Source: Facebook

  • THE BATTLE WE FACE TODAY: (important piece) I know I’m not the first person to s

    THE BATTLE WE FACE TODAY:

    (important piece)

    I know I’m not the first person to say this, but it’s pretty clear that Russia is not only the ultimate expression of postmodernism (lying), but that it evolved to this state by reforming jewish strategy, philosophy, and law: destroy the trust of the outsiders in order to create demand for authority and group cohesion, thereby creating opportunity for predation.

    While the founders of Russia were disproportionately jewish, and while their secret service was disproportionately jewish, what is more important is that the jewish strategy was useful for the Mongolian/Tatar/Islamic authoritarianism that is the source of Russian political culture. Russia combines ‘white’ people, Steppe totalitarianism, and jewish deceit (propaganda) as the complete economic, social, political and martial expression of the jewish strategy: destroy the higher trust societies and create demand for authority, and create opportunity for predation.

    If we go back through history and see the success of lying created through zoroastrian monotheism: jewish, it’s revolutionary reformation: christianity, and it’s counter-revolutionary authoritarianism: Islamism, then it’s modern branches in Marxism, Western Postmodernism, Russian secular judaism, and anglo progressive pseudoscience and outright lying, then

    We can not only cure ourselves, but we can disarm the world: TRUTH IS ENOUGH.

    The Truthful and Trusting society may not be the end of history, but social democracy is certainly not.

    There are three means of production of commons:

    – Truthful and Trustful (libertarian: rule of law, civic society)

    – Pragmatic and Utilitarian (social democracy)

    – Deceitful and Parasitic (authoritarianism)

    We have focused our efforts too long on the economy. Consumer capitalism has won the battle for the production of goods and services. We no longer fight that battle. And focusing our efforts on it is a waste of energy. We won not by arguments but by resisting the state long enough so that the logically obvious could result in the empirically demonstrable: the voluntary organization of production is the only successful technology for the production of consumer goods and services.

    Instead of the battle for a voluntary economy, the battle we face today is the suppression of parasitism in central bureaucracy and the expansion of trust and thereby increase of economic velocity.

    We must create a non-parasitic voluntary production of commons just as we created a non-parasitic voluntary production of goods and services.

    At present there is only one way we know of by which to destroy all parasitism, increase trust, increase economic velocity, increase prosperity, ad therefore increase choices. That is universal standing under the common law, the legal prohibition of parasitism, by mutual insurance: the exchange of guarantee of defense and restitution of property-en-toto.

    But we must also provide for the construction of commons by voluntary means, by changing what is currently a monopoly constructed by majority ascent into a market wherein any non-parasitic exchange between the classes, or objective of the classes can be constructed.

    We succeeded in transforming humanity into the voluntary organization of production of goods and services we call consumer capitalism.

    Our next mission – purely out of self defense – is to transform our government into a voluntary organization of commons.

    This project is eminently possible. It will forever render the corporeal state to the dustbin of antiquity, categorically relegated to another attempt at pseudoscience for the purpose of pure power accumulation and nothing more.

    We have a very simple mission then. To reform every possible constitution such that the judiciary shall prohibit all parasitism without exception. And that the provision of commons be one of adjudication of differences, not of ascent. And that the defense of the realm be the province of every man, under universal standing under the common law.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2015-07-25 11:13:00 UTC

  • RATIONAL, AND EMPIRICAL ETHICS (learning propertarianism)

    http://www.propertarianism.com/2015/06/30/will-we-see-a-post-religious-future/ARATIONAL, RATIONAL, AND EMPIRICAL ETHICS

    (learning propertarianism)


    Source date (UTC): 2015-07-25 09:13:00 UTC

  • APRIORI AND RATIONAL VS EMPIRICAL AND OPERATIONAL —“Anything that can be shown

    APRIORI AND RATIONAL VS EMPIRICAL AND OPERATIONAL

    —“Anything that can be shown apriori can be demonstrated or translated empirically with higher confidence but not everything that is empirical can be demonstrated apriori.”— Ayelam Valentine Agaliba

    I am sure he thinks I’m crazy but honestly I see Val as a guardian angel without whose scarce but precious counsel I would not have made the progress I have over the past few years.

