Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • HONESTY, TRUTHFULNESS AND TRUTH VS PARASITISM AND DISCOUNTING. Honestly, truthfu

    HONESTY, TRUTHFULNESS AND TRUTH VS PARASITISM AND DISCOUNTING.

    Honestly, truthfulness, and truth are three different things.

    Honesty is what you believe prior to criticism, truthfulness is demonstration of scientific warranty having performed thorough criticism, and analytic truth is something we are likely prohibited from knowing, except as tautology. It is extremely difficult to make fallacious arguments if they are stated truthfully.

    People want to rely upon religious argument, moral argument, and rationalist argument, instead of scientific (truthful) speech: because it allows them to lie. Religious argument is an authoritarian mythos – often for the common good, because it allowed us to overcome tribalism – but just as often not. Moral argument without Propertarian criticism is an excellent means of lying because it forces guilt and shaming into the conversation. Rationalism is an exceptional means of lying because it forces verbalism into the argument. Postmodernism is the most masterful lie ever constructed after religion.

    —“But, … are you lying if you think you are telling the truth?”—

    This in itself is a verbalism: imprecise language that permits deceit through obscurity. The correct statement is, “if I fail to warranty by due diligence my statements, I am engaged in an act of willful ignorance.” Most of us engage in willful ignorance in order to use deceit to justify our discounts (parasitism). All language is negotiation, and all moral argument is justification. Truth isn’t kind to our justifications. But truthfulness is as necessary a commons as is property.

    – Humans acquire. We attempt to obtain the greatest benefit, in the shortest time, with the least effort, with the greatest certainty, at the lowest risk.

    – Cooperation is a multiplier on acquisition.

    – Parasitism in all its forms is a disincentive to cooperate: murder, violence, theft, fraud, fraud by omission, fraud by indirection, fraud by obstruction, free riding, privatization of the commons, socialization of losses, conspiracy, invasion, conquest, and predation.

    – Parasitism is an unearned discount (theft) on cooperation. Commons are a premium on cooperation.

    – Cooperation, norms, truth telling, and property are costs – the premiums we pay for cooperation.

    – Everything else is theft.

    – Economic velocity and group production, acquisition and consumption are the result of the total suppression of parasitism in all its forms. The greater the suppression of parasitism, the greater the warranty of truth telling, the higher the economic velocity.

    It’s just math really.

    Humans are entirely algorithmically expressible creatures.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-04-20 05:34:00 UTC

  • “It happened once that he set sail for Corinth and, being overtaken by a storm,

    —“It happened once that he set sail for Corinth and, being overtaken by a storm, he was in great consternation.

    Someone said, “We plain men are not alarmed, and are you philosophers turned cowards?”

    To this he replied, “The lives at stake in the two cases are not comparable.””—Aristippus

    Thanks Paul. 😉

    Aristocratia.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-04-20 03:47:00 UTC

  • MURDERING THE UNBORN – PART II —“who is the parasite, the mother or the fetus?

    MURDERING THE UNBORN – PART II

    —“who is the parasite, the mother or the fetus?”—

    The mother parasitically consumes the life of the child killed.

    The mother parasitically imposes costs on society if she is not capable of provision.

    The only non violation of the prohibition in parasitism that we call morality is to bear, and support a child.

    As such the entire feminist movement other than property rights rendering all equal under the law is an immoral deceit for the single purpose of escaping resposubikity for her inability to control her impulsesu. Just as the entire penal system exists to punish men who act parasitically, the moral code, property rights and family structure evolved to prevent women from engaging in parasitism.

    The manorial system and our prudish morality existed largely to prevent reproduction by immoral women who would then subject the rest of us to moral hazard – in other words, bearing a child one cannot support is a form of entrapment. A deceit. A fraud. A theft.

    Women need oppressing in reproduction since they use parasitism as a reproductive strategy.

    The west evolved faster because we supprssed our underclasses from reproducing.

    Women have used democracy to reinstitute parasitism as the primary means of reproductive strategy.

    The historical narrative is one of demonic males. But the equally obvious historical narrative is parasitic females.

    This is profound. It is quite the opposite of the anglo enlightenment argument that has failed under democracy.

    It is quite the opposite of the feminist narrative.

    The operational narrative is that man rose out of barbarism by controlling the reproduction of parasitic females through the institutions of family and property rights.

    And socialism(male) and feminism(female) is just another attempt to regress into dysgenic reoroducion.

    The conflict is not between classes but between eugenic and dysgenic reproduction.

