Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • Americans: overly emotional dramatic acting, and hgh production values to appeal

    Americans: overly emotional dramatic acting, and hgh production values to appeal to senses. British, better acting, better writing, but .. the rather insipid british moral virtue signaling is as off putting as the insipid american heroic virtue signaling. Both of which are designed to make the average person fell righteous in the moment, both of which are false. The brits have gone as effeminate and posturing as the french, and the americans as shallow as well … underclass americans.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-17 20:24:00 UTC

  • Updated Nov 17, 2019, 7:55 PM

    Updated Nov 17, 2019, 7:55 PM

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-17 19:55:00 UTC

  • Every time some conservative asserts something in confidence despite his relativ

    Every time some conservative asserts something in confidence despite his relative ignorance, he is no different from his consumptive (liberal) counterpart. The only ‘truthful’ empirical, and therefore ‘conservative’ answer is: “i don’t know yet” But ‘i know…’ is merely a statement of being lazy or incompetent.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-17 19:55:00 UTC

  • Reminder: Humans have very little agency. Those of us who are at the extreme end

    Reminder: Humans have very little agency. Those of us who are at the extreme end of the spectrum have much more agency than most.

    So we cannot necessarily blame people for their genetics – we can only blame each other for not creating rule of law that limits the damage done by their genetics.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-17 19:48:00 UTC

  • All I’m saying is that a monarch is superior to any other ‘decider of last resor

    All I’m saying is that a monarch is superior to any other ‘decider of last resort’ because of natural long-term incentives, and natural pressure to retain position – and that a monarchy, as ‘kin’, within a nation-state, eliminates usurpation by invasion.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-17 19:40:00 UTC

  • PICK YOUR GOVERNMENT Think about that question for a moment. What protection did

    PICK YOUR GOVERNMENT

    Think about that question for a moment.

    What protection did our founders intend?

    What protection do we have now?

    What is the ultimate protection that we CAN have?

    Globalism

    or

    Nationalism

    … Ethnocentrism

    … … Homogeneity

    … … … Conformity

    … … … … Subject of Law

    … … … … … individual

    … … … … … or;

    … … … … … individual and collective

    … … … … Subject of Policy

    … … … … … Extended Intergenerational Family

    … … … … … or;

    … … … … … Nuclear Intergenerational Family;

    … … … … … or;

    … … … … … Individual

    … … … … Subject of Polity

    … … … … … Consumption (dysgenia)

    … … … … … or;

    … … … … … Capitalization (eugenia)

    and (Limits)

    Rule by Priesthood (tradition? wisdom?) (Islam)

    … Rule by Justification (Supernatural)

    or

    Rule by Politicians (discretion)(europe)

    … Rule by Discretion (Sophistry)

    or

    Rule of Law (non-discretion)(old-usa)

    …Rule of Law (Technology)

    and Judiciary (Resolution of Disputes)

    … Constitution

    … … Supreme Court

    … … … Courts of Appeals

    … … … … Regional Courts

    … … … … … Specialty Courts

    … … … … … … Professional Judiciary (judges)

    … … … … … … … Professional Officers of Court (law)

    … … … … … … … … Prof.l Property Finance, Banking (title)

    … … … … … … … … … Prof Insurers

    and (Production of Commons)

    Government (Closure: final decision maker)

    … Dictator

    … or

    … Monarchy

    … or

    … President

    … or

    … Prime Minister

    and (selection of commons)

    … … … cabinet

    … … or

    … … … Jury (veto) of appropriations

    … … or (representation)

    … … … Senate-lords

    … … … or

    … … … Parliament and senate-lords

    … … … or

    … … … Lower house(families),

    … … … Middle house(parliament/business), and

    … … … … Upper house (senate-lords/territories)

    … … or (direct participation)

    … … … direct proportional democracy

    … … … or

    … … … direct economic democracy (by who pays)

    and Services (Assets)

    … … Military

    … … … Standing

    … … … … Warfighters

    … … … … Professional Technical

    … … … … Logistics and Supply

    … … … … Medical and Care

    … … … Regiments (Local Part time)

    … … … Reserves( those who have served )

    … … … Militia (every able bodied citizen)

    … … Infrastructure (assets)

    … … Insurer (emergency, disasters, etc)

