Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • THE GREAT CRIMES OF HISTORY TEMPLARS: Bankers. Warriors. With Swords. Without La

    THE GREAT CRIMES OF HISTORY

    TEMPLARS: Bankers. Warriors. With Swords. Without Land. Is there any better strategy on earth than that one? The end of the Templars was on par with the christianization of rome, and the enfranchisement of the lower classes into the houses of commons instead of their own house, and the french revolution. Had we kept the Templars but prohibited them by charter from owning land, we never would have had the Rothschilds. We never would have had many of our problems today.

    If I could get the holy see to enact one thing only, it would be to restate the charter of the Templars as warrior banker economists, obedient to the church, and requiring that we kill those who abridge that charter.

    This act would alone, within four generations, restore the Church.

    Source date (UTC): 2014-09-21 10:06:00 UTC

  • THE REASON THE WEST IS HESITANT TO GRANT MONEY TO UKRAINE (important)(pervasive

    THE REASON THE WEST IS HESITANT TO GRANT MONEY TO UKRAINE

    (important)(pervasive Russian corruption and sympathizers in the bureaucracy)

    Entry into the western family of countries requires the elimination of Russian Kleptocracy (systemic corruption) that was endemic under Russian backed administrations. It does no good to give Ukraine money or access to Europe, if this corruption is not eradicated. (And this is why Russia is fighting so hard in Ukraine, because if Ukraine can, like Poland, evolve out of a low-trust, high-corruption, kleptocracy in the absence of Russian influence, then so can Russia and the Russian people. To prevent loss of control (Putin is now wealthier than bill gates), Putin and his ThinkTanks have used the press to convince Russians that they are not white (european) and that the west is engaged in suicide that the Russians must defend against, thus making them non-european. And therefore justifying totalitarianism (russian kelptocracy).

    UKRAINE’S COMING PURGE OF RUSSIAN SYMPATHIZERS

    Ukraine has just started a new organization, whose purpose is to cleanse the Ukrainian bureaucracy of corruption (russian-sympathzing kleptocrats, as well as corrupt Ukrainians). This new organizatino is structured as a new independent police force in a rigid hierarchy and entry into these positions requires that applications possess experience in business and industry and NOT IN GOVERNMENT. (yes you heard that right. what if we did that in the states?) The salaries for these jobs are high enough that graft and corruption are hard to accomplish.

    BIOMETRIC PASSPORTS

    So, in order to issue biometric passports they must first purge the ranks, show europeans that they can reliably issue passports, and demonstrate that the passports themselves and the equipment will not fall into Russian and Russian-sympathizing hands.

    Trust matters, everywhere and everywhere. Diversity destroys trust. You cannot invade ukraine with russians and create trust, any more than you can invade any other populace with a competitor and create trust.

    WHY RUSSIA HAS A MORAL ARGUMENT: WESTERN SUICIDAL MULTICULTURALISM

    The single argument that Russia has going for it is western suicidal stance on immigration. Russia promotes nationalism, as should the european countries. If not for this one problem in the west, Russia would have no argument to make. But as long as the west proceeds with its suicide through multiculturalism, equality and massive immigration, Russia will have a legitimate argument with which to separate Russian peoples from european peoples.

    The means by which we unite all circumpolar people is to re-nationalize liberalism and end the divide between west and eastern Europe.

    You might not like it but that’s just how it is.

    Source date (UTC): 2014-09-21 09:58:00 UTC

  • SUSCEPTIBILITY DUE TO TRUST NOT STUPIDITY I don’t mean to call Rothbardians stup

    SUSCEPTIBILITY DUE TO TRUST NOT STUPIDITY

    I don’t mean to call Rothbardians stupid and immoral per-se. It’s easy to be misled by pseudo-rationalism and pseudo-science. It’s easy to be misled by half-truths. It’s easy to be misled by words that sound moral but which produce immoral actions.

