Looks like huffing to post is filtering out Russian propagandists now. Fast too.
Source date (UTC): 2014-10-08 01:40:00 UTC
Looks like huffing to post is filtering out Russian propagandists now. Fast too.
Source date (UTC): 2014-10-08 01:40:00 UTC
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2014/10/revealing-look-at-hours-worked.html#B1QvdPDk9k0dsCVh.99Working Age Population
—“In November of 2007, there were 121,875,000 full time employees. Now there are 119,287,000.
Fulltime employment is 2,588,000 below the 2007 peak. Meanwhile working age population, 16 and older has gone up from 232,939,000 to 248,446,000. That’s an increase of 15,507,000.
Simply put, the working-age population has gone up by approximately 15.5 million while fulltime employment has declined by 2.5 million.
Some of this is related to boomer demographics and retirement. A lot of it isn’t.”—
Source date (UTC): 2014-10-07 05:48:00 UTC
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0449908976THE “GENDER DIFFERENCES” READING LIST
THE ANATOMY OF LOVE by Fisher
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0449908976
WHY WE LOVE by Fisher
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0805077960
A NATURAL HISTORY OF LOVE by Ackerman
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0679761837/
THE ART OF LOVE by Ovid
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0375761179/
THE RED QUEEN by Ridley
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0060556579/
DEMONIC MALES by Petersen
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0395877431
THE ESSENTIAL DIFFERENCE by Baron-Cohen
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/046500556X/
FEMINISM AND FREEDOM (its genetic) by Levin
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0887381251/
WHY MEN RULE by Goldberg
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0812692373/
THE INEVITABILITY OF PATRIARCHY
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0688001750/
Source date (UTC): 2014-10-06 15:59:00 UTC
http://online.wsj.com/articles/the-new-bureaucratic-brazenness-1412288561DOES ANYONE IN GOVERNMENT FEEL COMPELLED TO SPEAK TRUTHFULLY ANY LONGER? (No)
Source date (UTC): 2014-10-06 15:21:00 UTC
http://freebeacon.com/columns/the-case-for-panic/INCOMPETENT GOVERNMENT: the case for panic
Source date (UTC): 2014-10-06 15:20:00 UTC
http://www.nationalreview.com/node/388336/printWHERE THE MIDDLE CLASS GOES TO DIE
Urban policy.
Source date (UTC): 2014-10-06 15:17:00 UTC
http://www.city-journal.org/2014/24_3_nyc-private-wealth.htmlWhat the Rich Give to New York by Nicole Gelinas, City Journal Summer 2014
Source date (UTC): 2014-10-06 15:15:00 UTC
–“UNAPOLOGETIC LIVING”–
Masculinity for the 21st century.
No more apologies.
For anything.
It was messy dragging the world out of ignorance and poverty.
Yeah, we could have done a better job at it for sure.
But the fact is, that from Burke forward, we did it.
So I don’t apologize.
Sorry.
Source date (UTC): 2014-10-06 10:51:00 UTC
(Dropped my iphone 6 again today – albeit within a nice safe case. I bought a new case that’s easier to hold onto. But net is, that it’s too big to operate with one hand while maintaining a grip, unless you get a much bigger case to give it weight and volume. I am constantly nervous about. And it sure seems like the SONY, LG, Samsung and Nokia phones are at least as good if not better than the apple phones. The only thing I really appreciate is how easily my apple products work together. So at this point I don’t know what to do. Sure seems like a 5S is the best companion for apple products. I do notice that I need my laptop a lot less with the 6, because I can do so much more on the 6 screen than the 4S.)
Source date (UTC): 2014-10-06 10:50:00 UTC
ROTHBARDIANS AS FEMINIST CONSPIRATORS – THE PHILOSOPHY OF BETAS.
It’s true that rothbardians have constructed an elaborate system of justification, and a set of arguments to advance that justification. It is only that your argument requires belief and normative adoption. It’s a cult. And that cult has failed. Because only socially dysfunctional people are capable of holding that belief. And only with such an elaborately justified edifice to maintain that belief.
Instead I am suggesting a social science that fully explains all political systems as evolutionary and competitive strategies, and that all belief is justification, while this particular science is an explanation.
I choose aristocratic egalitarianism because I do not have to be socially dysfunctional, adopt a belief, suspend disbelief, or engage in justification. I must only observe and acknowledge man as he demonstrates himself, and understand which institutions are necessary to provide the incentives to produce Liberty – while suppressing all free riding, and therefore both demand for the State and ability to construct a state.
You in the other hand require the fantasy – the fallacy – that ghetto ethics constitute a rational choice. They don’t. Which is why people won’t adopt them.
No one wants jews and gypsies. We murdered Jews and gypsies. We are getting close to the same with Muslims. We didn’t try to imitate them. That would be to devolve our civilization. We conquered, ostracized, oppressed and killed them. Justifiably. Necessarily. Usefully. Even if immorally. What is remarkable is that unlike all other civilisations we are tolerant enough not to exterminate them. The reason we are tolerant is that we obtain status signals from maintaining their inferiority.
No one wants low trust people’s. All lower trust people’s that one can possibly defend against, must be conquered, converted, oppressed, or killed. If not, in ghettos, whether real or virtual, we can keep low trust people as useful pets, and cheap status signals that remind us our our higher station, our superior civilization, and our superior ethics, morality, and institutions.
Unfortunately, women have entered the political domain under open enfranchisement, and have not had to earn their enfranchisement through demonstrating good judgement. And have, therefore, devolved our society rapidly, by undermining the means of suppressing unethical, immoral, and conspiratorial behavior, because women practice, unethical, immoral, and conspiratorial behavior in order to advance themselves and their offspring regardless of their merit.
(wow. I think that’s about as offensively direct as I currently know how to construct the argument. lol )
Curt Doolittle
The Philosophy of Aristocracy
Source date (UTC): 2014-10-06 09:52:00 UTC