Source: Facebook

  • YOU MISS THE POINT. ANTI-MATERIALISM IS A SOPHISM TO COVER FOR LYING. WE SEEK GA

    YOU MISS THE POINT. ANTI-MATERIALISM IS A SOPHISM TO COVER FOR LYING. WE SEEK GAINS AND TO PREVENT LOSSES.

    —“But I think you miss the mark somewhat here because heroism is fundamentally not about the material or Darwinian advantages.”—

    Heroism is a means of paying status and opportunity rather than material rewards, in exchange for directing dominance display to the production of commons. those commons may be physical, may be opportunities, may be, normative, may be informational or anything in between.

    So your mistake is failing to grasp that the use of ‘materialism’ as a criticism is an attempt to lie. instead, we seek gains whether material, opportunistic, or informational, and to prevent losses of the same. Because in all things we are simply an extension of the physical laws of the universe, with nothing other than the use of memory to choose optimum opportunities, rather than fae the limits of the physical world in seizing the first opportunity. it is by this vast accumulation of differences using different forms of memory that we capture and resist entropy while the reset of the universe decays.

    If I can get this thru: if you cannot convert an emotion to its underlying economic terms, then you are still talking superstition. It’s pseudoscientific superstition. But it’s superstition. In this example you are still thinking feelings have value, instead of that we evolved to experience positive and negative feelings for having increasing or decreasing assets, in physical (premium), opportunistic(discount), or informational (discount) form.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-31 13:39:00 UTC

  • WORDS OF WISDOM: THE KING OF THE HILL EDUCATION —“Riffing off each other creat

    WORDS OF WISDOM: THE KING OF THE HILL EDUCATION

    —“Riffing off each other creates the best teaching posts and the best learning posts… the best way to learn something is to teach it.. Thanks Curt and Bill..”—Tobias Darby

    Multiple overlapping King of The Hill Games – over time – rather than under time pressure – are the optimum means of teaching men, and it certainly appears the optimum means of teaching women, who prefer not to climb, but to observe, support and criticize.

    This is my vision of education, and it will mean only the best of us will be able to teach, and as such teaching weill become as it should be and is in other civilizations the most respected of positions rather than a clerical position largely one of babysitting.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-31 13:30:00 UTC

  • NO THE FOUNDERS DIDN’T FAIL, THE CHURCH FAILED – REPEATEDLY – JUST AS IT IS FAIL

    NO THE FOUNDERS DIDN’T FAIL, THE CHURCH FAILED – REPEATEDLY – JUST AS IT IS FAILING TODAY. WE ARE TRYING TO RESTORE OUR RELIGION IF ONLY IN DEFENSE

    ‪One cannot force those of us who cannot believe to lie that we believe. One cannot force those who believe not to. It matters only to believers whether we follow the natural law in for superstitious, philosophical,or scientific reasons. Because you must defend the comforting lie by which you pay the cost of membership in the community of the faithful, and profess observance to the same rules as we simply because they are evidentiary empirically demonstrated laws of nature, whether or not a a deity imposed them.

    The founders advanced european civilization by advancing the aristotelian project, that advanced the law of our ancestors, using martial truth, truthful testimonial, warranty of that testimony, and test of that testimony before a jury of our peers. In other words, truth must be testifiable. But the founders were part of the first major phase of restoration of western civlization from semitic conquest by false promise, ignorance and deceit. So while between the Declaration, Articles of Confederation, The Constitution, The Bill of Rights, So they lacked the knowledge

    The failure of the founders was trusting the church to teach the ignorant illiterate poor. The Church failed because it failed the reforms I am proposing whereby the natural law and Christian Love are stated in scientific terms, embedded in our law and the constitution constructed from it.

    So that the reason we obey the natural law, whether by i) command of a depotic evil selfish Semitic god, or ii) the good god of the Persians and romans Jesus transformed and merged into a jewish new testament god; or iii) or of Jesus himself as a philosopher speaking new wisdom literature in the only language the primitive peoples could understand, or iv) of Aristotle himself as the philosopher of truth creating new wisdom literature we call science, or v) the evidence of human success and failure throughout history: science and history of world jurisprudence.