    I don’t mean to call Misesians stupid per se. It is easy for average and above average minds, to be misled by pseudo-rationalism and pseudo-science when it is articulated with that great a level of detail. That’s the purpose of loading (emotions), framing (selective inclusion and exclusion of properties), and overloading (great detail, and repetition).

    But the susceptibility of those minds capable of managing economic thought, which requires consideration of more dimensions that other forms of thought, demonstrates why so many are susceptible to the other forms of cosmopolitan deception via loading, framing and overloading: leftism in general, and neo-conservatism.

    They manipulate our moral intuitions. We are the most moral people. We are most subject to pseudoscientific excitement of our moral intuitions. Whatever moral bias you adhere to, the cosmopolitans have a pseudoscientific and immoral argument to excite you: leftism, libertarianism, or neo-conservatism. And high trust europeans are readily susceptible to these false moral arguments.

    Just as our scientists and philosophers have been subject to such pseudoscience in the form of abstract truth (Popperian truth as well), psychology, sociology cantorian sets, platonic truth, mathematical platonism, and modeling.

    Source date (UTC): 2014-09-21 09:42:00 UTC

  • TRUTH AND FEMALE MYSTICISM (very controversial) TRUTH BY CULTURE German Protesta

    TRUTH AND FEMALE MYSTICISM

    (very controversial)

    TRUTH BY CULTURE

    German Protestant : Martial Duty. Truth and Duty are inseparable.

    English Catholic (Episcopalian) : Aristocratic Paternalism. Testimonial Truth.

    Italian Catholic : Utilitarian Paternalism. Objective Truth, Pragmatic action.

    French Catholic : Authoritarian Paternalism. Pragmatism as Truth.

    European Jews : Authoritarian Separatism. Results, not truth. (Truth unknowable)

    Finns and Estonians (lutherans) : Pagans using christian rituals.

    I don’t feel ready to express any confidence in the eastern european concept of truth because as most Russians have said, it is almost impossible for westerners to understand the depth of Russian nihilism. As far as I can tell, eastern europeans practice demonstrable truth, and non-demonstrable mysticism, although their mysticism can be expressed as the opposite of western optimism: a deep presumption that the universe conspires to cheat or oppress them somehow, and that the truth is hidden from them by the universe, and they must defend against both man and the universe.

    ON WOMEN, PRE-SCIENTIFIC AND PSEUDOSCIENTIFIC MYSTICISM

    Women are easier to diagnose than men, since, for example, in the west, we have all the “crazy-chicks” that are into light therapy, pop psychology, postmodern sociology, horoscopes, feminism as an aspirational social model, yoga as religion, and reactionary religions in themselves. ***Western women have, at every single class level, and every single level of education, replaced traditional mysticism with pseudoscientific mysticism.*** The cosmopolitans have sold women every possible means of fulfilling their mystical desires.

    Here in the east, women are still very likely to resort to pre-scientific mysticism. They believe in magic, spells, taboos, superstitions, talismans, gods and demons, female intuition as extra sensory perception, and ‘the order of the universe’ as anthropocentric. Although we do see a creeping expansion of female pseudoscientific mysticism in the culture, as pre-scientific mysticism no longer seems to fulfill their needs, and the various female cults of buddhism, yoga in particular, and other emotionally loaded forms of mysticism evolve in response to increases in formal education. But there is no sign here or in the west that women have abandoned mysticism, even if it is formalized as a pseudoscience in the extreme of academic feminism.

    Women have been traditionally considered the root of evil. And given their impact on devolution of the aristocratic society, back to socialist and premodern forms, and their fascination by and expansion of pseudoscientific mysticism as a replacement for traditional mysticism, it is becoming statistically irrefutable that there is truth to this ancient caution.

    The root is quite obvious however. Female reproduction and intuition evolved for the self and her genes, while male reproduction and intuition evolved for the tribe and advancing the tribe. For women, peace means that they can select preferred mates, but they select mates poorly for regressive (aggressive and impulsive) traits whenever possible (sorry ladies, I just go with the data). Males on the other hand want to band together as brothers to create a tribe, that can compete with other tribes of men.

