Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • IQ IS MORE PREDICTIVE OF LIFE THAN SOCIO ECONOMIC STATUS

    IQ IS MORE PREDICTIVE OF LIFE THAN SOCIO ECONOMIC STATUS.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-05-26 12:46:00 UTC

  • PARENTING STYLE HAS NO EFFECT ON ADOLESCENT AND ADULT IQ. Like I’ve been saying:

    PARENTING STYLE HAS NO EFFECT ON ADOLESCENT AND ADULT IQ.

    Like I’ve been saying: you can screw up your kid, but you can’t make him or her better. The best thing you can do is just do things together as a family, with other families, and in teams, and particularly in team sports.

    Sorry. That’s it. It’s 50% genetics, 0% nurture, and 50% consequences in utero.

    https://hbdchick.wordpress.com/2014/01/31/its-not-nature-and-nurture/

    Source date (UTC): 2015-05-26 12:44:00 UTC

  • FREE KOENIGSBERG!!!!! SEND THE MONGOLS HOME!!!!

    FREE KOENIGSBERG!!!!! SEND THE MONGOLS HOME!!!!

    Source date (UTC): 2015-05-26 09:26:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    http://wpo.st/Pt0J0

    Source date (UTC): 2015-05-26 05:44:00 UTC

  • myth of the immobile European slowly evaporates under the heat if science. Our b

    http://eurogenes.blogspot.com/2015/05/high-female-mobility-in-bronze-age.htmlThe myth of the immobile European slowly evaporates under the heat if science.

    Our better classes outbred like hell.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-05-26 05:25:00 UTC

  • The colonies return to…. That’s a spin I haven’t heard

    http://thosewhocansee.blogspot.com/2015/05/why-re-colonization-future-orientation.htmlOuch. The colonies return to….

    That’s a spin I haven’t heard.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-05-26 05:20:00 UTC

  • THE ONLY EXISTENTIALLY POSSIBLE ANARCHY IS CONSTRUCTED BY NOMOCRACY – WHEREIN NO

    THE ONLY EXISTENTIALLY POSSIBLE ANARCHY IS CONSTRUCTED BY NOMOCRACY – WHEREIN NO ONE RULES BECAUSE EVERYONE RULES.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-05-26 04:09:00 UTC

  • IS A THEORY GOOD BECAUSE IT IS USEFUL, OR BECAUSE WE FEEL IT IS TRUE? And is it

    IS A THEORY GOOD BECAUSE IT IS USEFUL, OR BECAUSE WE FEEL IT IS TRUE? And is it truthful because we can defend it, or because we cannot falsify it?

    (slightly tricky question)

    Source date (UTC): 2015-05-26 03:59:00 UTC

  • YES, MY POINT OF VIEW (MY VALUES) ARE WESTERN: SCIENTIFIC. BUT THAT IMPLIES BIAS

    YES, MY POINT OF VIEW (MY VALUES) ARE WESTERN: SCIENTIFIC. BUT THAT IMPLIES BIAS AND RELATIVITY NOT TRUTH. SO WHY AM I SO INTERESTED IN TRUTH?

    (h/t Karl )

    My point of view *IS* western; meaning: scientific. That is correct.

    Operations named can indeed be used as narrative for meaning. That is correct. Although that says nothing about the truth of the meaning inferred from the operations..

    Other cultures do not use rule of law, as such do not require logic in decision making. Yet liberty is only logically possible under rule of law. Other cultures don’t desire liberty. They desire consumption (as do most people in our culture as well). At present, liberty is a cultural preference of aristocratic civilization. But that just means that aristocratic civilization is scientific in function.

    I don’t generally make moral arguments except for ‘fun’ – I make AMORAL arguments. That’s the beauty of this logic: it’s not loaded. So, if one seeks to use this logic to create any possible political order, one can do so. But one need not (and cannot) resort to deception to do it.

    What isn’t obvious is that if you use this logic you can create non-monopoly social orders in a heterogeneous polity assuming that the rulers (monarchy) persists in maintaining rule of law, common organic law, property en toto, decide-able by the requirement for fully informed, productive, warrantied, voluntary exchange.

    Unlike unlimited free-associationists (advocates of the heroism of science) I am not interested in furthering free association – I don’t think it can be furthered. I’m only interested in preventing bias, propaganda and deceit. I am not even that concerned with error.

    Just as christianity was used to destroy western religion and thought, pseudoscience as used to destroy western law and thought.

    Rule of law is our religion. Virtue is our religion. Nature is our religion. Commons are the produce of our religion. And truth is our most precious commons.

    Curt

    Source date (UTC): 2015-05-26 03:54:00 UTC

  • There is a big difference between adding empirical content and removing imaginar

    There is a big difference between adding empirical content and removing imaginary content.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-05-25 16:37:00 UTC