    … … Treasury

    and Administration (Operations)

    … … … Bureaucracy

    … … … or

    … … … Bureaucracy – Private Partnership

    … … … or

    … … … Competing Private Contractors

    … … … or

    … … … Private Mandatory Public Service

    and Participation (participation)

    … … … … Maximally Earned Franchise

    … … … … Minimally Earned Franchise

    … … … … Citizenship Franchise

    … … … … Resident Franchise

    … … … … Genetic Franchise

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-17 19:25:00 UTC

  • FIVE QUESTIONS ON CONVERTING FROM PRESIDENCY TO PRIME MINISTER AND MONARCH AS JU

    FIVE QUESTIONS ON CONVERTING FROM PRESIDENCY TO PRIME MINISTER AND MONARCH AS JUDGE OF LAST RESORT

    1) –“Hey, I’ve got some concerns. Why does Mr. Doolittle want to return the US under British Imperial rule with a monarch? “—

    I just have a broader understanding of the strategic future than other americans – I’m thinking on the same scale as the enemy.

    it’s (a) that a monarch is superior in incentives to a president or prime minister or dictator, or any other individual, as a judge of last resort. (b) it’s the least different culture with a monarchy, (c) it would assist in creating the military-trade-culture block of USA, CA, AU, NZ and that gets us enough people enough trade, to maintain funding of a global military which they others cannot do without us (d) it becomes much easier to restore nationalism and monarchies to the rest of european civilization as defense against “the enemy”.

    2) —“I understand the monarch is still bound by the rules of reciprocity, but that goes against balance if powers the Founding Fathers put in place.”—

    That doesn’t make sense. The president has a veto. But even his veto wasn’t enough to protect the Natural Law, the Constitution, and our Civilization.

    I don’t understand why a prime minister and a monarchy with judge of last resort isn’t superior to a president, when (at least for those of us who study these thing) it’s record is fantastic and ours is terrible – and ours is only less visibly terrible because of the wealth we have from selling off a continent.

    3) —“Does the monarch having the power to over through Supreme Court rulings?”—

    The monarch has the power to veto findings of the court (rulings) that are in violation of the spirit of the constitution and the people, so that such things as abortion and gay marriage would not be possible to make law of the land, only local laws. (this isn’t that hard really)

    4) —“What about congress? Also, will there be a balance of political perspectives in this new government?”—

    The federal government is devolved almost entirely to the states with the senate surviving only as the sitting governors of the states, and their powers limited to voluntary contracts between the states – as in old europe – with majority rule limited to collective trade policy, treaty, and war. And all contracts survive only as long as those who enacted them.

    5) —“Balance in all levels of government is extremely important and thus having balanced perspectives is vital–that is as long as both sides are speaking the truth.”—

    This only partly true. We spent far too much time on government, little of which maters at all, when it’s the law that matters – and that was hayek’s insight – and the failure of the twentieth century intellectual caste.

    All that matters is the law. The production of commons within the law like the production of all other market goods, within the law, is served via-negativa, by prosecution for failure, within which any possible good is a good.

    Political orders are not a defense against the bad. Just the opposite. It’s LAW, EDUCATION, and MILITIA that provide defense against the abuse of power – by denying power to all.

    Cheers

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-17 18:39:00 UTC

  • Conservative Vox Populi: What have you done to deserve a good leader, good leade

    Conservative Vox Populi: What have you done to deserve a good leader, good leaders, good ideas, good solutions? Anything? Or are you as bad as the left.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-17 14:56:00 UTC

  • THE ONE IRRESOLVABLE PROBLEM: Dysgenic Consumption(Liberal), Eugenic Capitalizat

    THE ONE IRRESOLVABLE PROBLEM: Dysgenic Consumption(Liberal), Eugenic Capitalization (Conservative). A compromise is not possible by rational means. The only solution is to SEPARATE. The agrarian age is over. We can afford to return to speciation, and are. And that’s the conflict.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-17 12:04:00 UTC

  • OK. I’ll bite that an american monarchy from the military families, with educati

    OK. I’ll bite that an american monarchy from the military families, with educational support from one of the northern european monarchical families (denmark?) would accomplish the same goals, because of the natural alliance between the monarchies. Ok? Does that make you feel better? 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-17 10:44:00 UTC