Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • (LIBERTARIAN) CONSTITUTION WRITTEN BY A PRODIGY IN CHILDHOOD

    http://www.sidis.net/hesperia.htmAWESOME (LIBERTARIAN) CONSTITUTION WRITTEN BY A PRODIGY IN CHILDHOOD

    Source date (UTC): 2015-06-15 09:31:00 UTC

  • (The Real Kind: European) in 1912

    http://www.amazon.com/Liberty-Great-Libertarians-Anthology-Handbook/dp/B008X7OXFALibertarianism (The Real Kind: European) in 1912.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-06-15 09:26:00 UTC

  • UKRAINE WORD. It’s interesting how concerned Ukrainians are about keeping their

    UKRAINE WORD.

    It’s interesting how concerned Ukrainians are about keeping their word.

    It’s a beautiful thing.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-06-15 07:22:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    http://iqpersonalitygenius.blogspot.com/2015/06/teen-genius-is-mentor-orientated-rather.html

    Source date (UTC): 2015-06-15 07:10:00 UTC

  • CHARLTON ON INTELLIGENCE

    http://iqpersonalitygenius.blogspot.com/2015/06/the-endogenous-personality-its.htmlBRUCE CHARLTON ON INTELLIGENCE.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-06-15 07:09:00 UTC

  • WHICH DO YOU RELY UPON? NAME: – – – – UNIQUE IDENTIFIER FOR A REPEATABLE SEQUENC

    WHICH DO YOU RELY UPON?

    NAME:

    – – – – UNIQUE IDENTIFIER FOR A REPEATABLE SEQUENCE OF OPERATIONS

    DESCRIPTION:

    – – – – ACTOR (OPERATIONS / INTENTIONS)

    – – – – EXPERIENCER (EXPERIENCES / ASSUMPTIONS OF ACTOR)

    – – – – OBSERVER (OBSERVATIONS / ASSUMPTIONS OF ACTOR / EXPER.)

    ANALOGY:

    – – – – P.O.V. Actor, Exp, Observer, or Conflated?

    Source date (UTC): 2015-06-15 06:16:00 UTC

  • PROPERTARAINISM ALLOWS YOU TO WRITE PROOFS. Now, a proof is not a ‘truth’, it is

    PROPERTARAINISM ALLOWS YOU TO WRITE PROOFS.

    Now, a proof is not a ‘truth’, it is a test of existential possibility. It just says something is possible. That’s all it tells you. But just as a proof in math helps you grasp very complex processes, a proof in human action allows you to grasp very complex processes.

    Propertarian proofs are not much harder to write than mathematical proofs. There are a very limited number of operations, and a very limited number of categories of property to consider.

    Within a year or two I will be able to teach people how to write praxeological ‘proofs’, to either test if something is possible, or challenge whether something is possible.

    At that point, psychology will be limited to the study of cognitive biases, and economics will be divided into deceptions (disinformation by policy) and truths (institutional improvements in the means of cooperation).

    And we will be able to demonstrate how to write strictly constructed law free of judicial activism.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev Ukraine.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-06-15 05:59:00 UTC

  • QUIGGIN IS AT IT AGAIN. Some small percent of any thinker’s ideas survive the te

    http://johnquiggin.com/2015/06/15/john-locke-an-enemy-of-freedom/LEFTIST QUIGGIN IS AT IT AGAIN.

    Some small percent of any thinker’s ideas survive the test of time. We acknowledge these thinkers for their surviving ideas – the duration of an idea as a capital asset. Those ideas that do not survive the test of time are irrelevant.

    The only reason to argue that an individual is or is not morally something or other, is if one is attributing authority to the individual, rather than to the asset value of his surviving ideas.

    In other words, John’s post is an authoritarian and unscientific argument against an authoritarian and unscientific hypothesis.

    Aristotle was wrong about almost everything. But that does not diminish that of the thinkers in the age of transformation, that he was not more ‘right’ and therefore more influential than all other thinkers combined.

    He gave us a way of thinking. Locke gave us a way of thinking.

    (BTW: The Catholics were just as damaging to the Rule of Law as Locke and his contemporaries supposed. They were certainly catastrophically damaging to the American constitution and American rule of law. And that’s before we get to Socialism and Judaism. Australia, like Canada, is one of the most privileged nations on earth, and Australians are notorious for confusing and conflating virtue with luxury and signaling.)

    Source date (UTC): 2015-06-15 05:54:00 UTC

  • LOVE DOES NOT MEAN WE ABANDON REASON. IT MEANS WE RETAIN PATERNALISM. The Christ

    LOVE DOES NOT MEAN WE ABANDON REASON. IT MEANS WE RETAIN PATERNALISM.

    The Christian ideal of extirpation of hatred from the Human Heart does not mean that at the same time we abandon reason. To require capital and rule of law and property rights be brought to people in order to improve the objective morality of their norms, rather than people brought to capital, rule of law, property rights and high trust in order to degrade the host’s capital, rule of law, property rights, and high trust.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-06-15 05:30:00 UTC

  • (ideas. This is what happens when I get enough sleep) 🙂 I’ve been working on re

    (ideas. This is what happens when I get enough sleep) 🙂

    I’ve been working on religion since I think January? Finally making minute progress. I have this feeling that somehow I have to reform Christianity. And until recently I thought that was impossible. But just as we need different narratives for every standard deviation of IQ, so do we need social mythos for every standard deviation in IQ. And while stoicism is a personal philosophy, and law is a political philosophy, Janus is looking much more interesting an idea for a religious philosophy at the moment. Gods speak to us in the language we can understand. To do otherwise would be ungodlike.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-06-15 05:18:00 UTC