Source: Facebook

  • RUSSIA: THE WHITE PEOPLE WHO FAILED (use this meme) Why is it, that throughout t

    RUSSIA: THE WHITE PEOPLE WHO FAILED

    (use this meme)

    Why is it, that throughout their history, at every opportunity, Russians consistently make the wrong decision? What is it that Russians incorrectly intuit about the world? Why do they have the lowest trust most corrupt nation of all the white peoples? Why is it that Russians are the one white people who have failed.

    If any people was ever incapable of self government, it’s Russians. If any people was less capable of governing others. It’s the Russians. What is it about the Russian character that causes them to consistently fail? What metaphysical assumption about the nature of man and his relationship to the world is so flawed that unless tightly bound to europe they contribute nothing to legacy of white people? Why is it that western peoples have dragged the entire world out of ignorance mysticism sickness and poverty, while russians try consistently to reverse the trend by dragging those white people near them into their failed civilization?

    Why is it that Russians have nothing to offer the world other than corruption, violence, fear and poverty?

    Why are Russians the only white people who have failed?

    Curt Doolittle

    Kiev

    ===

    FROM ANDRAS TOTH (edited)

    Russian peculiarity, to a certain extent is a consequence of geography – as with any other nation and state in premodern and to a certain extent, lesser degree in modern times.

    1) Few big rivers channeling into closed sees – obstructs trade and industrial development, favours self-sustaining closed economies.

    2) Far away from big cultural centres, which lessened the impact of other cultures, and learning by transactions, copying, emulating and transfer of ideas, new practices.

    3) Russia only entered into European history in the XVIIIth century, when expanded borders westward (absorbing Ukraine and Eastern Poland and the Baltics) and with the advent of railways, which made possible the larger scale involvement in trade and world markets.

    4) Unfortunately for Russia, when technically was able to join to the world economy, key countries moved to economic nationalism, beginning with Germany which imposed custom tariff on agriculture products to save East Prussian Junkers from Russian wheat and agricultural products.

    5) Nothing else left to Russia than turn to imperialism and try to expand to get to the seashore through the Balkans to circumvent German trade barrier.

    6) Hence the I.WW, where Russian expansion was blocked by Austria Hungary backed by Germany.

    7). Bolshevik revolution due to the extreme hardship and delegitimization of Czarist regime as a direct consequence of I. WW.

    8) Communist destruction.

    ===

    To which I’ll add:

    (1) the desert and steppe people are a problem and always have been, and have been exceedingly so for the Rus who sit between us, and those people. The chinese character is likewise informed by that same concern, although the chinese do have a nearly impassable desert between them and the ‘undesirable’ people. So just as we in the west have tried to keep the ‘near east’ at bay since the bronze age, the people in both Russia and China have tried to keep the ‘steppe’ people at bay – and failed most of the time. The mongols the most obvious case.

    (2) When Russians sought to modernize, the had the choice of selecting european or byzantine christianity. They chose poorly. Their main trading partner was still byzantium / Islam. The origin of much of the Rus culture is slave trade with Byzantium / Islam.

    (3) As a large poor backward country, they kept their expropriation serfdom until a couple of hundred years ago, the better of the Czars couldn’t modernize fast enough, the soviets (the underclasses) restored that totalitarianism. It’s a very nihilistic low trust culture that seeks easy solutions to problems and has no problem with the win-lose ethic. The win-win ethic is something they actually assume is some kind of deception.

    (4) Without the catholic church’s ban on intermarriage, the west would not have broken familial and tribal bonds, and we would not have outbred, and created the high trust society. Although one reason we broke those bonds easily was that north sea peoples had already been practicing outbreeding and manorialism, which is the origin of the protestant ethic. Not much protestant about it.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-05-01 04:15:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    http://poseidonawoke.blogspot.com/2014/04/meme-libertarian-leon-and-moral.html


    Source date (UTC): 2014-04-30 16:56:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    https://ph.news.yahoo.com/harsh-conditions-men-dont-want-pretty-face-230237617.html;)

    Source date (UTC): 2014-04-30 15:13:00 UTC

  • CIVILIZATION HAS LIBERATED MANKIND —“”When we review the names of Muslim philo

    http://www.memri.org/report/en/0/0/0/0/0/0/3264.htmWESTERN CIVILIZATION HAS LIBERATED MANKIND

    —“”When we review the names of Muslim philosophers and scholars whose contribution to the West is pointed out by Western writers, such as Ibn Rushd, Ibn Al-Haitham, Ibn Sina, Al-Farbi, Al-Razi, Al-Khwarizmi, and their likes, we find that all of them were disciples of the Greek culture and they were individuals who were outside the [Islamic] mainstream. They were and continue to be unrecognized in our culture. We even burned their books, harassed them, [and] warned against them, and we continue to look at them with suspicion and aversion. How can we then take pride in people from whom we kept our distance and whose thought we rejected?…”—