    Thank you Val.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-07-25 09:10:00 UTC

  • VS RATIO-SCIENTIFIC ARGUMENTS (learning propertarianism)

    http://www.propertarianism.com/2013/11/26/the-problem-of-ratio-moral-versus-ratio-scientific-arguments/RATIO-MORAL VS RATIO-SCIENTIFIC ARGUMENTS

    (learning propertarianism)


    Source date (UTC): 2015-07-25 08:56:00 UTC

  • THE LIMITS OF INTELLIGENCE AND THE CHALLENGE OF ERROR (life’s wisdom) At some po

    THE LIMITS OF INTELLIGENCE AND THE CHALLENGE OF ERROR

    (life’s wisdom)

    At some point, it seems that greater intelligence is less influential than lack of wishful thinking, lack of accumulated error, accumulating knowledge, the time you invest in problem solving, and choosing a narrow field of inquiry.

    Most smart people I meet suffer from wishful thinking and accumulated error.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-07-24 17:46:00 UTC

  • My road warrior days are over I think. Cars are OK. But the whole airport thing

    My road warrior days are over I think. Cars are OK. But the whole airport thing is out of control now. It’s tragic.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-07-24 13:06:00 UTC

  • QUESTION: How successful are the french and german educational systems in perfor

    QUESTION: How successful are the french and german educational systems in performing class sortition ostensibly by demonstrated merit?


    Source date (UTC): 2015-07-24 09:09:00 UTC

  • ARISTOCRACY (PATRIARCHY) IS A CRITICAL RESPONSIBILTY: WE SET LIMITS. WE DON’T EN

    ARISTOCRACY (PATRIARCHY) IS A CRITICAL RESPONSIBILTY: WE SET LIMITS. WE DON’T ENGAGE IN ADVOCACY. WE PRODUCE THE FIRST COMMONS: THE REQUIREMENT FOR PRODUCTIVE COOPERATION.

    Our function is to incrementally but consistently evolve our people (and prevent their devolution) by preventing parasitism, and forcing productive cooperation. We force the development of markets for good and services by prohibiting parasitism. We force the production of markets for commons by prohibiting parasitism.

    There is a great difference between RULE (conflict resolution) and GOVERNANCE (production of commons). Our function is to RULE (judiciary, rule of law, property rights, property en-toto.) The entrepreneurial aristocracy’s function is to organize PRODUCTION using the voluntary organization of production. Our gossip class’s function is to ADVOCATE for the allocation of resources to particular ends. But in all cases we must prevent parasitism.

    It is epistemologically impossible for an aristocratic minority to police all of these functions for parasitism without tyranny. It is on the other hand, trivially easy for individuals to police these functions for parasitism without tyranny. The means by which we engage individuals in the process of policing is to grant them universal standing in the prosecution of parasitism, expressed as the right to property-en-toto, and to include them in the restitution under conspiracy if they fail to prosecute parasitism.

    Our function is to create order by prohibiting parasitism- to create the first commons: cooperation (property-en-toto). Not to advocate. Others’ functions are to produce goods and services for the commons, and advocate for and produce commons.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-07-24 08:53:00 UTC

  • COOPERATION ITSELF IS THE MOST SCARCE MOST VALUABLE GOOD

    COOPERATION ITSELF IS THE MOST SCARCE MOST VALUABLE GOOD.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-07-24 08:22:00 UTC

  • EVOLUTION OF COOPERATION (important for understanding the evolution of property

    http://www.propertarianism.com/2014/09/28/the-evolution-of-cooperation/THE EVOLUTION OF COOPERATION

    (important for understanding the evolution of property rights)


    Source date (UTC): 2015-07-24 08:06:00 UTC