Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • V. REASONS LYING IS PART OF RUSSIAN CIVILIZATION (Roman Skaskiw) 1) They have be

    V. REASONS LYING IS PART OF RUSSIAN CIVILIZATION

    (Roman Skaskiw)

    1) They have been solving the problem of creating a culture to justify their state. And their enormous tangle of lies will unravel with the truth:

    The accumulated weight of Russia’s lies has to be pressing on something – there has to be a consequence to it.

    For centuries they’ve valued strength above everything else, but they lie to achieve it, and because no one can trust anyone else, they are far weaker than their European neighbors. Maybe it’s time for them to understand the truth.

    But to accept it, Russians need a moral exit. They need a way to feel good about themselves that isn’t a lie. They need to rediscover their own story. They need a new mythology.

    But they’ve been lied to for so long: Russians are not ‘Rus’. They are not Kievan. They are Muscovites – Europeans, mostly – but their culture and institutions are Byzantine, Mongol, Tatar and Islamic. And that is an unappealing, uninspiring history.

    This conflict may be truth’s conquest of strength. It will continue toward Moscow because truth and cooperation is stronger than strength exercised as savagery and corruption.

    The faster Muskovites find their story and return to their roots, the less people will suffer.

    2) They inherited institutions from the Golden Horde, and before intermarrying with the Finno-Ugric, Turkik, and Slavic people in and around Muskovy, they led them for two generations, training the locals in brutality and lying by example.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-07-10 04:52:00 UTC

  • Can I tell you how much I hate library pricing? Great idea: since libraries are

    Can I tell you how much I hate library pricing? Great idea: since libraries are a public good produced either through taxation or student loans, we outlaw punitive pricing for libraries as a form of rent seeking. 🙂

    And we do the same for all publications that make use of public funds either directly or through the institutional process. 🙂

    Parasitism is everywhere.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-07-10 04:33:00 UTC

  • TWO BOOK THIS SPRING ON THE NORTH SEA-BALTIC PEOPLE’S (reading lists) Lots of cr

    TWO BOOK THIS SPRING ON THE NORTH SEA-BALTIC PEOPLE’S

    (reading lists)

    Lots of criticism of Pye’s writing ability (North Sea). But the fact that the book exists is still a sign of momentum.

    North’s book (Baltic) doesn’t have any feedback yet and I can’t get my hands on it yet.

    But I have high hopes that the two books form a good basis, along with a history of the Hanseatic league, of the central thesis:

    **The North Sea / Baltic Kingdoms were the product of trade routes. And that, like the Aegean, trade, contract, trust, truth gave rise to reason and science.**

    So it appears to me that mankind faces a terrible choice: to develop writing first and authoritarian rule, or to inherit (adopt, import) writing, and develop commercial (civic) rule.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-07-10 04:30:00 UTC

  • THE ALTERNATE HISTORY OF MAN. (important) (inflammatory) Each wave of man was mo

    THE ALTERNATE HISTORY OF MAN.

    (important) (inflammatory)

    Each wave of man was more aggressive than the previous.

    Each wave of man exterminated the previous wave of man, whenever advantageous.

    Hunter-Gatherers had bigger brains but were less numerous and less aggressive.

    Northern Europeans with big brains are smarter with bigger brains and less aggressive.

    The Steppe/Desert/Levant has been kicking off waves of increasingly aggressive peoples for thousands of years.

    The newer peoples are less intelligent, more reproductive, and more aggressive.

    They are the future of man.

    Unless we change again, to keep them at bay.

    The future isn’t one of achieving supra-human intelligence.

    It’s one of decreasing intelligence and increasing aggression.

    And the world is running out of the old species with calmer, smarter, bigger brains.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-07-10 04:06:00 UTC

  • MUST REALLY SUCK FOR AMERINDIANS TO KNOW THEY WIPED OUT THEIR PREDECESSORS. (Kin

    MUST REALLY SUCK FOR AMERINDIANS TO KNOW THEY WIPED OUT THEIR PREDECESSORS.

    (Kinda gets white people off the hook.)

