Analytic was close.
Operational was the answer.
Why did philosophers get it wrong?
Source date (UTC): 2014-08-22 04:40:00 UTC
Analytic was close.
Operational was the answer.
Why did philosophers get it wrong?
Source date (UTC): 2014-08-22 04:40:00 UTC
http://www.oocities.org/danielmacryan/antimac.html
Source date (UTC): 2014-08-21 23:12:00 UTC
Keynesianism -> Restated Marx = “Dishonest Socialism”
Rothbardianism -> Restated Hospers = “Dishonest Libertarianism”
Source date (UTC): 2014-08-21 23:07:00 UTC
http://vimeo.com/100888579http://vimeo.com/100888579
Source date (UTC): 2014-08-21 21:09:00 UTC
CLARIFYING THE ETHICAL SPECTRUM
Roman has suggested that I try to clarify:
(a) Ethical statements are truths, not Preferences.
(b) Some groups prefer MORE moral and ethical societies, and some LESS moral and ethical societies, depending upon the homogeneity of the group.
(c) Criminal, Ethical, Moral and Conspiratorial prohibitions constitute a spectrum from the most personally experiential to the most distant and indirect. An homogenous society can prohibit many forms of unethical, immoral, and conspiratorial conduct. However, heterogeneous societies do not benefit from enforcing ethical moral and conspiratorial prohibitions, since this prohibits inter-group parasitism.
(d) Humans compete by cooperating. Even though we are cooperating we are still competing. We are just competing productively rather than destructively. He who breeds wins.
Source date (UTC): 2014-08-21 11:27:00 UTC
ETHICS: IMPROVING FUZZY LANGUAGE
—“To be correct, ethical memes need to be universal. It cannot be right or wrong only for some but not for all. But all mere values are personal, but a value is only like a belief in that respect.”— David M.
Excellent. I’d suggest improving this a bit.
First:
“All true ethical propositions must apply universally. All preferential rules need not apply universally. All preferences must exist as individual opinions. All ethical (and moral) rules must exist independent of individual opinions. “
Second:
The term “meme” refers to the rate of involuntary distribution. An ethical rule may be stated mimetically or not. While it is certainly more efficacious that an ethical rule be stated mimetically, the truth of the proposition holds whether it is stated mimetically or not.
For example, most false moral statements constructed by the Frankfurt school and the postmodernists as well as many of the pseudoscientific arguments of twentieth century social science, appear to be ethical, but are not.
Third:
Worse, justifications for unethical and immoral actions spread fastest because they allow for rapid returns.
CONCLUSION
So (a) ethical rules, if true, are universal. (b) The memetic construction of an idea has no correspondence with its truth. In fact since ethical rules require us to forgo consumption, in general, they impose a cost upon us, and therefore they are constantly met with friction. This is why the common law must always evolve: we find a new way of ‘cheating’ and then must describe that form of cheating as illegal. Rules follow inventions.
Curt Doolittle
The Philosophy of Aristocracy
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine.
Source date (UTC): 2014-08-21 11:21:00 UTC
WHAT CONSTITUTES “ETHICS” AND WHAT MAKES CERTAIN ETHICAL STATEMENTS UNIVERSAL?
—” what constitutes ethics and what makes certain ethical values it universal?”—
Cooperation (forgoing opportunity to use violence) is non logical under conditions of parasitism, imposed costs, or free riding. Voluntary exchange is only rational if mutually productive, and free of negative externality.
Now, if one exists in a tribal family structure (say levantine or arabic) or in an outbred family structure (northern Europe), whether one is ‘free riding’ on whom may constitute different ethical preferences. One group may prefer a less moral and ethical society, and another may prefer a more moral and ethical society. In other words, in a low-trust in-bred polity (Jews, gypsies, arabs) one is expected to act on behalf of the family at all costs. (See Banfield’s The Moral Basis of a Backward Society). However, this inbreeding is a reproductive strategy. (See Emmanuel Todd) Just as jewish and Gypsy near breeding is a reproductive strategy. (See Macdonald) These groups practice dual ethical systems: high trust-in-group and low-trust out-group. Only northern europeans, who practice the absolute nuclear family, evolved high trust ethics – a total prohibition on parasitism, imposed costs, and free riding. Because only northern Europeans succeeded in breaking the family and tribal fealties through manorialism, outbreeding and property rights. It was an economic advantage for westerners to develop universalism. But that universalism independent of separatism, is uncompetitive.
Ethical rules are universal. We choose a m ore ethical society or a less ethical society given the diversity or heterogeneity of the population.
(Period. End of Argument. Much to the displeasure of many.)
Curt Doolittle
The Philosophy of Aristocracy
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev Ukraine
Source date (UTC): 2014-08-21 11:20:00 UTC
http://blog.insart.com/?p=392Ukrainian’s are ‘us’. Moral people. Hard working people. (Well, except around New Years. 🙂 ) Smart. They speak english. And they have innate nobility.
Source date (UTC): 2014-08-21 10:50:00 UTC
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-debate/apples-to-apples-canadas-health-system-underperforms/article19351870/?utm_content=buffer3d879&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=bufferCanada has nearly the worst health care system in the developed world.
Source date (UTC): 2014-08-21 10:09:00 UTC
Exchanging one’s wealth of violence for cooperation, is only rational in the absence if parasitism.
Parasitism and insurance are two very different things.
Source date (UTC): 2014-08-21 10:08:00 UTC