I DON’T EXPECT YOU TO LIKE IT
—And I don’t expect you to like Natural Law any more than the Semites liked Aristotle, the French and Germans liked Locke, Smith, and Hume, or the Church liked Darwin, Menger, and Nietzsche. No one likes having their crimes (parasitisms) suppressed. We do it anyway. The Returns are exceptional.—
(worth repeating)
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-29 14:00:00 UTC
THE TRUTH ISN’T DESIRABLE IT’S JUST TRUE (DECIDABLE)
Nature consists of constant relations. We can describe those constant relations. Math is the language of positional relations, logic of set relations, and operations of humanly possible subjectively testable actions. Law consists in the test of the MOST constant relations possible.
So a) man creates descriptions of physical laws (applications of entropy), and b) man creates descriptions of natural laws (applications of reciprocity), c) judges discover those applications, and d) man issues command, legislation, and regulation, that is rarely if ever ‘law’.
So, I mean, I sense your frustration, but Aristotle started the project, Descartes and the British restored it, Darwin advanced it, and I’m completing it: the scientific method is complete. And it’s completed because we have that method for ALL disciplines now, not just physical.
And I don’t expect you to like it any more than the Semites liked Aristotle, the french and germans liked locke, smith, and Hume, or the Church liked Darwin, Menger, and Nietzsche. No one likes having their crimes (parasitisms) suppressed. We do it anyway. Returns are exceptional.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-29 13:59:00 UTC
—“You are the one insisting on specific terms and frameworks. -Lol. Are there measures of insulation and protection? Yes. Are they self sufficient and unrelated to everything else? No. See, you have a box you’re comfortable playing in, but reality extends way beyond its walls.”—
I’m just MEASURING CHANGES IN CAPITAL. It’s not an opinion. It’s just what exists. There is nothing undecidable by change in capital, any more than change in property, and as such, we see all peoples, all states, in all history operating by this test of reciprocity.
So again, the only reason to DISAGREE is to steal. Humans always and everywhere retaliate at high cost, against theft. I’m just explaining the world. If you don’t like it that isn’t material to me. I don’t do ‘good’ I do ‘true’.
So the test is not abstractions its cases. If you pick any case i will walk through it and you’ll see you’re engaged in theft and justifying it. Well, then I’ll equally justify your prosecution.
That’s what I do: law.
So it doesn’t matter what people think is good or agree is good what matters is that when in dispute science (law) provides decidability.
Art is decidable as is nearly everything.
There is no difference between science and law.
We just like lying and cheating … a lot.
—“Laws in science are merely pragmatic dependabilities and measurements which are artificially created and imposed by humans. Law in government is always a matter of subjective expression that requires interpretation. Laws only exist because of subjective humans.”—Jason Powell
@KillerkattArt
A scientific law is a description (langauge) of constant relations extant in the universe at (so far) increasing degrees of precision (and parsimony).
There is nothing subjective about ohms law. nothing.
There is nothing subjective about Reciprocity.
Nature consists of constant relations. We can describe those constant relations. Math is the language of positional relations, logic of set relations, and operations of humanly possible subjectively testable actions. Law consists in the test of the MOST constant relations possible.
So a) man creates descriptions of physical laws (applications of entropy), and b) man creates descriptions of natural laws (applications of reciprocity), c) judges discover those applications, and d) man issues command, legislation, and regulation, that are rarely if ever ‘law’.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-29 13:52:00 UTC
PROPERTY IN TOTO (CAPITAL) IS NOT AN OPINION
I’m just MEASURING CHANGES IN CAPITAL. It’s not an opinion. It’s just what exists. There is nothing undecidable by change in capital, any more than change in property, and as such, we see all peoples, all states, in all history operating by this test of reciprocity.
So again, the only reason to DISAGREE is to steal. Humans always and everywhere retaliate at high cost, against theft. I’m just explaining the world. If you don’t like it that isn’t material to me. I don’t do ‘good’ I do ‘true’.
So the test is not abstractions its cases. If you pick any case i will walk through it and you’ll see you’re engaged in theft and justifying it. Well, then I’ll equally justify your prosecution.
That’s what I do: law.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-29 13:31:00 UTC
—“Good art cannot be proven. But bad art can be falsified.”—Zachary Miller
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-29 12:52:00 UTC
THE UNDERMINED OUR THIRD WAY ON PURPOSE
—“We import millions of people, and as they start to commit crime because of the oppressive system, which wipes out the unlucky ones, Steven Pinker publishes a book about how we never had less crime. Or something like that.”—@ArturBooth
But that’s the whole point of our system: The Third Way. Neither priesthood(poor) or aristocracy(strong) but the third way (meritocracy and the natural law of tort). The question is, why did we in ’65 under Johnson’s Great Society imitation of the Soviets, bring in underclasses?
They did it on purpose to DESTROY OUR THIRD WAY through immigration. They failed with economic marxism. The failed with cultural marxism. They failed with postmodernism. But they succeeded in destroying the west only because of immigrating people who can’t exist under The Third Way.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-29 12:48:00 UTC
—“I don’t understand. Are you saying there is a formula to produce beautiful architecture, paintings, movies, music, statues etc”–Carl Persson
A formula is via positiva.
Science is via negativa.
So Reverse that.
Knowledge is not closed.
Language is not closed.
Symbolism is not closed.
We can know bad art.
We must discover good art.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-29 12:35:00 UTC
HERE IS THE PROBLEM FOR THE ARTIST
The artist cannot necessarily control his intuitions – the elephant is stronger than the rider, and the elephant gets stronger the lower the individual’s agency (class). But he produces a good in a market, like any other, he can be liable for. Criticism (or shaming, or even ridicule at times, and perhaps prosecution) are what all producers of goods risk.
HERE. I’LL MAKE IT WORSE
Art can EASILY be evaluated by triangulation (ordinal), as can all things not reducible to linear (cardinal) measures. Anything humans value can be evaluated by triangulation.
Most of the time, in art, we are measuring ignorance, as in any other field.
Likewise, people can be taught the basics of art criticism just as they can be taught the basics of fashion criticism, or of literary criticism, or of movie criticism …like any other system of weights and measures. The fact that they don’t know the method doesn’t mean it’s hard.
What we find if we give people a basic education in art criticism (which I can probably do in the space of three hours or so)we find that they are quite good at identifying quality, and need only the language of demarcating decoration and context. What fits where, like ‘manners’.
Your bath, bedroom, hallway, living room, office spaces, public buildings, museums, and monuments require different ‘manners’ of behavior, dress … and art. For the same reasons. And that’s what people do everywhere.
( The reason to do otherwise is to take attention by ‘theft’ from those environments. )
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-29 12:34:00 UTC
TRUMP IS PAINFULLY SIMPLE TO UNDERSTAND
—“Three years in, they still don’t get him.”—
Because they don’t know any self-made billionaires, and particularly those who work with labor, bankers, and politicians, all of which are quasi organized crime syndicates. Every single thing Trump does and says is simple: “I made a deal with my voters. I’m fulfilling it-regardless of the scumbags that are ‘in the way’.
Really. That’s it.
I would do the exact same thing.
I made a deal.
I’m doing the deal.
If you don’t like the deal your an obstacle.
If you try to interfere with the deal I’ll ridicule and humiliate you, to show you, every single day, every single time, I don’t care about you, and your opinion doesn’t matter, because I did a just deal.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-29 12:20:00 UTC
Truth=Decidable vs Preferable=Good
Men know the difference
Not all truth is preferable.
Not all preferences are true (possible)
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-29 10:37:00 UTC