    Source date (UTC): 2015-07-09 16:05:00 UTC

  • LIBERTINES. YOU’RE INFECTED. BUT WE HAVE A CURE: PROPERTARIANISM Dear Cosmopolit

    LIBERTINES. YOU’RE INFECTED. BUT WE HAVE A CURE: PROPERTARIANISM

    Dear Cosmopolitan Libertines:

    You’re Infected. Infected with a virus of the mind.

    When you hear the word commons, you’ve been misled by the artificial limits to the category of property established by the principle of ‘intersubjectively verifiable property’: material things. Yes, material things may be scarce. But cooperation is more scarce. And cooperation is always a shareholder good. And as such, a commons for those shareholders.

    So, first, you confuse those property rights necessary for the construction of production under inter-temporal division of perception, cognition, knowledge, planning and labor, with the production of institutional commons: informal and formal institutions. (property rights, truth telling, courts, the jury, rule of law, the common law, liberty, and the militia.)

    And secondly you presuppose that a commons of necessity can be consumed rather than an investment merely maintained and used (a park).

    And thirdly you presuppose that the construction of commons must be performed monopolistically rather than civically (a courthouse, a temple, rule of law).

    And fourth you presuppose that entry into the market is a sufficient payment for constructing the voluntary organization of production that we call consumer capitalism. When this is illogical: if one cannot make use of the market, then it is not logical for him to pay for it by forgoing opportunities for predation, parasitism and consumption. So you wish your market – the voluntary organization of innovation, production, distribution and trade – to be purchased at a discount, if not for free. That in itself an act of parasitism: forgoing an opportunity for trade.

    Physical resources must be acquired, but institutional resources must be constructed. Both bear costs. But property rights themselves are a commons. The west is better at the production of commons than any other group. The reason being we evolved from a civic society and voluntary organization of production instead of forced production in the lands of irrigation, or primitivism of tribal conflict of the steppe and desert.

    You have been infected by the cosmopolitan libertines with a cognitive error. This is what they do. They create mental viruses. They create these viruses out of the repetition of half-truths therefore resulting in a process of suggestion that overwhelms reason.

    And you’ve been infected.

    It’s OK. We have a cure.

    Propertarianism.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-07-09 09:02:00 UTC

  • Mr. Doolittle, I believe you will “enjoy” this. PS : How intellectually dishones

    Mr. Doolittle, I believe you will “enjoy” this.

    PS : How intellectually dishonest someone must be to do this?

    Source date (UTC): 2015-07-09 02:51:00 UTC

  • TWO MORE INTERVIEWS IN THE PIPELINE. 🙂 I’ll keep you posted. 🙂 hugs. 🙂

    TWO MORE INTERVIEWS IN THE PIPELINE. 🙂

    I’ll keep you posted. 🙂

    hugs. 🙂

    Source date (UTC): 2015-07-08 13:24:00 UTC

  • COOPERATION: CHOICE WORDS FROM MY CURRENT PAPER (good stuff!) —“Cooperation in

    COOPERATION: CHOICE WORDS FROM MY CURRENT PAPER

    (good stuff!)

    —“Cooperation in a division of knowledge and labor is a disproportionately rewarding action – so much so, that without it, it’s nearly impossible to survive, and with it, and increasing numbers of it, we prosper. And instead of income being the result of action, it is the result of action to acquire, and the most valuable things one can acquire are opportunity for cooperation, acts of cooperation, and debts of cooperation that can be inventoried for future use. Which is precisely what mankind demonstrates daily by his actions in every walk of life.”—

    Source date (UTC): 2015-07-08 07:56:00 UTC

  • “Mainstream Economics is not a practiced as a science of man but as a science of

    —“Mainstream Economics is not a practiced as a science of man but as a science of the deception of man. Not how to improve cooperation by reducing transaction costs and uncertainties but how to force consumption for the purpose of increasing employment.”—

    Of course the simplest method here is to stop distorting the labor economy and directly redistribute liquidity to consumers such that employment makes less of an impact on the unemployed. That would have a side effect of impoverishing the financial sector. Which is a good thing.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-07-08 00:50:00 UTC