS LIKE JOHN MARK

    —“Sir: I watched an interview with Ann Coulter just a minute ago and she sounds just like John Mark. … She needs to be recruited.” — Jim

    We assume she will raise the ‘call to arms’ because she is the most positioned to do so. We are gently keeping Ann ‘informed’ by arms-length distribution of information.

    But, we created a lot of ‘friction’ during research and development. We don’t want her tainted by association with the collateral damage of our (my) prosecutorial method of working our way through libertarianism, alt right, hard right, traditional right, religious right, and now into the mainstream.

    We only want her to appropriate our ideas like we want all center left, center, center-right, libertarian, traditional right, christian right, and hard right to appropriate our ideas.

    In other words, we want to empower Ann and others, not empower ourselves. We don’t need attention. we don’t need recognition or appreciation. We need to produce results restoring western civilization.

    -Curt Doolittle

    -The Propertarian Institute

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 12:15:00 UTC

  • THE CHOICE – AND OUR CIVILIZATION’S CHOICES Life separates plant from mineral. C

    THE CHOICE – AND OUR CIVILIZATION’S CHOICES

    Life separates plant from mineral.

    Consciousness separates animals from plants.

    Agency separates man from animals.

    And not everyone has agency.

    — Ryan Drummond

    Thus we have a choice.

    – Evolve the rest of man into agency (Aryanism, Africanism)

    – Cooperate at our current level of agency (Hinduism)

    – Farm the rest of man that lacks agency (Asianism)

    – Devolve man into the lack of agency (Judaism and Islam)

    — Curt Doolittle

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 12:15:00 UTC