    Because by putting the natural law and christian love and charity into the law of man, a constitution under that law, and into the education of people- the scientific, the rational, and the faithful act the same, according to an immutable natural law, the transgression of which licenses violence against them. *Thereby eliminating all competition from hostile alien religions in scientific, rational, or theological form.*

    Once embedded in our law, the ‘folk’ can govern, adapt, and evolve their religion, as they have for over a thousand years, and no church can fail them. And no competitor can usurp them.

    So just as the classes can cooperate economically despite different abilities interests, and means of storytelling because of the natural law, the classes can cooperate socially and politically despite different interests, abilities, and means of stories, under that law. Because the law is same for all parties – and all that differs is the story they use to measure theirs and others’ thoughts word and deeds. But the law – the system of measurement is the same regardless of language and grammar of storytelling that provides that system of measurement.

    Christians are rather … politically incompetent …, because they practice a religion that failed to evolve like islam into a political religion, because their church failed to succeed at governing, as it was doomed to fail from the beginning.

    The jews, christians, and muslims, forever failed to grasp, that they were creating not a system of rule or civilization, but a system of rebellion against the indo european revolution, of truth, reciprocity, markets, meritocracy, and hierarchy, that created a natural division between the classes, increasing the power-distance between members previously able to directly address headmen and elders – even the corrupt headmen and elders of the semites. And that the consequences of jewish, christian, and muslim civilization was destruction of every single civilization it touches.

    Christianity succeed in the modern world after failing in the medieval, not succeeding because of anything christian, but because of european military, technology, literacy, commerce, and law that was made possible by the failure of the church to consolidate power among the monarchies, and thereby converting europe into semitic submission, corruption, ignorance and poverty. If anything, as most historians have stated before me, christianity served as a cover story for justifying restoration of European-Indo-Iranic Aryan Tradition of Conquest, that had conquered the world from spain to the borders of china, and made the indo european religion the largest in the world.

    We have proposed, I have proposed, a correction of this failure of christianity, and that is to complete the conversion of christianity to a European folk religion as we have seen in the american evangelical movement, and away from a semitic, despotic, religion specifically evolved to sell false promise to the underclass in the next world, as a means of their submission to despotism and ignorance in the living world.

    I propose restoring the churches to central function of family and education, but that these churches may choose to teach the scientific, philosophical, or supernatural versions of natural law and christian love and charity, and if we are lucky, and in addition, restore the debt payment we call worship to nature (heathen), our ancestors, and our heroes(pagan), for those of us who need a good spirit (nature) or a masculine god to rise to (heroes), as well as those of you who need a maternal feminine god to submit to (saints).

    Or you can in your folly, let happen to protestantism under islam what the catholics have let happen under jewish influence, and take your selfish egos, your arrogance, your un-christ-like intolerance, into extinction, like the jews and muslims have destroyed every great civlization that they have touched.

    You have only yourselves to blame for your arrogance.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-31 12:48:00 UTC

  • THE POST MARX-KEYNES ECONOMY: OUR RESTORATION —“There’s plenty wrong with GDP

    THE POST MARX-KEYNES ECONOMY: OUR RESTORATION

    —“There’s plenty wrong with GDP as a global measure of system performance. One of those problems is that no one has yet to come up with a better one.”—Duke Newcomb

    Income != balance sheet. That’s the problem. (Really). GDP P/C @ PPP = Standard of living. Change in Balance Sheet = Gain or Loss (productivity); GDP = Debt Capacity = Military Capacity = Coercive Capacity and that’s all it means. The problem is false productivity, were in consumption of capital is obscured by velocity, in order to maintain keynesian employment as a (bad) means of restoring economic velocity (which is the error) – where under digital and fiat money, liquidity distribution directly to the people will make employment a measure only of demographic utility (which is what the left is afraid of) and the correction of which (as I recommend) will re-suppress immigration, and re-suppress underclass reproduction, and restore middle class reproduction.The only way to increase wealth in this model is reproduction of the middle class, employment of young and old, payment for labor necessary to create an aesthetic commons, one child policy for those who are dependent, and following the japanese in automation.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-31 11:33:00 UTC

  • WE MUST RULE WITH THE PEOPLE WE HAVE, NOT THOSE WE WISH WE HAD – WE TRIED THAT.