    Marx was not only wrong, he was a justificationary fraud.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-04-20 03:38:00 UTC

  • Made a great new friend this morning over breakfast. Similar soul. Swiss. Engine

    Made a great new friend this morning over breakfast. Similar soul. Swiss. Engineer. Wonderful person.

    Lucky day.

    Thank you God for making wonderful humans to meet.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-04-19 06:05:00 UTC

  • “Parasitism robs everyone of Liberty. Let’s see if Rothbardians are at ease with

    —“Parasitism robs everyone of Liberty. Let’s see if Rothbardians are at ease with this. :)”— Jorge Alfredo Olortegui Oneeglio

    Source date (UTC): 2015-04-19 06:03:00 UTC

  • APOLOGISTS The truth of any religion is the actions produced by its adherents. A

    APOLOGISTS

    The truth of any religion is the actions produced by its adherents. A religion is not what you believe it is, it is what we observe the results of its practice are. I know this infuriates Neo-Puritans, Jews, Muslims and Hindus if not Buddhists and Catholics, but the net result of it is that your religion produces outcomes, and those outcomes if different from outcomes in other religions, determines the properties of your religion. Not what you believe, not what you practice, not what you profess, not what you study, not what you teach – but what people do with belief, practice, profession, study, teaching.

    We have too much knowledge now that language, myth, narrative. ritual and belief are illusions that produce externalities. If you are poor, your culture and your religion, and that which you cherish, as well as the family you cherish, are responsible.

    I don’t have any respect for devoted atheism. The mythic is too important a producer of outcomes. Our ancient myths, from the greek to the germanic, to the Arthurian to the American revolution, to the Burkeian, to the science fiction of the golden age are more important than our religious, and rationalist traditions.

    The important reformations were Smiths (economics), and Darwin’s(our self image). . And the Marxist and syndicalist left, Jewish separatist, and neo puritan atheists, as well as the anti-Darwinian religious have attempted to suppress these narratives in an attempt to preserve authoritarianism: to preserve group bonds.

    Curt Doolittle

    Source date (UTC): 2015-04-19 03:42:00 UTC

  • If you can choose to abort, I can choose not to support. There is no difference.

    If you can choose to abort, I can choose not to support. There is no difference.

    ***So the basic female argument is to (a) justify her imposition of costs upon others, but (b) refuse to bear costs that are her responsibility.***

    ie: parasitism.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-04-19 03:28:00 UTC

  • MURDERING THE UNBORN – PART 1 As mother, you do not have the moral justification

    MURDERING THE UNBORN – PART 1

    As mother, you do not have the moral justification to kill your offspring unless your offspring will kill you – all other arguments are illogical.

    You certainly CAN kill your offspring for other reasons, just as I can kill you for other reasons, or you can kill anyone else for other reasons.

    Now, you might say that killing is pragmatic. And I have no problem with killing. But you cannot deceive others by obscurant argument that you are not killing. You are in fact, killing.

    As for Parasitism: a child is not parasitic for the simple reason that it is an offspring (kin). You acted to create the child. It is the reason that you exist.

    As for taboos: the purpose of traditional taboos is moral and logical: you should take all precautions possible so that you kill as infrequently as possible.

    But that said, we should preserve the stigma that one is killing, precisely because one is in fact, killing. Murder is murder. Whether we choose to prosecute murderers is a matter of willingness. But our willingness to prosecute murderers is a choice, while the act of murder is a fact.

    I have no problem with killing. I argue that we need to do a LOT of killing at present. But I have a problem with deceit. I cannot for the life of me understand the logic of killing the unborn and not killing the repeated violent offenders.

    But then, that’s feminism’s deceit at play: (a) women are victims and devoid of responsibility for their actions, and (b) women are fully capable of military participation, and membership in the special forces. OR (a) abortion is a woman’s right, and (b) we cannot raise animals for fur. OR (a) abortion isn’t murder, and (b) women’s almost universal insistence that their children are good, and (c) women’s almost universal defense of their criminal and murderous offspring.

    All speech is justification. The question is only whether we justify moral or immoral action. And moral action is that which does not break the contract for cooperation. And the contract for cooperation is one in which we do not impose costs upon others.

    **So the basic female argument is to (a) justify her imposition of costs upon others, but (b) refuse to bear costs that are her responsibility.** )

    The parasitic argument cannot hold, since demonstrated feminist behavior in all walks of personal and political life, is parasitic.

