http://www.propertarianism.com/2014/07/04/central-arguments-defeating-three-red-queens/(worth repeating)
Source date (UTC): 2015-06-19 13:22:00 UTC
http://www.propertarianism.com/2014/07/04/central-arguments-defeating-three-red-queens/(worth repeating)
Source date (UTC): 2015-06-19 13:22:00 UTC
http://news.yahoo.com/poland-says-europes-peaceful-period-now-over-185146755.htmlPOLAND: THE PAX AMERICANA IS OVER THE STEPPE PEOPLE: RUSSIA AND MUSLIM TERRORISM END THE EUROPEAN PEACE
Source date (UTC): 2015-06-19 12:13:00 UTC
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/247746791_International_DeceptionMore literature than I expected on international differences in lying. Last I knew there was only one study. This is cool.
Source date (UTC): 2015-06-19 09:55:00 UTC
Protestants signal Catholics, Catholics signal Jews, Jews signal themselves – we all signal. None of this is ‘good’. None of this is ‘moral’. All of it is nonsense.
Freebies.
Your only honest signal is the product of your time, energy and offspring.
Everything else is just lying for status.
Source date (UTC): 2015-06-19 06:26:00 UTC
THE CATHOLICS DID TREMENDOUS DAMAGE
—“Ted Kennedy’s ’65 immigration act was “specifically designed to change the demographics of this country. When it went through, as with Obamacare, surrounded with lies, a miasma of lies: ‘this will not change the demographic of America; we’ll get basically the same people we’ve always gotten.’” But, instead, Coulter asserted, this act “was specifically designed to bring in peasant cultures who would remain poor for generations, remain on government support, so that you would have a solid block of Democratic voters, and it worked.”… “Obama never would have been elected. …. Romney would have won a bigger landslide than Reagan did against Carter in 1980.”— ibid
Source date (UTC): 2015-06-19 06:16:00 UTC
WHY ARE MOST DESIGNERS ‘SH_T’?
(rant on)
They have no formal training in design, in aesthetics, in composition, in the fine arts, in art history and very little intuitive talent.
They have no understanding of type, it’s history or symbolism. They think in boxes instead of white spaces. They think of getting information instead of only the necessary information. They think color matters rather than color suggests time and space “moments”.
If you cannot design it with white space and type, then you should go home. So design it with white space and type, and without any boxes at all. Ok? Remember “wax on, wax off”? Well, do the same: white space and type (wax on), new page (wax off), until you get it right.
To do that, (a) you start with a message, (b) you build a type pallette after researching the associations the audience will make with that type, and (b) you draw it freehand with pencil and paper, or at least Illustrator and a stylus.
After that, you add images and after that, color.
And then let the marketing people write all their absolutely sh_t copy, and then get it to a good writer or editor that can reduce it to no more than eight words. And hopefully not more than three. And test the sh_t copy from marketing and the edited copy on someone other than the marketer – preferably a customer. Watch how they read it, and then just ask them how they feel. Don’t ask for an opinion. How they feel is all that matters. Your client is an idiot. That’s their job: to be smart in their profession and an idiot in yours. (So try not to ALSO be an idiot.)
For most of you untalented ‘creatives’ (which is the opposite of what you really are), research the entire brand space. Put it in a hierarchy (order).
Build a pallet of fonts, symbols, colours and layouts.
And try to be craftsmanly. Try not to be ‘creative’, because in your case that means relying on your intuition. And really, it sucks. Becuase unless you have mastered your craft, your intuition is a hodge-podge of lower middle class and upper proletarian propaganda.
Great advertising is the truth spoken elegantly and succinctly.
Good artists copy great artists. Great artist steal.
Pre-schoolers and amateurs rely on ‘inspiration’.
Try not to suck. You just make the world uglier than if we only let the good people publish work, and sent you back to washing dishes in the scullery.
Sigh.
(rant off)
Source date (UTC): 2015-06-19 06:04:00 UTC
http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/milsocialtrust.pngTHE ME GENERATION IS THE LEAST TRUSTING GENERATION.
Children raised as entitled pets act as such.
Source date (UTC): 2015-06-19 04:05:00 UTC
http://aeon.co/magazine/philosophy/people-do-violence-because-their-moral-codes-demand-it/VIOLENCE REQUIRES MORAL INCENTIVE : VIOLENCE IS MORAL PERSUASION
—“Across practices, across cultures, and throughout historical periods, when people support and engage in violence, their primary motivations are moral. By ‘moral’, I mean that people are violent because they feel they must be; because they feel that their violence is obligatory. They know that they are harming fully human beings. Nonetheless, they believe they should. Violence does not stem from a psychopathic lack of morality. Quite the reverse: it comes from the exercise of perceived moral rights and obligations.”—
Source date (UTC): 2015-06-18 23:34:00 UTC
TRUTH IS A VERY EXPENSIVE NORM – THATS WHY NO ONE ELSE DOES IT
(guaranteed to make people angry)(sketch)
—HIERARCHY—
-TRUTHFUL-
GERMANIC EUROPE (non-ideological)
ANGLO/AMERICAN (ideological optimism)
INDIA (utopian idealism and justification)
-DECEPTIVE-
JEWISH (circumstantial truth, dual ethics, framing and overloading: pseudoscience and pseudorationalism and informational asymmetry)
CHINA (creative lying, obscurantism, and delaying, lying as buying time, avoiding conflict, accumulating strength.)
-DECEITFUL-
RUSSIA (outright lying and cheating, non-contractual, lying as strength,)
ISLAM/ARAB (denial of reality, deceit and aggression, lying as heroic.)
I need a third dimension because India and SE Asia are hard to fit in a stack.
Source date (UTC): 2015-06-18 16:23:00 UTC
What I don’t like myself, about american truth telling.
—“The U.S. and Finland both lean heavily towards the truth and directness, but what constitutes truth and directness varies greatly across cultures. Whereas Americans are comfortable taking liberty with the truth when it comes to marketing, selling and getting the business, to a Finn it can sound like lies. You see, the Finns believe that their words are their commitments. They establish their credibility by understating their abilities, and delivering what they promise. Period.”—
Source date (UTC): 2015-06-18 16:23:00 UTC