http://thosewhocansee.blogspot.com/2015/09/why-re-colonization-commonweal.html?m=1HIGH TRUST IS A EUROPEAN EXCEPTIONALISM – it’s an aberration.
(Must read)
The rest of the world is low trust (other than Japan).
Source date (UTC): 2015-09-13 11:56:00 UTC
http://www.thefword.org.uk/2015/09/how-to-date-a-feminist-2/Femininity is reproductively desirable.
Selfishness is reproductively undesirable.
Feminine women have more children.
Mating requires compromise between high investment and low investment reproductive strategies.
Feminism is merely hyper consumption – end result of consumerism.
Net is that the author is undesirable.
Men empirically demonstrate she is undesirable.
Her beliefs (values) are counter productive and disproportionately selfish.
No man with any self worth will find her attractive.
That is why feminists end up with betas.
We men happily lie for sex.
But we do not change.
She will find a man who is willing to.
Source date (UTC): 2015-09-13 11:48:00 UTC
Curt Doolittle shared a photo.
Source date (UTC): 2015-09-13 11:30:00 UTC
http://www.amazon.com/Computable-Foundations-Economics-Routledge-Experimental-ebook/dp/B008SA2EC6/ref=mt_kindle?_encoding=UTF8&meFROM A FRIEND: RECURSIVE COMPUTABLE MATHEMATICS IN ECONOMICS!!!!!
Now, before anyone throws silly arguments at me, in testimonialism I argue that all hypothesis is performed by free association, and that operational (computational, recursive, intuitionistic) construction is a test of existential possibility (the reduction of error.) Critical rationalists do not make justificationary truth claims, we make moral claims of due diligence – countering the long standing error which conflates truth and testimony. A Testimonialist will make a claim of TRUTHFULNESS: that he has passed all possible means of criticism, and his theory or description survives that criticism.
In propertarianism, (as well as praxeology reformed), the application of construction to economics is a moral one: that unless every transfer is constructed from productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer free of externality of the same criteria, that we are measuring THE ECONOMICS OF THEFT AND LYING rather than ECONOMICS OF COOPERATION.
I have not read this work yet ( I have no american credit cards right now and can’t buy it from Amazon. But I’ll get to it shortly.)
Source date (UTC): 2015-09-13 05:51:00 UTC
(Trying to explain the concept of a ‘starter marriage’ to Ukrainians and they don’t think it’s funny. lol I mean, we have all these starter marriages because we’re lied to about men and women and marriage our entire youth’s. But men are men, women are women, we are not equal in interest or ability, and marriage is not a panacea, but a compromise that produces economic returns pretty much forever, and insurance in the longest term. )
Source date (UTC): 2015-09-13 05:19:00 UTC
Slavic men cannot really compete with their northern and western peers in features – I am not sure humans get better looking than Celt, Dutch, Dane, Swede and Finn, but there sure are a lot of good looking men here, and they have better proportions and fewer asymmetrics. There is a father here marrying off his daughter and he is very good looking. Damn.
Source date (UTC): 2015-09-13 05:12:00 UTC
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/13/sunday-review/are-western-values-losing-their-sway.html?smid=fb-share
Source date (UTC): 2015-09-12 23:18:00 UTC
CAN I PLEASE HAVE BETTERS?
I mean, I want a king whose family has been in royalty for a thousand years. I want a senate with Norman Schwartzkopf’s, a house of commerce with captains of finance and industry, a house of commons with heads of households (families) and small and medium business owners, and a house of dependents who are none of the above. Why do we vote with unaccountable numbers rather than measurable money? Why do I have to listen to professional politicians lie about a non-existent common good, instead of the point of view of each of the classes? Why do we engage in the greatest lie since monotheism: democracy, rather than discuss the expressed wants and needs of the different classes?
I am happy to acknowledge my betters in family and business, industry and finance, trade routes and defense. Why do I not want my betters to rule? Why would any of us prefer the existing system of conflict generation and lying over truthful speech in the pursuit of creating commons between the classes?
**I pray thee god, grant us kings, and deliver us from the people.**
Source date (UTC): 2015-09-12 07:59:00 UTC
FEAR OF HAVING BETTERS?
Why is it that some of us find comfort in having ‘betters’ and some of us are horrified by the fact that we have betters – so much so that we deny it? And, is this another expression of the masculine feminine reproductive strategy making its way into cognitive and moral biases?
Can we please have an honest aristocracy rather than government by pseudoscientific lying prole?
Source date (UTC): 2015-09-12 07:45:00 UTC
—“Our modern lifestyle is not a political creation. Before 1700, everybody was poor as hell. Life was short and brutish. It wasn’t because we didn’t have good politicians; we had some really good politicians. But then we started inventing — electricity, steam engines, microprocessors, understanding genetics and medicine and things like that. Yes, stability and education are important — I’m not taking anything away from that — but innovation is the real driver of progress.”
— Bill Gates, Rolling Stone, March 13, 2014
Source date (UTC): 2015-09-11 19:16:00 UTC