Women who read Forbes
Awesome. sigh. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2015-10-20 11:52:00 UTC
Women who read Forbes
Awesome. sigh. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2015-10-20 11:52:00 UTC
I love this meme:
—“Love your people? Fuck the State!”—
Source date (UTC): 2015-10-20 11:18:00 UTC
THE MEANING OF INCREMENTAL SUPPRESSION
Source date (UTC): 2015-10-20 09:00:00 UTC
(As you get older, everything mental is easier, everything social is easier, and everything physical is harder. lol I can still work almost as many hours as I could in my twenties, and I can outperform myself in my twenties in intellectual effort and in social interaction. But I used to be awfully strong and I need to work on that a bit – ’cause it fades. lol )
Source date (UTC): 2015-10-20 08:10:00 UTC
Doolittle’s incremental suppression and Hoppe’s physical removal.
Still makes me laugh.
Source date (UTC): 2015-10-20 06:26:00 UTC
ITS POSSIBLE TO BREAK THE BIG FINANCIAL HOUSES
Contrary to common argument, it is trivially easy to break the big finance houses.
But all those rent seekers both in finance and government could no longer seek rents.
This is why we will require revolution. It is not possible to replace those rents and those incentives.
For us to win they must lose.
Which is enough incentive for me.
Source date (UTC): 2015-10-20 06:24:00 UTC
Writing propertarian arguments is no different than the practice of geometry. You start with claims, identify the property the individuals wish to acquire, and the discounts they seek to obtain it by – usually in excess of the discounts obtained through productive exchange, and then translate negotiation strategies into the same. That’s it. I mean, it takes practice just like geometry. But it’s not terribly difficult. The principle problem is overcoming bias.
Source date (UTC): 2015-10-20 05:15:00 UTC
THE INCENTIVES TO MARRY REGRESS TO THE NOBILITY ALONE
(There is currently no economic benefit to marriage for those who do not have property and wish to transfer property across generations – building a clan. So we return to normal form: serial relationships. Marriage evolved as a means of preventing violence over mates, second as a means of controlling property, and third as a means of supporting children, lastly as a means of regulating access to land, and finally of regulating access to ‘respectable society” by imitation of those with children, property, and land. If those needs no longer exist, many will not practice them.)
Source date (UTC): 2015-10-20 05:10:00 UTC
Curt Doolittle shared a post.
Source date (UTC): 2015-10-20 01:27:00 UTC
ITS NOT THAT PHILOSOPHY IS DEAD ITS THAT RATIONALISM IS DEAD AND WITH OBJECTIVE MORALITY, PHILOSOPHY IS COMPLETE
—“Philosophy is dead… Scientists have become the bearers of the torch of discovery in our quest for knowledge.”—Stephen Hawking
Of course, I write in the language of philosophy but as far as I can tell I think and argue as a scientist.
The law of that category we refer to as natural law, functions as the foundation of our philosophy. Otherwise, yes, philosophy appears to consist of a set empty of verbalisms searching for rational rather than mystical religion. They toy with meaning, and morality, but not truth and voluntary exchange.
Strictly constructed natural law is indistinguishable from strictly constructed sets, or strictly constructed mathematics, or strictly constructed physics – all that differs is the scope of properties involved.
Unfortunately the academy, starting with theology, moving into philosophy, has sought engaged in job preservation. But science prevails.
And more unfortunately, The state has taken on the technique of legislation and regulation, which are to law what lying is to testimony, justification is to logic and mathematics, and pseudoscience is to physics.
Stop the lies.
Curt Doolittle
The Philosophy of Aristocracy
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine
Source date (UTC): 2015-10-19 13:35:00 UTC