INEQUALITY IS A GOOD
Inequality is a good. In evolves man. Invention is a good. In increases our ability to consume. If we were all equal, we would have nothing to trade. And we would be poor. As are extant people who are in fact equal. To create an economy to sustain man we must create equality constantly. To create humans that evolve man, we must create equality constantly. Equality = stasis = extinction.
Source date (UTC): 2015-06-29 02:54:00 UTC
CLASS: REPRODUCTIVE VALUE
Social class refers a rough division of humans into a distribution by their reproductive value. The struggle between the classes is dysgenic at the bottom and eugenic at the top. In other words, classes are the result of evolution in action. And the question of eugenia or dysgenia provides us with decidability in the broadest possible ethical and moral questions facing mankind.
It’s just anti-monotheistic, anti-democratic, anti-dysgenic to say so.
But then, I don’t get to say nice things. My job is true things.
Or isn’t that the function of philosophy?
Source date (UTC): 2015-06-29 02:54:00 UTC
—“Why are you wearing that stupid man-suit?”—
Source date (UTC): 2015-06-28 12:31:00 UTC
I worked on the product pretty much full-time from January through about April. Since April I’ve had some time to get my head back into philosophy. In may and June I’ve tried to make sure I make time for it. So it sure seems like it takes 90 days to get into some pretty deep thought. … Now, I have a couple of nits I have to figure out. Mostly around the writing of law. I think I can do it. So if I happen to seem pedantic this summer when writing about the law, I apologize in advance.
Source date (UTC): 2015-06-28 09:06:00 UTC
There is one advantage to living in the states over Ukraine. Just one.
Amazon will ship stuff to you. lol
Source date (UTC): 2015-06-28 09:03:00 UTC
THE END OF HISTORY NEEDS A PAINFUL BIRTH
—“
Fukuyama was wrong.
The end of history is the truthful civilization.
And we are going to birth it.
And I hope that birth is painful.
“—
Source date (UTC): 2015-06-28 08:54:00 UTC
PROPERTARIAN ARGUMENTS ARE CATEGORICALLY PROOFS
A proof is a test of internal consistency. A proof is not a truth proposition. It is merely a statement of existential possibility: that by (a)the given axioms, or (b)the possible operations, and(c) the tests of subjective incentive at each opportunity for choice, that the given argument is possible.
This extends Critical Rationalism fully to all areas of thought. Testimonialism completes critical rationalism.
The profundity of the first paragraph is something that you probably cannot find in university philosophy departments. As far as I know, Testimonialism is a completely novel invention. And you and I are watching the growth of something very new. Something that failed in the early 20th century, and by that failure nearly wiped out western civilization.
If you learn propertarianism and testimonialism you will construct proofs.
The fact that I am constructing proofs, rather than asking you to accept authority or wisdom or moral appeal, is why I have such an absurdly off kilter behavior when doing philosophy.
Because I’m just taking an argument and seeing if I can construct a proof for it – just like a mathematician tries to construct a proof, and just like a computer programmers is trying to figure out if something is computable.
I don’t have to act like a member of the Academy (Cathedral) because I am not lying or asking you to believe nonsense. I’m a just constructing proofs. Proofs are truthful even if they may not be true (complete).
So this is how we are going to win. We are going to win because when I am done it will be possible to construct moral proofs.
And we will eliminate lying the same way we created property and eliminated violence and theft. And the same way we created contracts and law, and eliminated fraud.
Fukuyama was wrong. The end of history is the truthful civilization.
And we are going to birth it.
And I hope that birth is painful. 🙂
Source date (UTC): 2015-06-28 08:45:00 UTC
LIBERTARIANISM INCREASES ECONOMIC VELOCITY AT THE EXPENSE OF NORMATIVE AND GENETIC CAPITAL.
Thus endeth the lesson.
Source date (UTC): 2015-06-28 08:33:00 UTC
WRITING: CASE.
Look. If Popper can use Italics, then I can use Case. (Yet another thing Germans do right.).
Proper casing of names of terms cues the reader.
Using headlines, callouts, paragraph headlines and then bold on keywords has become common in print because it assists in helping the user scan the text to skip what he knows and find what he doesn’t.
The purpose of punctuation is to assist in reading aloud or in the equivalent inner voice.
And good type handling is just good indexing.
So if you still think in antique terms you are just stuck in an obsolete technology.
Sorry. That’s how it is.
Source date (UTC): 2015-06-28 08:07:00 UTC
LAWS PROHIBIT INVOLUNTARY TRANSFER – CONTRACTS EXCHANGE RIGHTS.
In writing a new constitution, we can easily deprive the government(producers of commons) and the judiciary(adjudication of law) of the ability to make law. The only laws that can possibly exist are those that prohibit a means of free riding (parasitism/imposing costs). And those laws must be found (discovered), theorized.
Conversely, all positive rights can only possibly exist as contractual provisions in matters of exchange. The justness of contracts is something that we know how to do, and have done throughout our history.
Now we can, each of us, either negotiate directly, or grant to some person, or some party, the right to negotiate contracts on our behalf. And to be bound by the contract that they negotiate.
But in no case can I make a contract (a negotiation) that is unlawful – imposes involuntary transfers, or externalizes involuntary transfers. Nor can I engage in deceit in such contracts, by means of verbal obscurantism (non-operational language, or in violation of strict construction, or its quantitative equivalent laundering and pooling (money).
Source date (UTC): 2015-06-28 07:36:00 UTC