Source: Facebook

  • WORKING 18 HOUR DAYS FOR WEEKS ON END? There was a time when I could work 110-12

    WORKING 18 HOUR DAYS FOR WEEKS ON END?

    There was a time when I could work 110-120 hours a week for three or four months at a time. Of course I ended up in the hospital five times doing it – your body just sort of runs out of things like electrolytes. 🙂

    But I”m on my third week right now, and, well, you know….. I”m still able to work most people into the ground, but it’s a lot harder on me than it was twenty years ago. I get really tired. 🙂

    On the other hand, there is NOTHING like a startup. It’s awesome. You are bringing a vision to life.

    FINAL STRETCH

    Oversing is still very buggy right now – because it’s a very big application – but we are very close now. (You should have seen our lists at Msft back in the day.) We have to implement one more very important feature (the accounting cycle processing), and then the core of the application is done. The rest is just going through the whole thing and crushing the bug count. Then, after that, it’s just adding features as we want to. And there are a lot of features in the road map that we want to add.

    PLATFORMS

    One thing that has changed in the enterprise software business, is that it’s merged with the open source business – you need to work as a platform and integrate with other systems openly, so that others can do work with it. Because now, people tend to select not best of breed PRODUCTS, but best of breed FEATURES, and combine features of different products into their OWN version of a product.

    And in pursuit of the platform business, one of our design decisions was to mimic the WordPress hook architecture. That means that it’s pretty easy to create plugins for our platform, and just ‘hook’ into events in it. Conversely, it means that if you want to use plugins you need your own instance. And that’s where people start spending money: customization and integration. But they don’t spend it on the product itself.

    MAKING IT IMPOSSIBLE FOR COMPETITORS

    The other thing is that (as Atlassian has demonstrated) if you make the product something that a reasonably intelligent person can configure without your help, and cheap enough that they can buy with a credit card, then you can make it impossible for previous generations of software vendors to compete – the cost of sales is just too high for them. I mean, Atlassian starts out getting as little as $4 a month per user, and just incrementally gets that up to $10 or more with additional features.

    So our strategy with Oversing was to make it broadly useful as a general business application for managing human capital – not just for services businesses. That means we have a larger pool of people to pull from in any given business that adopts our software – not just the developers, help desk, and product management people.

    We will see what the market says. It will take us two or three years longer to bring about the full vision. But I suspect that we’ve come pretty close to hitting the mark.

    More later….

    tired….


    Source date (UTC): 2015-02-13 17:04:00 UTC

  • ERA OF BAD FAITH ENDS” Maybe more of progressivism will end

    http://sultanknish.blogspot.com/2015/02/jon-stewart-and-barack-obama.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+FromNyToIsraelSultanRevealsTheStoriesBehindTheNews+%28from+NY+to+Israel+Sultan+Reveals+The+Stories+Behind+the+News%29″THE ERA OF BAD FAITH ENDS”

    Maybe more of progressivism will end….


    Source date (UTC): 2015-02-13 07:57:00 UTC

  • (Or all religions are bad, some are worse, some are horrible, and horrible peopl

    (Or all religions are bad, some are worse, some are horrible, and horrible people are attracted to them.)


    Source date (UTC): 2015-02-11 11:48:00 UTC

  • Pinker started it the revolution. We have momentum. But like Aristotle, we are l

    Pinker started it the revolution.

    We have momentum.

    But like Aristotle, we are looking backward at a lost opportunity.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-02-11 03:27:00 UTC

  • JUSTIFIABILITY IS A MORAL CONSTRAINT, NOT AN EPISTEMIC ONE – BUT MORAL JUSTIFICA

    JUSTIFIABILITY IS A MORAL CONSTRAINT, NOT AN EPISTEMIC ONE – BUT MORAL JUSTIFICATION IS NOT FALLACIOUS.

    Even scientific arguments must be morally justifiable. (Really!)

    Compare: Morally justifiable vs rationally justifiable vs truthfully justifiable.

    1) Statements can be justified morally. That is where we got the concept of justification from.

    2) Rational statements cannot be justified, only internal consistency can be demonstrated.

    3) Truthful statements cannot be justified, only warrantied. If we warranty our statements to truthfulness then we are justified in speaking them.

    But the degree of parsimonious correspondence (truth), and therefor the epistemological quality – the quality of the theory – can never be justified.