    —“Indeed, it is not, nor is it indebted to any other previous civilization. Western civilization has its foundation in Greece in the sixth and fifth centuries BC; then it stopped in the Middle Ages, but resumed its progress in modern times, when its benefits have come to include all nations. It is really extraordinary in every meaning of the word – excellence, uniqueness, and novelty… It has components and qualities which distinguish it from all previous and subsequent civilizations. It is the product of philosophical thinking invented by the Greeks. The Europeans have based themselves on this kind of thinking, especially on its critical aspect, which developed the capability of producing objective knowledge that is always open to review, correction and progress…”—

    –“The only civilization which possesses the ingredients of perpetual progress is Western civilization, with its Greek foundation and its amazing contemporary formation. … Western civilization believes that it is impossible to possess absolute truth and that human perfection is impossible, so man must strive to achieve it while recognizing that it is impossible to reach. Thus it is the only civilization which is constantly growing and constantly reviewing and correcting itself and achieving continuous discoveries. …”–

    Thanks Adam Voight. This made my day. He compliments the right things. Ignores the bad things, and correctly identifies the difference between following teachings, and acting politically in the name of teachings.

    Sometimes I think it’s all hopeless but these little bits of intellectual sunshine are something to enjoy.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-04-30 14:24:00 UTC

  • AND CALCULABILITY NOT ARBITRARY MORALITY John. Good piece. Although, I’m critica

    http://www.johnmccaskey.com/joomla/index.php/blog/71-new-libertariansEXCHANGE AND CALCULABILITY NOT ARBITRARY MORALITY

    John.

    Good piece. Although, I’m critical of philosophical pretense in social justice as much as I am in the market.

    If any judgment is beyond our perception, and any concept of social justice is, then we must, as in all other matters where complexity exceeds our perception, develop some kind of instrumentation and means of calculation such that we can reduce that which we cannot perceive, to some analogy to experience that we can perceive. Moral rules are not sufficient for achieving that kind of instrumentation, or performing that kind of calculation. The problem requires formal institutions and means of calculation. We have the market for cooperating on means even if we disagree on ends. We have the government for forcing cooperation on means and ends by majority rule. We have accounting to assist us in the perception of that which we cannot possibly grasp without it. And we have economics to attempt to measure our success. But we have no such instrumentation and means of calculating social justice – or even defining such a thing as social justice. (Which current psychologists and economists suspect is reducible to status seeking, and insurance against risk, and nothing more.)

    While we might continue in the methods of the past, and attempt to concoct yet another empty incalculable moralism for the purported common good, these are value judgements and nothing more. They are incalculable. Most of the post-enlightenment effort has considered society a monopoly, in contrast to the pre-enlightenment condition of most urban cities, as federations of minorities denied access to political power, and forced to compete outside of politics, in the market. So the idea of social justice is an artifact of monopoly democracy rather than a federation of disparate interests.

    However, libertarians rightly argue that the only moral test is that of voluntary exchange free of violent coercion. I argue that this ‘test’ is incorrect, since no in-group human organizations demonstrate that low a level of trust, And instead all groups demonstrate and require higher standards of trust, tah also forbid free riding, deception, cheating, as well as burdening other group members indirectly. However, whether we accept a low trust society and high demand for external authority that low trust societies demonstrate, or a high trust society and the low demand for external authority that high trust societies demonstrate, the underlying argument that the only test of moral action is voluntary exchange. So the effort that political philosophers left, libertarian and right have expended under the universalist assumption of the enlightenment has been to find some justification for moral decision making even if the knowledge to make such decisions is impossible both in the market, and afterward, using the profits created from the market.

    The question instead, is how to construct institutions with which groups can conduct voluntary exchanges, which are by definition moral. Majority rule does not allow this. Majority rule is sufficient for the selection of priorities in homogenous polities with homogenous interests. The market is the means by which heterogeneous polities cooperate on means despite different interests on ends. But how can we construct an institutional system that allows the construction of commons, and other exchanges between groups and classes, but is not dependent upon a monopoly bureaucracy, majority rule, or representatives open to influence, special interest, and corruption? Because a government of contracts, not laws, would allow the exchange of say, adherence to traditions and norms, or requirements for married families in order to obtain redistribution. This would make government a means of cooperation rather than the source and facilitator of conflict.

    Cheers

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev

    http://www.johnmccaskey.com/joomla/index.php/blog/71-new-libertarians


    Source date (UTC): 2014-04-30 13:48:00 UTC

  • JOSE TRIES TO BE THE FIRST CITY TO BRING SOUTH AMERICAN GHETTOS TO AMERICA. Less

    http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2014/04/29/san-jose-leaders-look-to-build-pods-microhouses-to-shelter-the-homeless/SAN JOSE TRIES TO BE THE FIRST CITY TO BRING SOUTH AMERICAN GHETTOS TO AMERICA.

    Lesson from the rest of the world. Shipping containers, sheet metal, cardboard, cement blocks and stolen wire cable, are all you need to shelter the homeless. Where they can reproduce like rats.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-04-30 13:08:00 UTC

  • ITS ALL GENES – THE WORLD IS A MUCH FAIRER PLACE THAN IT SEEMS. –” 1) First, it

    ITS ALL GENES – THE WORLD IS A MUCH FAIRER PLACE THAN IT SEEMS.