    For this reason women are politically and genetically destructive. The evidence is that under democracy women have sought to, and succeeded in, destroying their own civilization, mostly by their support of pseudoscientific mysticism as the new religion, and attacking traditional religion so that the could replace it with new pseudoscientific religion. That is why the other civilizations are rebelling against expansion of cultural suicide. They adopt central banking, fiat money, consumer capitalism, but not democracy. Because under democracy the lowest common denominator is expressed in law, and therefore in culture.

    For this reason male dominated cultures will always conquer female dominated cultures. Because if males submit to female political preferences, the more aggressive males have, and always will, propagate. Which is in contrast to evolution that has shown us that the most advanced civilizations suppress impulsivity and aggression at the genetic level.

    POLITICAL SOLUTIONS

    I am not recommending that women be disenfranchised, only that we acknowledge that male and female votes are not of equal weight, or of similar interest. As such, just as we have had the monarchy, the aristocracy (the great families), the business class (the good families), and the church (the peasantry) as separate ‘houses’ of government, representing competing interests, we should also separate the male and female vote, representing competing interests. Competing interests with houses of government allow those houses to conduct exchanges rather than under a monopoly, conduct thefts (“takings”).

    I promote compatibilism through voluntary exchange (cooperation). This promotes truth telling. Democracy requires that we lie (conquest). And the evidence is that all we do is lie under democracy. And anyone who tries will have a very hard time refuting this argument.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2014-09-21 09:07:00 UTC

  • IMPACT ON RUSSIAN POLITICS EMERGING Impact on the economy is showing. Open defia

    IMPACT ON RUSSIAN POLITICS EMERGING

    Impact on the economy is showing. Open defiance of Putin emerging. Open refutation of Russians as non-european, even if they are less advanced culturally (low trust).

    Honestly I didn’t expect this so soon. I would have used much more aggressive tactics against the Russians, but the general strategy in the west was to destroy the political class without harming individual russian citizens.

    Source date (UTC): 2014-09-21 09:00:00 UTC

  • UKRAINE TO GET SCHENGEN VISAS NEXT YEAR Apparently the delay is in getting and i

    UKRAINE TO GET SCHENGEN VISAS NEXT YEAR

    Apparently the delay is in getting and issuing biometric passports, because the EU will not tolerate people from the east, with Russian sympathies, to enter the EU, so Ukraine must guarantee that they have processes and procedures for issuing biometric passports to only Ukrainians.

    Source date (UTC): 2014-09-21 08:58:00 UTC

  • WHY? I AM RABIDLY PRO-UKRAINIAN. Why? Because I am an Aristocratic Libertarian.

    WHY? I AM RABIDLY PRO-UKRAINIAN.

    Why? Because I am an Aristocratic Libertarian.

    PHILOSOPHICALLY

    (a) all people who desire them have the right to property if they will grant the same right to others.

    (b) all peoples have the right to self determination so that they may have the right to property and organize property and family according to their needs.

    (c) all people have the right to higher levels of freedom, with more atomic property rights if they so desire it.

    (d) The aristocratic EGALITARIAN contract requires that in order to secure my liberty I must fight to extend that liberty to all who desire it, and will do the same for me. That is the meaning of ‘egalitarian’ in ‘Aristocratic (meritocratic) Egalitarianism (open entry to all who desire it).”

    POLITICALLY

    (e) No government may interfere with the INDIVIDUAL fulfillment of the aristocratic egalitarian contract.

    (f) As such Aristocratic Egalitarianism’s mutual insurance of individual and political property rights constitutes a standard of moral action that supersedes all other agreements and obligations.

    (g) Therefore Aristocratic Egalitarianism must be treated with the same argumentative, political and moral status, or higher status, than that of religion.

    PRAGMATICALLY

    (h) Russians have created more brutality, murder and genocide than any race other than the Chinese, and much of it against their own people – which is even worse.