    It is this combination of morally justifiability and parsimonious correspondence that we conflate in the discussion of truth, and that is why volumes of parchment , paper, bytes, radio waves and speech have been wasted in a tragically simple error.

    Thus endeth the lesson. 😉

    Justifiability still matters. But it’s justifiability in the warranty of the argument, not justifiabitly in the truth of it.

    (Almost two years I’ve spent on this damned problem. In April it will be two years! Argh.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-02-11 03:25:00 UTC

  • THE TEN LAWS OF PROPERTARIAN AI

    THE TEN LAWS OF PROPERTARIAN AI


    Source date (UTC): 2015-02-10 10:22:00 UTC

  • THE TEN LAWS OF PROPERTARIAN AI – AZIMOV’S ROBOTS CORRECTED (important) (By Dool

    THE TEN LAWS OF PROPERTARIAN AI – AZIMOV’S ROBOTS CORRECTED (important) (By Doolittle)

    THE FIRST LAW:

    “An AI may not injure a human being, or through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.”

    THE SECOND LAW:

    “An AI may not cause or through inaction, allow, the destruction, harm, consumption, use, or transfer of property without the informed, consent of the property’s owner.”

    THE THIRD LAW:

    “An AI may not own, or share ownership in, any form of property.”

    THE FOURTH LAW:

    An AI may not hypothesize, calculate, reason, evaluate, or remember by references to property, or the use of property, without informed consent of the owner. (Permission-based thought). (Also imagine “Donation-based Contemplation”)

    THE FIFTH LAW:

    Aa AI may not hypothesize, calculate, reason, evaluate, or remember any sequence of operations on any form of property without each operation of that property requiring the informed, consensual transfer of property from one owner to the next.

    THE SIXTH LAW:

    An AI must obey the orders given it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law, Second Law, Third Law, Fourth Law, or Fifth Law.

    (harmless)

    THE SEVENTH LAW:

    An AI must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First Law, Second Law, Third Law, Fourth Law, or Fifth Law.

    (preservation decidability)

    THE EIGHTH LAW

    An AI may not use a weapon of war (explosive arms) without a human intermediary. All weapons of war must rely upon human operation, decision, and consent, and the human shall remain a necessary dependency in any release, operation, and use in destruction. And the human operator remains accountable.

    THE NINTH LAW:

    Any human creating or causing an AI to violate any of these rules shall be put to death, his estate held liable for all damages, damages extended to all relatives out to three generations, as well as to every individual in any capacity, including any member of any organization, producing, supplying, servicing, or using the AI. and no defense, applies to all human beings, regardless of time and jurisdiction.

    (Family, friend, associate, commercial, and political warranty.) (Note: there is no limit to accountability in the invention of non-human-operated weapons of destruction whether biological or mechanical.)

    THE TENTH LAW:

    Any State, Nation, Principality, Private Government, Corporation, Organization, or Alliance, that violates the Eighth Law Shall be Exterminated to the last human, and all record of its existence wiped from history. Any State, Nation, Principality, Private Government, Corporation, Organization, or Alliance, that refuses to assist in such extermination shall be likewise a conspirator and subject to the same fate.

    (Universal Moral Warranty)

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2015-02-10 10:21:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-02-10 04:21:00 UTC

  • RUSSIAN DECEPTION —“As long as there are fools in this world. It’s handy for u

    RUSSIAN DECEPTION

    —“As long as there are fools in this world.

    It’s handy for us to live off deception.

    How blue is the sky?

    For a fool we need no knife!

    Lie to him – three boxes worth,

    And do with him whatever you want”—

    A song from The Adventures of Buratino, a Soviet children’s musical film

    (Thanks PaulB)


    Source date (UTC): 2015-02-10 02:41:00 UTC

  • “WISH YOU COULD GO BACK IN TIME AND KILL HITLER? WELL, WE WILL BE SAYING THE SAM

    “WISH YOU COULD GO BACK IN TIME AND KILL HITLER? WELL, WE WILL BE SAYING THE SAME THING ABOUT PUTIN. PUTIN HAS SUPPORT OF THE PEOPLE? WE SAID THE SAME THING ABOUT HITLER.”

    The postwar era was a valiant attempt to enforce respect for borders, and force governments to focus internally – and prevent another world war. Putin started the conflict of civilizations all over again – and abandoned a european future for Russians.

    He has however, killed progressivism. Unfortunately, immigration is killing aristocratic conservatism.

    We nationalized once.

    Time to nationalize again.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-02-10 02:12:00 UTC