    While I could write an entire book on the subject, using thousands of similar examples, as far as I know the last sentence: ***So the basic female argument is to (a) justify her imposition of costs upon others, but (b) refuse to bear costs that are her responsibility.*** is the final word on the matter.

    Unpleasant truths are unpleasant truths.

    THE PURPOSE OF THIS ARGUMENT: SPEAK TRUTH.

    I am not making such a grand argument really. There is nothing of moral equivalency about it. Instead, it’s a very simple, but profoundly important argument: “BE TRUTHFUL”.

    If moral discussions appear complicated, or paradoxical, then falsehoods are contained in the propositions.

    Just as mothers must discipline children, men must discipline men. Violence occurs when the accumulated incentives are insufficient to discipline men. Violence also occurs when incentives outweight costs. (Crimea/Donbas, Kuwait, Hungary).

    But deception, is just deception, and makes rational resolution of differences impossible. That is why this debate is interesting. It is very simple. It is not a moral question. It is not a question between mother and child. It is a question of what we will tolerate from one another while still maintaining cooperation.Political order being our most complex form of cooperation.

    Feminism, like its male counterpart socialism, is an elaborate verbal game of loading and framing in order to use guilt to obscure and justify parasitism. And democracy is merely a slow road to socialism: parasitism.

    S THE ONLY MORAL GOOD IS TRUTHFUL, FULLY INFORMED, VOLUNTARY EXCHANGE IN THE ABSENCE OF PARASITISM

    The only common good is not a singular, monopoly optimum, but voluntary exchange (cooperation) in the absence of parasitism(non-cooperation) for the purpose of constructing commons.

    All majority-rule mandates are lost opportunities for voluntary and mutually beneficial cooperation. ie: theft.

    Curt

    PS: You should read these posts as follow-up.

    1) MURDERING THE UNBORN — PART II

    https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10153259110292264

    2) HONESTY, TRUTHFULNESS AND TRUTH (PART III)

    https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10153259239887264

    3) WE MAY NOT CHOOSE TO PUNISH MURDER. BUT ITS AN ACT OF MURDER. (PRELUDE)

    https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10153255381997264

    (Note: Moral rules are justificationary because they are contractual. Conversely, the search for truth is critical).

    Source date (UTC): 2015-04-19 03:25:00 UTC

  • ITS MURDER. ITS AN ACT OF MURDER. WE MAY NOT CHOOSE TO PUNISH MURDER. BUT ITS AN

    ITS MURDER. ITS AN ACT OF MURDER. WE MAY NOT CHOOSE TO PUNISH MURDER. BUT ITS AN ACT OF MURDER.

    If you take action to end a life, regardless of what stage, you end a life. That is all there is to it. There isn’t anything else do debate. The debate is only whether we hold people accountable for ending lives.

    I have no problem with murder. I just call it murder. Whether we punish murderers or not is a choice. But the choice to punish murderers has no factual impact on whether one committed an action to end a life, regardless of whether it’s an embryonic life, or a centenarian in a coma on life support. If you act, you change state, and if you change state by your actions, you are the cause of the consequences.

    I am OK with murder. I am ok with abortion-murder. I am ok with all murder really. We don’t do enough murdering as far as I can tell. Murder is underrated. Murder often produces goods. Murder quite often can produce exceptional goods. I can think of lots of good that can be done with murder.

    But that’s different from feminist deceit. Feminist deceit is just a means of stealing. Because that’s the central proposition of feminism, just as the central proposition of socialism, and the central proposition of postmodernism: theft.

    So, abortion is murder. You want to murder your fetus so that you aren’t responsible for paying for it in time, care, money and opportunity. I want to murder adults so that I don’t have to pay for them. I probably want to murder you so that I don’t have do pay for you. The world would probably be better if all parasites were murdered. So it’s murder. And let’s not lie and say it isn’t murder. It’s just murder. It’s plain and simple. Murder.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-04-18 16:22:00 UTC

  • NEO-REACTION (REFUTATION OF THE ENLIGHTENMENT THEORIES OF MAN) IS RADICAL, NOT C

    NEO-REACTION (REFUTATION OF THE ENLIGHTENMENT THEORIES OF MAN) IS RADICAL, NOT CONSERVATIVE.

    It’s an attack on the status quo. But mostly, it’s a return to empiricism. To truth telling. After a century and a half of pseudoscientific and outright deceitful argument to suppress the Darwinian revolution.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-04-18 06:25:00 UTC