in western natural law, one can propose a superior, reciprocal and truthful solution, but one cannot underming the current solution without providing one that is better.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-10 09:46:00 UTC
in western natural law, one can propose a superior, reciprocal and truthful solution, but one cannot underming the current solution without providing one that is better.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-10 09:46:00 UTC

photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/77018943_503420860254809_4391763304662433792_n_503420856921476.jpg WELL, THE OBVIOUS CONFIRMED.
(if there is anything good on this earth europeans, persians, chinese, did it.)
https://science.sciencemag.org/content/366/6466/708WELL, THE OBVIOUS CONFIRMED.
(if there is anything good on this earth europeans, persians, chinese, did it.)
https://science.sciencemag.org/content/366/6466/708

Source date (UTC): 2019-11-10 00:15:00 UTC
INTERESTING STATISTICS
According to Pew Research:
* 71% of Hispanic immigrant households are on welfare
* 59% of Hispanics have children out of wedlock
* Almost 60% don’t have a high school diploma
* Over 70% say we should have strict gun control
* Almost 60% say hate speech should be criminalized
* Almost 60% support abortion
* Almost 60% support gay marriage
* Over 80% support big government
* 69% of even highly religious Hispanics vote democrat
According to the national gang center:
* Almost half of all gang members are Hispanic and almost half are black
According recent polls:
*a record 67 million people don’t speak English at home and we’re breaking records every year
According to the FBI:
*Hispanics commit murder at a per capita rate that is triple the rate of whites
*Hispanics commit rape at a per capita rate that is double the rate of whites
Hispanics commit robbery at a per capita rate that is quadruple the rate of whites
According to all exit polls:
*Hispanics have voted 70% for democrats consistently since 1968 and haven’t really deviated
*Almost 80% of Hispanics in the top 5 counties in Texas voted for Beto Orourke
Hispanics will be a super majority in Texas by 2024 and whites will become a minority in America come 2050. With the coming years republicans will never be able to win a presidential election ever again, and this is due to LEGAL not illegal immigration.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-09 20:25:00 UTC

photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/74664679_503315460265349_4815798287560867840_n_503315456932016.jpg lolzlolz

Source date (UTC): 2019-11-09 20:17:00 UTC
(AFAIK Nietzsche died from the same brain disease that his father did, and not syphilis.)
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-09 20:10:00 UTC
THE CATHOLIC CHURCH: FORCIBLY REFORM, NATIONALIZE, OR INCORPORATE INTO ORTHODOXY, OR END IT?
—“The Papacy either needs to go or the Catholic Church needs to be decentralized and nationalized like the Orthodox Church.”—David Long
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-09 19:43:00 UTC
WOMEN IN OUR ARGUMENTS
Oh. BTW: Women rarely engage in any of these arguments at the fundamental level – more to ‘fine tune’ our arguments – especially when we overdo it. (which we do).
It’s MEN who use the female strategy of undermining(GSRRM) that are the usual target of our criticism – not women. So yeah, when we say “You’re using the female means of showing disapproval instead of argument to the truth or falsehood, reciprocity or irreciprocity of the argument – when and claiming you’re falsifying the argument.” So yes, it’s not just calling the opposition dishonest, but insulting his masculinity.
What you’ll find here is that the primary difference between men and women is female cog bias of NAXALT (exceptions) because of the personal cog bias, and the male cog bias of Generalizations (distributions), because of the political cog bias. )
Hugs.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-09 19:35:00 UTC
—“I guess my question is: Why is the feminine always framed as negative or wrong? I understand GSRRM would be wrong for a male. But isn’t there an appropriate application? Is it only among women? Should it have any reach beyond that? Please excuse if I’m out of line here. I ask in all sincerity.”— New Person
–Brandon Hayes–
Intellectual honesty will never be met with hostility here. 🙂
You’re simply mistaking things.
In the case of stigma (scarlet letter) you’re talking about norms.
Shaming to maintain order.
GRSM is shaming to undermine order (create chaos).
Shaming isn’t wrong.
Subversion is.
–The Propertarian Institute–
^He’s good. 😉
1 -So violence can be used to:
… (a) violate law, or (b) enforce law.
2 – Shaming can be used to:
… (a) subvert norms or enforce norms.
3 – The difference is:
… (a) cost and severity of punishment must fit the crime.
… (b) shaming is cheap to perform and to correct
… (c) violence is expensive to perform and to correct.
4 – GSRRM (undermining) can be used to
… (a) suppress truth
… (b) undermine those who speak truth
… (c) undermine societies that operate by trust and truth.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-09 17:30:00 UTC
DISCIPLINE: JOYS OF DOING ONE’S PATERNAL CIVIC DUTY
—“A deeper, non gay sounding voice is key. And don’t be fat or weird.— Twittiot.
Now that I’m back to normal weight, at least I don’t have to worry about being unattractive, incompetent, ignorant, stupid, uncultured, and inarticulate. 😉
But I’m absolutely going to preserve my charming eccentricities, as a means of signaling the peasantry (you) my disdain. 😉
(I love disciplining the peasantry. It’s a burden. But I have come to enjoy the spiritual rewards for doing my civic duty.)
(humor) lolz
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-09 16:10:00 UTC
MARXIAN ECONOMICS DO NOT MERIT MORE THAN A FOOTNOTE
by Daniel Gurpide
Having been proved empirically wrong, Marxian economics do not merit more than a footnote. Marx’s lasting enthusiasm for the working class was due to his belief that within the framework of bourgeois society the factory hand would be condemned forever to a life of misery in eternal bondage.
He never realized that modern technological society, with or without exploitation, could ever provide the working man with a middle-class existence.
The New Left had to abandon its innermost hopes for a revolutionary rising of a no longer existing proletariat now integrated with all its material interests into the process of production.
In addition, no modern industrialist wants merely to exploit his workers- they should be happy, well-paid consumers.
The utter inanity of Marxian economics is so evident that the person who is first and foremost a revolutionary and merely seeks for a rational excuse to preach the overturn of the existing order has to look in other directions, towards other social layers to whom preach the revolutionary gospel.
That’s why the New Left, Cultural Marxism and Postmodernists appeal to the outcasts of modern society, to the eternal Lumpenproletariat, the term understood not in a sociological sense.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-09 15:54:00 UTC