    –“

    1) First, it means the world is a much fairer place than we intuit. Innate talent, not inherited privilege, is the main source of economic success.

    2) Second, it suggests that the large investment made by the upper classes in the care and raising of their children is of no avail in preventing long-run downward mobility: the wealthy Manhattan attorneys who hire coaches for their toddlers to ensure placement in elite kindergartens cannot prevent the eventual regression of their descendants to the mean.

    3) Third, government interventions to increase social mobility are unlikely to have much impact unless they affect the rate of intermarriage between levels of the social hierarchy and between ethnic groups.

    4) Fourth, emphasis on racial, ethnic, and religious differences allows persistent social stratification through the barriers they create to this intermarriage. In order for a society to increase social mobility over the long run, it must achieve the cultural homogeneity that maximizes intermarriage rates between social groups.

    “–

    Justification. Dunning Kreuger. Envy. Reproductive Strategy. All guarantee that despite the fact his is true, it is in the lower majority’s interests to deny it. Unless we pay them well to have but one child, and punish them severely for having more. Personally I think that’s a pretty good deal. I’d have just one child if someone would pay me 10-20K a year for it, and would take it away if I had more.

    I don’t advocate redistribution for the purpose of equality. I advocate it for the purpose of suppressing breeding, and paying people to assist in the construction of property rights and the commons that facilitates the voluntary organization of production.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-04-30 12:57:00 UTC

  • WHY SO LITTLE SOCIAL ROTATION? IT’S PRETTY MUCH ALL NATURE. –“If genetics domin

    WHY SO LITTLE SOCIAL ROTATION? IT’S PRETTY MUCH ALL NATURE.

    –“If genetics dominates, then the persistence rate should be the same at the top and at the bottom of the social hierarchy. Moreover, endogamous social groups—groups whose members do not marry outside the group—will be completely persistent in their status, high or low. Groups that are on average high or low on the social scale will not succeed or fail socially because of any distinctive culture that they adopted. Instead their success or failure will be the result purely of their positive or negative selection from a larger population. The more distinctive they are now in social status, the smaller a share they will be of the descendants of their parent population.”–

    (INVOLUNTARY REDISTRIBUTION IS GENOCIDE)

    –“Only if genetics is the main element in determining economic success, if nature trumps nurture, is there a built-in mechanism that explains the observed regression. That mechanism is the intermarriage of the children of rich and educated lineages with successful, upwardly mobile children of poor and uneducated lineages. Even though there is strong assortative mating—because this is based on the social phenotype created in part

    by luck—those of higher-than-average innate talent tend to mate with those of lesser ability and regress to the mean. Similarly, those of lower-than-average innate talent tend to marry unlucky offspring of higher average innate talent.”–


    Source date (UTC): 2014-04-30 12:46:00 UTC

  • (Thank you god for Apple wireless hotspot functionality so that as long as I hav

    (Thank you god for Apple wireless hotspot functionality so that as long as I have phone access, I have a laptop that can be connected to the internet.)


    Source date (UTC): 2014-04-30 12:43:00 UTC

  • GETTING ON BOARD: DISARM THE FEDS Disarm the IRS, The BLM, The Treasury, the ATF

    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/apr/30/bundy-aftermath-utah-lawmaker-moves-to-disarm-blm-/LAWMAKERS GETTING ON BOARD: DISARM THE FEDS

    Disarm the IRS, The BLM, The Treasury, the ATF the FBI and only allow locally elected sheriffs to carry weapons on behalf of the state. Require all NEW sheriffs have a law degree, and be members of the bar. Require them all to carry insurance against unlawful use of force.

    DISARM THE FEDERAL POLICE

    Federal Reserve Police

    Library of Congress Police

    National Security Agency Police (NSA Police)

    Smithsonian National Zoological Park Police

    United States Capitol Police (USCP)

    United States Postal Inspection Service (USPIS)

    United States Supreme Court Police

    Veterans Affairs Police

    DISARM THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

    National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Fisheries Office for Law EnforcementDepartment of Treasury

    Internal Revenue Service Criminal Investigations Division (IRS-CID)

    Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA)

    United States Mint Police (USMP)

    United States Treasury Police – merged into the US Secret Service Uniformed Division in 1986.

    DISARM THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

    Office of the Inspector General (OIG)

    DISARM THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

    Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Office of Criminal Investigations

    DISARM THE DEPARTMENT OF AGRIGULTURE

    U.S. Forest Service Law Enforcement and Investigations

    Office of Inspector General

    DISARM THE DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR

    Bureau of Indian Affairs Police

    Bureau of Land Management Office of Law Enforcement & Security

    National Parks Service

    -National Park Rangers

    -United States Park Police

    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Office of Law Enforcement

    DISARM THEM ALL

    ARM US ALL


    Source date (UTC): 2014-04-30 12:02:00 UTC