    WE MUST RULE WITH THE PEOPLE WE HAVE, NOT THOSE WE WISH WE HAD – WE TRIED THAT. IT FAILED

    —“People are stupid. Plain and simple.”—@hunderkoch

    We can train them well and rule them well, train them poorly and rule them poorly, train them not and rule them as serfs at higher cost and lower productivity, and train them not and rule them as slaves at even higher cost and lower productivity. What we cannot do is let them rule, or let the enemy train them.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-31 11:21:00 UTC

  • “A few groups of people – those predisposed to developing high-trust – see the c

    —“A few groups of people – those predisposed to developing high-trust – see the current state of things and turn their efforts to the pursuit of liberty. …. All the other groups are just fighting over who gets to be overseer.”—Luke Weinhagen


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-31 11:09:00 UTC

  • NEW CONSTITUTION ENDS THE PROBLEM 1-OUTLAW false and ir-reciprocal speech, AND o

    NEW CONSTITUTION ENDS THE PROBLEM

    1-OUTLAW false and ir-reciprocal speech, AND outlaws suppression of truthful and reciprocal speech.

    2-REQUIRES all able bodied men bear arms

    3-REQUIRES defense of the physical, normative, and informational commons.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-31 11:06:00 UTC

  • THE AUDIENCE IS ‘EVERYONE ABLE, AND NO ONE UNABLE’. —“Seriously, why don’t you

    THE AUDIENCE IS ‘EVERYONE ABLE, AND NO ONE UNABLE’.

    —“Seriously, why don’t you write in sentences, the layperson can understand? Nobody, absolutely nobody wants to carry dictionary or Thesaurus around with them. Again, seriously, who is your audience?”—

    Seriously, why don’t you recognize that I write the same set of concepts in in essay, argument, aphorism, ‘poetic list’, table, graph, and serialized form because each of these forms increases the informational density of the content, providing different minds, different means?

    For some of you, an explanation is required.

    For others, a set of bullet points is required.

    For others an aphorism is required.

    For others a diagram is required.

    Because some of us rapidly understand complex relations quickly and some of us need them explained in prose.

    I can read the equations that capture the entire description of the physical universe. Other people need prose, and others videos, and others cartoons.

    The audience is ‘everyone able, and no one unable’.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-31 08:22:00 UTC

  • “Quoting yourself?”—Chip Sills Is there some other way of demonstrating that a

    —“Quoting yourself?”—Chip Sills

    Is there some other way of demonstrating that a body of text is an excerpt from a larger body of text, thereby informing the reader that there is more to be known if desired?

    Is there some reason I shouldn’t disambiguate new content from repeated content?

    Is there some reason that salient ideas and arguments often buried in longer works, overlooked in reading, or ignored because of length, should not be promoted to quoted excerpt such that those with less time or patience can make use of them?

    Is there some reason I shouldn’t include both image and text so that either can be shared depending upon the medium its shared upon?

    Is there some reason that I shouldn’t use these quotes (short) excerpts (longer) in image form for marketing the ideas in feeds like twitter?

    I thought so.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-31 08:09:00 UTC

  • THE ENEMY’S TECHNIQUE Baiting in to Hazard (certain risk); By use of False Promi

    THE ENEMY’S TECHNIQUE

    Baiting in to Hazard (certain risk);

    By use of False Promise (circumvention of reality);

    Under cover of Sophism (pilpul);

    Justified by Critique (lie, criticism, straw manning)

    Under cover of Moral Pretense (lie);

    Under cover of Plausible Deniability (lie);

    For the purpose of profiting (by harm)

    From consumption of accumulated assets (undermining):

    … truth, reason, delay of gratification, manners, ethics, morals, traditions, cooperation between classes, organization of the classes,

    Thereby;

    …creating conflict, destroying trust, generating demand for authority,

    Authority that recursively issues another iteration of false promise,

    until all accumulated assets:

    …genetic, cultural, normative, artistic, economic, institutional and political;

    have been consumed;

    by expansion of the underclasses;

    whose reproduction or invasion, had been limited by;

    … productivity, property, market, law, and natural aristocracy.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-31 08:02:00 UTC