Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • If you can’t define the series of constant relations to which the word you’re us

    If you can’t define the series of constant relations to which the word you’re using belongs, you do not understand the word.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-24 14:16:00 UTC

  • Intuiting, remembering, re-experiencing, and re-living describe a spectrum of re

    Intuiting, remembering, re-experiencing, and re-living describe a spectrum of recall that – as far as I know – is partly difference in physical brain gender, and partly in brain development. Like the autism spectrum it might be an adaptation or specialization, not a limitation.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-24 14:15:00 UTC

  • FOUNDATIONS OF AXIAL AGE RELIGIONS: Read chapter 1 “The Axial Peoples” from The

    FOUNDATIONS OF AXIAL AGE RELIGIONS:

    Read chapter 1 “The Axial Peoples” from The Great Transformation (2006) by Karen Armstrong.

    If you don’t know the foundations – you don’t know anything.

    Then you will understand the strong and material european gods and the weak and etherial eastern gods.

    Our Link: https://mega.nz/#!L34mmY7D!PTxst2uDEnAusH0zYWxicVOYiCFQBJGju2h7UdHc4U0

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-24 14:15:00 UTC

  • ( FYI: My tweet to Carmel PD calling them idiots for kicking off the civil war w

    ( FYI: My tweet to Carmel PD calling them idiots for kicking off the civil war was deleted. )

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-24 13:48:00 UTC

  • THE SERIES OF GRAMMARS OF PSYCHOLOGY (important) (read this) —“is there any smal

    THE SERIES OF GRAMMARS OF PSYCHOLOGY

    (important) (read this)

    —“is there any smaller sphere in which you think psychoanalysis is an appropriate method or inquiry? (ie, hopefully the one it is intended for – personal therapy rather than public argumentation).”— Gerard

    I think that it is always better to use this series:

    1. Means: Personality traits and reward systems. (anglo/physical)

    2. Cause: Acquisitionism and Propertarianism.(masculine/objective)

    3. Training: Stoicism (Acquisition of virtues by CBT)

    4. Affect(Heroic): Jungian ( Archetypes as proxies for traits) (german, sympathetic)

    5. Defect:(Victim)Freudian Analysis (feminine conformity) (Jewish feminine)

    This series begins with the most precise but least experiential and moves to the least precise but must experiential.

    Personally I would prefer, that we use the above series just like the series math, physics, chemistry, biology, cooperation (sentience/economics), speech (negotiation), that we all knew the hierarchy of those from the most physical to the most experiential, and as such that we understood how each expresses a more fictional but more experiential grammar as we proceed down that list.

    This series is as important as:

    1. The hierarchy of Measurements (mathematics)

    2. The hierarchy of States of Matter (physical science)

    3. The hierarchy of Grammars (language)

    4. The hierarchy of Knowledge (aristotelian categories)

    (repost)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-24 11:41:00 UTC

  • “We are living in an era when sanity is controversial and insanity is just anoth

    —“We are living in an era when sanity is controversial and insanity is just another viewpoint—and degeneracy only another lifestyle.”–Thomas Sowell @ThomasSowell

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-24 11:06:00 UTC

  • The orthodox church correctly saw themselves as the lower house of government –

    The orthodox church correctly saw themselves as the lower house of government – not THE government, and that is why they succeeded where western catholicism failed.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-24 10:50:00 UTC

  • Updated Nov 24, 2019, 6:55 AM

    Updated Nov 24, 2019, 6:55 AM

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-24 06:55:00 UTC

  • OUR PEOPLE DON’T DO. Nov 23, 2019, 9:25 PM

    https://www.fox5ny.com/news/with-schools-out-early-mayhem-breaks-out-at-mall-in-queensTHINGS OUR PEOPLE DON’T DO.

    https://www.fox5ny.com/news/with-schools-out-early-mayhem-breaks-out-at-mall-in-queensUpdated Nov 23, 2019, 9:25 PM

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-23 21:25:00 UTC

  • Joseph E. Postma Love is very simple to explain… For a woman, you get the feel

    Joseph E. Postma

    Love is very simple to explain…

    For a woman, you get the feeling of love where there is the possibility of a nest.

    For a man, you get the feeling of love where there is the possibility of fertility.

    Love is THAT simple. It’s a nice feeling…but it’s very mechanical in fact, and very simple. It’s more or less rational when you have a male and female of roughly equal marketability and roughly equally-limited supply, i.e., in a healthy community. Then you get good families and roughly good marriages.

    A female nests, a male inseminates. Rich men give the proposition of unlimited nesting, hence they are given unlimited supply. Young attractive (healthy) women give the proposition of unlimited inseminating, hence they are given unlimited offer. In these bounds are marketability and also disposability. At the boundaries, you get insanity of course and nothing rational at all. Unlimited supply on one hand, and zero on the other.

    It’s simply about what leads to, what has the potential to lead to, successful reproduction…which is what genes want.

    A woman has every right to value the potential to nest from her partner (agency, wealth, resources), as a man has every right to value the potential of fertility (young, healthy, attractive).

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-23 20:34:00 UTC