    (i) Reformation of Russia and its incorporation (as Gorbachev aspired) into the european people’s is beneficial for all white peoples. Even if it is a very high cost.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.

    Source date (UTC): 2014-09-21 07:05:00 UTC

  • I AM RABIDLY PRO-UKRAINIAN Why? Because I am an aristocratic libertarian. PHILOS

    I AM RABIDLY PRO-UKRAINIAN

    Why? Because I am an aristocratic libertarian.

    PHILOSOPHICALLY

    (a) all people who desire them have the right to property if they will grant the same right to others.

    (b) all peoples have the right to self determination so that they may have the right to property and organize property and family according to their needs.

    (c) all people have the right to higher levels of freedom, with more atomic property rights if they so desire it.

    (d) The aristocratic EGALITARIAN contract requires that in order to secure my liberty I must fight to extend that liberty to all who desire it, and will do the same for me. That is the meaning of ‘egalitarian’ in ‘Aristocratic (meritocratic) Egalitarianism (open entry to all who desire it).”

    PRAGMATICALLY

    (e) Russians have created more brutality, murder and genocide than any polity other than the Chinese, and much of it against their own people – which is even worse.

    (f) Reformation of Russia and its incorporation (as Gorbachev aspired) into the european people’s is beneficial for all white peoples. Even if it is a very high cost.

    Source date (UTC): 2014-09-21 06:41:00 UTC

  • NEW VIDEO IN PRODUCTION : Ancestral Lands We just finished recording a new Prope

    NEW VIDEO IN PRODUCTION : Ancestral Lands

    We just finished recording a new Propertarian video on “Ancestral Lands”, where we extend Lockeian theory from the interpersonal and communal, to the level of civilizations. The central argument isn’t terribly complicated. But we made a number of deep digressions which in themselves are very interesting, and so we managed to fill the entire 30 minutes.

    The studio will give the video to us mid-week, and we will try to get it edited and posted by next weekend.

    NEXT UP:

    1) Roman wants to address why we need to abandon the NAP, and adopt high trust.

    2) After a conversation with Osku, I think, it would be helpful if I addressed inter-polity (inter-state) ethics where high trust is not necessary, and intra-polity (within-state) ethics, where thigh trust **IS** necessary. Because the NAP is sufficient for inter-polity, but not sufficient for intra-polity ethics. You cannot apply the ethics of the family (kin selection) to the state, any more than the ethics of cooperation between states to the family.

    3) After talking to Roman, it seems like we should point out that Propertarianism is a formal logic applicable to all polities and all allocations of property: a DESCRIPTIVE ethics. Whereas Aristocratic Egalitarianism is a recommendation for the competitive advantage in production of high trust aristocratic polities.

    4) After reviewing our talk today, I missed two points necessary to harden the argument, I think are important and will have to edit those in somehow.

    5) It seems that I should address immigration, movement of people to capital versus movement of capital to people, the impact on the different measures of economics by immigration (or exit). And the need to re-nationalize liberalism (liberty) or we shall lose it.

    6) I covered it today, but I suppose I should do a piece on the structure of the family, the division of labor, property rights, liberty, demand for the state, and trust, using diagrams. I don’t think it’s that difficult but it seems to be hard for people ot grasp the relationships between them as necessary.

    Following those, I think I’ll work my way through each topic in the table of contents, one video at a time.

    TOPIC REQUESTS

    Of course, I want to address the more complex topics that are personally fascinating to me and perhaps other philosophers, but those topics are not that interesting (and perhaps more confusing) for most people. So I would like to address those ideas that are both unclear and necessary to understand, instead of those ideas that are unclear but unnecessary to understand.

    So if you have a topic that you want me to discuss please post here or send a message.

    Thanks

    Source date (UTC): 2014-09-20 16:52:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    http://phys.org/news/2014-09-natural-born-killers-chimpanzee-violence.html

    Source date (UTC): 2014-09-20 07:52:00 UTC